Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:40:59.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haemosporidian parasite infections of Malagasy Philepittidae and Nectariniidae are driven by phylogeny rather than ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2023

Hannah Barbon
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Jean-Louis Berthoud
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Friederike Woog
Affiliation:
State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Sandrine Musa*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
*
Corresponding author: Sandrine Musa; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The nectarivorous common sunbird asity (Neodrepanis coruscans) is phylogenetically closely related to the frugivorous velvet asity (Philepitta castanea), yet it shares similar habitat and foraging behaviour as the Malagasy sunbirds (Cinnyris spp.). As ecological factors have been shown to influence blood parasite prevalence, it should be tested whether parasite abundance, prevalence and diversity of N. coruscans are more similar to the sunbirds than to its relative. Therefore, blood samples (n = 156) and smears (n = 60) were tested for different blood parasites (Haemosporida, trypanosomes, filarioid nematodes) using molecular and microscopic methods. High prevalence of haemosporidian parasites was observed in all bird taxa, with rates ranging from 23% in N. coruscans to 84.6% in C. notatus. The Malagasy Cinnyris spp. exhibited a high occurrence of mixed haemosporidian infections (>76%) with various specialized lineages. Within the Philepittidae family, no Haemoproteus infection was detected and just a few cases of mixed infections. Nectariniidae species predominantly had specialized haemosporidian lineages, while Philepittidae had infections mainly caused by generalist lineages. These findings emphasize the diverse range of blood parasites in Nectariniidae, while additionally highlighting the high diversity of trypanosomes and filarioid nematodes in Philepittidae. Additionally, several newly discovered haemosporidian lineages, Trypanosoma isolates and filarioid nematode isolates were identified. Notably, Philepittidae exhibited a lower prevalence of avian haemosporidian parasites compared to Nectariniidae, possibly due to potential resistance mechanisms. Despite N. coruscans sharing similar habitat and behavioural ecology with both Cinnyris spp., it closely resembles its relative, P. castanea, in all aspects of haemosporidian parasitism.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The asities (Philepittidae) are a family of old world suboscine birds of Madagascar and form a single radiation of only 4 extant species (Goodman, Reference Goodman2022). Their ancestors likely arrived from Asia to Madagascar approximately 41 million years ago (Warren et al., Reference Warren, Strasberg, Bruggemann, Prys-Jones and Thébaud2010). These 4 endemic species are divided into 2 different genera (Neodrepanis spp. and Philepitta spp.), which exhibit significant differences in their physical characteristics and behavioural ecology. Neodrepanis are nectar-feeding birds characterized by their slender bill. On the other hand, Philepitta species have shorter beaks (Fig. 1) and are among the few primary frugivorous songbirds in Madagascar. All 4 species exhibit sexual dimorphism in terms of plumage and physical features. The Schlegel's asity (Philepitta schlegeli) is primarily found, even if scarce, in the western forests of Madagascar. In contrast, the velvet asity (Philepitta castanea) inhabits eastern rainforests at altitudes below 1500 m (Hawkins et al., Reference Hawkins, Safford and Skerrett2015). It tends to be sedentary and is thought to play a role as a seed disperser, primarily foraging on small fruits in the understory shrubs at heights ranging from 2.5 to 5 m. Additionally, they construct elongated globe-shaped nests, typically positioned 2–7 m above the ground (Safford and Hawkins, Reference Safford and Hawkins2013). Neodrepanis asities were formerly categorized as sunbirds (Nectariniidae) due to the similarities in ecological traits and physical characteristics. One of these species, the yellow-bellied sunbird asity (N. hypoxantha), is found exclusively in high-altitude humid forests between 1200 and 2500 m in eastern Madagascar. Whereas the common sunbird asity (N. coruscans) occurs in mid-altitude rainforests, typically occupying elevations ranging from 500 to 1500 m. It is a small and exceptionally active bird that inhabits the canopy and subcanopy layers. It is often seen accompanying mixed-species flocks (Eguchi et al., Reference Eguchi, Yamagishi and Randrianasol1993) and, occasionally, it competes with the souimanga sunbird (Cinnyris sovimanga) for access to flowers (Safford and Hawkins, Reference Safford and Hawkins2013). The construction of the nests is similar to that of the velvet asity, featuring a small entrance hole and suspended from vegetation, although typically positioned somewhat higher, around 5–8 m above the ground (Safford and Hawkins, Reference Safford and Hawkins2013).

Figure 1. Illustrations of breeding males of examined Malagasy bird species: (a) Madagascar green sunbird (Cinnyris notatus), (b) souimanga sunbird (Cinnyris sovimanga), (c) common sunbird asity (Neodrepanis coruscans), (d) velvet asity (Philepitta castanea). Females have inconspicuous colorations in comparison. Drawings by S. Musa.

The 2 sunbird species endemic to Madagascar occupy similar habitat and behavioural ecology as the Neodrepanis species. In contrast to the asities, sunbirds belong to the oscines and represent a relatively recent radiation, dating back approximately 3.9 million years. It appears that the 2 species arrived on Madagascar through 2 separate colonization events originating from the African continent. They used Indian Ocean islands like the Comoros as stepping stones during their journey from Africa (Warren et al., Reference Warren, Bermingham, Bowie, Prys-Jones and Thébaud2003). The souimanga sunbird (C. sovimanga) is abundantly found in all wooded habitats across Madagascar (Hawkins et al., Reference Hawkins, Safford and Skerrett2015) and often joins mixed species flocks (Eguchi et al., Reference Eguchi, Yamagishi and Randrianasol1993). It utilizes various vegetation levels, ranging from the canopy of tall forests to shrubbery in clearings, and scattered areas of trees and bushes in open ground (Safford and Hawkins, Reference Safford and Hawkins2013). The Madagascar green sunbird (Cinnyris notatus) is also distributed throughout Madagascar, with its presence extending up to elevations of 2050 m; however, in forests, it prefers to forage mid-stratum and in the canopy (Hawkins et al., Reference Hawkins, Safford and Skerrett2015). It can be distinguished from the souimanga sunbird and sunbird asities by its long, strong bill, a larger size and darker plumage of the male (Fig. 1). Both sunbird species show active and restless behaviour. They primarily feed on nectar, but they also capture spiders and insects from flowers. Their strong bills enable them to feed on larger flowers, while flowers with long corollas remain inaccessible to the souimanga sunbird (Safford and Hawkins, Reference Safford and Hawkins2013). In terms of sexual dimorphism, both species exhibit distinct differences between males and females regarding their plumage and morphology. Females in both species engage in nest construction and incubation, while males are either absent or responsible for defending their territory. The nests built by both species share a design typical for sunbirds, featuring a domed structure with a side entrance. However, the height of these nests varies, with souimanga sunbirds typically placing their nests at 0.5–1.8 m above the ground, while Madagascar green sunbird species opt for higher nest locations (Safford and Hawkins, Reference Safford and Hawkins2013).

Previous studies highlighted that various ecological traits and the geographical distribution of birds exert a significant influence on the abundance, prevalence and diversity of parasites. This pertains specifically to parasites such as protists belonging to the order Haemosporida (Apicomplexa), the genus Trypanosoma (Euglenozoa) and metazoa like filarioid nematodes, all of which share a common habitat at some stage of their life cycles – the bloodstream. Among these parasites, the haemosporidian genera (Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon) develop their gametocytes within the blood cells of their avian hosts. Notably, Plasmodium is the sole genus that also undergoes a phase of asexual reproduction within erythrocytes (Valkiunas, Reference Valkiunas2005). In contrast, Trypanosomes, while not entirely intracellular parasites like the Haemosporida, reside within the bloodstream or the intestines of their host. Only the amastigote form of the parasite is intracellular (Moretti et al., Reference Moretti, Mortara and Schenkman2020). Parasitic nematodes, on the other hand, primarily infect host tissues and tissue spaces, with their larval stages occasionally appearing in peripheral blood circulation (Sehgal et al., Reference Sehgal, Jones and Smith2005). All blood parasites play pivotal roles as avian parasites, and exhibit a global distribution and transmission via a variety of blood-sucking insects. They often co-occur in mixed infections (Savage et al., Reference Savage, Robert, Goodman, Raharimanga, Raherilalao, Andrianarimisa, Dé, Ariey and Greiner2009) and in most instances, they do not pose significant harm to their avian hosts. However, it is important to acknowledge that research efforts have been disproportionately allocated among different parasite taxa, with the majority of available data focusing on Plasmodium and Haemoproteus, primarily due to their close relationship with agents responsible for human malaria (Atkinson et al., Reference Atkinson, Thomas, Hunter, Atkinson, Thomas and Hunter2008; Santiago-Alarcon and Marzal, Reference Santiago-Alarcon, Marzal, Santiago-Alarcon and Marzal2020).

The abundance, prevalence and diversity of parasites in different bird species are influenced by various factors, including the extent of host specialization. Specialization plays a crucial role in determining which parasites are capable of infecting a particular host species. Parasites that exhibit a high degree of specialization, focusing on their specific bird hosts, tend to have a narrower host range and consequently a more limited geographic distribution. A case in point is the highly specialized haemosporidian lineages found in Vangas (Vangidae), which are confined to the geographic range of their hosts, primarily Madagascar (Magaña Vázquez et al., Reference Magaña Vázquez, Woog, Dinkel, Mackenstedt and Musa2022). In contrast, generalist avian malaria parasites like Plasmodium relictum are characterized by a global distribution and a remarkable ability to invade diverse host species (Hellgren et al., Reference Hellgren, Atkinson, Bensch, Albayrak, Dimitrov, Ewen, Kim, Lima, Martin, Palinauskas, Ricklefs, Sehgal, Valkiunas, Tsuda and Marzal2015). Avian Trypanosoma parasites, on the other hand, do not exhibit strict vertebrate–host specificity (Valkiunas et al., Reference Valkiunas, Iezhova, Carlson and Sehgal2011), while filarioid nematodes are believed to be highly specialized for their avian hosts (Binkienė et al., Reference Binkienė, Chagas, Bernotienė and Valkiūnas2021). Within the realm of avian Haemosporida parasites, the degree of specialization varies not only between host genera but also among different species within the same genus. In general, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon species are often considered to be more generalists, capable of infecting a broader range of hosts, whereas Haemoproteus species tend to exhibit a high degree of specialization in most instances. This specialization pattern has been observed in various studies (e.g. Musa et al., Reference Musa, Mackenstedt, Woog and Dinkel2019; Doussang et al., Reference Doussang, Sallaberry-Pincheira, Cabanne, Lijtmaer, González-Acuña and Vianna2021).

Previous research has demonstrated that the diversity of haemosporidian parasites is closely linked to the richness of avian species (Clark et al., Reference Clark, Clegg and Lima2014) and that the specific assembly of parasite communities is largely influenced by the composition of their host species (Fecchio et al., Reference Fecchio, Bell, Pinheiro, Cueto, Gorosito, Lutz, Gaiotti, Paiva, França, Toledo-Lima, Tolentino, Pinho, Tkach, Fontana, Grande, Santillán, Caparroz, Roos, Bessa, Nogueira, Moura, Nolasco, Comiche, Kirchgatter, Guimarães, Dispoto, Marini, Weckstein, Batalha-Filho and Collins2019). However, the likelihood of birds becoming infected with blood parasites depends on their interaction with the vectors, and this connection is strongly influenced by the ecological characteristics and distribution of these vectors. For instance, in regions with high elevations, there is a notable prevalence of black flies (Simuliidae), which serve as vectors for Leucocytozoon spp. In contrast, areas at lower elevations tend to have a higher abundance of mosquitoes (Culicidae). This altitudinal variation also extends to the distribution of blood parasites. Therefore, Leucocytozoon is more prevalent at higher elevations, followed by Haemoproteus and Plasmodium (Rodríguez-Hernández et al., Reference Rodríguez-Hernández, Álvarez-Mendizábal, Chapa-Vargas, Escobar, González-García and Santiago-Alarcon2021), whereas trypanosomes and filarioid nematodes are predominantly found at lower elevation areas (Chapa-Vargas et al., Reference Chapa-Vargas, Matta, Merino, Santiago-Alarcon and Marzal2020). Ornithophilic mosquitoes exhibit greater diversity at the canopy level compared to the forest floor (Chathuranga et al., Reference Chathuranga, Weereratne, Karunaratne and De Silva2022) which may indicate a higher Plasmodium diversity in the canopy.

Moreover, recent research has identified several ecological and individual traits that play a significant role in affecting the prevalence of haemosporidian parasites. Incidence of infection is directly correlated to the age and sex of birds (Valkiunas, Reference Valkiunas2005). Furthermore, it has been observed that foraging behaviour exerts an influence on prevalence rates. In particular, the highest prevalence of Plasmodium was found among frugivores, granivores and omnivores, while insectivores exhibited the lowest prevalence (Rodríguez-Hernández et al., Reference Rodríguez-Hernández, Álvarez-Mendizábal, Chapa-Vargas, Escobar, González-García and Santiago-Alarcon2021). On the other hand, Haemoproteus prevalence was highest among granivores, insectivores and nectarivores, and Leucocytozoon was predominantly present in granivorous and insectivorous birds in Mexico (Rodríguez-Hernández et al., Reference Rodríguez-Hernández, Álvarez-Mendizábal, Chapa-Vargas, Escobar, González-García and Santiago-Alarcon2021). In open nests, it was noted that the prevalence of Haemoproteus spp. and Leucocytozoon spp. was higher compared to closed nests (Rodríguez-Hernández et al., Reference Rodríguez-Hernández, Álvarez-Mendizábal, Chapa-Vargas, Escobar, González-García and Santiago-Alarcon2021). This difference in prevalence was attributed to the better protection provided by closed nests for both nestlings and breeding adults (Valkiunas, Reference Valkiunas2005).

The primary hypothesis investigated in this study posited that the blood parasite abundance, prevalence and diversity in the common sunbird asity (Neodrepanis coruscans) is akin to that of other nectarivorous bird species in Madagascar, specifically the sunbirds (C. notatus and C. sovimanga), due to their similar habitat and behavioural ecology. In contrast, the velvet asity (P. castanea), a relative of the common sunbird asity, is expected to exhibit differing infection rates. Furthermore, it was tested whether (1) the nectarivorous species have lower prevalence for Plasmodium species but a higher diversity in contrast to the frugivorous P. castanea, (2) Nectariniidae and Philepitiidae do have their own specialized Haemoproteus and filarioid nematode species and (3) due to their breeding in closed nests, the prevalence of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon of both bird taxa will be lower than in other species at that study site using open cups.

Materials and methods

Study site and test material

Birds of the family Nectariniidae and Philepittidae were captured in the Maromizaha tropical rainforest located in the eastern part of Madagascar (18580800 S, 482704800 E), 30 km from the city of Moramanga, at 5 different sampling sites with an altitude between 943 and 1213 m. In the course of a ringing project, birds were caught in mist nets mostly during the breeding season in November and December (2003–2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2022). Individual data of birds such as age, sex or weight were measured whenever possible. Birds in juvenile plumage were aged as juveniles until having completed post-juvenile moult. This plumage differs in its colouration and structure. In addition, juveniles often displayed some rest of a gape. Birds lacking juvenile characteristics were categorized as adults, with no further opportunity for a more precise determination of their age.

