Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:22:43.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Daniel M. Hausman
Daniel M. Hausman*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Stuart Mill regards economics as an inexact and separate science which employs a deductive method. This paper analyzes and restates Mill's views and considers whether they help one to understand philosophical peculiarities of contemporary microeconomic theory. The author concludes that it is philosophically enlightening to interpret microeconomics as an inexact and separate science, but that Mill's notion of a deductive method has only a little to contribute.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 363 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I have benefited greatly from discussing the issues considered in this paper with Margaret Atherton, Lindley Darden, Philip Ehrlich, Isaac Levi, Sidney Morgenbesser, Robert Schwartz and Frederick Suppe. Conrad Johnson, Catherine Kautsky, Alexander Rosenberg, Dudley Shapere, Allen Stairs, and Paul Thagard read earlier drafts and offered helpful advice and criticism. Anonymous reviewers for this journal offered some useful criticism. The support of the National Science Foundation (Grant #SES 8007385) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

Anschutz, R. P. (1953), The Philosophy of J. S. Mill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bonar, J. (1893), Philosophy and Political Economy. rpt. London: Allen & Unwin, 1967.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. E. (1888), The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy. 2nd. ed. rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1980), “Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. and Varian, H. (1978), “Economic Models”, Journal of Philosophy 75: 664–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, R. (1979), Understanding Scientific Reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (1981a), “Are General Equilibrium Theories Explanatory?” in J. Pitt, (ed.) Philosophy in Economics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (1981b), Capital, Profits and Prices: An Essay in the Philosophy of Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. and Oppenheim, P. (1948), “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, rpt. in Hempel (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. (1946), Value and Capital 2nd. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. (1938), The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economics, rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Neville (1890), Scope and Method of Political Economy. 4th ed. rpt. New York: Kelley & Millman, 1955.Google Scholar
Levi, I. and Morgenbesser, S. (1964), “Beliefs and Dispositions”, American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 221–32.Google Scholar
McClelland, P. (1975), Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics and the New Economic History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1836), “On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It”, rpt. in Mill (1844).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843), A System of Logic. rpt. London: Longmans, 1949.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1844), Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. rpt. in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. IV. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848), Principles of Political Economy. 7th ed. rpt. in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 2 and 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1873), Autobiography. rpt. New York: New American Library, 1964.Google Scholar
Morgenbesser, S. (1969), “The Realist-Instrumentalist Controversy”, in Morgenbesser, S., Suppes, P. and White, M., (eds.) Philosophy, Science and Method. New York: St. Martin's, pp. 200–218.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1966), The Open Society and its Enemies, vol. II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1970), Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1976), Microeconomic Laws: A Philosophical Analysis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. (1974), J. S. Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1954), History of Economic Analysis. Schumpeter, E. (ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1969), “Towards a Post-positivistic Interpretation of Science”, in Achinstein, P. and Barker, S., (eds.) The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, W. (1976), The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, tr. W. Wohlhueter. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, F. (1974), “Theories and Phenomena”, in Leinfellner, W. and Kohler, W., (eds.) Developments in the Methodology of Social Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 45–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, F. (1976), “Theoretical Laws”, in Przelecki, M., Szaniawski, K., and Wojcicki, R., (eds.) Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Science. Wroc/aw: Ossolineum, pp. 247–67.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1957), Introduction to Logic. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904), “Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy”, tr. E. Shils and H. Finch. rpt. in M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar