Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:49:39.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feature structures and indices*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Steven Bird
Steven Bird
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hayes (1990) proposes the adoption of a new notation for representing hierarchical phonological structure, in response to a notational problem which he calls the DIPHTHONGISATION PARADOX. More generally, he seeks to find a replacement for the current method of depicting feature trees, which is not ideally suited to the clear expression of rules and derivations. While I am in complete agreement with this standpoint and fully support Hayes' assertion that certain ambiguities of interpretation have crept into the graphical conventions currently in widespread use, I nevertheless believe his proposal suffers from a number of problems. Once identified, these problems can be solved with further notational and formal refinements.

Type
Squibs and replies
Information
Phonology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , May 1991 , pp. 137 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Árnason, Kristján (1986). The segmental and suprasegmental status of preaspiration in Modern Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 9. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Steven (1990). Constraint-based phonology. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bird, Steven & Patrick, Blackburn (1991). A logical approach to Arabic phonology. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Steven & Ewan, Klein (1990). Phonological events. JL 26. 33–56.Google Scholar
Broe, Michael (to appear). An introduction to feature geometry. In Docherty, G. J. & Ladd, D. R. (eds.) Gesture, segment, prosody: papers in laboratory phonology II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.Google Scholar
Coleman, John & John, Local (to appear). The ‘No Crossing’ Constraint in autosegmental phonology. Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Gazdar, , Gerald, , Ewan, Klein, Geoffrey, Pullum & Ivan, Sag (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger, Vergnaud (1980). Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1. 83–105.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1990). Diphthongisation and coindexing. Phonology 7. 31–71.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark (1988). Attribute-value logic and the theory of grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes 16. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M. & Joan, Bresnan (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: a formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J. (ed.) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 173–281.Google Scholar
Larkin, Jill H. & Herbert, A. Simon (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11. 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. (1989). Formal linguistics meets the boojum. NLLT 7. 137–143.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elisabeth (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James (1991). Attribute value phonology. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart (1986). An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes 4. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart, Uszkoreit, Hans, Pereira, Fernando C. N., Robinson, Jane J. & Tyson, Mabrys (1983). The formalism and implementation of PATR-II. In Grosz, Barbara & Stickel, Mark E. (eds.) Research on interactive acquisition and use of knowledge. Stanford: SRI International. 39–79.Google Scholar