Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:23:45.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I. Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

C. W. Churchman
C. W. Churchman*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, University of Pennsylvania, Phila., Pa.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is a curious fact that in the many writings on the theory of probability, one rarely finds an instance of a clear cut definition of the fundamental problem of the subject. On intuitive grounds, one grasps the intent of most of the authors: it is to define the concept of probability and to show its relationship to the other concepts of science; and yet since the criterion of adequacy in the answering of this question is rarely stated, one must feel that the problem itself has remained undefined.

Type
Probability Theory
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1945 , pp. 147 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) “Dialectic of Modern Philosophy”, to appear.Google Scholar
(2) Kolmogoroff, A., “Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung”, Ergeb. der Math. (vol. 2).Google Scholar
(3) Reichenbach, H., “Axiomatik der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung”, Math. Z. (vol. 34).Google Scholar
(4) Copeland, A. H., “Postulates for the Theory of Probability”, Amer. Jour. Math. (vol. 63).Google Scholar
(5) Gödel, K., “Uber Formal Unentscheidbare Sätze der PM und verwandter Systeme”, Monatsh. Math. Phys. (vol. 38).Google Scholar
(6) Fisher, R. A., Statistical Methods for Research Workers.Google Scholar
(7) Neyman, J., E. Pearson, Statistical Research Memoirs (vols. 1 and 2).Google Scholar