Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:47:32.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bibliography of Pediculus and Phthirus including Zoological and Medical Publications dealing with Human Lice, their Anatomy, Biology, Relation to Disease, etc., and Prophylactic Measures directed against them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

George H. F. Nuttall
George H. F. Nuttall
Affiliation:
(From the Quick Laboratory, University of Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This bibliography—the first of the kind hitherto published—deals with zoological and medical publications relating to the two species of lice (Pediculits humanus Linn. 1758 and Phthirus pubis Leach, 1815) infesting man, the part they play in pathology, the prophylactic measures and means of destruction employed against lice, their anatomy and biology and other matters pertaining to them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , November 1917 , pp. 1 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, , Nakao, (24. 09. 1907), Ueber den Nachweis von Typhusbazillen in den Läusen Typhuskranker. München. med. Wochenschr., LIV. 1924. D.Google Scholar
Adler-Herzmark, J. (10. 07. 1915), Fleckfieberfälle und Entlausungsmethoden. Der Militärarzt, Wien, XLIX. 258–264, 4 figs. D.K.Google Scholar
Albin, E. (1736), A natural history of spiders and other curious insects. 76 pp., 53 Pls. 4°. London, [ pp. 70–74 quotes Hooke's description of the louse and on PI. 42 reproduces Hooke's figure of the ♀.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, A. (1911), Entomology for Medical Officers. London: Gurney and Jackson. xx + 374 pp.,. 136 Figs. [pp. 212–216, Figs. 94–6, Pediculi. Fig. 94 shows a ‘food reservoir’ alongside the ‘stomach’; such a reservoir does not exist. The structure, probably drawn by transparency without dissection, is an egg.] G.Google Scholar
Aldrovandus, U. (1638), De animalibus insectis; libri septem, cum singulorum iconibus ad vivum expressis [etc.]. 4, p. 1, 767 pp., 21. 1, Pls., Figs. Fol. Bononiae. [S.]Google Scholar
Alessandrini, G. (29. 02. 1916), I pidocchi ed i mezzi per distruggerli. Ann. d' Igiene, Rome, XXVI. 92–108, 3 Figs. [Chiefly a compilation dealing with methods of destruction; brief description of structure and biology, somewhat inaccurate.] A.B.D.Google Scholar
Allan, G. (4. 05. 1912), The treatment of pediculosis capitis. Med. Times, London, XL. 348–9. K.Google Scholar
Allan, J. W. (4. 12. 1915), Typhus fever and lice. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 841. [Short letter. Author thinks typhus may be conveyed otherwise than by lice.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allbutt, Sir T. C. and Rolleston, H. D. (1909–1911). System of Medicine. London: Macmillan. [Pediculosis, vol. IX. 158–159, by Malcolm Morris; Pediculi and Plague, II. ii. 374, in section by Bulloch and Douglas; Beriberi, II. ii. 627, by Sir P. Hanson; Ph. pubis, ix. 556.] D.Google Scholar
Allen, C. W. (1892), Nomenclature of pediculosis. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., CXXVI. 440. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. W. (1905), Pediculosis vestimentorum. Post-Graduate, New York, XX. 46. [I.M.]Google Scholar
Alt, H. C. (1824), De Phtiriasi (Dissertation), Bonn. 8°. [s.] [p. 8 Pediculus tabescentium, Alt, 1824. According to Piaget, 1880, p. 625, the species is invalid, being merely P. vestimenti as Landois pointed out. Goldfusz and Burmeister merely copied from Alt.] S.Google Scholar
Amatus, L. (ca. 1560), De Phtiriasi. Curatium cum medicinalium cuturae. Basiliae. [M.]Google Scholar
Amelung, F. (1837), Beobaehtungen und Bemerkungen über die Läuse-krankheit. Journ. d. pract. Heilk., Berlin, LXXXV., 2. St., 13–45. [I.C.]Google Scholar
Anderson, J. F. (1915), Typhus Fever. Its etiology and the methods of its prevention. U.S. Public Health Rep., XXX. 1303–1311. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (10. 12. 1909), On the relation of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever to the typhus fever of Mexico. Preliminary note. Publ. Health Reports, Washington, XXIV. 1861–1862. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus. Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 9–10. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. [Regard the fevers as distinct.] D.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (24. 12. 1909), A note on the etiology of ‘tabardillo,’ the typhus fever of Mexico. Public Health Reports, Washington, XXIV. 1941. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab.— Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 11–12. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (18. 02. 1910), On the infeotivity of tabardillo or Mexican typhus for monkeys and studies on its mode of transmission. Public Health Reports, Washington, xxv. 177–185. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 13–24. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (2. 02. 1912), The relation of so-called Brill's disease to typhus fever. An experimental demonstration of their identity. Publ. Health Reports, Washington, XXVII. 149–160, 6 Charts. Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86 (Oct. 1912), pp. 25–35. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. F. and Goldberger, J. (10. 1912), Studies on immunity and means of transmission of typhus. (Included in Collected Studies on Typhus), Hyg. Lab.—Bull., No. 86, pp. 81–138. Treas. Dept. U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.Google Scholar
Andree, J. (1812), A case of morbus pedicularis. N. Med. and Phys. Journ., London, III. 210–212. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1915), Ungezieferplage und Ungezieferbekämpfung. Eine Zusam-menstellung der angegebenen Methoden zur Vernichtung des Ungeziefers mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Vernichtung der Kleiderläuse. Deutscher Verlag für Volkswohlfahrt. Dresden. [Cited by Heymann 18. VIII. 1915, p. 300; and by Hase 29. xi. 1915. Inaccessible.] K.Google Scholar
Anonymous (09. 1915), The danger of disease from flies and lice. British Museum (Nat. Hist.) Economic Leaflets, No. 1, 4 pp. [Lice, pp. 3–4. Popular.] P.Google Scholar
