Violence and Democracy. By John Keane. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press, 2004. 226p. $65.00 cloth, $23.99 paper.
This is a very readable discursive essay. In consequence, John
Keane's many digressions are provocative and informative, for
example, his meditation on death on page 40 or his short history of the
British peace movement on pages 83–88. His method also adds greatly
to the reader's pleasure: He identifies key authors in a wide range
of related fields, summarizes their key works, links them together, one
generous summary after another, and finally, criticizes the synthesis he
has just created. For example, after summarizing and synthesizing Hans
Mangus Enzensberger's, Martin van Creveld's, and Robert D.
Kaplan's views on post–Cold War “uncivil wars,”
Keane remarks: “The temptation to think of contemporary uncivil wars
as ‘primitive’ is itself primitive. It should be
resisted” (p. 115). He then resists the temptation by discussing
primitive warfare among Muslim desert tribes and Native Americans, as
described by Ernest Gellner and Pierre Clastres, respectively. The value
of this method is that one learns in a critical manner what others think.
The disadvantage is that the issues in hand are never addressed.