Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:57:13.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are you how you eat? Aspects of self-awareness in eating disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Bruna de Moura Cortes Coutinho
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225 Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 22451-900, Brazil
Caio Gomes Pariz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225 Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 22451-900, Brazil
Thomas E. Krahe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225 Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 22451-900, Brazil
Daniel C. Mograbi*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225 Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP 22451-900, Brazil Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, Psychology & Neuroscience, KCL, PO Box 078, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
*
Corresponding author: Daniel C. Mograbi; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eating disorders (ED) are severe psychiatric disorders characterized by dysfunctional behaviors related to eating or weight control, with profound impacts on health, quality of life, and the financial burden of affected individuals and society at large. Given that these disorders involve disturbances in self-perception, it is crucial to comprehend the role of self-awareness in their prevalence and maintenance. This literature review presents different self-awareness processes, discussing their functioning across different levels of complexity. By deconstructing this concept, we can gain a better understanding of how each facet of self and personality relates to the symptoms of these disorders. Understanding the absence or impairment of self-awareness in ED holds significant implications for diagnosis, treatment, and overall management. By recognizing and comprehending the characteristics of self-awareness, clinicians can develop tailored interventions and evidence-based treatments for individuals with ED. Furthermore, this narrative review underscores the importance of considering temperament and personality factors in the context of ED, as temperament traits and personality characteristics may interact with self-awareness processes, influencing the development and maintenance of ED. Ultimately, the results highlight the pressing need for further research on the development of effective interventions and support strategies grounded in the aspects of self-awareness mechanisms for individuals affected by these disorders.

Type
Review Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Eating disorders (ED), psychiatric disorders characterized by dysfunctional behaviors related to eating or weight control (Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020), can be extremely disabling, deadly, and costly, presenting a significant impact on the present and future health, as well as the quality of life of affected individuals, their caregivers, and society (van Hoeken & Hoek, Reference van Hoeken and Hoek2020; Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020; Smink et al., Reference Smink, van Hoeken and Hoek2012). They also significantly impair physical health and disrupt psychosocial functioning (Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020). In the USA, the total healthcare costs associated with ED were estimated to be $64.7 billion in the fiscal year 2018–2019, equivalent to $11 808 per affected person (Streatfeild et al., Reference Streatfeild, Hickson, Austin, Hutcheson, Kandel, Lampert, Myers, Richmond, Samnaliev, Velasquez, Weissman and Pezzullo2021). Therefore, it is evident that the impact of ED is substantial when considering mortality, disability, costs, quality of life, and family burden (van Hoeken & Hoek, Reference van Hoeken and Hoek2020). This underscores the importance of gaining a better understanding of the psychological mechanisms and processes behind this condition.

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), there are six main ED: (i) Pica, (ii) Rumination Disorder, (iii) Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, (iv) Anorexia Nervosa, (v) Bulimia Nervosa, and (vi) Binge-Eating Disorder (Dawson-Squibb et al., Reference Dawson-Squibb, Davids, Viljoen, Rice and Stein2023). With the exception of Pica and Rumination, which are considered more conceptual feeding disorders, these EDs are characterized by dysfunctional eating behaviors, excessive preoccupation with, and distress related to, body weight or shape, and specifically in the case of anorexia (AN), a persistent failure to recognize the seriousness of low body weight (Riva, Reference Riva2014). Despite their unique characteristics, all ED significantly impact physical health and disrupt psychosocial functioning (Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020). Epidemiological data indicate a heightened risk of mortality for all EDs (i.e., deaths per 1000 person-years), with 5.1 for anorexia and 1.7 for bulimia (Arcelus et al., Reference Arcelus, Mitchell, Wales and Nielsen2011). One in five individuals with AN who died committed suicide (Smink et al., Reference Smink, van Hoeken and Hoek2012). Moreover, resistance and denial are prominent features of these disorders, resulting in patients rarely seeking treatment voluntarily, which is largely true for AN (Riva, Reference Riva2014). A distinctive characteristic of EDs is their ego-syntonic nature; patients suffering from such illnesses experience the disorder as part of their identity, thus highlighting the significance of self-awareness in EDs (Riva, Reference Riva2014; Starzomska et al., Reference Starzomska, Wilkos and Kucharska2018).

Self-awareness can be described as the ability through which individuals become the object of their own awareness (Morin, Reference Morin2011). However, this definition suggests a unified model of the self, whereas in reality, it should encompass a range of processes (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021). Consequently, self-awareness takes the form of a dynamic property consisting of diverse yet interconnected aspects. Mograbi et al. (Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021, Reference Mograbi, Hall, Arantes and Huntley2024) identify interoception, proprioception, agency, metacognition, emotion regulation, and autobiographical memory as components of self-awareness.

Considering that negative self-perception lies at the heart of ED, we believe that by delving into the various processes and aspects of self-awareness, we can gain a better understanding of how the disorder manifests and persists. Body image represents one of the primary concerns and focal points for these patients (Eshkevari et al., Reference Eshkevari, Rieger, Longo, Haggard and Treasure2012). Perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes toward weight, body shape, and diet also play crucial roles, along with mechanisms of emotional dysregulation (Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020).

The literature on ED already discusses these processes (e.g., Riva, Reference Riva2014; Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020; Martin et al., Reference Martin, Dourish, Rotshtein, Spetter and Higgs2019; Palmieri et al., Reference Palmieri, Mansueto, Ruggiero, Caselli, Sassaroli and Spada2021). However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has yet summarized the relationship between ED and each of these components. Therefore, the present work aims to discuss the role of self-awareness in ED, considering the multiple processes associated with the dysfunctional features in these patients. Our objective is to delve deeper into self-awareness and gain a better understanding of how each component is affected in ED and how self-awareness is influenced at various levels and processes. This narrative review aims to provide valuable information about the extent and specificity of alterations in self-awareness within these clinical groups. Through this exploration, we aim to contribute to the advancement of effective approaches for individuals affected by these debilitating disorders. Additionally, recognizing and understanding changes in self-awareness can contribute to the clinical management of these conditions, as well as drive the development of new evidence-based treatments and interventions.

2. Self-awareness in Eating Disorders

Alongside the ego-syntonic nature of ED, we can also emphasize the allocentrism associated with this condition, that is the notion of the body as an object in the physical world. While an egocentric perspective frames the body as a first-person reference in one’s experience, ED patients often find themselves trapped in an allocentric representation of their bodies – a third-person perspective (Riva, Reference Riva2012). In this view, individuals primarily rely on somatic representations, which encompass their understanding of the body as a continuous entity in the physical realm, whereas the egocentric frame is based on an integrated perception of their current bodily state (Riva, Reference Riva2012; Galati et al., Reference Galati, Lobel, Vallar, Berthoz, Pizzamiglio and Le Bihan2000; Longo et al., Reference Longo, Azañón and Haggard2010). Furthermore, when locked into the allocentric frame, a negative body representation remains unaltered, as it is not updated by contrasting it with the perception from the egocentric frame. Although spatial experiences, including bodily awareness, typically involve the integration of various sensory inputs within both egocentric and allocentric frames, individuals with ED appear to have this system disrupted (Riva, Reference Riva2012; Longo et al., Reference Longo, Azañón and Haggard2010). The allocentric lock hypothesis seems to support the notion that self-awareness may be a core issue in ED.

As previously explained, self-awareness can be defined by multiple heterogeneous but interrelated processes (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021, Reference Mograbi, Hall, Arantes and Huntley2024). Since self-awareness encompasses several dissociable processes, understanding the particularities of each of them is crucial for comprehending the morbid changes observed in various psychiatric conditions. It is known that brain structural and functional alterations in individuals with clinical conditions can lead to variations in self-awareness processes (Bomilcar et al., Reference Bomilcar, Bertrand, Morris and Mograbi2021; Leslie et al., Reference Leslie, Halls, Leppanen, Sedgewick, Smith, Hayward, Lang, Fonville, Simic, Mandy, Nicholls, Murphy, Williams and Tchanturia2020; Marková et al., Reference Marková, Clare, Whitaker, Roth, Nelis, Martyr, Roberts, Woods and Morris2014). This notion has already been addressed in people with dementia, for example (Bomilcar et al., Reference Bomilcar, Bertrand, Morris and Mograbi2021; Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021), as well as in individuals with Bipolar Disorder (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Mograbi, Camelo, Bifano, Wainstok, Silveira and Cheniaux2015) and other neuropsychiatric conditions (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Hall, Arantes and Huntley2024).

In the case of ED, the clinical condition is characterized, and in some cases even defined, by changes in self-awareness. Therefore, it is essential to discuss their relationship with these multiple domains. This multifactorial perspective of self-awareness helps us understand differences between individuals with and without psychiatric diagnoses (Mograbi & Morris, Reference Mograbi and Morris2014; Silva et al., Reference Silva, Mograbi, Camelo, Bifano, Wainstok, Silveira and Cheniaux2015). Thus, it is understood that clinical conditions, such as ED, can result in selective deficits in self-awareness, compromising specific skills. In the following discussion, we will explore how impairments in self-awareness processes may underlie the development of characteristic symptoms of ED.

2.1 Interoception

A foundational aspect of self-awareness is interoception, which refers to the body’s ability to regulate its internal state through reflexes and adaptive responses. This process entails the regulation and stabilization of the internal physiological state of the body through homeostatic reflexes and adaptive, anticipatory (allostatic) responses. These responses are coordinated among organic systems and drive adaptive behaviors (Craig, Reference Craig2002). From an evolutionary perspective, this foundational level is associated with the physiological conditions of the body, making it integral to the concept of self-representation (Damasio, Reference Damasio1999, Reference Damasio2010).

Being aware of stimuli and variations within the body allows us to perceive sensations such as thirst, nausea, the need to use the bathroom, hunger, and satiety. The transmission of information from the body to the brain occurs precisely to establish a dynamic and comprehensive representation of the physical self, which in turn coordinates behavioral responses to address these physiological needs (Craig, Reference Craig2002). Although a significant portion of this process functions automatically through reflexes, the emergence of awareness initially stems from bodily sensations and emotional states. (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021; Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020). Hence, it becomes evident that the concept of body awareness encompasses interoception as a representation of the body’s internal state. This initial stage of awareness refers to the process by which the nervous system senses, interprets, and integrates signals originating from within the body, providing a moment-to-moment mapping of the body’s internal landscape across conscious and unconscious levels (Khalsa et al., Reference Khalsa, Adolphs, Cameron, Critchley, Davenport, Feinstein, Feusner, Garfinkel, Lane, Mehling, Meuret, Nemeroff, Oppenheimer, Petzschner, Pollatos, Rhudy, Schramm, Simmons and Stein2018).

Three interoceptive skills have been suggested: accuracy, sensitivity, and awareness (Critchley & Garfinkel, Reference Critchley and Garfinkel2017; Joshi et al., Reference Joshi, Graziani and Del-Monte2021). Interoceptive accuracy can be defined as the objective ability to detect internal states. Interoceptive sensitivity represents dispositional tendencies to be internally self-focused. Finally, interoceptive awareness indicates the level of self-knowledge, that is, the degree to which the subject perceives themselves capable of accurately judging their interoceptive sensations. Linked to these interoceptive abilities is an understanding of time. Time perception and estimation arise from the accumulation of bodily information and have been connected not only to interoceptive processes but also to subjective orientation, autobiographical memories, and emotion regulation (Richter & Ibáñez, Reference Richter and Ibáñez2021; Meneguzzo et al., Reference Meneguzzo, Mancini, Ormitti, Bonello and Todisco2022). Moreover, the impaired ability to estimate time in patients with ED seems to be related to compulsive self-monitoring (Meneguzzo et al., Reference Meneguzzo, Mancini, Ormitti, Bonello and Todisco2022). The overestimation of time in individuals with AN and the underestimation of time in those with BN can provide insights into the high levels of distress experienced by these patients (Holman & Grisham, Reference Holman and Grisham2020).

Following from that, hunger and satiety, which, as internal states of the body, also encompass accuracy, sensitivity, and awareness. Therefore, it is speculated how accurate, sensitive, and aware an individual with an eating disorder is. It is well known that dysfunctional processing of internal bodily cues related to hunger and satiety is a significant factor in disordered eating behaviors such as binge eating, purging, and cognitive restraint (Poovey et al., Reference Poovey, Ahlich, Attaway and Rancourt2022). This interoceptive sensitivity presents itself as a crucial risk factor to address in screenings and interventions for disordered eating.

Recent research has identified a disturbance in the interoceptive system as a central mechanism underlying AN and BN. This disturbance affects various aspects of physiological condition interpretation, including hunger and satiety perception, risk prediction errors, emotional awareness, time accuracy, and body dysmorphia (Jacquemot & Park, Reference Jacquemot and Park2020; Meneguzzo et al., Reference Meneguzzo, Mancini, Ormitti, Bonello and Todisco2022).

Furthermore, studies utilizing magnetic resonance imaging to measure postprandial gastric volumes have revealed that one in three AN patients experience feelings of fullness and lack of hunger even when their stomachs are empty (Bluemel et al., Reference Bluemel, Menne, Milos, Goetze, Fried, Schwizer, Fox and Steingoetter2017). This suggests that disturbances in satiety perception in AN may arise from the interpretation and perception of visceral signals rather than differences in visceral sensitivity. Additionally, other modalities of interoception besides gastric distension may be implicated, as hunger ratings in AN patients have paradoxically decreased in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (Nakai & Koh, Reference Nakai and Koh2001). These misinterpretations of hunger and satiety signals could contribute to food avoidance and disrupted eating habits in AN (Jacquemot & Park, Reference Jacquemot and Park2020).

Indeed, intuitive eating, characterized by the regulation of food intake based on visceral cues of hunger and satiety, correlates positively with interoceptive accuracy while showing a negative association with disordered eating patterns (DeVille et al., Reference DeVille, Erchull and Mailloux2021). This ability to detect internal bodily cues, termed “interoceptive awareness,” along with the subsequent response to these cues, known as “interoceptive responsiveness,” plays pivotal roles in this process (Oswald et al., Reference Oswald, Chapman and Wilson2017). From this perspective, enhancing bodily cognition represents a crucial pathway toward reducing body misperception (Meneguzzo et al., Reference Meneguzzo, Dal Brun, Collantoni, Meregalli, Todisco, Favaro and Tenconi2023).

2.2 Proprioception and body ownership

Body awareness is guided by the representation of the physical extent of the body and the relative position of body parts in space, known as proprioception (Serino et al., Reference Serino, Alsmith, Costantini, Mandrigin, Tajadura-Jimenez and Lopez2013). Proprioception enhances the sense of owning a body and understanding its spatial location. Through this dynamic representation of proprioceptive information, one can become aware of their physical presence within a spatial context. Unlike the largely implicit nature of interoceptive information, proprioceptive information offers greater conscious access (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021, Reference Mograbi, Hall, Arantes and Huntley2024).

It is understood that body awareness results from the interaction between body image and schema, leading to a subjective sensation of one’s body (Thurm, Reference Thurm2012). The body schema allows individuals to recognize and perceive the various components of their own body, forming the perception of its dimensions regardless of body acceptance, self-esteem, or body type (Thurm, Reference Thurm2012). Perceived body image pertains specifically to an individual’s subjective perception or mental representation of their own physical appearance. In contrast, schema refers to broader cognitive frameworks that organize and interpret information across various domains, including beliefs, attitudes, perceptions, and expectations about oneself, others, and the environment (Young, Reference Young1999; Boone et al., Reference Boone, Braet, Vandereycken and Claes2013). It relies on multimodal sensory inputs, including exteroception, proprioception, vestibular, somatosensory, and visual systems (Riva, Reference Riva2014). Regarding proprioception specifically, it is important to assess the degree of body distortion, perception of specific body segments, the sensory aspects of freely projected body perception, and the perception of body boundaries – with or without visual or cognitive interference, as well as any external reference (Thurm et al., Reference Thurm, Miranda, Salzano, Cangelli Filho, Cordás and Gama2011; Riva, Reference Riva2014).

Based on clinical reports and a narrative review of the literature, it has been observed that patients with ED experience a distortion between their perceived body image and schema and their actual reality (Thurm, Reference Thurm2012; Miller, Reference Miller1991; Longo & Haggard, Reference Longo and Haggard2012; Pellegrini et al., Reference Pellegrini, Finzi, Veglia and Di Fini2021; Riva, Reference Riva2014). Consequently, individuals with ED exhibit a significantly stronger response to the rubber hand illusion, both in terms of perceptual (proprioceptive bias) and subjective (self-report) measures, compared to healthy controls (Eshkevari et al., Reference Eshkevari, Rieger, Longo, Haggard and Treasure2014). This suggests that individuals with a history of ED may have heightened sensitivity to visual information about their bodies while exhibiting reduced processing of somatosensory information (Eshkevari et al., Reference Eshkevari, Rieger, Longo, Haggard and Treasure2014).

Therefore, clinical interventions aim to reduce proprioceptive deviation, distortion, and dissatisfaction, while facilitating self-reintegration (Miller, Reference Miller1991; Longo & Haggard, Reference Longo and Haggard2012). The interventions proposed to stimulate personal space align with the primary somatosensory representation involved in structuring body perception, which occurs through exteroceptive and proprioceptive stimuli (Longo & Haggard, Reference Longo and Haggard2012; Riva, Reference Riva2014). These stimuli contribute to the formation of the body’s perceived boundaries. Since individuals with ED experience imprecision in perceiving their body dimensions, it is crucial to stimulate this representation to provide more accurate information about body dimensions to other cortical areas.

It is widely understood that our sense of self is closely related to both our physical bodies and our personal identity. Consequently, the formation and organization of our body image are integral aspects of our overall identity. From this perspective, the maintenance of an ED directly affects the subject’s identity (Pellegrini et al., Reference Pellegrini, Finzi, Veglia and Di Fini2021; Longo & Haggard, Reference Longo and Haggard2012). In line with self-objectification theory, which posits that individuals come to view themselves as objects to be evaluated based on appearance, the maintenance of an ED can exacerbate this tendency (Fredrickson & Roberts, Reference Fredrickson and Roberts1997). Given that our understanding of our bodies plays a central role in assigning meaning to our experiences, addressing factors such as body interactions, sensorimotor patterns, and proprioceptive patterns is crucial in ED treatment (Pellegrini et al., Reference Pellegrini, Finzi, Veglia and Di Fini2021; Longo & Haggard, Reference Longo and Haggard2012).

2.3 Agency

Agency, or the sense of initiating our actions, plays a crucial role in self-awareness, often distinguishing clinical and non-clinical individuals (i.e., those not seeking medical or clinical treatment or evaluation). Action and agency are closely related, with the sense of agency encompassing self-efficacy through the awareness of deliberate control over one’s behavior. It involves recognizing intentional control over one’s actions (Haggard, Reference Haggard2017). When exploring this concept, the literature proposes a distinction between the feeling of agency and the judgment of agency. While the feeling of agency captures implicit, non-conceptual sensations of being an agent of action, explicit higher-level agency judgment is influenced by prior knowledge, expectations, and beliefs (Zapparoli et al., Reference Zapparoli, Paulesu, Mariano, Ravani and Sacheli2022). The latter aligns with metacognition and holds significance in psychotherapeutic treatment.

A sense of agency enhances our understanding of important processes in psychotherapy (Kristmannsdottir et al., Reference Kristmannsdottir, Keski-Rahkonen and Kuusinen2019). In clinical psychology, agency has been defined as the ability to experience thoughts, emotions, and behaviors as belonging to the self and being under the influence and control of the self (Kögler, Reference Kögler2010; Williams & Levitt, Reference Williams and Levitt2007). The sense of agency can be measured in experimental settings by asking participants to explicitly judge whether their action caused an outcome event, or by using implicit measures, such as the compression of perceived time between action and outcome (Haggard, 2017). Thus, one can evaluate the concept of agency based on the degree to which a person believes they can impact their target experiences and behaviors (Colle et al., Reference Colle, Hilviu, Boggio, Toso, Longo, Abbate-Daga, Garbarini and Fossataro2023). For instance, a patient’s sense of agency regarding symptoms of bulimia nervosa can be assessed concurrently with treatment (Kristmannsdottir et al., Reference Kristmannsdottir, Keski-Rahkonen and Kuusinen2019).

Empirical findings can be assessed through different paradigms of implicit sense of agency in ED patients. Sensory attenuation, for example, consists of the fact that self-produced tactile stimulation is perceived as less intense than the same stimulus produced externally (Blakemore et al., Reference Blakemore, Frith and Wolpert1999). This paradigm explains the difference between people’s intensity perception of tactile stimuli delivered by themselves (self-generated condition) and the stimuli delivered by other individuals (other-generated condition). This difference in perception gives rise to the so-called sensory attenuation phenomenon, in which the intensity of self-generated stimuli is perceived as significantly attenuated compared to the same stimuli generated by someone else. This phenomenon occurs because people automatically anticipate the sensory consequences of self-generated actions, explaining why people are unable to tickle themselves (Colle et al., Reference Colle, Hilviu, Boggio, Toso, Longo, Abbate-Daga, Garbarini and Fossataro2023). Particularly, the first studies in this area show that in ED patients, there is an opposite pattern of behavior, with self-generated stimuli perceived as more intense than other-generated stimuli. This result indicates an alteration of the implicit component of the feeling of control in ED patients and alterations in the sense of agency (Colle et al., Reference Colle, Hilviu, Boggio, Toso, Longo, Abbate-Daga, Garbarini and Fossataro2023).

Another paradigm is control feedback, which refers to a motivational factor: sensitivity to our degree of control over the environment (Eitam et al., Reference Eitam, Kennedy and Tory Higgins2013). When actions have even trivial and constant perceptual effects, motivation to perform is enhanced. Eitam et al. (Reference Eitam, Kennedy and Tory Higgins2013) show that increased motivation is not explained solely by the availability of more information about task performance; rather, motivation increases only in conditions where control over the effects can be firmly established by the mind. Regarding EDs, it is known that the feeling of being out of control is present in AN and BN patients, especially in the latter (Adler et al. Reference Adler, Brown, Shott, Swindle and Frank2022; Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Bardone-Cone, Fitzsimmons-Craft, Printz, Le Grange, Mitchell, Crow, Peterson, Crosby, Klein, Wonderlich and Joiner2013). On the other hand, AN patients do not experience a self-perceived loss of control over eating (Adler et al. Reference Adler, Brown, Shott, Swindle and Frank2022; Brownstone et al., Reference Brownstone, Bardone-Cone, Fitzsimmons-Craft, Printz, Le Grange, Mitchell, Crow, Peterson, Crosby, Klein, Wonderlich and Joiner2013). This may suggest that individuals with AN are aware that they can maintain control over eating, not least because they have restricted food intake resulting in significantly low body weight (Adler et al. Reference Adler, Brown, Shott, Swindle and Frank2022). Thus, AN behaviors may help maintain a sense of control and support the motivational sensitivity of the symptoms. Individuals with EDs appear to control their eating, weight, and shape as a way to address their perceived lack of control over interpersonal and overall life stressors, and these behaviors could be attempts at establishing control and managing internal uncertainty surrounding life events.

In relation to the need for control, we can also access agency by applying degrees of uncertainty (Perrykkad et al., Reference Perrykkad, Lawson, Jamadar and Hohwy2021). It is known that uncertainty over actions negatively influences the sense of agency. Among all our sensations, we need to distinguish between those caused by ourselves and those caused by external factors (Perrykkad et al., Reference Perrykkad, Lawson, Jamadar and Hohwy2021). Such paradigms, which modulate uncertainty, might provide more informative insights into the sense of agency in AN, as AN patients experience higher anxiety and a greater need for control in uncertain situations (Sternheim et al., Reference Sternheim, Konstantellou, Startup and Schmidt2011; Frank et al., Reference Frank, Roblek, Shott, Jappe, Rollin, Hagman and Pryor2012). The ability to infer agency is particularly challenging under conditions of uncertainty, and although the literature has not yet investigated this issue specifically in EDs, it could be a promising approach to exploring agency in this group.

Although the rubber hand illusion may offer greater insights into the proprioception domain, we can also evaluate the feeling of ownership of the fake hand. When AN patients experience a stronger sense of ownership over the rubber hand than healthy individuals (Keizer et al., Reference Keizer, Smeets, Postma, van Elburg and Dijkerman2014), we can begin to understand not only the intensity of the feeling of agency but also its accuracy. In this case, AN patients seem to have a false yet robust sense of agency (Colle et al., Reference Colle, Hilviu, Boggio, Toso, Longo, Abbate-Daga, Garbarini and Fossataro2023).

The concept of agency can be particularly complex within the realm of ED. For instance, in AN, the need to maintain a sense of control is central (Kristmannsdottir et al., Reference Kristmannsdottir, Keski-Rahkonen and Kuusinen2019; Engel et al., Reference Engel, Ainley, Tsakiris, Chris Dijkerman and Keizer2022). Patients with this diagnosis often perceive their symptoms as a solution to their problems (Kristmannsdottir et al., Reference Kristmannsdottir, Keski-Rahkonen and Kuusinen2019; Bruch, Reference Bruch1973). Therefore, anorexic patients show a false yet powerful sense of agency (Colle et al., Reference Colle, Hilviu, Boggio, Toso, Longo, Abbate-Daga, Garbarini and Fossataro2023). Conversely, individuals within the bulimic spectrum may experience a loss of control during compulsive episodes. In such cases, the sense of agency can be considered weak when the patient feels helpless or overwhelmed by ED-related emotions, thoughts, and behavioral symptoms (Kristmannsdottir et al., Reference Kristmannsdottir, Keski-Rahkonen and Kuusinen2019). This dysregulation of the sense of agency occurs because ED symptoms often serve to shield individuals from feelings of inferiority and negative emotions (Kristmannsdottir et al., Reference Kristmannsdottir, Keski-Rahkonen and Kuusinen2019). Gaining a deeper understanding of a patient’s agency can facilitate the adaptation of treatment approaches and methods that are best suited to their capacity for change. Consequently, enhancing the sense of agency may be an important objective in the treatment of ED (Engel et al., Reference Engel, Ainley, Tsakiris, Chris Dijkerman and Keizer2022; Colle et al., Reference Colle, Hilviu, Boggio, Toso, Longo, Abbate-Daga, Garbarini and Fossataro2023).

2.4 Metacognition

Metacognition can be defined as the knowledge and cognitive processing involved in evaluating, monitoring, and regulating one’s own cognition (Flavell, Reference Flavell1979). It is a capacity observed, at different complexity levels, in a variety of species (Lage et al., Reference Lage, Wolmarans and Mograbi2022), being compromised in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and psychosis (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Hall, Arantes and Huntley2024). Recent systematic review and meta-analysis articles have highlighted the association between ED and dysfunctional metacognition, specifically focusing on metacognitive beliefs and maladaptive metacognitive patterns such as rumination (Palmieri et al., Reference Palmieri, Mansueto, Ruggiero, Caselli, Sassaroli and Spada2021; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Mason and Lavender2018, Sun et al., Reference Sun, Zhu and So2017). In the context of ED, it is understood that dysfunctional metacognitions play a pivotal role in maintaining maladaptive coping strategies, thus contributing to the development and persistence of symptoms (Palmieri et al., Reference Palmieri, Mansueto, Ruggiero, Caselli, Sassaroli and Spada2021; Spada et al., Reference Spada, Mohiyeddini and Wells2008).

Rumination is considered a central feature in ED (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Mason and Lavender2018; Palmieri et al., Reference Palmieri, Mansueto, Ruggiero, Caselli, Sassaroli and Spada2021). In this metacognitive process, individuals repetitively focus on seeking out meanings, causes, and consequences of their negative emotions. This pattern of repetitive thoughts is configured as an amplifying cycle: rumination accentuates the negative mood state and, consequently, generates mood-congruent cognitions that increase repetitive thinking. This, in turn, reinforces and exacerbates the negative mood state (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., Reference Nolen-Hoeksema, Wisco and Lyubomirsky2008). Importantly, patients with ED exhibit higher levels of rumination compared to healthy individuals. Furthermore, rumination is also associated with high levels of symptoms when only diagnosed patients are compared with each other (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Mason and Lavender2018). Difficulties in the capacity for cognitive flexibility have also been observed in this group of patients (Roberts et al., Reference Roberts, Tchanturia, Stahl, Southgate and Treasure2007; Tchanturia et al., Reference Tchanturia, Anderluh, Morris, Rabe-Hesketh, Collier, Sanchez and Treasure2004), emphasizing the relevance of repetitive thinking in the characterization of this condition. In the case of ED, rumination primarily manifests in relation to topics such as food, weight, shape, or physical appearance (Davenport et al., Reference Davenport, Rushford, Soon and McDermott2015). It has also been suggested that symptoms such as excessive focus on food and body weight and shape are actually forms of rumination specific to these disorders (Cowdrey & Park, Reference Cowdrey and Park2011).

The occurrence and persistence of ruminative thoughts are associated with the metacognitive beliefs presented by an individual, as observed in both clinical and non-clinical samples (Palmieri et al., Reference Palmieri, Mansueto, Scaini, Fiore, Sassaroli, Ruggiero, Borlimi and Carducci2018). The main metacognitive beliefs observed in patients with ED include negative attributions to worries, such as the belief that worries are uncontrollable, lower levels of cognitive confidence (self-efficacy in decision-making and problem-solving), and higher levels of cognitive self-awareness, characterized by a tendency to focus on the self and monitor one’s thoughts (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Mason and Lavender2018; Palmieri et al., Reference Palmieri, Mansueto, Ruggiero, Caselli, Sassaroli and Spada2021). The belief regarding the need to control thoughts is also considered particularly relevant in the context of ED (Olstad et al., Reference Olstad, Solem, Hjemdal and Hagen2015). For instance, patients often express thoughts such as “I should always be in control of my thoughts” or “Not being able to control my thoughts indicates weakness.” These beliefs can be triggered by rumination frames, where the idea that “worries are unmanageable” arises when one finds themselves caught in a cycle of negative thoughts. Additionally, these beliefs can reinforce the repetitive thought pattern; for example, by believing that thoughts must be controlled, individuals reinforce the importance of constantly observing and analyzing them.

It is important to highlight the potential cyclical effect between maladaptive metacognitive beliefs and rumination. It is evident that rumination contributes to the consolidation of a negative mood state in this patient group, while also hindering engagement in more constructive forms of cognitive processing that could help regulate dysfunctional behaviors. Thus, taking a metacognitive perspective is essential when addressing ED.

2.5 Emotional regulation

There is an evident relationship between metacognitive processes and the ability to regulate emotions (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021). The latter can be defined as the ability to modulate one’s affective experiences through cognitive, behavioral, intra-, and interpersonal strategies (Gross, Reference Gross2002). Capabilities such as self-awareness of one’s emotions and the construction and execution of strategies aimed at goals and demands, necessary for adequate emotional regulation (Gratz & Roemer, Reference Gratz and Roemer2004), involve metacognitive properties by definition. In fact, a direct association is observed between metacognitive beliefs, thought rumination, and emotional dysregulation, even in samples from the general population (Mansueto et al., Reference Mansueto, Marino, Palmieri, Offredi, Sarracino, Sassaroli, Ruggiero, Spada and Caselli2022). This relationship is hypothesized to have reciprocal causality, meaning that beliefs, metacognitive processes, and psychopathological mood symptoms mutually affect each other (Capobianco et al., Reference Capobianco, Heal, Bright and Wells2019).

Thus, it is not surprising that deficits in emotion regulation capacities are a central characteristic of ED (Ruscitti et al., Reference Ruscitti, Rufino, Goodwin and Wagner2016). A recent meta-analysis identified a strong association between maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and the symptomatology of such disorders (Leppanen et al., Reference Leppanen, Brown, McLinden, Williams and Tchanturia2022). Interestingly, reduced use of acceptance, along with the adoption of strategies such as emotion suppression and avoidance, is also associated with dietary restriction habits in non-clinical populations (Mikhail & Kring, Reference Mikhail and Kring2019). However, compared to psychiatric patients with other diagnoses, patients with ED face greater levels of difficulty with emotion regulation, including the ability to accept affective responses, achieve goals when affected by intense emotional states, and identify and understand their own emotions (Ruscitti et al., Reference Ruscitti, Rufino, Goodwin and Wagner2016).

In binge-eating disorder, emotional dysregulation, specifically difficulty controlling impulses, is associated with the severity of the episodes (Aloi et al., Reference Aloi, Rania, Carbone, Caroleo, Calabrò, Zaffino, Nicolò, Carcione, Coco, Cosentino and Segura-Garcia2021). It is understood that this relationship is mediated by the ability to self-monitor, so difficulties with recognizing one’s own emotions play a key role in the development and maintenance of this disorder (Prefit et al., Reference Prefit, Cândea and Szentagotai-Tătar2019; Westwood et al., Reference Westwood, Kerr-Gaffney, Stahl and Tchanturia2017). An episode of binge eating can also be understood as a maladaptive emotion regulation strategy. In this sense, the ingestion of a large amount of food would be an attempt to alleviate negative feelings, but it would be dysfunctional as it causes new negative emotions at the end of the episodes (Leehr et al., Reference Leehr, Krohmer, Schag, Dresler, Zipfel and Giel2015; Hilbert & Tuschen-Caffier, Reference Hilbert and Tuschen-Caffier2007). On the other hand, patients with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa report feelings of pleasure or relief from implementing strategies such as food restriction or purging (Ruscitti et al., Reference Ruscitti, Rufino, Goodwin and Wagner2016). These behaviors can also be understood as attempts at emotional regulation. For example, food restriction to the point of causing starvation can reduce both the internal affective experience and the expression of emotions, helping the individual to avoid unwanted states (Leppanen et al., Reference Leppanen, Brown, McLinden, Williams and Tchanturia2022). However, these strategies still constitute maladaptive approaches due to their resulting physical and emotional consequences. Despite possible distinctions in the specific skills and strategies within each condition, a meta-analysis found no differences in the existence and intensity of deficits in emotion regulation between the disorders. This finding reinforces the transdiagnostic nature of emotional dysregulation in eating disorders (Prefit et al., Reference Prefit, Cândea and Szentagotai-Tătar2019).

In the realm of eating disorders (EDs), ambulatory assessment methods, particularly Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), have emerged as valuable tools for investigating the dynamic nature of ED symptoms in naturalistic settings (Maugeri & Barchitta, Reference Maugeri and Barchitta2019). These methods allow researchers to examine the type, frequency, and temporal sequencing of symptoms as they occur in real-time (Smith & Juarascio, Reference Smith and Juarascio2019). Additionally, there’s a growing interest in utilizing Ecological Momentary Interventions to target ED symptoms more effectively. These methodologies involve real-time data collection methods, based on repeated evaluations of emotions, behaviors, or experiences on a portable electronic device (e.g., a smartphone) throughout the day (at random or at specific moments) in natural environments (Walenda et al., Reference Walenda, Bogusz, Kopera, Jakubczyk, Wojnar and Kucharska2021).

Negative emotions and deficits in their regulation are significant contributors to EDs, with increased negative emotions often preceding binge-eating episodes (Puttevils et al., Reference Puttevils, Vanderhasselt, Horczak and Vervaet2021). Individuals with BED and BN experience heightened negative affect, particularly anxiety, and depression, leading up to binge-eating episodes, with fluctuations in mood and emotional states throughout the day often exacerbating those episodes (Walenda et al., Reference Walenda, Bogusz, Kopera, Jakubczyk, Wojnar and Kucharska2021). EMA methodology research represents a way to focus on emotional changes related to the binge cycle, identifying its reinforcing factors, for instance.

Consistent with these observations, individuals with AN have demonstrated patterns of emotional dysregulation characterized by heightened negative affect, particularly anxiety and distress, preceding and following eating episodes or meal times (Puttevils et al., Reference Puttevils, Vanderhasselt, Horczak and Vervaet2021). Individuals with AN often engage in maladaptive emotion regulation strategies such as avoidance or cognitive control, contributing to the maintenance of disordered eating behaviors (Wayda-Zalewska et al., Reference Wayda-Zalewska, Grzegorzewski, Kot, Skimina, Santangelo and Kucharska2022).

EMA studies can provide a wealth of data, including dietary, behavioral, physical, socio-psychological, and contextual information, facilitating the examination of concurrent exposures and events (Maugeri & Barchitta, Reference Maugeri and Barchitta2019). These methods hold promise in various fields of nutritional epidemiology, from identifying determinants of dietary habits in healthy individuals to managing patients with eating or metabolic disorders. However, efforts to improve the validity, reliability, and technological innovations of EMA are encouraged for advancing public health research and interventions.

2.6 Autobiographical memory

Autobiographical memory is defined as the memory systems that encode, consolidate, and retrieve personal events and facts (Fossati, Reference Fossati2013). Because it is strongly related to self-representation, autobiographical remembering reflects an advanced state of consciousness that mediates awareness of the self as continuous across time (Levine, Reference Levine2004). It also contributes to a sense of self, allowing autonoetic consciousness, time and travel, the ability to re-experience details, and therefore the development of self-knowledge (Lenzoni, Morris & Mograbi, Reference Lenzoni, Morris and Mograbi2020; Morris & Mograbi, Reference Morris and Mograbi2013). In this context, a particularity of ED is the patient’s experience of identity (Riva, Reference Riva2014).

Unlike many other conditions, EDs are also, to some extent, experienced positively by these patients (Vanderlinden, Reference Vanderlinden2008; Serpell et al., Reference Serpell, Treasure, Teasdale and Sullivan1999). This is because some of their maladaptive eating behaviors have social functionality, such as providing a sense of belonging, adequacy, control, and alignment with their belief system (Riva, Reference Riva2014). Considering this direct relationship between the disorder and identity, it is relevant to discuss the association of the former with autobiographical memory, which plays a crucial role in the construction of identity and a sense of self (Wilson & Ross, Reference Wilson and Ross2003). In fact, different studies point to the existence of alterations in autobiographical memory processes in patients with ED. For example, patients with anorexia nervosa have been observed to have difficulties in accessing emotional memories (Ková et al., Reference Ková, Szabo and Paszthy2011), integrating positive and negative emotional experiences (Nandrino et al., Reference Nandrino, Doba, Lesne, Christophe and Pezard2006), and developing narrative discourse (Gandolphe et al., Reference Gandolphe, Nandrino, Hendrickx, Willem, Cottencin, Gérardin, Guardia, Buttitta, Zanini and Dodin2021). Additionally, these patients may exhibit a lack of specificity in autobiographical memories related to sensitive topics, such as food and the body (Terhoeven et al., Reference Terhoeven, Nikendei, Faschingbauer, Huber, Young, Bendszus, Herzog, Friederich and Simon2023; Huber et al., Reference Huber, Salatsch, Ingenerf, Schmid, Maatouk, Weisbrod, Herzog, Friederich and Nikendei2015). They also report intense emotional activation and negative valence when recalling such experiences (Zhu et al., Reference Zhu, Hu, Wang, Chen, Guo, Li and Enck2012). It is speculated that this overgeneralization of memories may serve as an avoidant regulatory mechanism (Oldershaw et al., Reference Oldershaw, Lavender, Sallis, Stahl and Schmidt2015; Treasure & Schmidt, Reference Treasure and Schmidt2013). It is also known that overgeneral autobiographic memory disturbance is related to affective disorders and may represent a risk factor for depression, even due to possible comorbidity (Fang & Dong, Reference Fang and Dong2022).

3. Personality factors

People with adaptive personalities appear to have positive views on many aspects of the self, and the other way around (Kamiya & Ito, Reference Kamiya and Ito2000). There is a complex and multifaceted relationship between personality and ED (Barajas Iglesias et al., Reference Barajas Iglesias, Jáuregui Lobera, Laporta Herrero and Santed Germán2017; Dahl et al., Reference Dahl, Eriksen, Vedul-Kjelsås, Strømmen, Kulseng, Mårvik and Holen2012). Personality traits, temperament, and personality disorders are three main domains that have been investigated in this field (Rotella et al., Reference Rotella, Fioravanti and Ricca2016). Recent literature seems to confirm that specific personality and temperamental profiles can be drawn for these patients, which can help understand different diagnoses or symptoms (Barajas Iglesias et al., Reference Barajas Iglesias, Jáuregui Lobera, Laporta Herrero and Santed Germán2017; Petisco-Rodríguez et al., Reference Petisco-Rodríguez, Sánchez-Sánchez, Fernández-García, Sánchez-Sánchez and García-Montes2020; Rotella et al., Reference Rotella, Fioravanti and Ricca2016).

