Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:26:54.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and government*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Jonathan Kaye ,
Jean Lowenstamm  and
Jean-Roger Vergnaud
Jonathan Kaye
Affiliation:
UQAM
Jean Lowenstamm
Affiliation:
UQAM
Jean-Roger Vergnaud
Affiliation:
CNRS, U.A. 819, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article we have two primary objectives: (1) to elaborate in some detail a theory of phonological representations embedded within a parametric framework, and (2) to apply this theory to a particular vowel system which displays some rather interesting properties. This work is a continuation of a collaboration on a programme of research on phonological theory begun in 1982 (cf. Vergnaud 1982; Kaye & Vergnaud 1984; Kaye et al. 1984, 1985, in preparation).This programme incorporates the view that phonology is to be regarded as a system of universal principles defining the class of human phonological systems. These principles underdetermine given phonologies in certain specific areas. A complete phonological system consists, then, of these principles along with sets of parameter values. Taken together, the principles and language-specific parameter settings give a complete characterisation of the phonological system under study. In this model, a phonological system contains no rule component. The observed phonological phenomena result from a combination of the general principles governing phonological representations and structures and the parameter values in operation in the particular language. We view this line of research as a continuation of the development of a theory of markedness (cf. Chomsky & Halle 1968 (SPE); Kean 1975, 1979). At the moment of writing, this view of phonology remains a long-term objective of our research programme. However, an increasing number of phonological processes which were formerly considered to be manifestations of rules are now successfully derivable from the principles of Universal Phonology (UP) (cf. Kaye & Lowenstamm 1984, to appear).

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , May 1985 , pp. 305 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations. JL 10. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bach, E. & Wheeler, D. (1980). Montague Phonology. Ms, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1981). Harmony processes. In Klein, W. & Levelt, W. (eds.) Crossing the boundaries in linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel. 1–22.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (in preparation). Preliminaries to a theory of stress.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1980). The mystery of the tenth vowel. Journal of Linguistic Research I.1–14.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1981). La sélection des formes pronominales en vata et en d'autres langues kru orientales. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique 11. 117–134.Google Scholar
Kay, J. D. (1982). Harmony processes in Vata. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Vol. 2. Dordrecht. Foris. 385–452.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. & Lowenstamm, J. (1984). De la syllabicité. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (eds.) Forme sonore du langage. Paris: Hermann. 123–159.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. & Lowenstamm, J. (to appear). A metrical treatment of Grassman's Law. NELS 16.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1984). La syntaxe des expressions phonologiques. Paper presented at the Paris VII International Colloquium, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D., Lowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1985). Vowel systems. Paper presented at the 1985 GLOW colloquium, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D., Jowenstamm, J. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (in preparation). A theory of phonological representations.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1984). Dominance and complex segments. Paper presented at the 1984 GLOW colloquium, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Kean, M.-L. (1975). The theory of markedness in generative grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kean, M.-L. (1979). On a theory of markedness: some general considerations and a case in point. Social Sciences Research Report 41. UC Irvine.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1980, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. & Prunet, J. F. (in preparation). On the vowel system of Tigrinya.Google Scholar
Marchese, L. (1979). Atlas linguistique kru: essai de typologie. Abidjan: ILA, Université d'Abidjan.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1984a). Two English vowel movements: a particle analysis. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.) (1984). Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 32–51.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1984b). The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology Yearbook I. 129–155.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J.-R. (1982). On the theoretical bases of phonology. Paper presented at the 1982 GLOW colloquium, Paris.Google Scholar
Zogbo, G. (1981). Description d'un parler bété (Daloa). These de 3ème cycle, Université Paris III.Google Scholar