Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:36:39.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology and Goodman's Paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Ingemar Nordin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Goodman's paradox gives rise to a cluster of problems, problems that are in need of different answers. I will discuss some variants of the grue hypothesis applied to the technological context. One conclusion in this paper is that there is room for rational decisions, and that solutions to the paradoxes in technology can be found in the practical choice situation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 345 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goodman, N. ([1955] 1965), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Bobs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Miller, D. W. (1994), Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Miller, D. W. (2006), Out of Error. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nordin, I. (1989), “The Rationality of Technology”, The Rationality of Technology 2:3–10.Google Scholar
Nordin, I. (2006), “The Pragmatic Problem of Induction”, in Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl, and Miller, David (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Vol. 2. Aldershot: Ashgate, 231–244.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1957), “Should We Attempt to Justify Induction?”, Should We Attempt to Justify Induction? 3:33–48.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1981), “Rational Prediction”, Rational Prediction 32:115–125.Google Scholar