Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:37:15.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cambridge Philosophers IV: Whitehead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Dorothy Emmet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alfred North Whitehead is rightly considered a Cambridge philosopher. His intellectual life falls into three periods, of which the first (1880-1910) was in Cambridge, the second (1910-1924) in London, and the third (1924-1947) in Cambridge, Mass. But he always saw himself as a Cambridge person, and was a Life Fellow of Trinity College. Moreover, though each of these periods is associated with a different kind of philosophy, some ideas and concerns from the Cambridge period carry right through.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 71 , Issue 275 , January 1996 , pp. 101 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 From ‘England the Narrow Seas’, Atlantic Monthly, June 1927.Google Scholar Reprinted in Essays in Science and Philosophy, p. 48. New York, 1947. (E.S.P.).Google Scholar

2 ‘The Education of an Englishman’, Atlantic Monthly, August 1926 and E.S.P. p. 35.Google Scholar

3 ‘Autobiographical Notes’. In The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, p. 13.Google ScholarLibrary of Living Philosophers, Evanston, , 111., 1941.Google Scholar

4 ‘The Relevance of “On Mathematical Concepts of the Material World” to Whitehead's Philosophy’. In The Relevance of Whitehead, ed. Leclerc, I., London, 1961.Google Scholar

5 The Concept of Nature, p. 172. (Cambridge, 1920).Google Scholar

6 The replacement of Substance by processes and events went along with an attack on the adequacy of the Subject/Predicate form of language. Whitehead wrote no specific work on the nature of language, but there are remarks scattered throughout his books, notably in the last one, Modes of Thought.Google Scholar These suggest he saw language going on in a flow with emphasis-patterns, rhythms, reiteration, contrasts, its nature being shown in the spoken word rather than in the written text. Margaret Masterman claimed that this was a fertile view when one tried to uncover deep structures in language. See her paper ‘First Impressions of a Whiteheadean Model of Language’ in Whitehead und der Prozessbegriff, eds. Holz, H. and Wolf-Gazo, E., Alber, Freiburg, 1984.Google Scholar

7 By Leemon, McHenry in the second volume of Victor Lowe's biography Alfred North Whitehead: the Man and his Work. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990. (p. 127).Google Scholar

8 ‘Whitehead's Philosophy of Science’. Philosophical Review, LXXI, 1962.Google Scholar

9 Process and Reality, Revised Edition, p. 110, New York, 1978.Google Scholar

10 These will be found in the Autobiographical Notes in the volume in the Library of Living Philosophers and in the pieces listed under ‘Personal’ in Essays in Science and Philosophy.