Before release, a tiny drop of blood was taken by puncturing the brachial vein. The protocol was approved by the Direction de la Préservation de la Biodiversité, Antananarivo, Madagascar. Blood was immediately stored in lysis buffer (Wink, Reference Wink2006) and, if possible, 1–3 blood smears per bird were prepared before the bird was released back into the wild. A total of 82 blood samples of Nectariniidae (C. sovimanga, n = 56; C. notatus, n = 13) and 74 Philepittidae (P. castanea, n = 61; N. coruscans, n = 13) were collected. Blood smears were prepared for 29 Nectariniidae (C.is sovimanga, n = 26; C. notatus, n = 3) and 31 Philepittidae species (P. castanea, n = 26; N. coruscans, n = 5). The slides were dried on site and fixed with >99% methanol for 10 min in the field. Blood smears from 2022 were Giemsa stained on site using the Hemacolor® staining set (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol, blood smears of other years were stained in the lab with the same staining set.

Microscopic examination of blood smears

Every slide was examined using an AxioImager M2 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). At first, slides were screened at 400 magnification for 10 min to quickly detect larger parasites (Leucocytozoon spp., trypanosomes and filarioid nematodes) and then 20 min under high magnification (100 oil-immersion objective, 10 ocular) to detect smaller ones (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus spp.). Pictures were taken and edited with Zen software (Carl Zeiss AG).

DNA extraction and molecular detection methods of blood parasites

Total DNA extraction of blood samples was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration and purity were quantified using a NanoDrop N50 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Implen GmbH, Munich, Germany) and stored at –20°C until further use. Molecular parasite detection was performed using different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) setups. In each test run, a positive control as well as a negative control (nuclease-free water) were included.

Haemosporidian parasites

Detection of haemosporidian infections was done by applying 2 different PCR setups. At first, all samples were screened using a nested PCR targeting a 479 bp region of the cytochrome b gene (cytb) of the 3 parasite genera (Hellgren et al., Reference Hellgren, Waldenstrom and Bensch2004) following the protocol described by Magaña Vázquez et al. (Reference Magaña Vázquez, Woog, Dinkel, Mackenstedt and Musa2022). Samples that showed no bands in the agarose gel were redone a second time. As this nested PCR approach is not able to detect mixed infections with Plasmodium and Haemoproteus, a second PCR setup was performed for all samples that showed positive signals for either Plasmodium or Haemoproteus infection. This PCR setup was a nested multiplex PCR which detects lineages of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus parasites separately, by yielding amplicons with different sizes (Pacheco et al., Reference Pacheco, Cepeda, Bernotienė, Lotta, Matta, Valkiūnas and Escalante2018). PCR reactions of the primary PCR were carried out in a total volume of 25 μL, containing 2.5 μL GeneAmp™ 10× PCR Buffer II (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 2 μL MgCl2 (25 mm), 1 μL of each primer (AE298/AE299; 10 mm), 0.5 μL of each dNTP (10 mol), 0.125 μL AmpliTaq™ DNA polymerase (5 U μL−1; Applied Biosystems), 2 μL template DNA (10–100 ng μL−1) and 15.875 μL nuclease-free water. The reaction mixture of the nested multiplex PCRs consisted of 5 μL GeneAmp™ 10× PCR Buffer II (Applied Biosystems), 4 μL MgCl2 (25 mm), 2 μL of each primer (AE980/AE982 and AE983/AE985; 10 mm), 1 μL of each dNTP (10 mol), 0.25 μL AmpliTaq™ DNA polymerase (5 U μL−1; Applied Biosystems), 2 μL amplification product of the initial PCR and 33.75 μL nuclease-free water in a total volume of 50 μL. Cycling conditions of both PCRs were performed as described by Pacheco et al. (Reference Pacheco, Cepeda, Bernotienė, Lotta, Matta, Valkiūnas and Escalante2018). Amplification products (10 μL) of the nested multiplex PCR were mixed with GelRed™ stain (BIOTREND, Köln, Germany) and visualized on a 2% agarose gel after 30 min at 90 V. DNA fragments of 580 bp length belong to Plasmodium spp. whereas fragments of 346 bp length are considered to be Haemoproteus species.

Trypanosomes

Presence of Trypanosoma DNA was detected by nested PCR targeting a 770 bp SSU rRNA fragment (Valkiunas et al., Reference Valkiunas, Iezhova, Carlson and Sehgal2011). Reaction mixtures were equal to the nested PCR used for haemosporidian detection. The first set of primers was Tryp763 and Tryp1016 and the second pair was Tryp99 and Tryp957. Cycling conditions of both PCRs were performed as described by Valkiunas et al. (Reference Valkiunas, Iezhova, Carlson and Sehgal2011). Amplification products (5 μL) of the nested PCR were also mixed with GelRed™ stain and then visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel after 20 min at 90 V.

Filarioid nematodes

Screening for microfilariae was performed using a nested PCR assay targeting an approximately 690 bp fragment of the 28S rRNA. Reaction mixtures were equal to the nested PCR used for haemosporidian and Trypanosoma detection. The first set of primers was 28SNemF1 and 28SNemR1 and the second set was 28SNemF2 and 28SNemR2. Cycling conditions of both PCRs were performed as described by Magaña Vázquez et al. (Reference Magaña Vázquez, Woog, Dinkel, Mackenstedt and Musa2022). A second nested PCR, targeting a 650 bp fragment of the cox1 gene, was used for samples where DNA amplification of the microfilarial 28S rRNA fragment was successful. Reaction mixtures were equal to the nested PCR targeting the microfilarial 28S rRNA, beside the use of the specific primer set COINemF1/COINemR1 and COINemF2/COINemR2, and cycling conditions were also performed after Magaña Vázquez et al. (Reference Magaña Vázquez, Woog, Dinkel, Mackenstedt and Musa2022).

Sequence identification

All amplification products, except those of the nested multiplex PCR, were purified using the PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). After sequencing (Microsynth AG, Balgach, Switzerland), the resulting sequence data were checked and edited using Geneious v. 2021.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com). If the chromatogram showed clear double peaks, the sample was considered to contain a mixed infection. The final sequences were then distinguished by identifying their closest matches in GenBank (Benson et al., Reference Benson, Cavanaugh, Clark, Karsch-Mizrachi, Lipman, Ostell and Sayers2013) using the NCBI nucleotide BLAST search. Avian haemosporidian parasites were additionally identified using the BLAST search of the MalAvi database (Bensch et al., Reference Bensch, Hellgren and PÉrez-Tris2009). If haemosporidian sequences differed in at least 1 base pair, it was considered a new lineage and naming was performed according to the system used for the MalAvi database: the first 3 letters of the bird genus, the first 3 letters of the species name, followed by a number (e.g. CINNOT03 from C. notatus). In the text, those lineage names were always accompanied by an abbreviation of its parasite genus (p: Plasmodium, h: Haemoproteus, l: Leucocytozoon). Newly amplified sequences of trypanosomes and filarioid nematodes were named according to their closest match in GenBank and given an isolate-abbreviation for easier identification. All newly detected parasite lineages/sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers OQ995051–OQ995057, OR148589–OR148300, OR149496–149504, OR159320–OR159331; Supplementary Tables 1–3).