Artault de Vevey, S. (26. 10. 1895), Deux cas de pédiculose accidentelle et intermittente chez l'homme. C.R. Soc. de Biol., 10th ser., II. 684–5. [Report on two cases of infestation with Pedicinus breviceps in persons who kept monkeys.] R.Google Scholar
Aubert, (1879), Les poux et les écoles. Un point d'hygiène scolaire. Lyon. [Rev. in Ann. de Dermatol., 1880, 2 ser., I. 292. Cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 36.] D.Google Scholar
Axenfeld, T. (1. 04. 1915), Ist Naphthalinabwehr der Läuseplage für das Sehorgan bedenklich? Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 396. K.Google Scholar
Bacot, A. (1914), Diseases carried by insects. Journ. R. San. Inst., XXXV. 26–34. G.Google Scholar
Bacot, A. (29. 01. 1916), The temperature necessary for the destruction of lice and their eggs. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 167. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacot, A. (3. 06. 1916), Notes on Pediculus humanus (vestimenti) and Pediculus capitis. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 788–9. [Abstract of Bacbt 26. II. 1917, q.v.] B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacot, A. (30. 09. 1916), The use of insecticides against lice. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 447–450, 2 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Bacot, A. (26. 02. 1917). A contribution to the bionomics of Pediculus humanus (vestimenti) and Pediculus capitis. Parasitology, IX. 228–258, 4 Figs. B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacot, A. (04. 1917), The Louse Problem. Proc. Royal Soc. Med., London, X. 61–94. Also [abstract] in Brit. Med. Journ., 3. III. 1917, I. 296–7 [paper read 23. II. 17]. B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehr, G., Plotz, H. and Olitsky, P. K. (1915), The etiology of typhus exanthematicus. in. Experimental studies. Proc. N.Y. Pathol. Soc., n.s., XV. 53–62. [Abstract of paper to appear in Journ. Infect. Dis. Regard ‘Bacillus typhi exanihematicus’ as the cause of typhus. No mention of lice.] D.Google Scholar
Balfour, A. (1911), The spirochaete of Egyptian relapsing fever. Is it a specific entity? 4th Report Wellcome Trop. Res. Laboratories at the Gordon Mem. Coll. Khartoum, Vol. A—Medical, pp. 68–75, 1 Fig. D.Google Scholar
Balfour, A. (19. 06. 1915), Typhus fever, lice and the war; a suggestive fact. Lancet, I. 1311. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, A. (17. 05. 1916), The Medical Entomology of Salonica. 25 pp., 31 Figs. London: Wellcome Bureau, [p. 21 lice merely mentioned. Illustrations after Terzi. Nothing original.] O.Google Scholar
Barbut, J. (1781), The Genera Insectorum of Linnaeus exemplified by various specimens of English Insects, drawn from Nature. London. 1 vol 4°. [PL 18, gen. 4, P. humanus; cited by Stephens, 1829.] I.Google Scholar
Barrie, H. G. (25. 09. 1915), Prevention of Typhus. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 492. [A letter to Ed.] K.Google Scholar
Bass, R. (4. 07. 1916), Neue Vorrichtungen zur feldmässigen Desinfektion. München. med. Wochenschr., No. 27. [Abstr. in Bull. Inst. Pasteur, XIV. 744.] K.Google Scholar
Belt, T. (1874), The Naturalist in Nicaragua. London: John Murray. 403 pp. [p. 210 casual reference to Pediculi as abounding on savage and semi-civilized peoples, without mention of country.] O.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van (1889), Animal Parasites and Messmates. 4th ed. 83 Figs. 274 pp. London: Kegan Paul and Trench and Co. (Internat. Sci. Series). [Lice, see pp. 124–126, Figs. 17, 18. Text and Figs, very poor.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benenati, U. (1905), La malattia di Addison e la pidocchiara. Gazz. d. osp., Milano, XXVI. 389–392. [This is probably the same reference as one given by Editorial 29. VII. 1905: Gazz. d. Osp. e d. Cliniche, 26. III. 1905, wherein Benenati is quoted as citing old authors.] [I.M.] D.H.Google Scholar
Berkenhout, J. (1789), Synopsis of the Natural History of Great Britain and Ireland, being a second ed. of the Outlines, etc. London. 2 vols. 8°. [Vol. I. 170, P. humanus, Ph. pubis; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar
Bertarelli, E. (1915), La profilassi negli ospedali succursali improvvisati. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. pt. 2, 985–9. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Bertarelli, E. (04. 1915), La lotta contro il tifo esantematico. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. 343–8. [Description of typhus epidemic and results of preventive measures in Tunis. Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 153.] D.K.Google Scholar
Bertarelli, E. (02. 1916), Gli insegnamenti della lotta profilattica contro il tifo esaiitematico. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. 145–156. [Summary of methods used against lice in various countries, including Italy. Abstract in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 153.] K.Google Scholar
Bertarelli, E. (07. 1916), I punti controversi della epidemiologia del tifo esantematico. Morgagni, Milan, LVII. 585–591. [Discusses epidemiology and louse transmission. Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., iv., ser. B, 153.] D.Google Scholar
Bertin, (1906), Phtiriase. Echo méd. du nord, Lille, X. 391–4. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
BertuluS, E. (1871), Communication sur un cas de phthiriasis critique. Marseille Méd., VIII. 334–344. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Beyer, H. G. (05. 1916), On the etiology of typhus fever and louse extermination, from the view point of the sanitarian. Milit. Surgeon, Washington, D.C., XXXVIII. 483–491, 4 Pls. [A condensed summary. Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 135.] D.K.Google Scholar
Bingley, W. (1813), Animal Biography, or Popular Zoology. London. 4th ed. 3 vols. 8°. [III. 345, P. humanus; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar
Birt, C. (11. 1912), Typhus fever. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, XIX. 521–530. [A useful summary.] D.Google Scholar
Bisset, E. (19–27. 01. 1914), Relapsing fever in the Meerut Division. Proc. 3rd All-India Sanit. Conference, Lucknow, IV. 114–9, Supplt. to Ind. Journ. Med. Res. D.Google Scholar
Blair, J. (1863), On an unusual case of phthiriasis. Austral. Med. Journ., Melbourne, VIII. 174. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Blanchard, M. (01.–02. 1914), Epidémie de fièvre récurrente à Bikié. Ann. Hyg. Méd. Coloniale, Paris, XVII. 81–86; abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, II. 79. [Relapsing fever in French Congo, accounted for by Ornithodorus moubata, evidence excluding lice as carriers of Spiro-chaeta duttoni.] D.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1890), Traité de Zoologie médicale. Paris: Baillière et Fils. 2 vols. [Human lice, pp. 435–446; Text-figs. 672–682, poor.] G.Google Scholar
Blaschko, A. (1. 01. 1915), Zur Prophylaxe des Flecktyphus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 12. [A few lines only.] D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaschko, A. (18. 02. 1915), Zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 228. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleicher, P. (1882), Pediculus pubis (Phthirius inguinalis) in. den Cilien kleiner Kinder. Wien. med. Wochenschr., XXXII. 976–7. Ph.Google Scholar
Bleykaerts, (1875), Observation d'un aecès de fièvre pédiculaire aiguë. Presse méd. belge, Brussels, XXVII. 5. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Blumberg, (25. 07. 1915), Ueber Massenentlausung und Desinfektion von Gefangenenlagern durch Lokomobilen. Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 837–9. K.Google Scholar
Bodin, E. (1912–1913), Traitement des phtiriases. Paris méd. IX. 333–336. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Bodkin, G. E. and Cleare, L. D. (10. 1916), Notes on some animal parasites in British Guiana. Bull. Entomol. Res., London, VII. 179–190, 3 Figs., 1 Map. [Head-lice on negroes, East Indians, etc.; body-lice only on East Indians; Ph. pubis on all races.] Geo.Google Scholar
Bohne, (1915), Stubenfliegen als Träger von Läusen. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 358. [I.M.] B.Google Scholar
Boral, H. (17. 05. 1915), Zur Differentialdiagnostik und Prophylaxe des Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 24, 641–645. D.K.Google Scholar
Bordas, F. (20. 07. 1915), Désinfection des trains sanitaires dans le camp retranché de Paris. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 727–740, 3 Figs. [Includes destruction of vermin by SO2 and vapourised.benzine.] K.Google Scholar
Bordas, F. (20. 03. 1916), Désinfection rapide par la chaleur. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVIII. 275–282, 5 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Bordas, and Bruère, S. (20. 06. 1915), Efficacité comparée de la benzine et de l'anisol pour la destruction des parasites. Rev. d'hyg. et de police sanit., Paris, XXXVII. 628–633. K.Google Scholar
Borne, G. (20. 11.–12. 1914), Prophylaxie et Destruction des parasites de l'homme. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVI. 955–966. K.Google Scholar
Börner, C. (1904), Zur Systematik der Hexapoden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVII. 511–533. S.Google Scholar
Bousfield, L. (1911), Notes on human spirochaetosis. 4th Report Wettcome Trap. Res. Laboratories at the Gordon Mem. Coll. Khartoum, Vol. A— Medical, pp. 62–67, 7 temp. Charts. [Merely suspected that P. vestimenti served as vectors.] D.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S. (10. 1873), On the brain and a portion of the nervous system of Pediculus capitis. Entomologist, VI. 489–497. A.Google Scholar
Brauer, A. (6. 05. 1915), Ueber die Unzulänglichkeit der bisherigen Entlau-sungsverfahren. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI., No. 19, 561–2. B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brault, J. (1906), Quelques cas de phtiriases anormales. Bull. soc. franç, de dermatol. et syph., Paris, xvii. 37–40; also Ann. de Derm, et de Syph., 4 s., VII. 70–73. Ph.Google Scholar
Brault, J. and Montpellier, J. (8. 01. 1914), Infestation du cuir ohevelu de l'adulte par le phtirius pubis. Bull. soc. franç, de dermal, et syph., Paris, XXV. 78–80; also Gaz. d. hôp., Paris, LXXXVII. 261. Ph.Google Scholar
Brault, J. and Montpellier, J. (1914), Nouveau cas d'infestation du cuir chevelu de l'adulte par le Phtirius pubis. Gaz. d. hôp., LXXXVII. 805; also Bull. soc. franç. de dermatol. et syph., XXV. 206. Ph.Google Scholar
Braun, (1851), Conjecturen ueber Phthiriasis. Rhein. Monatschr. f. prakt. Aerzte, Köln, V. 677. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1906), The Animal Parasites of Man. 3rd ed., transl. by Falcke, P., with additions by Sambon, L. W. and Theobald, F. V.. London: J. Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd. XIX + 453 pp., 294 Figs. [pp. 394–6, Figs. 251–255, Pediculus capitis, P. vestimenti, Phthirius inguinalis, poor. It is stated of the last that it ‘reproduces more rapidly than other lice, and is communicated much more freely’ and that the nits are laid singly on ‘hairs near their apex’ (!) (the Fig. is taken from Leuckart without acknowledgement).] G.Google Scholar
Braun, M. and Lühe, M. (1910), A Handbook of Practical Parasitology. Transl. by Forster, L.. London: John Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd. VIII + 208 pp., 100 Figs. [pp. 185–187, Figs. 96–97 as in Braun, 1906; brief and inadequate description.] G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brill, N. E. (08. 1911), Pathological and experimental data derived from a further study of an acute infectious disease of unknown origin. American Journ. Med. Sci., CXLII. 196–218. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brühl, (1871), Zur feineren Anatomie der an Menschen schmarotzenden Läuse. Wien. med. Wochenschr., XXI. 475–9, 501–6, 1 Fig. A.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E. (1910), Précis de Parasitologie. Paris: Masson & Cie. 915 pp., 683 Figs. [Pediculi, pp. 548–555, Figs. 395–8.] G.Google Scholar
Brunton, Sir L. (6. 02. 1915), Lice and rheumatism amongst soldiers. Lancet, CLXXXIII. 298. D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, (15. 01. 1838), Morbus pedicularis. Lancet, XXXII. 614. [Reports a case of intense infestation with P. humanus, aggravated by scratching.] D.Google Scholar
Bujwid, O. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar
Bulkley, L. D. (1881), Phthiriasis. Arch. Dermatol., New York, VII. 394–403. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Bulloch, W. and Douglas, S. R. (1909), see Allbutt and Rolleston.Google Scholar
