Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:54:39.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrastrucural observations on the interaction in vitro between bovine eosinophils and juvenile Fasciola hepatica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Audrey M. Glauert ,
D. A. Lammas  and
W. P. H. Duffus
Audrey M. Glauert
Affiliation:
Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 4RN
D. A. Lammas
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES
W. P. H. Duffus
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This ultrastructural study has shown that there is a layer of dense flocculent material on the surface of juvenile Fasciola hepatica incubated in vitro with specific bovine antiserum. This material corresponds to the complexes of secreted glycocalyx and bovine antibody previously characterized by fluorescence microscopy. Bovine eosinophils attach closely to those regions of the parasite's surface that are free of flocculent precipitates. This close attachment is followed by degranulation of the eosinophils into the narrow zone between the cells and the parasite. Only in these regions is damage, in the form of vacuolation of the tegument, seen within the juvenile F. hepatica. It is concluded that the inability of bovine eosinophils to kill juvenile F. hepatica in the presence of specific antiserum results from the presence of a protective layer, consisting of antigen/antibody complexes, on the parasite's surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 459 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, C. E. & Threadgold, L. T. (1973). Electron microscope studies of Fasciola hepatica. XIII. Fine structure of newly excysted juvenile. Experimental Parasitology 34, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. E. & Threadgold, L. T. (1975). Fasciola hepatica: development of tegument during migration in mouse. Experimental Parasitology 38, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, D. J., Bland, A. P., Hughes, D. L. & Hammett, N. C. (1983). Fasciola hepatica: development of the tegument of normal and xxx-irradiated flukes during infection in rats and mice. Parasitology 86, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E. (1977). The eosinophil and its role in immunity to helminth infection. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 77, 127–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E., David, J. R., Franks, D., Mahmoud, A. A. F., David, P. H., Sturrock, R. E. & Houba, V. (1977). Antibody-dependent eosinophil-mediated damage to 51Cr-labeled schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni: damage by purified eosinophils. Journal of Experimental Medicine 145, 136–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, A. E., Wassom, D. L., Gleich, G. J., Loegering, D. A. & David, J. R. (1979). Damage to schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni induced directly by eosinophil major basic protein. Journal of Immunology 122, 221–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capron, M., Rousseaux, J., Mazingue, C., Bazin, H. & Capron, A. (1978). Rat mast cell-eosinophil interaction in antibody-dependent eosinophil cytotoxicity to schistosoma mansoni schistosomula. Journal of Immunology 121, 2518–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, C. & Goose, J. (1981). Killing of newly excysted juveniles of Fasciola hepatica in sensitized rats. Parasite Immunology 3, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffus, W. P. H. & Franks, D. (1980). In vitro effect of immune serum and bovine granulocytes on juvenile Fasciola hepatica. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 41, 430–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Duffus, W. P. H. & Franks, D. (1981). The interaction in vitro between bovine immunoglobulin and juvenile Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology 82, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffus, W. P. H., Thorne, K. & Oliver, R. (1980). Killing of juvenile Fasciola hepatica by purified bovine eosinophil proteins. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 40, 336–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Gennaro, R., Schneider, C., De Nicola, G., Cian, F. & Romeo, D. (1978). Biochemical properties of bovine granulocytes. Proceedings of the society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 157, 342–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glauert, A. M., Butterworth, A. E., Sturrock, R. F. & Houba, V. (1978). The mechanism of antibody-dependent, eosinophil-mediated damage to schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni in vitro: a study by phase-contrast and electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Science 34, 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. E. B. (1980). Fasciola hepatica: glycocalyx replacement in the juvenile as a possible mechanism for protection against host immunity. Experimental Parasitology 50, 103–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, T. J., Bailer, J. & Mitrovic, M. (1972). Immunity in rats to superinfection with Fasciola hepatica. Journal of Parasitology 58, 1103–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, M. J. & Sandeman, R. M. (1979). Fasciola hepatica: some properties of a precipitate which forms when metacercariae are cultured in immune rat serum. International Journal for Parasitology 9, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, S. B., Sinclair, I. J., Everrett, G. & Parfitt, J. W. (1978). Resistance in cattle to Fasciola hepatica. I. Parasitological and serological observations. Journal of Comparative Pathology 88, 115–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, D. J., Mackenzie, C. D. & Ramalho-Pinto, F. J. (1977). Ultrastructural observations on the in vitro interaction between rat eosinophils and some parasitic helminths (Schistosoma mansoni, Trichinella spiralis and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis). Clinical and Experimental Immunology 30, 105–18.Google ScholarPubMed
McLaren, D. J., Ramalho-Pinto, F. J. & Smithers, S. R. (1978). Ultrastructural evidence for complement and antibody-dependent damage to schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni by rat eosinophils in vitro. Parasitology 77, 313–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Threadgold, L. T. (1976). Fasciola hepatica: ultrastructure and histochemistry of the glycocalyx of the tegument. Experimental Parasitology 39, 119–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, J., Duffus, W. P. H. & Glauert, A. M. (1982). An ultrastructural study of the interaction in vitro between Trypanosoma theileri and bovine leucocytes. Journal of Cell Science 56, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veith, M. C. & Butterworth, A. E. (1973). Enhancement of human eosinophil-mediated killing of Schistosoma mansoni larvae by mononuclear cell products in vitro. Journal of Experimental Medicine 157, 1828–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hegner, D. (1968). Isolierung und Enzymbestand von Granula aus polymorphkernigen Leukozyten des peripheren Rinderblutes. Hoppe-Seyler's Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie 349, 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar