Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:07:32.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological and molecular characterization of underutilized medicinal wild ginger (Zingiber barbatum Wall.) from Myanmar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2011

Noladhi Wicaksana ,
Syed Abdullah Gilani ,
Dawood Ahmad ,
Akira Kikuchi  and
Kazuo N. Watanabe
Noladhi Wicaksana
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan Plant Breeding Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung40600, Indonesia
Syed Abdullah Gilani*
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan
Dawood Ahmad
Affiliation:
Institute of Bio-Technology and Genetics Engineering, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan
Akira Kikuchi
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan
Kazuo N. Watanabe
Affiliation:
Watanabe Laboratory, Gene Research Center, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8572, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zingiber barbatum Wall. (family Zingiberaceae), is an underutilized medicinal plant and commonly known as ‘Meik tha-lin’ in Myanmar where it is used in the indigenous system of medicine. In the present study, 19 accessions of Z. barbatum from five provinces in Myanmar have been utilized to characterize and assess genetic diversity. Twenty-nine morphological characters were noted, including growth habit, leaf, pseudo-stem and rhizome characters. Fifteen primer sets of P450-based analogue (PBA) markers were used to reveal molecular characteristics. Of the 29 morphological characters, 22 showed a high degree of variation within wild ginger accessions, whereas 20 of these characters contributed significantly to morphological variation. Eleven amplified primer sets gave a total of 175 bands and exhibited 92.15% polymorphism across Z. barbatum accessions. Based on morphological characters and PBA markers, 19 accessions can be divided into two morphotype groups with comparatively higher genetic diversity. This information can be applied in future crop improvement, proper conservation and better use of this underutilized medicinal species.

Keywords

genetic diversitymorphological and genetic characterizationwild gingerZingiber barbatumZingiberaceae
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 531 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, S (2008) Diversity study on Zingiberaceae genetic resources with special reference to Myanmar. PhD Thesis, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Awale, S, Linn, TZ, Than, MM, Swe, T, Saiki, I and Kadota, S (2006) The healing art of traditional medicines in Myanmar. Journal of Traditional Medicine 23: 47–68.Google Scholar
Botstein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314–331.Google ScholarPubMed
Bua-in, S and Paisooksantivatana, Y (2010) Study of clonally propagated cassumunar ginger (Zingiber montanum (Koenig) Link ex Dietr.) and its relation of Wild Zingiber species from Thailand revealed by RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartea, ME, Picoaga, A, Soengas, P and Ordás, A (2002) Morphological characterization of kale populations from northwestern Spain. Euphytica 129: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, HD, Spillane, C and Hodgkin, T (2001) Broadening the genetic base of crops: an overview. In: Cooper, HD, Spillane, C and Hodgkin, T (eds) Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delin, W and Larsen, K (2000) Zingiberaceae. Flora of China 24: 235–377.Google Scholar
Dos Santos, TMM, Ganança, F, Slaski, JJ and Pinheiro de Carvalho, MÂA (2009) Morphological characterization of wheat genetic resources from the Island of Madeira, Portugal. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–15.Google Scholar
Ghalmi, N, Malice, M, Jacquemin, JM, Ounane, SM, Mekliche, L and Baudoin, JP (2010) Morphological and molecular diversity within Algerian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) landraces. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilani, SA, Kikuchi, A and Watanabe, KN (2009) Genetic variation within and among fragmented populations of endangered medicinal plant, Withania coagulans (Solanaceae) from Pakistan and its implications for conservation. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 2948–2958.Google Scholar
Hangelbroek, HH, Ouborg, NJ, Santamaria, L and Schwenk, S (2002) Clonal diversity and strucuture within a population of the pondweed Potamogeton pectinatus foraged by Bewick's swans. Molecular Ecology 11: 2137–2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, SMZ, Ngadin, AA, Shah, RM and Mohamad, N (2008) Morphological variability of greater yam (Dioscorea alata L.) in Malaysia. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 6: 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, R, Than Htun Oo, T and Watanabe, KN (2010) Myanmar mango landraces reveal genetic uniqueness over common cultivars from Florida, India, and Southeast Asia. Genome 53: 321–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, Z, Tyagi, RK, Sharma, R and Agrawal, A (2008) Genetic diversity in in vitro-conserved germplasm of Curcuma L. as revealed by RAPD markers. Biologia Plantarum 52: 627–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussin, KH, Seng, CT, Ibrahim, H, Gen, WQ, Ping, LJ and Nian, L (2000) Comparative leaf anatomy of Alpinia Roxb. species (Zingiberaceae) from China. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inui, H, Kodama, T, Ohkawa, Y and Ohkawa, A (2000) Herbicide metabolism and cross-tolerance in transgenic potato plants co-expressing human CYP1A1, CYP2B6, and CYP2B19. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 66: 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jatoi, SA, Kikuchi, A, Ahmad, D and Watanabe, KN (2010) Characterization of the genetic structure of mango ginger (Curcuma amada Roxb.) from Myanmar in farm and genebank collection by the neutral and functional genomic markers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2225/vol13-issue6-fulltext-10.Google Scholar
Jatoi, SA, Kikuchi, A, Mimura, M, San-San-Yi, and Watanabe, KN (2008) Relationship of Zingiber species, and genetic variability assessment in ginger (Zingiber officinale) accessions from ex-situ genebank, on-farm and rural market. Breeding Science 58: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jatoi, SA, Kikuchi, A, San-San-Yi, , Naing, KW, Yamanaka, S, Watanabe, JA and Watanabe, KN (2006) Use of rice SSR markers as RAPD markers for genetic diversity analysis in Zingiberaceae. Breeding Science 56: 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, JNR (1967) Two case studies in the application of principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 16: 225–236.Google Scholar
Karp, A (2002) The new genetic era: will it help us in managing genetic diversity? In: Engels, JMM, Rao, VR, Brown, AHD and Jakson, MT (eds) Managing Plant Genetic Diversity. Wallingford: CAB Publishing, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
Keeratinijakal, V, Kladmook, M and Laosatit, K (2010) Identification and characterization of Curcuma comosa Roxb., phytoestrogens-producing plant, using AFLP markers and morphological characteristics. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 4: 2651–2657.Google Scholar
Kiyokawa, S, Ohbayashi, M, Shimada, Y and Kikuchi, Y (1997) PCR-amplification of sequences encoding the heme-binding region of plant cytochrome P450. Plant Biotechnology 14: 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kizhakkayil, J and Sasikumar, B (2010) Genetic diversity analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) germplasm based on RAPD and ISSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae 125: 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kladmook, V, Chidchenchey, S and Keeratinijakal, V (2010) Assessment of genetic diversity in cassumunar ginger (Zingiber cassumunar Roxb.) in Thailand using AFLP markers. Breeding Science 60: 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAS(2000) Common Name, Scientific Name, and Botanical Name of Important Shrub and Tree in Myanmar. Myanmar: Department of Planning Myanmar Agriculture Service (MAS). (In Burmese).Google Scholar
Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, da Fonseca, GAB and Kent, J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohkawa, H, Imaishi, H, Shiota, N, Yamada, T, Inui, H and Ohkawa, Y (1998) Molecular mechanisms of herbicide resistance with special emphasis on cytochrome P450 mono-oxigenases. Plant Biotechnology 15: 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, JM, Martín, JP, Borrego, J, Chávez, J, Rodríguez, I, Muñoz, G and Cabello, F (2004) Molecular and morphological characterization of a Vitis gene bank for the establishment of a base collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oumouloud, A, Arnedo-Andrés, MS, González-Torres, R and Álvarez, JM (2009) Morphological and molecular characterization of melon accession resistant to Fusarium wilts. Euphytica 169: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, PN, Babu, KN and Shiva, KN (2005) Botany and crop improvement of ginger. In: Ravindran, PN and Babu, KN (eds) Ginger: The Genus Zingiber. New York: CRC Press, pp. 15–85.Google Scholar
Ravindran, PN, Sasikumar, B, George, JK, Ratnambal, MJ, Babu, KN, Zachariah, JT and Nair, RR (1994) Genetic resources of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) and its conservation in India. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 98: 1–4.Google Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2000) NTSYSpc 21 Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
Sajeev, S, Roy, AR, Iangrai, B, Pattanayak, A and Deka, BC (2011) Genetic diversity analysis in the traditional and improved ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) clones cultivated in North-East India. Scientia Horticulturae 128: 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San-San-Yi, , Jatoi, SA, Fujimura, T, Yamanaka, S, Watanabe, J and Watanabe, KN (2008) Potential loss of unique genetic diversity in tomato landraces by genetic colonization of modern cultivars at a non-center of origin. Plant Breeding 127: 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasikumar, B (2005) Genetic resources of Curcuma: diversity, characterization and utilization. Plant Genetic Resources 3: 230–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasikumar, B, Krishnamoorthy, B, George, JK, Peter, KV and Ravindran, PN (1999) Spice diversity and conservation of plants that yield major spices in India. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 118: 19–26.Google Scholar
Solmaz, I, Sari, N, Aka-Kacar, Y and Yalcin-Mendi, NY (2010) The genetic characterization of Turkish watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) accession using RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szamosi, C, Solmaz, I, Sari, N and Bársony, C (2009) Morphological characterization of Hungarian and Turkish watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. et Nakai) genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 1091–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teutsch, HG, Hasenfratz, MP, Lesot, A, Stoltz, C, Garnier, JM, Jeltsch, JM, Durst, F and Reichhart, DW (1993) Isolation and sequence of a cDNA encoding the Jerusalem artichoke cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, a major plant cytochrome P450 involved in the general phenylpropanoid pathway. PNAS 90: 4102–4106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelaide, I (1999) A synopsis of the genus Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) in Thailand. Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velayudhan, KC, Muralidharan, VK, Amalraj, VA, Gautam, PL, Mandal, S and Kumar, D (1999) Curcuma Genetic Resources. Scientific Monograph No. 4. New Delhi: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources.Google Scholar
Wan, Y, Watanabe, JA, San-San-Yi, , Than Htaik, , Kyaw Win, , Yamanaka, S, Nakamura, I and Watanabe, KN (2005) Assessment of genetic diversity among the major Myanmar banana landraces. Breeding Science 55: 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, XY, Astuti, IP and Brink, M (1999) Zingiber G.R. Boehmer. In: de Guzman, CC and Siemonsma, JS (eds) Plant Resources of South-East Asia No. 13: Spices. Leiden, Netherlands: Backhuys Publisher, pp. 233–238.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, S, Ikeda, S, Imai, A, Luan, Y, Watanabe, JA and Watanabe, KN (2005) Construction of integrated genetic map between various existing DNA markers and newly developed P450-related PBA markers in diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum). Breeding Science 55: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanaka, S, Jatoi, SA, San-San-Yi, , Kothari, SL, Tin-Htut, and Watanabe, KN (2011) Genetic diversity of Myanmar rice and their implementation on management methods. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 1290–1298.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, S, Suzuki, E, Tanaka, M, Takeda, Y, Watanabe, JA and Watanabe, KN (2003) Assessment of cytochrome P450 sequences offers a useful tool for determining genetic diversity in higher plant species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 1

Gilani Supplementary Table 1

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 1(File)
File 24.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 2

Gilani Supplementary Table 2

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 2(File)
File 50.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 3

Gilani Supplementary Table 3

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 3(File)
File 21.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 4

Gilani Supplementary Table 4

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 4(File)
File 22 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gilani Supplementary Table 5

Gilani Supplementary Table 5

Download Gilani Supplementary Table 5(File)
File 29.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Gilani Supplementary Figure 1

Gilani Supplementary Figure 1

Download Gilani Supplementary Figure 1(Image)
Image 84.6 KB