Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:34:56.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Greek Atomists and Epicurus: a Study. By Cyril BaileyM.A.,, Jowett Fellow and Tutor of Balliol College. (Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1928. Pp. ix + 619. Price 24s. net.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
New Books
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 401 Note 1 We should like to enter a protest against the word ‘Canonice’ which stands as the chapter heading here. How is the English reader to know how to pronounce this word? Two German universities have allowed theses to go out under the title De Epicuri Canonica, which is at least better by the letter a for e Usener has a section headed ‘Canonica,’ but this is neuter plural (see footnote, Epicurea, p. 177). It is true that Diogenes gives the Epicurean division of philosophy (x, 29) as κανoνικóν, φυσικóν, ἠθικóν, but the form κανoνικἠ does not seem to occur, and actually, as Diogenes tells us in the same passage, the theory of the κανών was considered to be a part of ‘physiology.’