Morphological and molecular-based sexing

Sexing based on morphology was only deemed trustworthy for adult males in breeding plumage and for females presenting a clear brood patch (N = 62). The sex of all other samples was determined using a molecular methodology (N = 74) of Díaz Casana et al. (Reference Díaz Casana, Vivas Ruíz, Sandoval Peña and Chimoy Effio2019). As a basis of comparison for the PCR approach, 2 samples for which sexing based on morphology was certain were randomly chosen for both sexes in each species (N = 8). PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 25 μL, containing 2.5 μL GeneAmp™ 10× PCR Buffer II (Applied Biosystems), 2 μL MgCl2 (25 mm), 1 μL of each primer (HPF/HPR; 10 mm), 0.5 μL of each dNTP (10 mol), 0.125 μL AmpliTaq™ DNA polymerase (5 U L−1; Applied Biosystems), 2 μL template DNA (1–5 ng μL−1) and 15.875 μL nuclease-free water. Cycling conditions were performed after Díaz Casana et al. (Reference Díaz Casana, Vivas Ruíz, Sandoval Peña and Chimoy Effio2019). Amplification products (10 μL) were mixed with GelRed™ stain and visualized on a 2% agarose gel after 30 min at 90 V. The PCR products in female individuals should show 2 bands, the W band (350–450 bp) and the Z band (500–600 bp), while males show a single band (500–600 bp).

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses of haemosporidian lineages, trypanosomes and filarioid nematodes detected in this study were performed using MEGA v.10.2 (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Stecher, Li, Knyaz and Tamura2018). The dataset used for the first phylogenetic approach consisted of cytochrome b sequences of haemosporidian lineages obtained in this study and reference sequences of different morphospecies of Haemosporida downloaded from GenBank, each trimmed to 453 bp to ensure consistency in sequence length. A cytochrome b sequence from Leucocytozoon grallariae (MK103895) was used as an outgroup. The second tree included all 18S rRNA sequences of Trypanosoma detected in the sample set and homologous Trypanosoma sequences from GenBank, each trimmed to 669 bp. The human pathogen Trypanosoma brucei (AF306777) was used as an outgroup. The third and fourth dataset consisted of all sequences of microfilariae detected in this study. Partial sequences of cox1 (571) and 28S rRNA (681) were used to perform separate phylogenetic analyses. Ascaridia galli (KY990014 and KT613888) was used as an outgroup in both approaches. Phylogenies were generated by implementing the best-fitting model, which was identified by MEGA v.10.2 for every parasite taxon. All maximum likelihood methods were performed using 1000 replicates. The resulting phylograms were viewed and edited with MEGA v.10.2.

Statistical analyses

Significance of detected differences in prevalence of blood parasite infection between the different bird taxa was measured using the χ 2-test implemented in R-4.2.1. The influence of age and sex of the birds was also tested with the χ 2-test.

Degree of specialization

The study utilized the host-diversity index developed by Musa et al. (Reference Musa, Mackenstedt, Woog and Dinkel2019) to assess the level of specialization exhibited by each haemosporidian parasite lineage. The aim was to determine whether specialization occurred at the species, genus or family level, or if the lineages demonstrated a more generalized pattern. This index assigns a value of 1 to indicate maximum host diversity and 0 to signify minimal host diversity. In the context of parasitism, generalist parasite species are capable of infecting a wide range of host taxa, while specialists have a more limited set of potential host taxa. Consequently, parasite species with a high Hd value (>0.6) were categorized as generalists, while those with a value closer to 0 (<0.3) were considered specialists. To arrive at these conclusions, data from the present study and previous research (sourced from MalAvi in June 2023) were compiled. Furthermore, the Hd index was cross-referenced with information from the phylogenetic analysis to provide comprehensive insights into the degree of specialization.

Results

Haemosporidian abundance, prevalence and diversity

High prevalence of haemosporidian parasites was observed in all bird taxa, with rates ranging from 23% in N. coruscans to 84.6% in C. notatus (Table 1). Nectariniidae and N. coruscans differed significantly in prevalence (χ 2 = 19.89, d.f. = 1, P < 0.001), while both Philepittidae species were more similar in haemosporidian prevalence (χ 2 = 2.96, d.f. = 1, P = 0.086). Highest prevalence for all 3 haemosporidian genera was found in C. notatus (Plasmodium: 61.54%, Haemoproteus: 69.23% and Leucocytozoon: 84.62%). Lineages of all 3 haemosporidian genera were detected in Nectariniidae while Haemoproteus lineages were absent in both Philepittidae species and, in addition, no Plasmodium lineages were found in N. coruscans.

Table 1. Dataset of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species examined in this study

Absolute numbers of blood smears (Nbs) and blood samples (N) are given. Results of parasite detections are listed for haemosporidian parasites, trypanosomes and filarioid nematodes, respectively. For each parasite taxon, percentages (%) of infected samples identified with microscopic methods (Pmic) and molecular methods (Pmol), along with the name of the identified lineage/sequence, are given. ‘–’ indicates that percentages were not measurable due to a lack of samples or that no sequence was amplified. If the parasite lineage/sequence was detected more than once, sample sizes are given in brackets. Newly detected lineages/sequences are given in bold letters.

Mixed haemosporidian infections were highly abundant in C. notatus (90.9%) and C. sovimanga (76.8%) whereas in P. castanea few mixed haemosporidian infections were detected (20.7%) and none in N. coruscans (Table 2 and Fig. 2).

Table 2. Kind of haemosporidian infection (n) detected in avian blood samples of Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae (Philepitta castanea and Neodrepanis coruscans) from Madagascar by PCR method

P, Plasmodium spp.; H, Haemoproteus spp.; L, Leucocytozoon spp.

Figure 2. Percentage of shared (a) haemosporidian genera within infected Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae species (Neodrepanis coruscans and Philepitta castanea) and percentage of the kind of infections (b) present.

Haemosporidian lineage diversity was similar in both Nectariniidae (χ 2 = 1.86, d.f. = 1, P = 0.17) species and both Philepittidae species (χ 2 = 0.27, d.f. = 1, P = 0.605) respectively, but differed significantly (χ 2 = 5.97, d.f. = 1, P = 0.015) among those families (Fig. 2). Three lineages were shared between Nectariniidae and Philepittidae: pGRW09 (DQ060773), lFOMAD01 (JN032605) and lHYPMA02 (MF442609).

Microscopical detection of haemosporidian parasites was similar in sensitivity for Nectariniidae species (χ 2 = 1.184, d.f. = 1, P = 0.28) but less sensitive for Philepittidae species (χ 2 = 6.62, d.f. = 1, P = 0.01). However, in the case of mixed infections within Nectariniidae species, not all genera were equally detected. Prevalence of Haemoproteus spp. was similar for both detection methods (χ 2 = 0.295, d.f. = 1, P = 0.59) while Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon species were detected significantly less often using the microscopical approach (P: χ 2 = 20.62, d.f. = 1, P < 0.001; L: χ 2 = 25.02, d.f. = 1, P < 0.001). Gametocytes of the lineages pGRW09, hCINSOV01, hCINNOT01, hNENOT04, lHYPMA02, lFOMAD01, lCINSOV03 and lPHICAS01 were detected in the blood smears (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Gametocytes of haemosporidian parasites of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae from Madagascar. (a) Plasmodium pGRW09 from Philepitta castanea; (b) hNENOT04 from Cinnyris notatus; (c) hCINSOV01 from C. sovimanga; (d) hCINNOT01 from C. notatus; (e) lCINSOV03 from C. sovimanga; (f) lFOMAD01 from C. sovimanga; (g) lHYPMA02 from P. castanea; (h) lPHICAS01 from P. castanea. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Phylogenetic analyses revealed monophyly of all 3 haemosporidian genera (Fig. 4). Plasmodium lineages pCOSUN2 and pCINCOQ01 have been detected exclusively in Cinnyris species to date, as the closely related pFOUSEY01, which has additionally been detected once in Foudia sechellarum (Beadell et al., Reference Beadell, Ishtiaq, Covas, Melo, Warren, Atkinson, Bensch, Graves, Jhala, Peirce, Rahmani, Fonseca and Fleischer2006). The newly found lineage pCINNOT03 differs in 8 of 479 base pairs to its most homologous lineage pMEAPI 12, which was isolated from migratory bee-eaters Merops apiaster (Coraciiformes) in Portugal (Emmenegger et al., Reference Emmenegger, Alves, Rocha, Costa, Schmid, Schulze and Hahn2020). Haemoproteus lineages hCINNOT01, hCINSOV07, hCINSOV01 and hNENOT04 all group together and were exclusively isolated from C. sovimanga and C. notatus so far. The Leucocytozoon lineages isolated during this study form 2 completely different clades. One of them consists of the generalist lineage lHYPMA02, lPHICAS01 and lCINSOV08. The other clade is again divided into 2 groups of closely related lineages. The clade consisting of lCOSUN1, lCINSOV03 and lCINNOT02 are all exclusively found in Cinnyris species. The other clade contains 3 newly described lineages from C. sovimanga (lCINSOV04-06) and lCINSOV02, along with the generalist lineages lFOMAD01 and lANLAT10.

Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship of mitochondrial cytb lineages of haemosporidian parasites (Acc. No.) detected in blood samples of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species on Madagascar, along with sequences of different morphospecies (Acc. No.), constructed using maximum likelihood (TN93 + G). Dots on nodes indicate bootstrap values >70%. Bold text indicates new sequences. Bird hosts are indicated with colour-coded squares: dark green = Cinnyris spec. (n); green = C. sovimanga; light green = C. notatus; orange = Philepitta castanea; blue = other bird species (n) and multicoloured = >5 other bird genera. ‘X’ marks a potentially aberrant host.

The degree of specialization within each haemosporidian parasite lineage was determined by utilizing the host-diversity index (Hd), as indicated in Supplementary Tables 6 and 7. Notably, an Hd value of 1 was assigned to pGRW04 and pGRW09, as they are acknowledged as generalists. Table 3 included the specialization categorizations that resulted from a combination of Hd values and phylogenetic data.

Table 3. Predicted specialization of haemosporidian lineages (genus and lineage name) detected in Malagasy Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae species (Neodrepanis coruscans and Philepitta castanea)

Data of other findings are given (other hosts and sites) along with the predicted specialization of each lineage based on the host-diversity index and phylogenetic data.

Infections in Nectariniidae species consist mostly of specialized haemosporidian lineages, whereas infections in Philepittidae are mainly caused by generalist lineages (Fig. 5). pNEWAM07 and hXANZOS01 are considered to be abortive infections as they seem to be specialized on other bird taxa.

Figure 5. Percentage of generalist and specialist haemosporidian lineages detected in infected Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae species (Neodrepanis coruscans and Philepitta castanea). Generalist lineages found in both families are shown separately as ‘shared generalists’.

Trypanosoma abundance, prevalence and diversity

No trypanosomes were detected in blood smears during microscopic examination. Prevalence of Trypanosoma species detected in blood samples by molecular approach was between 7.7 and 17% in Nectariniidae and Philepittidae (Table 1). Trypanosoma sp. CORVOID01 was the only sequence shared between the families, once detected in C. sovimanga and 3 times in P. castanea. With 8 isolated Trypanosoma sequences, C. sovimanga exhibited the greatest diversity.

In the phylogenetic tree, Trypanosoma sequences detected in this study form 2 separate branches (Fig. 6). One of them contains Trypanosoma avium sequences, including the newly detected T. avium isolate SOSU, and 2 T. avium species sequences, one of them the isolate SOSU2. Other sequences isolated from Nectariniidae and Philepittidae in this study form the second clade, together with sequences of T. anguiformis and T. bennetti.

Figure 6. Phylogenetic relationship of Trypanosoma SSU rRNA sequences (Acc. No.) detected in blood samples of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species on Madagascar, along with highly homologous sequences of Trypanosoma species deposited in GenBank (Acc. No.), constructed using maximum likelihood (K2 + G). Dots on nodes indicate bootstrap values >70%. Bold text indicates new sequences.

Filarioid nematode abundance, prevalence and diversity

Highest prevalence for filarioid nematode infection was detected in C. notatus (31%) using molecular detection methods (Table 1). Other examined bird taxa showed prevalence of 6–13.1%. No sequence was shared between the different bird taxa. Splendidofilaria bartletti VELAS1 was detected once in a blood smear of P. castanea during microscopic examination (Fig. 7).

Figure 7. Larval stage (microfilaria) of Splendidofilaria bartletti isolate VELAS1 (OR148294) isolated from Philepitta castanea (Philepittidae) of Madagascar. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Phylogenetic examination was performed separately for 28S rRNA (Fig. 8a) and cox1 (Fig. 8b) sequences of filarioid nematodes because the comparable datasets of molecular markers are very different. In the phylogenetic tree of 28S rRNA sequences, Aproctella alessandroi clusters with Madathamugadia, and Chandlerella species sequences form a distinct clade. The Eufilaria species isolates form another clade, while Onchocercidae and Splendidofilaria species group together, forming a sister clade. This clear separation of groups cannot be seen in the phylogenetic tree using cox1 sequences of the filarioid nematodes.

Figure 8. Phylogenetic relationship of filarioid nematode 28S rRNA (a) and cox1 (b) sequences detected in blood samples of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species on Madagascar, along with highly homologous sequences of avian filarioid nematodes deposited in GenBank (Acc. No.), constructed using maximum likelihood (a: T92; b: TN93). Bootstrap values are given. Bold text indicates new sequences.

Mixed infections

Mixed infections of all blood parasite taxa were most abundant in C. notatus (30.7%), fewer in C. sovimanga (18.8%) and P. castanea (14.8%) and lowest in N. coruscans (7.7%). Single infections with haemosporidian parasites were the most common kind of infection in all avian taxa (Table 4).

Table 4. Kind of blood parasite infection (n) detected in avian blood samples of Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae (Philepitta castanea and Neodrepanis coruscans) from Madagascar by PCR method

H, Haemosporida.; T, Trypanosoma; FN, filarioid nematode.

Molecular sexing

The PCR approach used for sexing gave slightly different results than expected from the original protocol by Díaz Casana et al. (Reference Díaz Casana, Vivas Ruíz, Sandoval Peña and Chimoy Effio2019). For P. castanea only, female bird samples showed a single band at approximately 400 bp in the agarose gel instead of 2 bands (Fig. 9). This has been approved by 7 samples of birds, which have been additionally identified as females by morphological features in the field.

Figure 9. Comparison of PCR fragments in gel electrophoresis, obtained using primer set HPF/HPR (Díaz Casana et al., Reference Díaz Casana, Vivas Ruíz, Sandoval Peña and Chimoy Effio2019). One morphologically determined male and one female of each species (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus (Nectariniidae), Philepitta castanea and Neodrepanis coruscans (Philepittidae)) were included, along with a negative control. LR: FastRuler Low Range DNA Ladder (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, USA).

Influence of sex and age of birds on blood parasite prevalence

Statistical analyses revealed different effects of age and sex on the prevalence of haemosporidian parasites (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5). Female C. sovimanga tended to be infected less with Haemoproteus spp. than males (χ 2 = 5.56, d.f. = 1, P = 0.018) and female Nectariniidae in general were infected less with haemosporidian parasites than males (χ 2 = 4.03, d.f. = 1, P = 0.045). In contrast, female Philepittidae were significantly more often infected with Leucocytozoon spp. than males. For Trypanosoma species, an influence of sex was just detected in N. coruscans and Philepittidae (dataset of both species combined), where females were more often infected than males (N. coruscans: χ 2 = 5.96, d.f. = 1, P = 0.015; Philepittidae: χ 2 = 5.28, d.f. = 1, P = 0.022).

Haemosporidian parasites varied with the age of the different bird host families. In Nectariniidae species, juvenile birds of C. sovimanga were significantly less infected with each haemosporidian genus than adults and showed also lower numbers of multiple infections. Cinnyris notatus showed no significant differences, but combined with the results of C. sovimanga as Nectariniidae, differences were even more significant than with C. sovimanga alone. However, no significant difference was detected in Philepittidae species. For infections with Trypanosoma species or filarioid nematodes the age of the birds did not have a significant effect for either bird taxa.

Discussion

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the blood parasite composition in the Malagasy common sunbird asity (N. coruscans) is influenced by ecological traits or by its phylogenetic background. Our initial hypothesis suggested that Nectariniidae species (C. sovimanga and C. notatus) would share similar parasite compositions and prevalence rates with N. coruscans, despite belonging to different avian families, due to their similarities in habitat and behavioural ecology. However, our findings did not align with this expectation. We observed significant variations in parasite prevalence and diversity between N. coruscans and the Cinnyris species. Instead, the parasite composition in N. coruscans appeared to be more akin to that of its close relative, P. castanea, particularly concerning haemosporidian parasites.

In both Nectariniidae species, a substantial number of haemosporidian lineages were detected, and there was also a high diversity of these lineages. The majority of the samples showed evidence of mixed infections, with triple infections involving all 3 genera being the most prevalent type. Specialized haemosporidian lineages appear to exist in both Malagasy sunbird species. Neodrepanis coruscans showed the lowest prevalence of haemosporidian infections and was only found to be infected with generalist Leucocytozoon lineages. Philepitta castanea also harboured these lineages but additionally exhibited infection with a potentially specialized Leucocytozoon lineage (lPHICAS01) and a few other generalist Plasmodium lineages. Notably, the occurrence of mixed infections was significantly lower in both Philepittidae species compared to the Nectariniidae species. The absence of triple infections involving different haemosporidian genera was attributed to the complete absence of Haemoproteus lineages in Philepittidae species. Given the absence of reports of generalist Haemoproteus species in Madagascar so far, the lack of Haemoproteus spp. in Philepittidae species may suggest a resistance against specialized Haemoproteus species within the study area. The absence of specialized haemosporidian lineages in the Philepittidae species is quite surprising. Among these lineages, lPHICAS01 appears to be the only one that might be specialized or even prefers to infect P. castanea, as it has been just sporadically detected in 2 other bird species (Musa et al., Reference Musa, Mackenstedt, Woog and Dinkel2022). Phylogenetic analysis revealed a very close relationship (with only 4 out of 479 base pairs differing) between lPHICAS01 and the generalist lineage lHYPMA02, which was also detected in both Philepittidae species. It is possible that lPHICAS01 is in the process of developing into a specialized lineage.

The Philepittidae family of birds has ancient origins, with its roots tracing back to Asia, where it embarked on a radiation process in Madagascar over 40 million years ago (Warren et al., Reference Warren, Strasberg, Bruggemann, Prys-Jones and Thébaud2010). It is plausible that the ancestors of the Philepittidae were initially infected solely by generalist haemosporidian lineages that maintained their host range throughout this extended period. Interestingly, there is no evidence of speciation on the same host (with the exception of lPHICAS01) or host switching events that led to the development of specialized haemosporidian species within this family. In contrast, the Nectariniidae family arrived in Madagascar roughly 3 million years ago from Africa (Warren et al., Reference Warren, Bermingham, Bowie, Prys-Jones and Thébaud2003). It is possible that they already harboured specialized lineages, such as pCOSUN2, prior to their colonization of Madagascar. Subsequent to their arrival on the island, haemosporidian parasites within the Cinnyris species underwent further diversification, resulting in a broad array of specialized lineages. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the proposed specialized lineages (lCINSOV02, lCINSOV04–lCINSOV06) may have evolved from the generalist lineage lFOMAD01. However, it remains unclear why this radiation occurred in Nectariniidae but not in Philepittidae species, which are also suitable hosts for lFOMAD01. One possible explanation is that Philepittidae species exhibit a higher tolerance to these parasites, thereby reducing the selection pressure that would drive parasite evolution towards specialization. In lineages presumed to be already specialized, as observed in Nectariniidae, there exists a certain degree of selection pressure due to coevolutionary dynamics, which favours further diversification. It would be valuable for future studies to focus on ancient bird taxa and investigate whether this observed phenomenon holds true more broadly across different avian families.

Data from 2 bird taxa at the same study site, which, unlike the species examined in this study, construct open nests, were utilized to explore the impact of nest construction on haemosporidian prevalence. In the Madagascar paradise flycatcher (Terpsiphone mutata), the prevalence of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon infection was found to be 0% (Musa et al., Reference Musa, Mackenstedt, Woog and Dinkel2019), while of Vangidae showed prevalence rates in the range of 45–52% (Magaña Vázquez et al., Reference Magaña Vázquez, Woog, Dinkel, Mackenstedt and Musa2022). Similarly, notable differences in prevalence were observed within the studied bird families that utilize closed nests (Nectariniidae exhibited a prevalence of 63–70%, whereas Philepittidae showed 0% prevalence for Haemoproteus and 31% for Leucocytozoon). Consequently, it can be concluded that the nesting behaviour of the studied bird species did not have a discernible effect on the prevalence of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon when compared to bird species employing open cups for nesting at the same study site.

The age of the birds had a notable impact on avian haemosporidian prevalence within the Nectariniidae family, but this influence was not observed in the Philepittidae. In adult birds, both prevalence and the occurrence of mixed infections were higher compared to juveniles, and this can be attributed to the multiplication of infections over time. Haemosporidian parasites are known to persist in bird hosts for extended periods, potentially spanning years or even a lifetime (Valkiunas, Reference Valkiunas2005). Consequently, the likelihood of being infected with haemosporidian parasites increases with the age of the host (Slowinski et al., Reference Slowinski, Geissler, Gerlach, Heidinger and Ketterson2021). Conversely, no such age-related effect was observed in Philepittidae species. This discrepancy might be attributed to the relatively low diversity of parasites within this avian taxon. Given that the pool of suitable parasites for Philepittidae appears to be limited, the maximum number of potential infections within the population may be quickly reached.

The prevalence of Trypanosoma and filarial nematodes exhibited similarity across different avian taxa. Neither the distinct ecological niches nor the phylogenetic backgrounds of these birds appear to result in variations in the likelihood of infection with these blood parasites. Significant differences in prevalence were not found based on the sex and age of the various bird species. While age-related differences have been documented in Phasianidae (Holmstad et al., Reference Holmstad, Anwar, Iezhova and Skorping2003) and Accipitridae (Svobodová et al., Reference Svobodová, Weidinger, Peške, Volf, Votýpka and Voříšek2015), no such variations were identified in Passeriformes, such as the pied flycatcher (Muscicapidae) (Merino and Potti, Reference Merino and Potti1995). The study by Svobodová et al. (Reference Svobodová, Weidinger, Peške, Volf, Votýpka and Voříšek2015), which involved recaptures of Accipitridae, suggested that Trypanosoma infection persists throughout the lifetime of these birds. This finding elucidates the observed differences in prevalence between juveniles and adults. Conversely, since no such age-related discrepancy has been reported thus far in Passeriformes, it is reasonable to assume that Trypanosoma infections in these avian taxa are not of a long-lasting nature. Moreover, as there were no discernible differences in prevalence between the sexes and age groups of birds concerning microfilariae infections, it can be inferred that these infections also do not typically result in permanent, chronic infections. Additional research is needed to delve deeper into this subject.

Mixed infections involving both blood parasite taxa, Trypanosoma and filarioid nematodes, were frequently encountered. However, instances of double infections, where both Trypanosoma and filarioid nematodes were present together, were not observed. This outcome implies a potential positive correlation wherein haemosporidian infection might enhance the likelihood of acquiring infections with other blood parasite taxa. Infections with haemosporidian parasites, but not with Trypanosoma and filarioid nematodes, may lead to a decrease in host fitness and an increased vulnerability to other infections.

Host specialization is likely to be the case for filarioid nematodes, given the clear phylogenetic separation of their lineages and the absence of a single sequence detected in different bird species. On the other hand, the proposed generalism of avian trypanosomes (Zídková et al., Reference Zídková, Cepicka, Szabová and Svobodová2012) is supported by the presence of Trypanosoma sp. CORVOID01 in both Nectariniidae and Philepittidae. Nevertheless, the identification of a substantial number of newly discovered Trypanosoma sequences exclusively in a single bird species may suggest the existence of host-specific haplotypes. However, making more precise conclusions is challenging due to limited data availability for trypanosomes and the unclear systematics in this context.

In summary, Nectariniidae and Philepittidae exhibit disparities in terms of haemosporidian parasite prevalence, diversity and specialization, while no such distinctions are apparent in the case of Trypanosoma sp. or filarioid nematode infections. Despite N. coruscans sharing similarities in habitat and behavioural ecology with both Cinnyris spp., it closely resembles its relative, P.ta castanea, in all aspects of parasitism. The initial hypothesis suggesting that nectarivorous species would display lower prevalence but higher diversity in contrast to the frugivorous P. castanea was not supported by our findings. Specialized Haemoproteus lineages have only been proposed for Nectariniidae species, as Philepittidae lack these parasites. However, specialized filarioid nematode species are detected in both avian families. Interestingly, the construction of closed nests or feeding behaviour does not appear to significantly influence the likelihood of infection with Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon spp. in the examined bird species. Haemosporidian parasite infections in Malagasy Philepittidae and Nectariniidae appear to be primarily driven by phylogenetic factors rather than ecological ones, whereas Trypanosoma and filarioid nematode infections do not exhibit a clear association with either factor.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023001075.

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the Malagasy authorities for granting all the relevant research and export permits and to the Groupe d’Étude et de Recherche sur les Primates de Madagascar (GERP), namely Jonah Ratsimbazafy and Rose Marie Randrianarison, for letting us work at Maromizaha. Hajanirina Rakotomanana and Daniel Rakotondravony at the Department of Animal Biology, University of Antananarivo supported us throughout. We thank Jean-Robert Lekamisi, Lova Tahiry Rasolondraibe, Onja Randriamalala, Nicola Lillich, Pia Reufsteck and all the other Malagasy and German assistants for their help in the field. Further, we are indepted to Regina Magaña Vazquez for her help in preparing the revised version of the manuscript.

Author contributions

S. M. conceived and designed the study. F. W. and J.-L. B. collected the samples in the field. H. B. and J.-L. B. performed the molecular analyses. H. B. performed the morphological and phylogenetic analyses. H. B., S. M. and J.-L. B. performed statistical analyses. S. M., H. B., J. -L. B. and F. W. wrote the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Financial support

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), grant number 457213393.

Competing interests

None.

Ethical standards

Bird capture was carried out following the ethical guidelines set by the British Trust of Ornithology (Redfern and Clark, Reference Redfern and Clark2001). This means that birds were handled and sampled with great care and released instantly after ringing, measuring and sampling. The health of the bird had priority over any other considerations.

References

Atkinson, CT, Thomas, NJ and Hunter, DB (2008) Avian Malaria. In Atkinson, C, Thomas, NJ and Hunter, DB (eds), Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds. New Delhi, India: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadell, JS, Ishtiaq, F, Covas, R, Melo, M, Warren, BH, Atkinson, CT, Bensch, S, Graves, GR, Jhala, YV, Peirce, MA, Rahmani, AR, Fonseca, DM and Fleischer, RC (2006) Global phylogeographic limits of Hawaii's avian malaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, 29352944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bensch, S, Hellgren, O and PÉrez-Tris, J (2009) MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 13531358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, DA, Cavanaugh, M, Clark, K, Karsch-Mizrachi, I, Lipman, DJ, Ostell, J and Sayers, EW (2013) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 41, D36D42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binkienė, R, Chagas, CRF, Bernotienė, R and Valkiūnas, G (2021) Molecular and morphological characterization of three new species of avian Onchocercidae (Nematoda) with emphasis on circulating microfilariae. Parasites and Vectors 14, 119. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04614-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapa-Vargas, L, Matta, NE and Merino, S (2020) Effects of ecological gradients on tropical avian hemoparasites. In Santiago-Alarcon, D and Marzal, A (eds), Avian Malaria and Related Parasites in the Tropics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 349377. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-51633-8_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chathuranga, WGD, Weereratne, TC, Karunaratne, SHPP and De Silva, WAPP (2022) Spatial distribution pattern of ornithophilic mosquitoes along the vertical axis in forest habitats. Ceylon Journal of Science 51, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, NJ, Clegg, SM and Lima, MR (2014) A review of global diversity in avian haemosporidians (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus: Haemosporida): new insights from molecular data. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 329338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz Casana, CF, Vivas Ruíz, DE, Sandoval Peña, GA and Chimoy Effio, PJ (2019) Molecular sexing of the white-winged guan (Penelope albipennis) and other wild birds of the north of Peru. Sexual Development 13, 4754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doussang, D, Sallaberry-Pincheira, N, Cabanne, GS, Lijtmaer, DA, González-Acuña, D and Vianna, JA. (2021) Specialist versus generalist parasites: the interactions between host diversity, environment and geographic barriers in avian malaria. International Journal for Parasitology 51, 899911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eguchi, K, Yamagishi, S and Randrianasol, V (1993) The composition and foraging behaviour of mixed-species flocks of forest-living birds in Madagascar. IBIS 135, 9196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, T, Alves, JA, Rocha, AD, Costa, JS, Schmid, R, Schulze, M and Hahn, S (2020) Population- and age-specific patterns of haemosporidian assemblages and infection levels in European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). International Journal for Parasitology 50, 11251131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fecchio, A, Bell, JA, Pinheiro, RBP, Cueto, VR, Gorosito, CA, Lutz, HL, Gaiotti, MG, Paiva, LV, França, LF, Toledo-Lima, G, Tolentino, M, Pinho, JB, Tkach, VV, Fontana, CS, Grande, JM, Santillán, MA, Caparroz, R, Roos, AL, Bessa, R, Nogueira, W, Moura, T, Nolasco, EC, Comiche, KJM, Kirchgatter, K, Guimarães, LO, Dispoto, JH, Marini, M, Weckstein, JD, Batalha-Filho, H and Collins, MD (2019) Avian host composition, local speciation and dispersal drive the regional assembly of avian malaria parasites in South American birds. Molecular Ecology 28, 26812693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, SM (2022) The New Natural History of Madagascar. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780691229409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, F, Safford, R and Skerrett, A (2015) Birds of Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Hellgren, O, Waldenstrom, J and Bensch, S (2004) A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. The Journal of Parasitology 90, 797802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellgren, O, Atkinson, CT, Bensch, S, Albayrak, T, Dimitrov, D, Ewen, JG, Kim, KS, Lima, MR, Martin, L, Palinauskas, V, Ricklefs, R, Sehgal, RNM, Valkiunas, G, Tsuda, Y and Marzal, A (2015) Global phylogeography of the avian malaria pathogen Plasmodium relictum based on MSP1 allelic diversity. Ecography 38, 842850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstad, PR, Anwar, A, Iezhova, T and Skorping, A (2003) Standard sampling techniques underestimate prevalence of avian hematozoa in willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39, 354358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 15471549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magaña Vázquez, R, Woog, F, Dinkel, A, Mackenstedt, U and Musa, S (2022) Blood parasites of Vangas and other Corvoidea on Madagascar. Diversity 14, 888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, S and Potti, J (1995) High prevalence of hematozoa in nestlings of a passerine species, the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). The Auk 122, 10411043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, NS, Mortara, RA and Schenkman, S (2020) Trypanosoma cruzi. Trends in Parasitology 36, 404405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musa, S, Mackenstedt, U, Woog, F and Dinkel, A (2019) Avian malaria on Madagascar: prevalence, biodiversity and specialization of haemosporidian parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 49, 199210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musa, S, Mackenstedt, U, Woog, F and Dinkel, A (2022) Untangling the actual infection status: detection of avian haemosporidian parasites of three Malagasy bird species using microscopy, multiplex PCR, and nested PCR methods. Parasitology Research 121(10), 28172829. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07606-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, MA, Cepeda, AS, Bernotienė, R, Lotta, IA, Matta, NE, Valkiūnas, G and Escalante, AA (2018) Primers targeting mitochondrial genes of avian haemosporidians: PCR detection and differential DNA amplification of parasites belonging to different genera. International Journal for Parasitology 48, 657670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redfern, CPF and Clark, JA (2001) Ringers’ Manual. Thetford, GB: British Trust for Ornithology.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Hernández, K, Álvarez-Mendizábal, P, Chapa-Vargas, L, Escobar, F, González-García, F and Santiago-Alarcon, D (2021) Haemosporidian prevalence, parasitaemia and aggregation in relation to avian assemblage life history traits at different elevations. International Journal for Parasitology 51, 365378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safford, R and Hawkins, F (2013) The Birds of Africa: Volume VIII: The Malagasy Region: Madagascar, Seychelles, Comoros, Mascarenes. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Santiago-Alarcon, D and Marzal, A (2020) Research on Avian Haemosporidian Parasites in the Tropics Before the Year 2000. In Santiago-Alarcon, D and Marzal, A (eds), Avian Malaria and Related Parasites in the Tropics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 144. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-51633-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, AF, Robert, V, Goodman, SM, Raharimanga, V, Raherilalao, MJ, Andrianarimisa, A, , F, Ariey, R and Greiner, EC (2009) Blood parasites in birds from Madagascar. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45, 907920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sehgal, RNM, Jones, HI and Smith, TB (2005) Molecular evidence for host specificity of parasitic nematode microfilariae in some African rainforest birds. Molecular Ecology 14, 39773988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slowinski, SP, Geissler, AJ, Gerlach, N, Heidinger, BJ and Ketterson, ED (2021) The probability of being infected with haemosporidian parasites increases with host age but is not affected by experimental testosterone elevation in a wild songbird. Journal of Avian Biology 2022(1), 111. doi: 10.1111/jav.02819Google Scholar
Svobodová, M, Weidinger, K, Peške, L, Volf, P, Votýpka, J and Voříšek, P (2015) Trypanosomes and haemosporidia in the buzzard (Buteo buteo) and sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus): factors affecting the prevalence of parasites. Parasitology Research 114, 551560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valkiunas, G (2005) Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Valkiunas, G, Iezhova, TA, Carlson, JS and Sehgal, RNM (2011) Two new trypanosoma species from African birds, with notes on the taxonomy of avian trypanosomes. Journal of Parasitology 97, 924930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, BH, Bermingham, E, Bowie, RCK, Prys-Jones, RP and Thébaud, C (2003) Molecular phylogeography reveals island colonization history and diversification of western Indian Ocean sunbirds (Nectarinia: Nectariniidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29, 6785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, BH, Strasberg, D, Bruggemann, JH, Prys-Jones, RP and Thébaud, C (2010) Why does the biota of the Madagascar region have such a strong Asiatic flavour? Cladistics 26, 526538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wink, M (2006) Use of DNA markers to study bird migration. Journal of Ornithology 147, 234244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zídková, L, Cepicka, I, Szabová, J and Svobodová, M (2012) Biodiversity of avian trypanosomes. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 12, 102112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Illustrations of breeding males of examined Malagasy bird species: (a) Madagascar green sunbird (Cinnyris notatus), (b) souimanga sunbird (Cinnyris sovimanga), (c) common sunbird asity (Neodrepanis coruscans), (d) velvet asity (Philepitta castanea). Females have inconspicuous colorations in comparison. Drawings by S. Musa.

Figure 1

Table 1. Dataset of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species examined in this study

Figure 2

Table 2. Kind of haemosporidian infection (n) detected in avian blood samples of Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae (Philepitta castanea and Neodrepanis coruscans) from Madagascar by PCR method

Figure 3

Figure 2. Percentage of shared (a) haemosporidian genera within infected Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae species (Neodrepanis coruscans and Philepitta castanea) and percentage of the kind of infections (b) present.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Gametocytes of haemosporidian parasites of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae from Madagascar. (a) Plasmodium pGRW09 from Philepitta castanea; (b) hNENOT04 from Cinnyris notatus; (c) hCINSOV01 from C. sovimanga; (d) hCINNOT01 from C. notatus; (e) lCINSOV03 from C. sovimanga; (f) lFOMAD01 from C. sovimanga; (g) lHYPMA02 from P. castanea; (h) lPHICAS01 from P. castanea. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship of mitochondrial cytb lineages of haemosporidian parasites (Acc. No.) detected in blood samples of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species on Madagascar, along with sequences of different morphospecies (Acc. No.), constructed using maximum likelihood (TN93 + G). Dots on nodes indicate bootstrap values >70%. Bold text indicates new sequences. Bird hosts are indicated with colour-coded squares: dark green = Cinnyris spec. (n); green = C. sovimanga; light green = C. notatus; orange = Philepitta castanea; blue = other bird species (n) and multicoloured = >5 other bird genera. ‘X’ marks a potentially aberrant host.

Figure 6

Table 3. Predicted specialization of haemosporidian lineages (genus and lineage name) detected in Malagasy Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae species (Neodrepanis coruscans and Philepitta castanea)

Figure 7

Figure 5. Percentage of generalist and specialist haemosporidian lineages detected in infected Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae species (Neodrepanis coruscans and Philepitta castanea). Generalist lineages found in both families are shown separately as ‘shared generalists’.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Phylogenetic relationship of Trypanosoma SSU rRNA sequences (Acc. No.) detected in blood samples of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species on Madagascar, along with highly homologous sequences of Trypanosoma species deposited in GenBank (Acc. No.), constructed using maximum likelihood (K2 + G). Dots on nodes indicate bootstrap values >70%. Bold text indicates new sequences.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Larval stage (microfilaria) of Splendidofilaria bartletti isolate VELAS1 (OR148294) isolated from Philepitta castanea (Philepittidae) of Madagascar. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Phylogenetic relationship of filarioid nematode 28S rRNA (a) and cox1 (b) sequences detected in blood samples of Nectariniidae and Philepittidae species on Madagascar, along with highly homologous sequences of avian filarioid nematodes deposited in GenBank (Acc. No.), constructed using maximum likelihood (a: T92; b: TN93). Bootstrap values are given. Bold text indicates new sequences.

Figure 11

Table 4. Kind of blood parasite infection (n) detected in avian blood samples of Nectariniidae (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus) and Philepittidae (Philepitta castanea and Neodrepanis coruscans) from Madagascar by PCR method

Figure 12

Figure 9. Comparison of PCR fragments in gel electrophoresis, obtained using primer set HPF/HPR (Díaz Casana et al., 2019). One morphologically determined male and one female of each species (Cinnyris sovimanga and C. notatus (Nectariniidae), Philepitta castanea and Neodrepanis coruscans (Philepittidae)) were included, along with a negative control. LR: FastRuler Low Range DNA Ladder (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, USA).

Supplementary material: File

Barbon et al. supplementary material

Barbon et al. supplementary material
Download Barbon et al. supplementary material(File)
File 290.1 KB