Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:50:32.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nickles on Intensionality and the Covering Law Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Danny Steinberg*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario and Harvard University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Cupples, B. Explanation in Science. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, 1973.Google Scholar
[2] Eberle, R., Kaplan, D., and Montague, R.Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 28 (1961): 418428.10.1086/287828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P.Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 135175. (Reprinted in [4], pp. 245–290.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Hempel, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[5] Kalish, D. and Montague, R. Logic. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1964.Google Scholar
[6] Kaplan, D.Explanation Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 28 (1961): 429436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Nickles, T.Covering Law Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 542561.10.1086/288395CrossRefGoogle Scholar