The Big Five theory suggests that there are five fundamental dimensions of personality that capture the most important aspects of individual differences (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Sherry, Vidovic, Saklofske, Stoeber and Benoit2019). These dimensions are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (DeYoung et al., Reference DeYoung, Carey, Krueger and Ross2016). Neuroticism refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions such as anxiety, sadness, fear, and irritability more frequently and intensely. People with expressive traits of neuroticism are often described as emotionally unstable, prone to mood swings, and easily stressed; this personality trait is defined as the propensity to experience negative emotions (Dahl et al., Reference Dahl, Eriksen, Vedul-Kjelsås, Strømmen, Kulseng, Mårvik and Holen2012; DeYoung et al., Reference DeYoung, Carey, Krueger and Ross2016).

People with high levels of neuroticism tend to be emotionally reactive and struggle with regulating their emotions (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Mao, Niu, Wei, Wang and Qiu2020). They frequently experience intense mood swings and often suffer from elevated levels of anxiety and worry (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Li, Jiang and Yang2022). Moreover, they are more susceptible to feelings of fear and have an increased sense of threat perception (Carleton, Reference Carleton2016). As a result, individuals with neurotic tendencies are highly sensitive to stressors in their environment; they possess a lower threshold for perceiving situations as stressful and may find it challenging to cope with adversities (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Li, Jiang and Yang2022). In addition to emotional regulation difficulties, these individuals commonly hold a negative self-perception. They tend to engage in self-criticism, exhibit low self-esteem, and frequently engage in excessive worry regarding their perceived shortcomings (Schmitz et al., Reference Schmitz, Kugler and Rollnik2003).

These characteristics may lead to susceptibility to psychological disorders, as they represent an increased risk of developing anxiety disorders (De Pasquale et al., Reference De Pasquale, Morando, Platania, Sciacca, Hichy, Di Nuovo and Quattropani2022), depression (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Zhang, Li, Zhang and Zhang2019), and somatic symptoms (Denovan et al., Reference Denovan, Dagnall and Lofthouse2019; Macina et al., Reference Macina, Bendel, Walter and Wrege2021). Neuroticism has been linked to a variety of factors, including genetics, early life experiences, and environmental influences (DeYoung et al., Reference DeYoung, Carey, Krueger and Ross2016; Frank et al., Reference Frank, Shott and DeGuzman2019; Hu et al., Reference Hu, Li, Jiang and Yang2022). Understanding an individual’s level of neuroticism can provide insights into their emotional tendencies, coping mechanisms, and vulnerability to mental health issues (DeYoung et al., Reference DeYoung, Carey, Krueger and Ross2016).

In the context of ED, individuals with distorted perceptions of their own bodies may engage in self-deprecating thoughts, experience heightened levels of body dissatisfaction, and struggle with emotional instability (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Li, Jiang and Yang2022; Mansueto et al., Reference Mansueto, Marino, Palmieri, Offredi, Sarracino, Sassaroli, Ruggiero, Spada and Caselli2022; Schmitz et al., Reference Schmitz, Kugler and Rollnik2003). Positive associations between neuroticism and AN have already been demonstrated. However, despite the correlation between these two factors, causality cannot be inferred (Cassin & von Ranson, Reference Cassin and von Ranson2005; Bulik et al., Reference Bulik, Sullivan and Kendler2002; Elfhag & Morey, Reference Elfhag and Morey2008). Indeed, ego-syntonicity is more commonly associated with AN, whereas it is less prevalent in BN and BED.

Psychological distress and maladaptive coping skills may also mediate the relationship between neuroticism and ED (He et al., Reference He, Fan, Yan, Huang, Wu and Cai2019). Unlike neuroticism, which is a personality trait, psychological distress is an emotional state and is much more amenable to change through appropriate intervention (He et al., Reference He, Fan, Yan, Huang, Wu and Cai2019; McAdams, Reference McAdams1992).

Thus overall, the study of personality in eating disorders has revealed significant clinical implications, as treatment predominantly relies on psychotherapeutic interventions. Furthermore, the inclusion of personality factors in the etiology and maintenance of eating disorders underscores the importance of accentuating the examination of metacognition in these particular patients.

4. Neural correlates

Neural correlates of interoception appear to be associated with regions such as the insula, subcortical regions, and brainstem regions, all associated with homeostatic processes (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Ku, Lee, Lee and Jung2012). Supporting these findings, a review has highlighted the connection between areas of the anterior cingulate and insula and an individual’s orientation toward eating behaviors (Frank et al., Reference Frank, Shott and DeGuzman2019). While the anterior cingulate areas are involved in regulating emotions, cognitive processes, decision-making, and error detection, the insula is known for processing and integrating sensory information, emotional responses, and interoceptive processes (Aouizerate et al., Reference Aouizerate, Rotgé, Bioulac and Tignol2007; Uddin et al., Reference Uddin, Nomi, Hébert-Seropian, Ghaziri and Boucher2017). According to this review, patients diagnosed with anorexia demonstrate greater connectivity between the dorsal anterior area (which typically functions involve cognitive control, attention regulation, and response selection) and the posterior cingulate gyrus (involved in self-reflection, memory retrieval, and processing emotional stimuli) (Rolls, Reference Rolls2019; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Ran Kim, Ku, Lee, Namkoong and Jung2014). In contrast, patients diagnosed with bulimia show enhanced connectivity between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (conflict monitoring) and the medial orbitofrontal cortex (reward processing and emotional regulation) (Frank et al., Reference Frank, Shott and DeGuzman2019; Heilbronner & Hayden, Reference Heilbronner and Hayden2016; Loh & Rosenkranz, Reference Loh and Rosenkranz2023). One study compared women diagnosed with anorexia, weight-restored women with anorexia, and controls (Holsen et al., Reference Holsen, Lawson, Blum, Ko, Makris, Fazeli, Klibanski and Goldstein2012). In comparison to controls, both weight-restored women and those with active disease demonstrated pre-meal hypoactivity in the anterior insula in response to high-calorie foods. Reduced neural activity in the anterior insula may indicate diminished responsiveness to stimuli, potentially impacting emotional and interoceptive processing (Yoon et al., Reference Yoon, Kim, Ahn and Kim2015; Gray & Critchley, Reference Gray and Critchley2007). After the meal, hypoactivation in the anterior insula persisted in women with active disease (Holsen et al., Reference Holsen, Lawson, Blum, Ko, Makris, Fazeli, Klibanski and Goldstein2012). These patterns suggest dysfunctionality of the circuit in question, possibly predisposing the observed behaviors in eating disorders.

Thus, the behavioral changes observed in these conditions are correlated with functional changes in brain circuits and connectivity associated with reward, habit learning, interoception, and the construction of the self in general (Frank et al., Reference Frank, Shott and DeGuzman2019; Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020). These findings support the idea that there is indeed a relative imbalance between appetite regulation, in line with impairment in interoception (Frank et al., Reference Frank, Shott and DeGuzman2019). The perception of being fat while being severely underweight may have its foundation in abnormal neurocircuitry of interoception, in addition to cognitive-emotional processes.

In terms of emotional processes, it is understood that body dissatisfaction plays a significant role as both a precipitating and maintaining factor. Behavioral studies indicate that a cognitive-affective and perceptual component (involving perceptual disturbance of the body itself) is crucial in understanding this pathophysiology (Friederich et al., Reference Friederich, Brooks, Uher, Campbell, Giampietro, Brammer, Williams, Herzog and Treasure2010). Although the functional neuroanatomy underlying body dissatisfaction in AN remains inadequately understood, some empirical studies have begun to explore its neural correlates. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggest the activation of the right sensorimotor regions of the brain alongside decreased activation of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (Friederich et al., Reference Friederich, Brooks, Uher, Campbell, Giampietro, Brammer, Williams, Herzog and Treasure2010). The hyperactivation of the insula coupled with hypoactivation of the ACC may play a critical role in distorting interoceptive awareness related to self-comparisons of the body and/or altering implicit motivation for idealized body comparisons (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021; Friederich et al., Reference Friederich, Brooks, Uher, Campbell, Giampietro, Brammer, Williams, Herzog and Treasure2010). Conversely, impaired inhibitory control is recognized as a behavioral phenotype in patients with BN. Consistent with this notion, diminished activation is observed in the right sensorimotor area (postcentral gyrus, precentral gyrus) and the right dorsal striatum (caudate nucleus, putamen) (Skunde et al., Reference Skunde, Walther, Simon, Wu, Bendszus, Herzog and Friederich2016). The reduced activation within the frontostriatal brain circuitry in individuals with bulimia nervosa is believed to contribute to the severity of binge-eating symptoms (Thomas et al., Reference Thomas, Birch, Jones and Vanderwert2022).

Furthermore, individuals with AN commonly encounter challenges in social interactions, which could be linked to the heightened activity of brain regions including the right temporoparietal junction, the bilateral medial prefrontal cortex, the cerebellum, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Leslie et al., Reference Leslie, Halls, Leppanen, Sedgewick, Smith, Hayward, Lang, Fonville, Simic, Mandy, Nicholls, Murphy, Williams and Tchanturia2020). These regions are notably associated with aspects of self-awareness such as metacognition, emotion regulation, and autobiographical memory (Mograbi et al., Reference Mograbi, Huntley and Critchley2021). The difficulties in socio-emotional processing seen in AN might stem from reduced connectivity between the bilateral occipital facial area and various brain regions including the cingulate, precentral, superior, middle, medial, and inferior frontal gyri, especially when compared to individuals without the disorder (Halls et al., Reference Halls, Leslie, Leppanen, Sedgewick, Surguladze, Fonville, Lang, Simic, Nicholls, Williams and Tchanturia2021).

In a recent study, patients with AN, compared to healthy controls, exhibited less activation in areas such as the precuneus and angular gyrus, associated with self-referential processes, when performing tasks involving recalling autobiographical memories related to food and the body. However, no differences were observed when evoked memories were neutral (Terhoeven et al., Reference Terhoeven, Nikendei, Faschingbauer, Huber, Young, Bendszus, Herzog, Friederich and Simon2023). These findings not only indicate changes in the autobiographical process of these patients but also support the role of suppressing and avoiding emotions in maintaining the condition. This concept is also related to the development of self-knowledge and therefore implicated in personality identity construction (Wilson & Ross, Reference Wilson and Ross2003).

It is important to recognize that brain functions are part of a complex network of interconnected brain regions, and the boundaries between specific areas are not rigid. There are overlaps and interactions between different regions, highlighting the intricate nature of neural processing in the brain.

Despite the limited understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying ED, their intersection with brain areas linked to self-awareness is evident. Approaching the study of ED through the lens of self-awareness offers promising avenues for the development of novel treatment models and interventions in psychotherapy. Understanding the neural correlates of EDs is crucial for unraveling the complex interplay between brain function and the manifestation of these psychiatric conditions. Research in this area aims to identify brain regions, circuits, and neurobiological mechanisms contributing to the development, maintenance, and progression of the disorders. By examining neural correlates, researchers seek to elucidate how alterations in brain structure and function may underlie the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dysregulation observed in individuals with EDs.

5. Discussion

Based on the revised concepts, the present work aimed to discuss the relationship between ED and the multiple components of self-awareness. In general, this condition is characterized by the interaction between cognitive, socio-emotional, and interpersonal elements (Riva, Reference Riva2014). While various studies examine self-awareness in these disorders focusing on specific dimensions such as metacognition, emotion regulation, or self-image, it is evident from the present review that psychopathological models of ED should incorporate the multiple components and dynamic processes of self-awareness. Therefore, developing explanatory models and testing hypotheses related to these symptoms’ manifestations can be a promising future direction in investigating the relationship between self-awareness and ED.

Moreover, understanding this relationship can greatly impact the development of therapeutic treatments. Despite advancements in clinical research on ED, an increasing body of literature indicates that patients often do not receive evidence-based treatment (Hilbert & Tuschen-Caffier, Reference Hilbert and Tuschen-Caffier2007). In terms of psychotherapies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) has demonstrated more significant improvements in symptomatology among individuals with ED (Hay et al., Reference Hay, Chinn, Forbes, Madden, Newton, Sugenor, Touyz and Ward2014; Lammers et al., Reference Lammers, Vroling, Crosby and van Strien2020; Treasure et al., Reference Treasure, Duarte and Schmidt2020). Within the scope of intervention options for EDs, CBT was compared with various other therapeutic modalities, including Behavioral Systems Family Therapy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, Group Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Psychoanalysis, Cognitive Analytic Therapy, Focal Psychoanalytic Therapy, and other psychodynamic therapies. For more comprehensive insights, please refer to the review conducted by Hay et al. (Reference Hay, Chinn, Forbes, Madden, Newton, Sugenor, Touyz and Ward2014). However, according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2020), even CBT strategies can sometimes prove ineffective and, even when successful, carry a high risk of relapse. Despite these challenges, it remains unclear which factors mitigate the risk of relapse following successful treatment or the benefits individuals receive from additional treatment to prevent relapse (NICE, 2020; Vanderlinden, Reference Vanderlinden2008). Moreover, there is limited evidence regarding effective relapse prevention strategies for individuals in remission (NICE, 2020). In this regard, comprehending the mechanisms of self-awareness associated with these disorders assumes greater importance for the clinical treatment of these conditions. In interim treatment, especially for children and adolescents struggling with severe manifestations of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach should be adopted. This involves integrating targeted psychological therapy, such as CBT, to address the eating disorder and concurrent psychological issues. A comprehensive treatment plan should include psychoeducation for families, nutritional and medical interventions, occasionally incorporating pharmacotherapy. In some cases, it may require collaborative case management with schools and other relevant agencies (Hay et al., Reference Hay, Chinn, Forbes, Madden, Newton, Sugenor, Touyz and Ward2014).

This narrative review aimed to delve into the study of self-awareness within eating disorders, exploring its multifaceted aspects. It is crucial to note, however, that this review was not intended to be exhaustive, and we acknowledge the possibility that some relevant studies may have been omitted. Therefore, it is important to emphasize that the findings presented should be interpreted within the confines of this scope, recognizing the existence of potential gaps that may influence the conclusions drawn.

Embracing this comprehensive perspective of self-awareness is pivotal for gaining a deeper understanding of eating disorders and for the development of future effective interventions. By employing a dimensional approach to EDs, wherein management strategies are customized according to the stage of illness severity and the individual’s symptom profile, we hope to optimize treatment outcomes. This underscores the importance of conducting detailed evaluations of self-awareness and providing psychoeducation to healthcare professionals, patients, and their families. We aspire that addressing these facets of self-awareness will pave the way for the development of new therapist-led manualized approaches and interventions.

Financial support

This work was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Adler, L., Brown, T. A., Shott, M. E., Swindle, S., & Frank, G. K. (2022). I know I am not out of control, but I just cannot shake the feeling: Exploring feeling out of control in eating disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 27, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01211-7 Google Scholar
Aloi, M., Rania, M., Carbone, E. A., Caroleo, M., Calabrò, G., Zaffino, P., Nicolò, G., Carcione, A., Coco, G. L., Cosentino, C., & Segura-Garcia, C. (2021). Metacognition and emotion regulation as treatment targets in binge eating disorder: A network analysis study. Journal of Eating Disorders, 9, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00376-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (5th ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Aouizerate, B., Rotgé, J. Y., Bioulac, B., & Tignol, J. (2007). Apport actuel des neurosciences à travers une nouvelle lecture clinique du trouble obsessionnel compulsif [Present contribution of neurosciences to a new clinical reading of obsessive-compulsive disorder]. L’Encephale, 33, 203210. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91551-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 724731. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barajas Iglesias, B., Jáuregui Lobera, I., Laporta Herrero, I., & Santed Germán, M. Á. (2017). Eating disorders during the adolescence: Personality characteristics associated with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Trastornos de la conducta alimentaria durante la adolescencia: Perfiles de personalidad asociados a la anorexia y a la bulimia nerviosa. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 34, 11781184. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.1037 Google ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S. J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551559. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563607 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluemel, S., Menne, D., Milos, G., Goetze, O., Fried, M., Schwizer, W., Fox, M., & Steingoetter, A. (2017). Relationship of body weight with gastrointestinal motor and sensory function: Studies in anorexia nervosa and obesity. BMC Gastroenterology, 17, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0560-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bomilcar, I., Bertrand, E., Morris, R. G., & Mograbi, D. C. (2021). The seven selves of dementia. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 646050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.646050 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, L., Braet, C., Vandereycken, W., & Claes, L. (2013). Are maladaptive schema domains and perfectionism related to body image concerns in eating disorder patients? European Eating Disorders Review, 21, 4551. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2175 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownstone, L. M., Bardone-Cone, A. M., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Printz, K. S., Le Grange, D., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., Peterson, C. B., Crosby, R. D., Klein, M. H., Wonderlich, S. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2013). Subjective and objective binge eating in relation to eating disorder symptomatology, negative affect, and personality dimensions. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46, 6676. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22066 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruch, H. (1973). Eating disorders. Obesity, anorexia nervosa, and the person within. JAMA, 225, 997. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1973.03220360051028 Google Scholar
Bulik, C. M., Sullivan, P. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2002). Medical and psychiatric morbidity in obese women with and without binge eating. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32, 7278. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10072 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capobianco, L., Heal, C., Bright, M., & Wells, A. (2019). What comes first metacognition or negative emotion? A test of temporal precedence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 472994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02507 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carleton, R. N. (2016). Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 41, 521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassin, S. E., & von Ranson, K. M. (2005). Personality and eating disorders: A decade in review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 895916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clare, L., Nelis, S. M., Martyr, A., Whitaker, C. J., Marková, I. S., Roth, I., Woods, R. T., & Morris, R. G. (2012). Longitudinal trajectories of awareness in early-stage dementia. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 26, 140147. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31822c55c4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colle, L., Hilviu, D., Boggio, M., Toso, A., Longo, P., Abbate-Daga, G., Garbarini, F., & Fossataro, C. (2023). Abnormal sense of agency in eating disorders. Scientific Reports, 13, 14176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41345-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowdrey, F. A., & Park, R. J. (2011). Assessing rumination in eating disorders: Principal component analysis of a minimally modified ruminative response scale. Eating Behaviors, 12, 321324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.08.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Review Neuroscience, 3, 655666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, H. D., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2017). Interoception and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.020 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahl, J. K., Eriksen, L., Vedul-Kjelsås, E., Strømmen, M., Kulseng, B., Mårvik, R., & Holen, A. (2012). Depression, anxiety, and neuroticism in obese patients waiting for bariatric surgery: Differences between patients with and without eating disorders and subthreshold binge eating disorders. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 6, e139e147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2011.07.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1999). How the brain creates the mind. Scientific American, 281, 112117. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1299-112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, E., Rushford, N., Soon, S., & McDermott, C. (2015). Dysfunctional metacognition and drive for thinness in typical and atypical anorexia nervosa. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-015-0060-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson-Squibb, J. J., Davids, E. L., Viljoen, M., Rice, K., & Stein, D. J. (2023). The WHO International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (ICD-11). In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of clinical child psychology: Integrating theory and research into practice (pp. 5378). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pasquale, C., Morando, M., Platania, S., Sciacca, F., Hichy, Z., Di Nuovo, S., & Quattropani, M. C. (2022). The roles of anxiety and self-esteem in the risk of eating disorders and compulsive buying behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 16245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316245 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denovan, A., Dagnall, N., & Lofthouse, G. (2019). Neuroticism and somatic complaints: Concomitant effects of rumination and worry. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 47, 431445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465818000619 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVille, D. C., Erchull, M. J., & Mailloux, J. R. (2021). Intuitive eating mediates the relationship between interoceptive accuracy and eating disorder risk. Eating Behaviors, 41, 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101495 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C. G., Carey, B. E., Krueger, R. F., & Ross, S. R. (2016). Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Personality Disorders, 7, 113123. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000170 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eitam, B., Kennedy, P. M., & Tory Higgins, E. (2013). Motivation from control. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 475484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3370-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elfhag, K., & Morey, L. C. (2008). Personality traits and eating behavior in the obese: Poor self-control in emotional and external eating but personality assets in restrained eating. Eating Behaviors, 9, 285293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.10.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, M. M., Ainley, V., Tsakiris, M., Chris Dijkerman, H., & Keizer, A. (2022). Sense of agency during and following recovery from anorexia nervosa. Consciousness and Cognition, 103, 103369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103369 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshkevari, E., Rieger, E., Longo, M. R., Haggard, P., & Treasure, J. (2012). Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders. Psychological Medicine, 42, 819828. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002091 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshkevari, E., Rieger, E., Longo, M. R., Haggard, P., & Treasure, J. (2014). Persistent body image disturbance following recovery from eating disorders. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 400409. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22219 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, J., & Dong, Y. (2022). Autobiographical memory disturbance in depression. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27, 16181626. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1916954 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossati, P. (2013). Imaging autobiographical memory. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15, 487490. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.4/pfossati CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, G. K., Roblek, T., Shott, M. E., Jappe, L. M., Rollin, M. D., Hagman, J. O., & Pryor, T. (2012). Heightened fear of uncertainty in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45, 227232. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20929 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, G. K. W., Shott, M. E., & DeGuzman, M. C. (2019). The neurobiology of eating disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 28, 629640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2019.05.007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederich, H. C., Brooks, S., Uher, R., Campbell, I. C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M., Williams, S. C., Herzog, W., & Treasure, J. (2010). Neural correlates of body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychologia, 48, 28782885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.036 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galati, G., Lobel, E., Vallar, G., Berthoz, A., Pizzamiglio, L., & Le Bihan, D. (2000). The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: A functional magnetic resonance study. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 156164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000375 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandolphe, M. C., Nandrino, J. L., Hendrickx, M., Willem, C., Cottencin, O., Gérardin, P., Guardia, D., Buttitta, M., Zanini, V., & Dodin, V. (2021). Specificity and wealth of autobiographical memories in restrictive and mixed anorexic patients. PloS One, 16, e0256959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256959 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 4154. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. A., & Critchley, H. D. (2007). Interoceptive basis to craving. Neuron, 54, 183186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.03.024 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281291. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577201393198 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 18, 196207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.14 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halls, D., Leslie, M., Leppanen, J., Sedgewick, F., Surguladze, S., Fonville, L., Lang, K., Simic, M., Nicholls, D., Williams, S., & Tchanturia, K. (2021). The emotional face of anorexia nervosa: The neural correlates of emotional processing. Human Brain Mapping, 42, 30773087. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25417 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, P., Chinn, D., Forbes, D., Madden, S., Newton, R., Sugenor, L., Touyz, S., Ward, W., & Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (2014). Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 9771008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867414555814 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, J., Fan, X., Yan, J., Huang, F., Wu, W., & Cai, Z. (2019). The relationship between neuroticism and night eating: Exploring the mediating roles of psychological distress and maladaptive coping. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 24, 6875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1488081 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilbronner, S. R., & Hayden, B. Y. (2016). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A bottom-up view. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 39, 149170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013952 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilbert, A., & Tuschen-Caffier, B. (2007). Maintenance of binge eating through negative mood: A naturalistic comparison of binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 521530. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, E. A., & Grisham, E. L. (2020). When time falls apart: The public health implications of distorted time perception in the age of COVID-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 12, S63S65. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000756 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holsen, L. M., Lawson, E. A., Blum, J., Ko, E., Makris, N., Fazeli, P. K., Klibanski, A., & Goldstein, J. M. (2012). Food motivation circuitry hypoactivation related to hedonic and nonhedonic aspects of hunger and satiety in women with active anorexia nervosa and weight-restored women with anorexia nervosa. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 37, 322332. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.110156 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, K., Li, S., Jiang, H., & Yang, J. (2022). The stress model of neuroticism and anxiety symptoms in fishermen. International Maritime Health, 73, 203212. https://doi.org/10.5603/IMH.2022.0035 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, J., Salatsch, C., Ingenerf, K., Schmid, C., Maatouk, I., Weisbrod, M., Herzog, W., Friederich, H. C., & Nikendei, C. (2015). Characteristics of disorder-related autobiographical memory in acute anorexia nervosa patients. European Eating Disorders Review, 23, 379389. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2379 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacquemot, A. M. M. C., & Park, R. (2020). The role of interoception in the pathogenesis and treatment of anorexia nervosa: A narrative review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00281 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, V., Graziani, P., & Del-Monte, J. (2021). The role of interoceptive attention and appraisal in interoceptive regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 714641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714641 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamiya, S., & Ito, M. (2000). Shinrigaku kenkyu. [Personality correlates of autobiographical memory]. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 71, 96104. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.71.96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, A., Smeets, M. A., Postma, A., van Elburg, A., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2014). Does the experience of ownership over a rubber hand change body size perception in anorexia nervosa patients? Neuropsychologia, 62, 2637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., Critchley, H. D., Davenport, P. W., Feinstein, J. S., Feusner, J. D., Garfinkel, S. N., Lane, R. D., Mehling, W. E., Meuret, A. E., Nemeroff, C. B., Oppenheimer, S., Petzschner, F. H., Pollatos, O., Rhudy, J. L., Schramm, L. P., Simmons, W. K., Stein, M. B.,…, & Interoception Summit 2016 Participants (2018). Interoception and mental health: A roadmap. Biological Psychiatry. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3, 501513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, K. R., Ku, J., Lee, J. H., Lee, H., & Jung, Y. C. (2012). Functional and effective connectivity of anterior insula in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Neuroscience Letters, 521, 152157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.075 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kögler, H. H. (2010). Recognition and the resurgence of intentional agency. Inquiry, 53, 450469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2010.516677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ková, T., Szabo, P., & Paszthy, B. (2011). Reduced specificity of autobiographical memory in anorexia nervosa. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 11, 5766.Google Scholar
Kristmannsdottir, G., Keski-Rahkonen, A., & Kuusinen, K. L. (2019). Changes in the sense of agency: Implications for the psychotherapy of bulimia nervosa - A case study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75, 14151428. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22787 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lage, C., Wolmarans, D. W., & Mograbi, D.C. (2022). An evolutionary view of self-awareness. Behavioural Processes, 194, 104543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104543 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, M. W., Vroling, M. S., Crosby, R. D., & van Strien, T. (2020). Dialectical behavior therapy adapted for binge eating compared to cognitive behavior therapy in obese adults with binge eating disorder: A controlled study. Journal of Eating Disorders, 8, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00299-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Ran Kim, K., Ku, J., Lee, J. H., Namkoong, K., & Jung, Y. C. (2014). Resting-state synchrony between anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus relates to body shape concern in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Psychiatry Research, 221, 4348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.11.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leehr, E. J., Krohmer, K., Schag, K., Dresler, T., Zipfel, S., & Giel, K. E. (2015). Emotion regulation model in binge eating disorder and obesity - a systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 49, 125134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenzoni, S., Morris, R.G., & Mograbi, D.C. (2020). The Petrified Self 10 Years After: Current Evidence for Mnemonic anosognosia. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00465 Google Scholar
