Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T06:41:14.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridget D. Samuels (ed.) (2017). Beyond markedness in formal phonology. (Linguistics Today 241.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Pp. xii + 237.

Review products

Bridget D. Samuels (ed.) (2017). Beyond markedness in formal phonology. (Linguistics Today 241.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Pp. xii + 237.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Sara Mackenzie
Sara Mackenzie*
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
*
*E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 727 - 734
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5. 183–207.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter (1996). The representation of voicing contrasts. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eulitz, Carsten & Lahiri, Aditi (2004). Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16. 577–583.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232–276.Google Scholar
Gurevich, Naomi (2001). A critique of markedness-based theories in phonology. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 31:2. 89–114.Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie (2004). A formal approach to /v/: evidence from Czech and Slovak. In Arnaudova, Olga, Browne, Wayles, Rivera, María Luisa & Stojanović, Daniela (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 12: the Ottawa meeting 2003. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 187–205.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). JL 42. 25–70.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1984). The phonetics and phonology of Russian voicing assimilation. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 318–328.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth (2011). Markedness. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 79–106.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (2002). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology 19. 219–251.Google Scholar
Łubowicz, Anna (2003). Contrast preservation in phonological mappings. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff (2008). The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1991). On the bases of radical underspecification. NLLT 9. 285–325.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2002). Russian voicing assimilation, final devoicing, and the problem of [v]. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-528 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren (1996). Default variability: the coronal–velar relationship. NLLT 14. 493–543.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren (1999). Featural markedness in phonology: variation. Part 1. Glot International 4:7. 3–6.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren (2007). Markedness in phonology. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79–97.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1987). Redundant values. CLS 23:2. 339–362.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2009). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson, Kristin & Inkelas, Sharon (eds.) The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 151–179.Google Scholar