Bureau, M. and Bureau, G. (1907), Un cas de melanodermie phtiriasique avec pigmentation de la muqueuse buccale. Gaz. Méd. de Nantes, 2 s., XXV. 292–7. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Burmeister, (1839), Handb. der Entomologie Berlin, II., Abt. 2. [Cited by Pawlowsky, 1906, p. 157, as giving Nitzsch's description of mouthparts in Pediculus.] A.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. (1847), Ueber die Mundbildung yon Pediculus. Linnaea Entomologia, II. 569–591. A.Google Scholar
Busson, B. (24. 06. 1915), Zur Frage der Entlausung im Felde. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 674–678. K.Google Scholar
Calandruccio, S. (1890), Animali parassiti dell' uomo in Sicilia. Atti Accad. Gioenia di sci. nut. in Catania, Ann. 66, 4 s. Vol. II. pp. 95–135. [Brief reference to fly carriage of lice, p. 135.]Google Scholar
Campana, (1913), Eritrema ardesiaca da ftirii. Clinica dermosifilopat. d. R. Univ. di Roma, XXXI. 81. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Cantrell, J. A. (1889–1890), Pediculosis capillitii. Ann. Gynaec. and Paediatr., Philadelphia, III. 485–7. [I.M.] D.K.Google Scholar
Cantrell, J. A. (1900), Hospital treatment of pediculosis. Phila. Hosp. Rep., IV. 261–3. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Carter, W. T. (1872), Phthiriasis and its treatment. Amer. Pract., Louisville, VI. 211–213. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Casaux, J. (04. 1914), Considérations épidémiologiques concernant la fièvre récurrente au Tonkin. Bull. Soc. Méd. Chir. de l'Indo-Chine, Hanoi, V 142–150. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., ser. B, II. 170. Relapsing fever probably endemic; prevails in winter when natives confined to their huts; lice probable carriers.] D.Google Scholar
Castellani, A. and Chalmers, A. J. (1913), Manual of Tropical Medicine. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox. 2nd ed., xxxii + 1747 pp., 630 Figs., 15 coloured Pis. [pp. 631–4, Figs. 267–271, Pediculus humanus, P. corporis, Phthirius pubis; pp. 1578–1580, 1628 pediculosis.] G.Google Scholar
Castellani, A. and Jackson, T. W. (15. 11. 1915), Notes on certain insecticides. Journ. of Trop. Med. and Hyg., XVIII. 253–5. [Tested insecticides on lice, bugs and fleas.] K.Google Scholar
Cazals, (1807), Observation sur un cas de fièvre intermittente phthiriasique avec sympathie d'organes qui n'ont entr'eux aucun rapport sensible. Journ. gén. de méd. chir. et pharm., Paris, xxx. 169–177. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Cenni, (1839), Su la ftiriasi e il tremore mercuriale. Bull. d. sc. med. di Bologna, 2 s., VII. 354–7. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Charmeil, (1905), Phtiriase généralisée. Nord méd., Lille, xi. 68. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Chatin, (1880), Etudes analytiques sur le rostre des Anoplures. Bull. Soc. Philom. (7), iv. 59 and 60. [Cited by Enderlein, 1905, p. 634, regarding homologies of mouthparts.] A.Google Scholar
Chesney, L. M. (05. 1916), Typhus work in Serbia. Practitioner, London, XCVI. 542–550. [Thinks it ‘highly doubtful’ that lice are the only carriers but gives no evidence for her statement. Lice were very prevalent in the midst of the severe epidemic and she used sulphur and naphthalene to keep off lice.] D.K.Google Scholar
Chivaud, (1803), Mémoire sur la phthiriasis, ou maladie pédiculaire. Ann. Soc. de méd.-prat. de Montpel, II. 216–230. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Cholodkowsky, N. (1903), Zur Morphologie der Pediculiden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVII. 120–5, 6 Figs. A.I.Google Scholar
Cholodkowsky, N. (1904), Zur Kenntnis der Mundwerkzeuge und Systematik der Pediculiden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVIII. 368–370, 1 Fig. A.Google Scholar
Cholodkowsky, N. (1905), Noch ein Wort über die Mundteile der Pediculiden. Zool. Anzeiger, XXIX. 149. [Merely controversy with Enderlein.] A.Google Scholar
Ciavaldini, (13. 07. 1915), Relation d'une épidémie de typhus exanthématique (III.–IV. 1915). Bull. Acad. de Méd., Paris, 3 s., LXXIV. 63–64; also Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 725–6. [Short account of outbreaks of typhus in Algeria.] D.Google Scholar
Clairville, J. (1798–1806), Entomologie Helvétique, ou Catalogue des Insectes de la Suisse rangés d'après une nouvelle méthode. Zurich. 2 vols. 8°. [Cited re Pediculus by Denny, 1842; reference found in Stephens, 1829.] S.Google Scholar
Clemow, F. G. (1903), The Geography of Disease. Cambridge: University Press. [Relapsing fever, pp. 364–370. Typhus, pp. 495–508.] D.Google Scholar
Clerc, M. (20. 08. 1915). Prophylaxie du typhus exanthématique. Rev. d'hygiène, Paris, XXXVII. 780–4. K.Google Scholar
Copeman, S. M. (6. 02. 1915), Note on a successful method for the extermination of vermin infesting troops. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 247–8. [Also appeared in the Lancet; same date.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, C. H. (22. 05. 1915), Typhus fever in Palestine 1913–14. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 887–888. [Chiefly clinical. Casual mention of lice.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlette, C. E. (6. 05. 1916), The destruction of lice, bugs, and other insect pests, by hydrocyanic acid fumigation. Med. Journ. Australia, Sydney, 3rd Year, I. 391. [Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 135.] K.Google Scholar
Correspondent (21. 09. 1901), A child killed by lice. Lancet, II. 819. D.Google Scholar
Correspondent (14. 05. 1904), An unsuspected source of an objectionable parasite. Lancet, I. 1396. [Lice on child's head supposedly derived from contents of sparrows' nests washed into receptacle whence rain water was taken for washing child's head (! ).]Google Scholar
Crüger, D. (1705), De tumore cum pedieulis. Misc. Acad. nat. curios., 1685, Norimberg, decuria 2, IV. 40; also transl. Collect, acad. d. mém., etc., Dijon, 1755, III. 653. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Cuiffo, G. (6. 07. 1907), Intorno alia patogenesi delle cosi dette macchie cerulee. Boll. Soc. Med.-Chir. Pavia, XXI. 260–5. [Cited by Tièche, 1908.] Ph.Google Scholar
Cummings, B. F. (1915), The louse and its relation to disease. Its life-history and habits and how to deal with it. British Museum (Nat. Hist.) Economic Series, No. 2, 16 pp., 4 Figs. P.S.Google Scholar
