Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:59:07.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Avoiding the Emotion–Thought Conundrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Irving Thalberg
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wilson, J. R. S., Emotion and Object (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1972), 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Davidson, D., ‘Hume's Cognitive Theory of Pride,’ Journal of Philosophy 73, No. 19 (1976), 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Green, O. H., ‘Emotions and Belief’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph VI (1972), 38.Google Scholar

4 Neu, J., Emotion, Thought and Therapy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), 1, 36, 46, 161.Google Scholar

5 Neu, , op. cit., 99.Google Scholar

6 Neu, , op. cit., 36.Google Scholar

7 Thomson, Judith J., Acts and Other Events (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), 264.Google Scholar

8 See Thalberg, I., ‘Constituents and Causes of Emotion and Action,’ Philosophical Quarterly 23, No. 1 (1973), 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Thalberg, I., Perception, Emotion and Action (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977).Google Scholar

9 For example, Sartre, J. P., Esquisse d'une Théorie des Emotions (Paris: Vrin, 1939)Google Scholar; Solomon, R., The Passions (Garden City: Doubleday, 1976)Google Scholar; and Solomon, R.The Logic of Emotion, Nous 11, No. 1 (1977), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 For a beginning, see my ‘Mental Activity and Passivity’, Mind 87, No. 3 (1978). 376395.Google Scholar

11 This and the next paragraph were stimulated by the astute questioning of several people when I read a draft of my essay to the University of Chicago Philosophy Colloquium in November 1978. I am particularly indebted to Professor Donald Davidson for his commentary; but he is not responsible for the use to which I have put his event theory in these paragraphs.

12 See Davidson, D., ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967), 8195.Google Scholar