Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:40:03.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to A Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Frank Jackson
Frank Jackson*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While disagreeing with some of the detail of my argument in [2] F. John Clendinnen accepts its conclusion, namely, that the vindication he proposed in [1] fails. I will thus confine myself to saying, very briefly, why I think the new vindication of induction that he sketches in [3] also fails.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 449 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Clendinnen, F. J., “Induction and Objectivity,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 33, No. 3, 1966, pp. 215–229.10.1086/288095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Jackson, F., “A Reply to ‘Induction and Objectivity,‘” Philosophy of Science, this issue.Google Scholar
[3] Clendinnen, F. J., “A Response to Jackson,” Philosophy of Science, this issue.Google Scholar