Cummings, B. F. (03. 1916), Studies on the Anoplura and Mallophaga, being a report upon a collection from the mammals and birds in the [Zoological] Society's Gardens. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1916, pp. 253–295, 24 Text-figs. R.S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curschmann, P. (22. 07. 1915), Zur Vertilgung der Läuse im Felde. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 891–2. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalla, Torre K. W. (1908), ‘Anoplura’ in Genera Insectorum (Dirigés par P. Wystman, Bruxelles), Fasc. 81, 22 pp., 10 Figs. S.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1880), The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Appleton. [Pediculus, pp. 169–170. Refers to Murray's paper (1861, q.v.) and adds: ‘The surgeon of a whaling ship in the Pacific assured me that when Pediculi, with which some Sandwich Islanders on board swarmed, strayed on to the bodies of the English sailors, they died in the course of three or four days. These Pediculi were darker coloured, and appeared different from those proper to the natives of Chiloe, in South America, of which he gave me specimens. These again appeared larger and much softer than European lice.’]Google Scholar
Davies, F. C. and Weldon, R. P. (3. 02. 1917), A preliminary contribution on ‘P.U.O.’ (Trench Fever). Lancet, I. 183–4. Also [Abstract] in Journ. Trop. Med. and Hyg., xx. 70–71. [Report a single experiment indicating that P. hummanus may convey trench fever. Must be regarded as doubtful pending confirmation with adequate control experiments.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, H. E. (26. 06. 1915), Destruction of lice and other body vermin. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 1103. [Letter, asks for information.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davy, P. C. T. (11. 12. 1915), Typhus fever and lice. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 875–6. [Typhus convalescents when reinfested with lice may infect lice and so spread typhus. Merely a letter and a supposition.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaporte, (1821), Observation sur un cas de phthiriasis. Journ. gén. de méd., chir. et pharm., Paris, LXXVI. 178–183. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Deléarde, and d'Halluin, (20. 04. 1916), A propos d'une épidémie de typhus exanthématique observée en Allemagne (d'avril à juin 1915). Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVIII. 310–320. D.Google Scholar
Delta, C. G. (1915), Sur la destruction des poux dans les épidémies de typhus exanthématique. Presse méd., Paris, XXIII. 175. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Demsar, (11. 05. 1915), Aus der Feldpraxis. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 671. K.Google Scholar
Denny, H. (1842), Monographic, Anoplurorum Britanniae. London: H. G. Bohn. 8°, xxiv + 262 pp., 26 coloured Pls. [pp. 8–23, Phthirius inguinalis, Pediculus capitis, P. vestimenti and P. tabescentium, PI. XXVI., Figs. 1–3; cites old systematic literature.] S.Google Scholar
Desmons, B. (1901), Le traitement de la phtiriase. Ann. de thérap. dermatol. et syph., Paris, I. 27–30. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Deutsch, (1850), Phthiriasis. Med. Ztg., Berlin, XIX. 249–252. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Dewèvre, (1892), Note sur le rô1e des pediculi dans la propagation de l'impetigo. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, No. 11, pp. 232–4. [Cit. by Nuttall, 1899, p. 36.] D.Google Scholar
Discussion (1871), Sur la phthiriase. Marseille méd., VIII. 367–372. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Doane, R. W. (1913), An annotated list of the literature on insects and disease for the year 1912. Journ. Econ. Entomol., Concord, VI. 366–385. O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, N. A. (29. 04. 1916). [Lice, Abstract of paper read at a meeting of the 3rd Corps Med. Soc.] Brit. Med. Journ., I. 630. K.Google Scholar
Duguet, (1880), Sur les taches bleues; leur production artiflcielle et leur valeur séméiologique. Ann. de Dermatol. et de Syphil., X. 545. Ph.Google Scholar
Duguet, (17. 04. 1880), Les taches bleues et le pou de pubis. C. R. Soc. de Biol. Ph.Google Scholar
Duguet, (5. 02. 1881), Pathogénie des taches bleues. C. R. Soc. de Biol. Ph.Google Scholar
Duguet, (1882), Expériences et recherches nouvelles sur les taches bleues. C. R. Soc. de Biol., p. 617. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.Google Scholar
Duhring, L. A. (1871), Phthiriasis and localized eczema. Philadelphia Med. Times, II. 88. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Duplantier, P. (1907), Contribution à I'étude de la pigmentation des muqueuses dans la mélanodermie phtiriasique. Paris, 8°, 54 pp. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Dürr, G. E. F. (1840), Beobachtungen und Bemerkungen über die Läusekrankheit. Journ. d. prakt. Heilk., Berlin, XC. 79–94. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Dyer, D. (1897), A case of universal pediculosis pubis; purpura hemorrhagica a complication. Am. Journ. Dermatol. and Genito-Urin. Dis., St. Louis, I. 23. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Eckert, E. (22. 04. and 26. 08. 1915), Ein neues Entlausungsverfahren. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 419–420, 918–920, 4 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Editorial (4. 12. 1869), Pedicularia. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 612–3. G.Google Scholar
Editorial (29. 07. 1905), ‘Fatal’ pediculosis and Addison's disease. New York Med. Journ., LXXXII. 234. D.H.Google Scholar
Editorial (13. 11. 1909), Lice and liberty. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 1427. G.Google Scholar
Editorial (17. 10. 1914), The plague of lice in the Crimea. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 679. [Abstract and comments on an article in Guy's Hosp. Gaz. for 10. x. 1914 containing letters of Sir Thomas Longmore written in 1855 and describing the sufferings of soldiers in the trenches.] D.Google Scholar
Editorial (28. 02. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kriegsseuchen. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI. 263–4. D.K.Google Scholar