Leppanen, J., Brown, D., McLinden, H., Williams, S., & Tchanturia, K. (2022). The role of emotion regulation in eating disorders: A network meta-analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 793094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.793094 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, M., Halls, D., Leppanen, J., Sedgewick, F., Smith, K., Hayward, H., Lang, K., Fonville, L., Simic, M., Mandy, W., Nicholls, D., Murphy, D., Williams, S., & Tchanturia, K. (2020). Neural correlates of theory of mind are preserved in young women with anorexia nervosa. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 568073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568073 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, B. (2004). Autobiographical memory and the self in time: Brain lesion effects, functional neuroanatomy, and lifespan development. Brain and Cognition, 55, 5468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00280-X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loh, M. K., & Rosenkranz, J. A. (2023). The medial orbitofrontal cortex governs reward-related circuits in an age-dependent manner. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 33, 19131924. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, M. R., Azañón, E., & Haggard, P. (2010). More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 48, 655668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.022 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2012). Implicit body representations and the conscious body image. Acta Psychologica, 141, 164168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.015 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, A., Zhang, M., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). Neuroticism and depression: A moderated mediation model of secure peer attachment and blindness. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 31, 6375. https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2019.1608829 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macina, C., Bendel, R., Walter, M., & Wrege, J. S. (2021). Somatization and somatic symptom disorder and its overlap with dimensionally measured personality pathology: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 151, 110646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110646 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansueto, G., Marino, C., Palmieri, S., Offredi, A., Sarracino, D., Sassaroli, S., Ruggiero, G. M., Spada, M. M., & Caselli, G. (2022). Difficulties in emotion regulation: The role of repetitive negative thinking and metacognitive beliefs. Journal of Affective Disorders, 308, 473483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.086 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marková, I. S., Clare, L., Whitaker, C. J., Roth, I., Nelis, S. M., Martyr, A., Roberts, J. L., Woods, R. T., & Morris, R. (2014). Phenomena of awareness in dementia: Heterogeneity and its implications. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, E., Dourish, C. T., Rotshtein, P., Spetter, M. S., & Higgs, S. (2019). Interoception and disordered eating: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 166191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.020 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maugeri, A., & Barchitta, M. (2019). A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment of diet: Implications and perspectives for nutritional epidemiology. Nutrients, 11, 2696. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112696 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meneguzzo, P., Dal Brun, D., Collantoni, E., Meregalli, V., Todisco, P., Favaro, A., & Tenconi, E. (2023). Linguistic embodiment in typical and atypical anorexia nervosa: Evidence from an image-word matching task. European Eating Disorders Review, 31, 837849. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meneguzzo, P., Mancini, C., Ormitti, A., Bonello, E., & Todisco, P. (2022). Time evaluation and its accuracy in eating disorders: Differences in relation to interoceptive awareness. Eating and Weight Disorders, 27, 25512560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01394-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikhail, M. E., & Kring, A. M. (2019). Emotion regulation strategy use and eating disorder symptoms in daily life. Eating Behaviors, 34, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2019.101315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, K. D. (1991). Body-image therapy. The Nursing clinics of North America, 26, 727736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6465(22)00283-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mograbi, D. C., Huntley, J., & Critchley, H. (2021). Self-awareness in Dementia: A taxonomy of processes, overview of findings, and integrative framework. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 21, 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01155-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mograbi, D. C., & Morris, R. G. (2014). On the relation among mood, apathy, and anosognosia in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20, 27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617713001276 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mograbi, D. C., Hall, S., Arantes, B., & Huntley, J. (2024). The cognitive neuroscience of self-awareness: Current framework, clinical implications, and future research directions. WIREs Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, A. (2011). Self-awareness part 1: Definition, measures, effects, functions, and antecedents. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 807808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00387.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. G., & Mograbi, D. C. (2013). Anosognosia, autobiographical memory and self knowledge in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 49(6):1553–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakai, Y., & Koh, T. (2001). Perception of hunger to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in anorexia nervosa. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 354357. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.1030 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandrino, J. L., Doba, K., Lesne, A., Christophe, V., & Pezard, L. (2006). Autobiographical memory deficit in anorexia nervosa: Emotion regulation and effect of duration of illness. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61, 537543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.02.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE (2020). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE Guideline, No. 69.). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568394/ Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldershaw, A., Lavender, T., Sallis, H., Stahl, D., & Schmidt, U. (2015). Emotion generation and regulation in anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-report data. Clinical Psychology Review, 39, 8395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.04.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olstad, S., Solem, S., Hjemdal, O., & Hagen, R. (2015). Metacognition in eating disorders: Comparison of women with eating disorders, self-reported history of eating disorders or psychiatric problems, and healthy controls. Eating Behaviors, 16, 1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.10.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, A., Chapman, J., & Wilson, C. (2017). Do interoceptive awareness and interoceptive responsiveness mediate the relationship between body appreciation and intuitive eating in young women? Appetite, 109, 6672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmieri, S., Mansueto, G., Ruggiero, G. M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S., & Spada, M. M. (2021). Metacognitive beliefs across eating disorders and eating behaviours: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28, 12541265. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2573 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmieri, S., Mansueto, G., Scaini, S., Fiore, F., Sassaroli, S., Ruggiero, G. M., Borlimi, R., & Carducci, B. J. (2018). Role of rumination in the relationship between metacognition and shyness. World Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 108113. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v8.i4.108 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrini, R. A., Finzi, S., Veglia, F., & Di Fini, G. (2021). Narrative and bodily identity in eating disorders: Toward an integrated theoretical-clinical approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 785004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrykkad, K., Lawson, R. P., Jamadar, S., & Hohwy, J. (2021). The effect of uncertainty on prediction error in the action perception loop. Cognition, 210, 104598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104598 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petisco-Rodríguez, C., Sánchez-Sánchez, L. C., Fernández-García, R., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., & García-Montes, J. M. (2020). Disordered eating attitudes, anxiety, self-Esteem and perfectionism in young athletes and non-athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 6754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186754 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poovey, K., Ahlich, E., Attaway, S., & Rancourt, D. (2022). General versus hunger/satiety-specific interoceptive sensibility in predicting disordered eating. Appetite, 171, 105930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105930 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prefit, A. B., Cândea, D. M., & Szentagotai-Tătar, A. (2019). Emotion regulation across eating pathology: A meta-analysis. Appetite, 143, 104438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puttevils, L., Vanderhasselt, M. A., Horczak, P., & Vervaet, M. (2021). Differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between anorexia and bulimia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 109, 152262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152262 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, F., & Ibáñez, A. (2021). Time is body: Multimodal evidence of crosstalk between interoception and time estimation. Biological Psychology, 159, 108017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108017 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riva, G. (2012). Neuroscience and eating disorders: The allocentric lock hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses, 78, 254257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2011.10.039 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riva, G. (2014). Out of my real body: Cognitive neuroscience meets eating disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M. E., Tchanturia, K., Stahl, D., Southgate, L., & Treasure, J. (2007). A systematic review and meta-analysis of set-shifting ability in eating disorders. Psychological Medicine, 37, 10751084. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707009877 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolls, E. T. (2019). The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory. Brain structure & Function, 224, 30013018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotella, F., Fioravanti, G., & Ricca, V. (2016). Temperament and personality in eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29, 7783. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000212 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruscitti, C., Rufino, K., Goodwin, N., & Wagner, R. (2016). Difficulties in emotion regulation in patients with eating disorders. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-016-0037-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, N., Kugler, J., & Rollnik, J. (2003). On the relation between neuroticism, self-esteem, and depression: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44, 169176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00008-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serino, A., Alsmith, A., Costantini, M., Mandrigin, A., Tajadura-Jimenez, A., & Lopez, C. (2013). Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 12391252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.08.013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serpell, L., Treasure, J., Teasdale, J., & Sullivan, V. (1999). Anorexia nervosa: Friend or foe? The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 177186. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199903)25:2<177::aid-eat7>3.0.co;2-d 3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, R. D. A. D., Mograbi, D. C., Camelo, E. V., Bifano, J., Wainstok, M., Silveira, L. A. S., & Cheniaux, E. (2015). Insight in bipolar disorder: A comparison between mania, depression and euthymia using the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 37, 152156. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2015-0014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skunde, M., Walther, S., Simon, J. J., Wu, M., Bendszus, M., Herzog, W., & Friederich, H. C. (2016). Neural signature of behavioural inhibition in women with bulimia nervosa. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 41, E69E78. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.150335 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smink, F. R., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2012). Epidemiology of eating disorders: Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates. Current Psychiatry Reports, 14, 406414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0282-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. E., & Juarascio, A. (2019). From ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to ecological momentary intervention (EMI): Past and future directions for ambulatory assessment and interventions in eating disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1046-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. E., Mason, T. B., & Lavender, J. M. (2018). Rumination and eating disorder psychopathology: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 61, 923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Vidovic, V., Saklofske, D. H., Stoeber, J., & Benoit, A. (2019). Perfectionism and the five-factor model of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 367390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318814973 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spada, M. M., Mohiyeddini, C., & Wells, A. (2008). Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 238242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starzomska, M., Wilkos, E., & Kucharska, K. (2018). Contemporary psychotherapeutic interventions in patients with anorexia nervosa - a review. Współczesne oddziaływania psychoterapeutyczne wobec pacjentów z jadłowstrętem psychicznym – przegląd badań. Psychiatria Polska, 52, 663672. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/73733 Google ScholarPubMed
Sternheim, L., Konstantellou, A., Startup, H., & Schmidt, U. (2011). What does uncertainty mean to women with anorexia nervosa? An interpretative phenomenological analysis. European Eating Disorders Review, 19, 1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.1029 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streatfeild, J., Hickson, J., Austin, S. B., Hutcheson, R., Kandel, J. S., Lampert, J. G., Myers, E. M., Richmond, T. K., Samnaliev, M., Velasquez, K., Weissman, R. S., & Pezzullo, L. (2021). Social and economic cost of eating disorders in the United States: Evidence to inform policy action. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 54, 851868. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23486 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, X., Zhu, C., & So, S. H. W. (2017). Dysfunctional metacognition across psychopathologies: A meta-analytic review. European Psychiatry, 45, 139153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.029 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchanturia, K., Anderluh, M. B., Morris, R. G., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Collier, D. A., Sanchez, P., & Treasure, J. L. (2004). Cognitive flexibility in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 513520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704104086 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terhoeven, V., Nikendei, C., Faschingbauer, S., Huber, J., Young, K. D., Bendszus, M., Herzog, W., Friederich, H. C., & Simon, J. J. (2023). Neurophysiological correlates of disorder-related autobiographical memory in anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 53, 844854. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172100221X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, K. S., Birch, R. E., Jones, C. R. G., & Vanderwert, R. E. (2022). Neural correlates of executive functioning in anorexia nervosa and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 841633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.841633 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurm, B. E. (2012). Perfil da percepção corporal e a insatisfação corporal em mulheres com transtornos alimentares-uma proposta de intervenção corporal. Biblioteca São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, 1, 357.Google Scholar
Thurm, B. E., Miranda, M. L. D. J., Salzano, F. T., Cangelli Filho, R., Cordás, T. A., & Gama, E. F. (2011). Review of methods employed in the assessment of body size in patients with eating disorders. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 60, 331336. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852011000400015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasure, J., Duarte, T. A., & Schmidt, U. (2020). Eating disorders. Lancet (London, England), 395, 899911. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30059-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treasure, J., & Schmidt, U. (2013). The cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model of anorexia nervosa revisited: A summary of the evidence for cognitive, socio-emotional and interpersonal predisposing and perpetuating factors. Journal of Eating Disorders, 1, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-13 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uddin, L. Q., Nomi, J. S., Hébert-Seropian, B., Ghaziri, J., & Boucher, O. (2017). Structure and function of the human insula. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 300306. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000377 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2020). Review of the burden of eating disorders: Mortality, disability, costs, quality of life, and family burden. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 33, 521527. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000641 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderlinden, J. (2008). Many roads lead to Rome: Why does cognitive behavioural therapy remain unsuccessful for many eating disorder patients? European Eating Disorders Review, 16, 329333. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.889 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walenda, A., Bogusz, K., Kopera, M., Jakubczyk, A., Wojnar, M., & Kucharska, K. (2021). Regulacja emocji w zaburzeniu z napadami objadania się [Emotion regulation in binge eating disorder]. Psychiatria Polska, 55, 14331448. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/122212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayda-Zalewska, M., Grzegorzewski, P., Kot, E., Skimina, E., Santangelo, P. S., & Kucharska, K. (2022). Emotion dynamics and emotion regulation in anorexia nervosa: A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 13659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013659 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westwood, H., Kerr-Gaffney, J., Stahl, D., & Tchanturia, K. (2017). Alexithymia in eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 99, 6681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, D. C., & Levitt, H. M. (2007). Principles for facilitating agency in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 6682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500469098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2003). The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11, 137149. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938210 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J., Mao, Y., Niu, Y., Wei, D., Wang, X., & Qiu, J. (2020). Individual differences in neuroticism personality trait in emotion regulation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 265, 468474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.086 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, H., Kim, S. A., Ahn, H. M., & Kim, S. H. (2015). Altered neural activity in the anterior and posterior insula in individuals with problematic internet use. European Addiction Research, 21, 307314. https://doi.org/10.1159/000377627 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
Zapparoli, L., Paulesu, E., Mariano, M., Ravani, A., & Sacheli, L. M. (2022). The sense of agency in joint actions: A theory-driven meta-analysis. Cortex, 148, 99120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Y., Hu, X., Wang, J., Chen, J., Guo, Q., Li, C., & Enck, P. (2012). Processing of food, body and emotional stimuli in anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. European Eating Disorders Review, 20, 439450. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2197 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed