Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:12:06.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

James Madison: Republican or Democrat?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2005

Robert A. Dahl
Robert A. Dahl
Affiliation:
Yale University ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although James Madison is best known for the views he expressed in the Federalist, as he gained greater experience in the new American political system he rejected some of these early views and increasingly emphasized four propositions: (1) the greatest threat in the American republic comes from a minority, not the majority; (2) to protect their rights from minority factions, members of the majority faction must organize their own political party; (3) the danger that majorities might threaten property rights could be overcome by enabling a majority of citizens to own property, a feasible solution in America; and (4) in a republic, majorities must be allowed to prevail. Even Madison's post-1787 constitutional views, however, were flawed in at least three serious ways: (1) as an empirical proposition, his conjecture that increased size reduces the danger of factionalism is contradicted by subsequent experience; (2) in his conception of basic rights, Madison excluded more than half the adult population: women, African Americans, and American Indians; and (3) he actively supported the provision in the Constitution that gave to slave states an increase in representatives amounting to three-fifths of the slave population.Robert A. Dahl is the Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Yale University ([email protected]). A past president of the American Political Science Association, his numerous publications include A Preface to Democratic Theory; Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City; Democracy and Its Critics; and How Democratic is the American Constitution? The author expresses his appreciation to the Political Science Departments of the University of Indiana and Stanford University for providing opportunities to offer a lecture on the subject of this essay and to profit from the discussions that followed. Thanks also to Professors Jack Rakove, Richard Mathews, and Lyman T. Sargent for their helpful criticisms and suggestions on a draft of this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 439 - 448
Copyright
© 2005 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Willi Paul. 1980. The first American constitutions: Republican ideology and the making of state constitutions in the Revolutionary era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Alesina, Alberto, and Enrico Spolaore. 2003. The size of nations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bailyn, Bernard, ed. 1993. The debate on the Constitution, Federalist and Antifederalist speeches, articles, and letters during the struggle over ratification. New York: Library of America.
Bryan, Frank. 2004. Real democracy: The New England town meeting and how it works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bryan, Frank, and John McClaughry. 1989. The Vermont papers: Recreating democracy on a human scale. Chelsea, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Robert A., and Edward Tufte. 1973. Size and democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Damasio, Antonio. 1995. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.
Diamond, Larry. 2002. Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy (April): 21–50.Google Scholar
Ellis, Joseph. 2001. Founding brothers: The revolutionary generation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Farrand, Max, comp. 1987. Records of the federal convention of 1787. Rev. ed. 4 vols. Ed. James H. Hutson. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hamilton, Alexander, John Jay, and James Madison. 2000. The Federalist. New York: Modern Library. (Orig. pub. 1787.)
Kernell, Samuel. 2003. “The true principles of republican government”: Reassessing James Madison's political science. In James Madison: The theory and practice of republican government, ed. Samuel Kernell, 92–125. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ketcham, Ralph. 1990. James Madison: A biography. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Lewin, Leif. 1988. Majoritarian and consensus democracy: The Swedish experience. Scandinavian Political Studies 21 (3): 195–206.Google Scholar
Martines, Lauro. 1979. Power and imagination: City states in Renaissance Italy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Matthews, Richard K. 1995 If men were angels: James Madison and the heartless empire of reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Meyers, Marvin, ed. 1973. The mind of the founder: Sources of the political thought of James Madison. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Miller, William Lee. 1992. The business of May next: James Madison and the founding. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Padover, Saul K., ed. 1953. The forging of American federalism: Selected writings of James Madison. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Rakove, Jack N. 1996. Original meanings: Politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Richard, Carl J. 1994. The founders and the classics: Greece, Rome, and the American Enlightenment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Riemer, Neal. 1968. James Madison. New York: Washington Square Press.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, James F. 2002. What kind of nation? Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, and the epic struggle to create a United States. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wills, Garry. 2003. “Negro president”: Jefferson and the slave power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.