Editorial (9. 05. 1915), Umfrage über Uebertragung und Verhütung des Flecktyphus. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI. (19), 531–3. [Communications received from Flügge, Gärtner, Bujwid, Kisskalt and Uhlenhuth.] D.K.Google Scholar
Editorial (12. 06. 1915). [The spread of typhus by lice.] Lancet, CLXXXVIII. 1251. G.K.Google Scholar
Editorial (11. 1915). [‘Campaign jelly’ for the control of insect parasites of man.] CaaOBOai. [The Horticulturist], Rostov-on-Don, No. 11, p. 854. Rev. in Rev. of Appl. Entomol., ser. B, IV. 25. K.Google Scholar
Ekman, K. (1852), Phthiriasis. Förk. v. Svens. Läk.-Sällsk. Sammank. 1851–2, Stockholm, 26–28. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Emerson, C. P. (1906), A case of combined morbus errorum and Addison's disease. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., XVII. 238. [P. corporis present.] D.Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1904), Ueber die Morphologie, Klassiflkation und systematische Stellung der Anopluren. Zool. Anz., XXVIII. 121–147, 15 Figs. [Figs. 2, 10, 11P. vestimenti, Ph. pubis.] A.I.S.Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1905), Zur Morphologie des Läusekopfes. Zool. Anz., XXVIII. 626–636, 5 Figs. A.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, V. M. (28. 11. 1915), L'influenee sur la vitalité des poux adultes de la température, de la sécheresse de l'air et d'étoffes impregnées de différentes matières. [Russian.] Bull. Soc. Entomol. Moscou, I. 164–170. K.Google Scholar
Eysell, A. (1913), ‘Die Läuse’ in Mense's Handb. der Tropenkr., 2nd ed., I. 40–52. [A short account of Pediculi; compiled.] G.Google Scholar
Eysell, A. (03. 1915), Ein einfaches Vorbeugungsmittel gegen Verlausung und deren Folgen. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Trop.-Hyg., XIX. 170–1. Also München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. No. 16. K.Google Scholar
Eysell, A. (8. 04. 1915), Nachtrag zu ‘Ein einfaches Vorbeugungsmittel gegen Verlausung und ihre Folgen.’. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., Leipzig, XIX. 238–240. K.Google Scholar
Fabre, S. P. (1879), De la mélanodermie phthiriasique. Soc. d. sc. méd. de Gannat. Compt. Rend., Paris, XXXIII. 47–54. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Fabre, P. (1902), Sur les mélanodermies phthiriasiques. Rev. gén. de clin. et de thérap., Paris, XVI. 179–183. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1775), Syst. Entomologiae. Flensburgi et Lipsiae. [Pediculus, pp. 804–805.] S.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1794), Entomologia systematica, etc. Hafniae. [Pediculus, vol. IV. pp. 417–418; the same as Fabricius, 1775.] S.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. (14. 02. 1912), Herpetomonas pediculi n.sp. parasitic in the alimentary canal of Pediculus vestimenti, the human body louse. Proc. Roy. Soc., ser. B, LXXXIV. 505–517, col. PL 14. B.E.Google Scholar
Farrar, R. (1910), Report on the manufacture and sale of unwashed rag-flock. Reports Local Govt. Board on Public Health and Med. Subjects, London, n.s., No. 27, pp. 3–23. [p. 11, P. vestimenti and nits pass alive through tearing machine.] G.Google Scholar
Fasal, H. (22. 02. 1915), Die Pediculosisfrage. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 8, 225–7.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (17. 07. 1915), Zur Methode der Läusevertilgung durch Dämpfe chemischer Agentien. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 24, 647–8. K.Google Scholar
Fiebiger, J. (23. 04. 1915). [Morphologie der Kleiderlaus.] Sitzung d. K. K. Gesellsch. f. Aerate, Wien. Abstract in Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 657. A.Google Scholar
Fiebiger, J. (17. 07. 1915), Ueber Kleiderläuse und die Uebertragung von Krank-heiten durch Arthropoden. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 24, 645–7. A.B.D.Google Scholar
Filippini, A. (30. 04. 1916), Tossicità della benzina usata quale pediculicida. Ann. d' Igiene, Rome, XXVI. 268–9. K.Google Scholar
Fischer, I. (25. 03. 1915), Zur Geschichte des Flecktyphus. (Flecktyphus und Pedikulosis.) Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 12, 321–2. [History of typhus from 16th century onwards, prevalence of lice recorded by Corbems. Old prophylactics against typhus, such as placing mint, rosemary, marjoram etc. in bedding or using garlic and camphor— really served to repel lice.] D.H.K.Google Scholar
Fischer, W. (1910), Ueber die Phtiriasis der Cilien und des Kopfhaares. Monatsh. f. prakt. Dermatol., Hamburg and Leipzig, L. 115–8. Ph.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. B. (1914), Some South Indian Insects and other animals of importance considered especially from an economic point of view. Madras: Govt. Press, XXII + 565 pp., 50 Pis. and 440 Text-figs, [pp. 521–524, Figs. 412–413, Pediculi affecting man.] G.Google Scholar
Flügge, C. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar
Flügge, C. (1915), Schutzkleid bei Fleckfieber. Med. Klinik, No. 15. [Cited by Heymann, 18. VIII. 1915, p. 321; abstract in Deutsche med. Wochenschrift, 1915, p. 572.] K.Google Scholar
Font-Réaulx, P. de (1912), Une maladie des yeux causée par les poux. Arch. de Parasitol., XV. 385–397. [P. capitis regarded as cause.] D.Google Scholar
Forestus, P. (1619), Observationum et curationum medicinalium et chirurgicarum, etc., libri III. Fol. Francoforti, 476 pp. [s.]Google Scholar
Fournier, A. (1891), De la phthiriase pubienne. Union méd., Paris, 3rd s., LI. 293–7; also Gaz. d. hôp. de Toulouse, v. 81; also (abstract) Journ. d. mal. cutan. et syph., III. 125–8. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Fox, T. (1869), Prurigo and pediculosis, or phthiriasis, and the connection with pediculi. St Andrew's Med. Grad. Assoc. Tr., London, 1870, XXXIII. 213–230. [I.C.] D.Ph.Google Scholar
Fox, T. (1872), Note on a diagnostic sign of phthiriasis. Am. Journ. Syph. and Dermatol., New York, III. 1–4. [I.C.] D.Ph.Google Scholar
Fox, T. (1873), The diagnostic sign of phthiriasis. Lancet, II. 902. [I.C.] D.Ph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fränkel, S. (25. 03. 1915), Ueber ein neues sehr wirksames Mittel gegen die Kleiderlaus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 12, 313–4. K.Google Scholar
Fränkel, S. (8. 04. 1915), Weitere Mitteilungen über läusetötende Mittel. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 371. K.Google Scholar
