Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:06:44.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oviposition in Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Koch, 1844) (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. R. Snow
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of London King's College
Don. R. Arthur
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of London King's College

Extract

For the tick Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum, at constant temperature and humidity, the pattern of oviposition is constant, and consists of a peak period, usually after 2–3 days, followed by a gradual decline.

Oviposition proceeds more rapidly in constant darkness than in continuous light.

With increased temperature the oviposition period is decreased, but with increased humidity the period is extended.

The largest eggs are laid from 0 to 48 h after the peak of egg production, and no correlation has been observed between female size and egg size.

The number of eggs produced by a tick is directly proportional to its engorged weight, and since the engorged female weight is a direct reflexion of its unfed weight, the number of eggs laid is directly dependent on the size of the unfed female.

Guinea-pigs show partial immune response to adults of H. anatolicum anatolicum when the ticks are fed on them repeatedly. This minimizes the amount of nutrients imbibed and accordingly egg-laying potential is not realized.

The material on which this study was made was presented to us by Dr R. P. Chaudhuri, and we gratefully acknowledge his kindness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achan, P. D. (1961). Observations on the oviposition of Rhipicephalus sanguineus Latr. Bull. Ent. Loyola Coll., 2, 3942.Google Scholar
Allred, D. M. & Roscoe, E. J. (1956). Life history of the tick Dermacentor parumapertus in Utah. J. Parasit. 42, 516–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, D. R. (1951). The bionomics of Ixodes hexagonus Leach in Britain. Parasitology 41, 8290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buxton, P. A. (1931). The measurement and control of atmospheric humidity in relation to entomological problems. Bull ent. Res. 22, 431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, L. F. (1955). Studies of the non-parasitic stages on the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust. J. Zool. 3, 295311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, M. N. & Hoogstraal, H. (1964). The Hyalomma ticks (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae) of Pakistan, India and Ceylon with keys to subgenera and species. Acarologia 6, 257–86.Google Scholar
Kitaoka, S. & Yajima, A. (1958). Physiological and ecological studies on some ticks. II. Phase change of ovipositing ability with blood-sucking quantity. Bull. not. Inst. Anim. Hlth, Tokyo 34, 151–62.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1952). The role of cuticle growth in the feeding process of ticks. Proc. zool. Soc. Land. 121, 759–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. & Beament, J. W. L. (1948). An egg-waxing organ in ticks. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 89, 291332.Google ScholarPubMed
Legg, J. (1930). Some observations on the life history of the cattle tick (Boophilus australis). Proc. R. Soc. Qd. 41, 121–32.Google Scholar
Ross, I. C. (1924). The bionomics of Ixodes holocyclus Neumann, with a redescription of the adult and nymphal stage and a description of the larvae. Parasitology 16, 365–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapre, S. N. (1940). The life history of Boophilus australis (Fuller). Indian J. vet. Sci. 10, 346–53.Google Scholar
Stampa, S. & du Toit, R. (1958). Paralysis of stock due to the Karoo-paralysis tick (Ixodes rubicundus Neum.). S. Afr. J. Sci. 54, 241–6.Google Scholar
Trager, W. (1939). Acquired immunity to ticks. J. Parasit. 25, 5781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar