Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T00:39:25.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Reduction, Elimination, and Firewalking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Colin Cheyne
Colin Cheyne*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Otago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schwartz (1991) argues that the worry that successful reduction would eliminate rather than conserve the mental is a needless worry. He examines cases of reduction from the natural sciences and claims that if reduction of the mental is like any of those cases then it would not be a case of elimination. I discuss other cases of scientific reduction which do involve elimination. Schwartz has not shown that reduction of the mental could not be like such cases, so his argument is not sufficient to dispel the worry of elimination.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 349 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful for Alan Musgrave's helpful comments and encouragement.

‡

Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.

References

Bacon, F. ([1620] 1960), Novum Organum, in F. H. Anderson (ed.), The New Organum and Related Writings. New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1980), Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984), Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1987), The International Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. (1928), The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1981), Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Brighton: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1986), “Individualism and Supervenience I”, The Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 60: 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1986), Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1984), “Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction”, in Sober, E. (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 462–476.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. (1988), “Functionalism and Broad Content”, Mind 97: 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. (1990), “In Defence of Folk Psychology”, Philosophical Studies 59: 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leikind, B. J. and McCarthy, W. J. (1985), “An Investigation of Firewalking”, Skeptical Inquirer 10: 23–34.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1961), The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulos, J. A. (1988), Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. (1991), “Reduction, Elimination, and the Mental”, Philosophy of Science 58: 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. (1990), The Representational Theory of Mind: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (1977), “The Amateur Scientist”, Scientific American 237(2): 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1984), “Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account”, in Sober, E. (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 477–508.Google Scholar