Fränkel, S. (06. 1915), Ueber die Kleiderlaus tötende Mittel. Therap. Monatsh., Berlin, XXIX. 301–7. K.Google Scholar
Frank de Frankenau, G. (1678), Dissertatio de Phtiriasi morbo pediculari, quo nonnulli imperatores, reges, aliique illustres viri ac foeminae misere interierunt. Heidelberg. [M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Frauenholz, (1912), Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Anopluren. Jahresber. d. Niedersächs. Zoolog. Ver. zu Hannover. Reprint pp. 1–60, Pis. I.–III. [Cited by Miiller, 1915, p. 48 as first having described chaetotaxy in different stages of development of P. capitis.] A.Google Scholar
Frazer, W. (16. 12. 1885), Pediculi; their treatment by parasiticides; with observations. Med. Press and Circ., London, n.s., XL. 550–1. K.Google Scholar
Friedmann, A. (31. 01. 1916), Beiträge zur Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse in Kleidern. Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., I. Abt., Orig., LXXVII. 320–338, 4 Figs. K.B.Google Scholar
Frickhinger, H. W. (12. 10. 1916), Ueber das Geruchsvermögen der Kleiderlaus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1254–1256. [Announces fuller paper will appear in Zeitschr. f. angew. Entomol., III. Heft 2, 1916, but gives his main results.] B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. (8. 04. 1915), Zur Verhütung der Infektion mit Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 367–8. K.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. (no date given), Australian Insects. Sydney: Wm Brooks and Co., Ltd. XIV + 449 pp., 37 Pis. and 180 Text-figs, [p. 388, briefest reference only.] O.Google Scholar
Galaine, C. and Houlbert, C. (6. 03. 1916), Sur le self-diffuseur à anhydride sulfureux pour la désinsectation et la dératisation des tranchées, des cales de navires et des locaux habités. C.R. Acad. Sci., CLXII. 363–5. K.Google Scholar
Galewsky, (4. 03. 1915), Zur Behandlung und Prophylaxe der Kleiderläuse. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 285–286. K.Google Scholar
Galewsky, (27. 05. 1915), Vorschläge zur Entlausung von Gefangenenlagern. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 652–3. K.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (3. 07. 1913), Notes de parasitologie, etc. Centralbl. f. Bakt., etc., I. Abt., Orig., LXIX. 496–504. [p. 501 a few lines on survival of lice unfed.] B.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (9. 05. 1916), Neue Beiträge zur Biologie und zur Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk., I. Abt., Orig., LXXVIII. 37–43, 5 Figs. [The author refers to two earlier papers, Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1914, LXXV. 45 and 1915, LXXVI. 511 which are at present inaccessible.] B.K.Google Scholar
Gärtner, A. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar
Gaucher, (1900), La phthiriase. Méd. orient., Paris, IV. 453–6. Also Nice méd., XXV. 33–7. Also (abstract) Indépend. méd., Paris, VI. 377. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Gaud, T. (9. 03. 1916), Nouvelle forme d'emploi du formol pour les désin-fections aux armées. C.R. Acad. Sc., rev. in Rev. d'Hyg., XXXVIII. 441–3. K.Google Scholar
Gaulke, (1863), Ueber Läuse und Läusesucht (Phthiriasis) in therapeutischer und medicinal-polizeilicher Beziehung. Vierteljschr. f. gerichtl. u. öffentl. Med., Berlin, XXIII. 315–329. [I.C.] A.Ph.Google Scholar
Gaulke, (1866), Ueber die Läusesucht (Phthiriasis). Wien. med. Wochenschr., XVI. 380; 398. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Gaviño, A. and Girard, J. (1910), (No. 1) El tifo experimental en los monos inferiores. (No. 3) El tifo exantematico en los monos inferiores (Ateles vellerosus). Immunidad conferida por un primer ataquo. Resistencia del virus á la calefacción. Publications del Instituto Bacteriologico National, Mexico. 32 pp. D.Google Scholar
Geer, C. de (1778), Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des insectes, VII. pp. iii-xii + 950, Pls. I.–XLIX. Stockholm, [pp. 62–67, Pl I., Figs. 6–10 (♀♀, penis, leg 1, head), P. humanus corporis and P. h. capitis; what relates to biology is cited from Leeuwenhoek.] A.I.S.Google Scholar
Geoffrey, (1764), Histoire Abrégée des Insectes, II. 596–7. Paris. [Pediculus humanus L. and P. inguinalis very brief treatment, cites older authors as do Linnaeus, de Geer, Latreille.] S.Google Scholar
Gerwin, (8. 06. 1915), Eine Schutzvorrichtung gegen Flecktyphus. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 802. [Places a wooden gutter in the¸ form of a frame on floor about beds of typhus patients or suspects; the gutter filled with cresol soap solution. This to prevent lice perambulating.] K.Google Scholar
Gibier, (5. 02. 1881), Nouvelle étude sur la corrélation qui existe entre les taches ombrées et la phthiriase du pubis; recherches cliniques. C.R. Soc. de Biol., 7th ser., III. 64–6. [Duguet refers to further experiments of his own in the discussion which follows Gibier's paper.] Ph.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. G. (1874), Insecta Epizoa. Die auf Säugethieren und Vögeln schmarotzenden Insekten nach Chr. L. Nitzsch's Nachlass. Leipzig: O. Wigand. Fol., xiv + 308 pp., 20 Pls. [pp. 23–27, Pl. I., Fig. 8 Phthirius inguinalis, pp. 27–32, Pl I., Figs. 1, 2, 5 Pediculus vestimenti and P. capitis. Systematic position and morphology.] A.S.Google Scholar
Giese, (14. 09. 1915), Ueber Reinigung der Lazarettzüge bei der Linienkom-mandatur × Stettin. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 1274–5, 1 Fig., Feldärztl. Beil., No. 37. [Railway carriage arranged as disinfector.] K.Google Scholar
Girard, M. (1885), Les Insectes. Traité élémentaire d'entomologie. Paris: Baillière et Fils. Vol. III. [Pediculus and Phthirus, pp. 1082–1085; Pl CXVII., Figs. 5–7, signed below E. Guérin pl xbre 1836.] G.I.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. (10. 1912), Notes on Pediculus vestimenti Nietzsche, the body louse of man. Entomol. News, XXIII. 339–344. [Trivial, wordy contribution. Merely saw corporis hatch and feed the same day, and he kept a few alive 2–3 days.] B.Google Scholar
