Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T20:18:32.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Relation between Dualities and Gauge Symmetries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Sebastian de Haro ,
Nicholas Teh  and
Jeremy Butterfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We make two points about dualities in string theory. The first point is that the conception of duality, which we will discuss, meshes with two dual theories being ‘gauge related’ in the general philosophical sense of being physically equivalent. The second point is a result about gauge/gravity duality that shows its relation to gauge symmetries to be subtler than one might expect: each of a certain class of gauge symmetries in the gravity theory, that is, diffeomorphisms, is related to a position-dependent symmetry of the gauge theory.

Type
Space, Time, and Space-Time
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 83 , Issue 5 , December 2016 , pp. 1059 - 1069
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We thank various audiences, especially the audience at PSA 2014, and two referees. Nicholas Teh thanks the John Templeton Foundation for supporting his work on this article.

References

De Haro, Sebastian. 2016a. “Dualities and Emergent Gravity: Gauge/Gravity Duality.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, forthcoming. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haro, Sebastian 2016b. “Is Diffeomorphism Invariance Emergent?” Unpublished manuscript, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Haro, Sebastian, Mayerson, Daniel, and Butterfield, Jeremy. 2016. “Conceptual Aspects of Gauge/Gravity Duality.” Foundations of Physics, forthcoming. doi:10.1007/s10701-016-0037-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haro, Sebastian, Teh, Nicholas, and Butterfield, Jeremy. 2016. “Comparing Dualities and Gauge Symmetries.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, forthcoming. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieks, Dennis, van Dongen, Jeroen, and de Haro, Sebastian. 2015. “Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for Gravity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics B 52:203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, Hillary, and Wallace, David. 2014. “Empirical Consequences of Symmetries.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65:59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Gary, and Polchinski, Joseph. 2006. “Gauge/Gravity Duality.” In Towards Quantum Gravity? ed. Oriti, Daniele. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huggett, Nick. 2016. “Target Space ≠ Space.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldacena, Juan. 1999. “The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38 (4): 1113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, John. 2010. “Holographic Duality with a View to Many-Body Physics.” Advances in High Energy Physics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/723105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polchinski, Joseph. 2016. “Dualities of Fields and Strings.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickles, Dean. 2011. “A Philosopher Looks at String Dualities.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickles, Dean 2015. “Dual Theories: ‘Same but Different’ or ‘Different but Same’?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teh, Nicholas. 2016. “Galileo’s Gauge: Understanding the Empirical Significance of Gauge Symmetry.” Philosophy of Science 83 (1): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar