Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:14:58.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant genetic resources and molecular markers: variety registration in a new era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2007

Robert J. Cooke  and
James C. Reeves
Robert J. Cooke*
Affiliation:
NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK
James C. Reeves
Affiliation:
NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variety registration is an important area of plant genetic resource characterization and utilization. Within the European Union, varieties must be included on a National List (NL) of a member state or on the Common Catalogue (a compilation of the NLs of the member states) before seed can be sold. This requires a series of tests and trials which assess if the variety is distinct, uniform and stable (DUS) and if it has sufficient value for cultivation and use (VCU). The same DUS criteria are also used world-wide for the granting of Plant Breeders' Rights (PBR), an intellectual property protection system. Both DUS and VCU are currently assessed primarily using field-based trials. However, the potential use of biochemical and molecular markers for DUS purposes is being actively investigated and such markers could have an important role to play in maintaining the quality and scope of PBR in an environment where the increasing number of countries involved in DUS testing and the number of variety comparisons to be made are causing logistical difficulties. More recently, given firstly the increase in the availability of markers from expressed regions of the genome, and secondly the possibilities raised by detailed DNA sequencing programmes and the association of markers (particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) with specific genes, the prospects for a more molecular approach to VCU are also being discussed. This paper reviews the current situation with regard to the use of molecular markers for DUS and VCU testing and considers future prospects for variety registration in the 21st century, ‘-omics’, era.

Keywords

DUSmolecular markersvariety registrationVCU
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 1 , Issue 2-3 , August 2003 , pp. 81 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bredemeijer, GMM, Cooke, RJ, Ganal, MW, Peeters, R, Isaac, P, Rendell, S, Jackson, J, Röder, MS, Korzun, V, Wendehake, K, Areshchenkova, T, Dijcks, M, Amelaine, M, Wickaert, V, Bertrand, L and Vosman, B (2002) Construction and testing of a microsatellite database containing more than 500 tomato varieties. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, RJ (1995) Review: Gel electrophoresis for the identification of plant varieties. Journal of Chromatography A 698: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, RJ and Reeves, JC (1998) Cultivar identification—a review of new methods. In: Kelly, AF and George, RAT (editors). Encyclopedia of Seed Production of World Crops. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 88–102.Google Scholar
Cooke, RJ, Bredemeijer, GMM, Ganal, MW, Peeters, R, Isaac, P, Rendell, S, Jackson, J, Röder, MS, Korzun, V, Wendehake, K, Areshchenkova, T, Dijcks, M, Laborie, D, Bertrand, L and Vosman, B. Assessment of the uniformity of wheat and tomato varieties at DNA microsatellite loci. Euphytica (in press).Google Scholar
Donini, P, Cooke, RJ and Reeves, JC (2000a) Molecular markers in variety and seed testing. In: Arencibia, AD (ed.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Plant Genetic Engineering, Havana, Cuba, 1999. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Donini, P, Law, JR, Koebner, RMD, Reeves, JC and Cooke, RJ (2000b) Temporal trends in the diversity of UK wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 912–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eujayl, I, Sorrells, M, Baum, M, Wolters, P and Powell, W (2001) Assessment of genotypic variation among cultivated durum wheat based on EST-SSRs and genomic SSRs. Euphytica 119: 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, MO (2003) Utilization of plant genetic resources in breeding for sustainability. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 1: 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H, Jarman, RJ, Austin, L, White, J and Cooke, RJ. The use of seed storage protein composition for the management of variety reference collections in distinctness, uniformity and stability testing of wheat. Euphytica (in press).Google Scholar
Kanazin, V, Talbert, H, See, D, DeCamp, P, Nevo, E and Blake, T (2002) Discovery and assay of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Plant Molecular Biology 48: 529–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kantety, RV, La Rota, M, Matthews, DE and Sorrells, ME (2002) Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Molecular Biology 48: 501–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koebner, RMD, Powell, W and Donini, P (2001) Contributions of DNA molecular marker technologies to the genetics and breeding of wheat and barley. Plant Breeding Reviews 21: 181–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koebner, RMD, Donini, P, Reeves, JC, Cooke, RJ and Law, JR (2003) Temporal flux in the morphological and molecular diversity of UK barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 550–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kota, R, Varshney, RK, Thiel, T, Dehmer, KJ and Graner, A (2001) Generation and comparison of EST-derived SSRs and SNPs in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Hereditas 135: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, JR, Donini, P, Koebner, RMD, Reeves, JC and Cooke, RJ (1998) DNA profiling and plant variety registration. 3: The statistical assessment of distinctness in wheat using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Euphytica 102: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, JR, Cooke, RJ, Reeves, JC, Donini, P and Smith, JSC (1999) Most similar variety comparisons as a grouping tool. Plant Varieties & Seeds 12: 181–190.Google Scholar
Marquez-Cedillo, LA, Hayes, PM, Jones, BL, Kleinhofs, A, Legge, WG, Rossnagel, BG, Sato, K, Ullrich, E and Wesenberg, DM (2000) QTL analysis of malting quality in barley based on the doubled-haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauria, S (2000) DUS testing of crop varieties—a synthesis on the subject for new PVP-opting countries. Plant Varieties & Seeds 13: 69–90.Google Scholar
Rafalski, A (2002) Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 94–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Röder, MS, Bredemeijer, GMM, Cooke, RJ, Peeters, R, Isaac, P, Rendell, S, Jackson, J, Korzun, V, Wendehake, K, Areshchenkova, T, Dijcks, M, Amelaine, M, Wickaert, V, Bertrand, L, Vosman, B and Ganal, MW (2002) Construction and analysis of a microsatellite-based database of European wheat varieties. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) (1991) International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Geneva: UPOV.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, Y, McMullen, M, Hittinger, CT, Houchins, K, Schulz, L, Kresovicj, S, Matsuoka, Y and Doebley, J (2002) Identifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Washington) 99: 9650–9655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, K, Pellio, B, Ordon, F and Friedt, W (2000) Development of an STS marker and SSRs suitable for marker-assisted selection for the BaMMV resistance gene rym9 in barley. Plant Breeding 119: 517–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar