Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:16:41.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Martha C. Pennington (ed.) (2007). Phonology in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. xii+317.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2007

Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 486 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donegan, Patricia J. & Stampe, David (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen, Daniel A. (ed.) Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126–173.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam & Fitch, Tecumseh W. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, Roman & Halle, Morris (1956). Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kelly, John & Local, John (1989). Doing phonology: observing, recording, interpreting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21. 499–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, Steven & Jackendoff, Ray (2005). The faculty of language: what's special about it? Cognition 95. 201–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar