Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:10:25.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laws, Symmetry, and Symmetry Breaking: Invariance, Conservation Principles, and Objectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

John Earman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given its importance in modern physics, philosophers of science have paid surprisingly little attention to the subject of symmetries and invariances, and they have largely neglected the subtopic of symmetry breaking. I illustrate how the topic of laws and symmetries brings into fruitful interaction technical issues in physics and mathematics with both methodological issues in philosophy of science, such as the status of laws of physics, and metaphysical issues, such as the nature of objectivity.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 1227 - 1241
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

The ungainly title is due to my desire to do homage to my predecessor, Bas van Fraassen, and my teacher, Robert Nozick. The version printed here is a brief summary of some of the major themes of the longer paper of the same title posted on the PhilSci Archive http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu.

References

Curie, Pierre (1894), “Sur la symmétrie dans les phénomène physiques: Symmétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique”, Sur la symmétrie dans les phénomène physiques: Symmétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique 3:393–415.Google Scholar
Earman, John (2001), “Lambda: The Constant That Refuses to Die”, Lambda: The Constant That Refuses to Die 55:189–220.Google Scholar
Earman, John (2002a), “Thoroughly Modern McTaggart: Or, What McTaggart Would Have Said if He Had Read the General Theory of Relativity”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 2. http://www.philosophersimprint.org.Google Scholar
Earman, John (2002b), “Gauge Matters”, Gauge Matters 69 (Proceedings): S209–S220.Google Scholar
Earman, John (2003a), “Tracking Down Gauge: An Ode to the Constrained Hamiltonian Formalism”, in Brading, Katherine and Castellani, Elena (eds.), Symmetries in Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John (2003b), “The Cosmological Constant, the Fate of the Universe, Unimodular Gravity, and All That”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 B: 557–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John (2004), “Curie's Principle and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking”, Curie's Principle and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking 18:173–198.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1999), Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, Ronald (1999), Science without Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henneaux, Marc, and Teitelboim, Claudio (1989), Quantization of Gauge Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Houtappel, R. M. F., Dam, H. Van, and Wigner, E. P. (1965), “The Conceptual Basis and Use of the Geometric Invariance Principles”, The Conceptual Basis and Use of the Geometric Invariance Principles 37:595–632.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K. (1973), Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert (2001), Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World. Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1965), The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo (1998), “Loop Quantum Gravity”, Living Reviews in Relativity. http://www.livingreviews.org/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1989), Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Steven (1980), “Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions”, Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions 52:515–523.Google Scholar
Wigner, Eugene P. (1967), Symmetries and Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar