Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:37:06.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gospel according to Auerbach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Jane O. Newman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Erich Auerbach's Mimesis (1946) can usefully be read in the context of the Christian existentialist thought to which Auerbach was exposed during his years as a professor at the University of Marburg between 1929 and 1935–36. Specifically, placing Auerbach's account of Peter's denial of Christ as related in the Gospel of Mark in conversation with the work of Auerbach's Marburg colleague Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976) helps us to understand Auerbach's indebtedness to Bultmann and to see Mimesis in new ways, as a project with a longer collaborative history that concerns not only literary “realism” but also the dargestellte Wirklichkeit (“represented reality”) of the finitude of the human condition. Acknowledging the importance of early-twentieth-century Christian existentialism in Germany for Auerbach's work helps explain the affective hold that Mimesis has had on lay and professional readers alike.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 135 , Issue 3 , May 2020 , pp. 455 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Jane O. Newman

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Apter, Emily. “Comparative Exile: Competing Margins in the History of Comparative Literature.” Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism, edited by Bernheimer, Charles, Johns Hopkins UP, 1995, pp. 86–96.Google Scholar
Apter, Emily. “Global Translatio: The ‘Invention’ of Comparative Literature, Istanbul, 1933.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 29, 2003, pp. 253–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Briefe an Paul Binswanger und Fritz Schalk.” Part 1, edited by Isolde Burr and Hans Rothe, Romanistisches Jahrbuch, Vol. 60, 2010, pp. 145–90.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Dante als Dichter der irdischen Welt. 1929. De Gruyter, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Dante and Virgil.” 1931. Auerbach, Time, pp. 124–33.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Dante: Poet of the Secular World. Translated by Manheim, Ralph, U of Chicago P, 1961.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Epilegomena to Mimesis.” 1954. Translated by Jan M. Ziolkowski. Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation, pp. 559–74.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Epilegomena zu Mimesis.” 1954. Treml and Barck, pp. 466–79.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Figura.” 1938. Auerbach, Gesammelte Aufsätze, pp. 55–92.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Figura.” 1938. Auerbach, Time, pp. 65–113.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie. Francke, 1967.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Giambattista Vico and the Idea of Philology.” 1936. Auerbach, Time, pp. 24–35.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Materials Submitted to the Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars, New York Public Library, Manuscripts and Archives Division, Astor, Lenox, and Tilden Foundations, “Auerbach, Erich 1934?1943,” box 38, folder 55.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur. 1946. Francke, 2001.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. 1953. Introduction by Said, Edward W., translated by Trask, Willard R., Princeton UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Montaigne the Writer.” 1932. Auerbach, Time, pp. 200–14.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “On Rousseau's Place in History.” 1932. Auerbach, Time, pp. 246–52.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “On the Anniversary Celebration of Dante.” 1921. Auerbach, Time, pp. 121–23.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Racine and the Passions.” 1927. Auerbach, Time, pp. 236–45.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Racine und die Leidenschaften.” Auerbach, Gesammelte Aufsätze, pp. 196–203.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Der Schriftsteller Montaigne.” 1932. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie, Francke, 1967, pp. 184–95.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “The Three Traits of Dante's Poetry.” 1948. Auerbach, Time, pp. 188–99.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Time, History, and Literature: Selected Essays of Erich Auerbach. Edited by Porter, James I., translated by Newman, Jane O., Princeton UP, 2014.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Über den historischen Ort Rousseaus.” 1932. Auerbach, Gesammelte Aufsätze, pp. 291–95.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Über die ernste Nachahmung des Alltäglichen.” 1937. Treml and Barck, pp. 439–65.Google Scholar
Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Pine-Coffin, R. S., Penguin Books, 1961.Google Scholar
Barck, Karlheinz. “Erich Auerbach in Berlin: Spurensicherung und ein Porträt.” Treml and Barck, pp. 195–214.Google Scholar
Baring, Edward. Converts to the Real: Catholicism and the Making of Continental Philosophy. Harvard UP, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Karl. Der Römerbrief 1922. Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2008.Google Scholar
“Beliebig.” Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, Trier Center for Digital Humanities, woerterbuchnetz.de/cgi-bin/WBNetz/wbgui_py?sigle=DWB&sigle=DWB&mode=Vernetzung&lemid=GB03712#XGB03712.Google Scholar
Boden, Petra. “Philologie als Wissenschaft: Korrespondenzen und Kontroversen zur Mimesis.” Treml and Barck, pp. 125–52.Google Scholar
Bormuth, Matthias. “Menschenkunde zwischen Menschen-Auerbach und Löwith.” Treml and Barck, pp. 82–104.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “The Crisis of Faith.” 1931. Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era, Translated by Johnson, Roger A., Collins, 1987, pp. 240–56.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Die Erforschung der synoptischen Evangelien.” 4th ed. 1961. Bultmann, Glauben, Vol. 4, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Die Eschatologie des Johannes-Evangelium.” 1928. Bultmann, Glauben, vol. 1, 134–52.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Die Frage nach dem messianischen Bewusstsein Jesu und das Petrus-Bekenntnis.” 1919?20. Exegetica: Aufsätze zur Erforschung des Neuen Testaments, edited by Erich Dinkier, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1967, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1921.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Glauben und Verstehen, Gesammelte Aufsätze. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1961. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. The History of the Synoptic Tradition. Translated by Marsh, John. 1931. 2nd ed., Harper and Row, Publishers, 1968.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate. Edited by Werner Bartsch, Hans, Cloister Library / Harper and Row, 1961.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Kirche und Lehre im Neuen Testament.” 1929. Bultmann, Glauben, Vol. 1, pp. 153–87.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Die Krisis des Glaubens.” 1931. Bultmann, Glauben, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Neues Testament und Mythologie.” Kerygma und Mythos: Ein theologisches Gespräch, Reich und Heidrich / Evangelischer Verlag, 1948, pp. 15–53.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “The New Approach to the Synoptic Problem.” 1926. The Journal of Religion, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1926, pp. 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. The Presence of Eternity: History and Eschatology: The Gifford Lectures, 1955. Harper and Brothers, 1957.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Theologische Enzyklopädie. Mohr, J. C. B. (Paul Siebeck), 1984.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. “Welchen Sinn hat es, von Gott zu reden?” 1925. Bultmann, Glauben, Vol. 1, pp. 26–37.Google Scholar
Cho, Hyonwon. “Vergangenes Vergängnis: Für eine Philologie des Stattdessen.” Arcadia, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2017, pp. 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, Ryan. “A Difficult Proximity: The Figure of Augustine in Heidegger's Path.” The Journal of Religion, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2011, pp. 365–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damrosch, David. “Auerbach in Exile.” Comparative Literature, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1995, pp. 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, Hent. “The Kierkegaardian Moment: Dialectical Theology and Its Aftermath.” Modern Language Notes, Vol. 128, No. 5, 2013, pp. 1083–114.Google Scholar
Efal, Adi. Figurai Philology: Panofsky and the Science of Things. Bloomsbury, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsky, Martin. “Church History and the Cultural Geography of Erich Auerbach: Europe and Its Eastern Other.” Opening the Borders: Inclusivity in Early Modern Studies: Essays in Honor of James V. Mirollo, edited by Herman, Peter C., U of Delaware P, 1999, pp. 324–49.Google Scholar
Elsky, Martin. “Wissenschaft und nationale Identität: Erich Auerbachs figurale Interpretation als Herausforderung an eine liberale Religion.” Marburger Hermeneutik zwischen Tradition und Krise, edited by Bormuth, Matthias and von Bulow, Ulrich, Wallstein Verlag, 2008, pp. 207–22.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. 1930. Translated and edited by Strachey, lames, W. W. Norton, 1961.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. Dichtung und Wahrheit. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag / C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1981. Vol. 9 and and vol. 10 (pp. 7–187) of Werke: Hamburger Ausgabe.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter E. “Weimar Theology: From Historicism to Crisis.” Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy, edited by Gordon, and McCormick, John P., Princeton UP, 2013, pp. 150–78.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. ‘“Pathos of the Earthly Progress’: Erich Auerbach's Everydays.” Literary History and the Challenge of Philology: The Legacy of Erich Auerbach, edited by Lerer, Seth, Stanford UP, 1996, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis übersetzt und erklärt von Hermann Gunkel. 1901. 4th ed. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1917.Google Scholar
Gunneweg, Antonius H. J. “Altes Testament und exis-tentiale Interpretation.” Rudolf Bultmanns Werk und Wirkung, edited by Jaspert, Bernd, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1984, pp. 332–47.Google Scholar
Hacohen, Malachi. “Typology and the Holocaust: Erich Auerbach and Judeo-Christian Europe.” Religions, Vol. 3, 2012, pp. 600–45. MDPI, www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/3/600/htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbsmeier, Eberhard. “Karl Barth und S⊘ren Kierkegaard.” Karl Barths Theologie als europäisches Ereignis, edited by Leiner, Martin and Trowitzsch, Michael, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2008, pp. 317–30.Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf von. “Die Verklärungsgeschichte Jesu, der Bericht des Paulus (I. Kor. 15, 3 ff.) und die beiden Christusvisionen des Petrus.” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vol. 7, 1922, pp. 62–80.Google Scholar
Hatch, Laura. “Auerbach's Pendulation: The Pendulum as Literary Form.” 2014. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Hui, Andrew. “The Many Returns of Philology: A State of the Field Report.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2017, pp. 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Ben. “Late Reading: Erich Auerbach and the Spätboot of Comparative Literature.” Comparative Critical Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, May 2017, pp. 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Antinomies of Realism. Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Kadir, Djelal. “Auerbach's Scar.” Memos from the Besieged City: Lifelines for Cultural Sustainability, Stanford UP, 2011, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S⊘ren. Furcht und Zittern: Dialektische Lyrik. 1843. Translated by Ketels, H. C., A. Deichert, 1882.Google Scholar
Köhler, Ludwig. “The Meaning and Possibilities of ‘Form-geschichte.‘” The Journal of Religion, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1928, pp. 603–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konuk, Kader. East West Mimesis: Auerbach in Turkey. Stanford UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Krystal, Arthur. “The Book of Books: Erich Auerbach and the Making of Mimesis.” The New Yorker, 9 Dec. 2013, pp. 83–88.Google Scholar
Landauer, Carl. “Auerbach's Performance and the American Academy; or, How New Haven Stole the Idea of Mimesis.” Literary History and the Challenge of Philology: The Legacy of Erich Auerbach,> edited by Lerer, Seth, Stanford UP, 1996, pp. 179–94.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. “Auerbach's Shakespeare.” Philological Quarterly, Vol. 90, 2011, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
Lindenberger, Herbert. “Aneignungen von Auerbach: Von Said zum Postkolonialismus.” Treml and Barck, pp. 357–70.Google Scholar
Marcus, Sharon. “Erich Auerbach's Mimesis and the Value of Scale.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3, 2016, pp. 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Essays of Montaigne. 1588. Translated by Frame, Donald M., Stanford UP, 1957.Google Scholar
Mufti, Aamir R. “Auerbach in Istanbul: Edward Said, Secular Criticism, and the Question of Minority Culture.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 25, 1998, pp. 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufti, Aamir R. “Erich Auerbach and the Death and Life of World Literature.” Routledge Companion to World Literature, edited by D'haen, Theo et al., Routledge, 2012, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
Mufti, Aamir R. “Orientalism and the Institution of World Literatures.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 36, 2010, pp. 458–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The New Oxford Annotated Bible. Edited by Michael, D. Coogan, Oxford UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Newman, Jane O. “Auerbach's Dante: Poetical Theology as a Point of Departure for a Philology of World Literature.” Approaches to World Literature, edited by Küpper, Joachim, De Gruyter, 2013, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Newman, Jane O. “Force and Justice: Auerbach's Pascal.” Political Theology and Early Modernity, edited by Rein-hard Lupton, Julia and Hammiii, Graham, U of Chicago P, 2012, pp. 159–80.Google Scholar
Nichols, Stephen G. “Erich Auerbach: Figura: The Hidden Agenda.” Free University, Berlin, 9 May 2017. Address.Google Scholar
Nichols, Stephen G. “Erich Auerbach: History, Literature, and Jewish Philosophy.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch, Vol. 58, 2007, pp. 166–85.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Ernest W. “Hermann Gunkel as a Pioneer of Modern Old Testament Study.” Genesis, by Gunkel, Hermann. 1901. Translated by Biddle, Mark E., Mercer UP, 1997, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. “Erich Auerbach and the Judaizing of Philology.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 35, 2008, pp. 115–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, James I. Introduction. Auerbach, Time, pp. ix–xlv.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. “Old Testament Realism in the Writings of Erich Auerbach.” Jews and the Ends of Theory, edited by Ginsburg, Shai et al., Fordham UP, 2019, pp. 187–224.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. “The Body of the Letter: Bible, Epic, Novel.” The Flesh of Words: The Politics of Writing. 1998. Translated by Mandell, Charlotte, Stanford UP, 2004, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. “Le corps de la lettre: Bible, épopée, roman.” La chair des mots : Politiques de l'écriture, Galilée, 1998, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Figures de l'histoire. Presses Universitaires de France, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Figures of History. 2012. Translated by Rose, Julie, Polity Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Richards, Earl Jeffrey. “Erich Auerbach's Mimesis as a Meditation on the Shoah.” German Politics and Society, Vol. 59, No. 2, Summer 2001, pp. 62–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohls, Jan. “Rudolf Bultmanns frühe Marburger Theologie.” Die Philipps-Universität Marburg zwischen Kaiserreich und Nationalsozialismus, edited by Hollenberg, Gunter and Schwersmann, Aloys, Verein für Hessische Geschichte und Landeskunde, 2006, pp. 63–83.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. “Secular Criticism.” Introduction. The World, the Text, and the Critic, Harvard UP, 1983, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Schmithals, Walter. “Ein Brief Rudolf Bultmanns an Erich Foerster.” Rudolf Bultmanns Werk und Wirkung, edited by Jaspert, Bernd, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1984, pp. 70–80.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Gerhard. “Christoph Schrempf: The ‘Swabian Socrates’ as Translator of Kierkegaard.” German Protestant Theology, edited by Stewart, Jon, Ashgate Publishing, 2012, pp. 275–320. Tome 1 of Kierkegaard's Influence on Theology.Google Scholar
Treml, Martin, and Karlheinz Barck, editors. Erich Auerbach: Geschichte und Aktualität eines europäischen Philologen. Kulturverlag Kadmos, 2007.Google Scholar
Vialon, Martin. “Die Stimme Dantes und ihre Resonanz: Zu einem bisher unbekannten Vortrag Erich Auerbachs aus dem Jahr 1948.” Treml and Barck, pp. 46–56.Google Scholar
Vialon, Martin. “Erich Auerbach und Rudolf Bultmann: Probleme abendländischer Geschichtsdeutung.” Marburger Hermeneutik zwischen Tradition und Krise, edited by Bormuth, Matthias and von Bulow, Ulrich, Wallstein Verlag, 2008, pp. 176–206.Google Scholar
Vialon, Martin. “Erich Auerbachs Verborgenes Judentum und sein Istanbuler Nachruf auf den Orientalisten Karl Süßheim.” Kalonymos: Beiträge zur deutsch-jüdischen Geschichte an dem Salomon Steinheim-Institut an der Universität Duisberg-Essen, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2015, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Von Koppenfels, Martin. “Auerbachs Ernst.” Poetica, Vol. 45, nos. 1–2, 2013, pp. 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Michelle R. “Introduction: Relating Philology, Practicing Humanism.” PMLA, Vol. 125, No. 2, Mar. 2010, pp. 283–88.Google Scholar
Weidner, Daniel. “Von der Literaturgeschichte zur Literaturwissenschaft: Neuere Philologien und die Bibel seit Hermann Gunkel.” Hermann Gunkel Revisited: Literatur- und religionsgeschichtliche Studien, edited by Eisen, Ute E. and Gerstenberger, Erhard S., LIT Verlag, 2010, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
Wellek, René. “Auerbach's Special Realism.” The Kenyon Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1954, pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. “Form and Representation in Auerbach's Mimesis.” Affirmations: Of the Modern, Winter 2014, pp. 110–27.Google Scholar
Wurgaft, Benjamin Aides. “The Uses of Walter: Walter Benjamin and the Counterfactual Imagination.” History and Theory, Vol. 49, Oct. 2010, pp. 361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yashin, V. N. “Euro(tro)pology: Philology, World Literature, and the Legacy of Erich Auerbach.” The Yearbook of Comparative Literature, Vol. 57, 2011, pp. 269–90.Google Scholar
Zakai, Avihu. Erich Auerbach and the Crisis of German Philology: The Humanist Tradition in Peril. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar