We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Footnotes
†
Thanks to Katie Creel, Kasey Genin, Dan Malinsky, Deborah G. Mayo, and Conor Mayo-Wilson for comments on a previous draft.
References
Berger, J. O.2003. “Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing?” Statistical Science18 (1): 1–32..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. O., and Sellke, T.. 1987. “Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence.” Journal of the American Statistical Association82 (397): 112–22..Google Scholar
Cox, D. R.1958. “Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics29:357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, C., and Urbach, P.. 2006. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. 3rd ed.Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Lehmann, E. L.2011. Fisher, Neyman, and the Creation of Classical Statistics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, H.1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. G.1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. S.1947. “The Choice of Statistical Tests Illustrated on the Interpretation of Data Classed in a 2 × 2 Table.” Biometrika34 (1/2): 139–67.Google Scholar