Goldberger, J. (1914), Typhus fever. A brief note on its prevention. U.S. Public Health Rep., XXIX. 1068–1073. [Brief account. Nothing original.] O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberger, J. and Anderson, J. F. (1. 03. 1912), The transmission of typhus fever, with especial reference to transmission by the head louse (Pediculus capitis). Public Health Reports, Washington, XXVII. 297–307, 6 Charts (Monkey temperatures). Also in Collected Studies on Typhus, Hyg. Lab. —Bull., No. 86, pp. 37–48 (Oct. 1912). Treas. Dept., U.S.P.H. Service, Washington. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, H. (1887), Ueber Pediculosis: Ein Beitrag zum Zusammenhang. zwischen Haut- und Augenkrankheiten. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr., XXIV. 866. D.Google Scholar
Gotschlich, (1915), Ueber Fleckfleber. Med. Klinik, No. 13. [Cited by Heymann, 18. 08. 1915, p. 321.] D.Google Scholar
Graber, V. (1872), Anatomiseh-physiologische Studien ueber Phthirius inguinalis Leach. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool, XXII. 137–167, Pl 11. [Important.] Ph.A.B.Google Scholar
Grandesso-Silvestri, O. (1865), Un caso di morbo pedicolare. Gazz. med. ital., prov. venete, Padova, VIII. 84–6. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Grandesso-Silvestri, O. (1871), Morbo pedicolare guarito colla cicutina. Gazz. med. ital., prov. venete, XIV. 320. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Granjux, (20. 04. 1915). (Discussion following paper by Nicolle and Conseil, 20. 02. 1915, pp. 172–203 q.v.) Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 430–2. [Disputes validity of statement that typhus and relapsing fevers are only transmitted by lice, but offers merely opinions as against experimental evidence.] D.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1881), Note intorno ad alcuni parassiti dell' uomo. Di una sede anomala di Phthirius inguinalis. Gazz. d. ospedali, Milano, II. 433. [Cited by Perroncito, 1881, and Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.Google Scholar
Grellety, (1890), Considérations sur la pédiculose et son traitement. Actualité méd., Paris II. 161–7. [i.c.] D.K.Google Scholar
Grellety, (1890–1891), Traitement de la phthiriase. Journ. d. mal. cutan. et syph., Paris II. 20–2. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Greene, E. M. (20. 01. 1898), Pediculosis in Boston's Public Schools. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., XXXVIII. 70–71. D.Google Scholar
Greenough, F. B. (1867–1868), Pediculi vestimentorum. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., LXXVII. 241–6. [i.c.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, F. B. (1887), Clinical Notes on Pediculosis. Trans. Am. Dermatol. Assoc., Boston, pp. 17–21. Also Boston Med.'and Surg. Journ., CXVII. 469–474. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Grimm, O. A. v. (1870), Zur Embryologie von Phthirius pubis. 8°, St Petersburg. Also in Mélanges biol. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Pétersbourg, 1869–71, VII. 303–310, I Pl. [s.] Ph.Google Scholar
Grixoni, G. (30. 06. 1916), La difesa contro i pidocchi. Giorn. Med. Milit., Rome, LXIV. 417–430. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 153, states this paper is a review.] K.Google Scholar
Gross, (23. 03. 1915). [Destruction of lice.] Neue freie Presse. [Cited by Swellengrebel, 1916, p. 25.] K.Google Scholar
Gross, J. (1906), Untersuchungen über die Ovarien von Mallophagen und Pediculiden. Zool. Jahrb., XXII. 347–386, Pls. XX., XXI. [Pl. XXI., Fig. 31 P. capitis, egg, structure of micropyle cap.] A.I.S.Google Scholar
Grube, A. E. (1851), ‘Parasiten’ in Middendorff, Reisen in den äussersten Norden u. Osten Sibiriens während der Jahre 1843 u. 1844, II., Pt. 1, pp. 469–503. [Cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 620, re P. capitis.] Geo.Google Scholar
Gruendler, O. (1850), Dissertatio de parasitis hominis, 55 pp., 2 Pls. 8°, Berlin. [s.] G.Google Scholar
Guérin-Méneville, F. E. (1829–1844), Iconographie du Règne animal de G. Cuvier. II. Planches des animaux invertébrés. Ins. Pl 2. [Coloured Figs. 5, 6, Pediculus humanus corporis and P. h. capitis. Fig. 7, P. pubis. No text.] I.Google Scholar
Guiart, J. and Grimbert, L. (1906), Précis de diagnostic chimique, microscopique et parasitologique. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval. XV + 960 pp., 500 Figs. [pp. 679–682, Figs. 421–3, Pediculus capitis ♀ and nit, Phthirius pubis ♀, copied from Gruby.] G.Google Scholar
Guibout, E. (1881), Dermatoses pediculaires. Thérap. contemp., Paris I. 769–775. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Guiteras, J. (1915), Insect borne diseases in Pan-America. 42 pp., 2 Charts, 2 Text-figs. Issued by the Dept. of Health and Charities Republic of Cuba. Habana: La Modema Poesia. [pp. 21–2, brief reference to lice and typhus. Nothing original.] O.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. (5. 05. 1917), A note on the prevention of pediculosis. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 579–580. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haesebroucq, (1848), Observation de phthiriasis d'une espèce très-rare chez l'homme. Ann. Soc. méd. d'émulat. de la Flandre occid., Roulers, II. 391. [i.c.] R. ?Google Scholar
Haight, H. H. (05. 1916), Endemic typhus in Toronto. Canadian Pract. and Rev., Toronto, XLI. 185–191. [Abstract in Rev. of Applied Entomol., s. B v. 33 states author gives history of a suspected case. P. capitis on patient's head.] D.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. (1895). [On several infectious forms of…pediculosis capitia.] Gaz. lek., Warszawa, 2 ser., XV. 380–2. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Hamer, W. H. (1910), Flies and vermin. Report of the Public Health Committee, London County Council, for 1909, Appendix IV. 9 pp., 4 Charts. [Lice, pp. 7–9, Chart IV.]Google Scholar
Hammerl, (1915). [Destruction of Pediculi.] Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. No. 3. [Cit. by Galewsky, 1915, p. 285.] K.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. (1903), Zur Phylogenie der Hexapoden. (Vorlaufige Mitteilung.) Sitzungsber. K. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl., CXII. 1 Abt., 716–738, 1 Pl. [Systematic position of Pediculidae.] S.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. (1905), Phylogenetisches über Insekten. Zool. Anzeiger, XXVIII. 664–670. 4 Figs. [pp. 668–670; lice; mouthparts.] A.Google Scholar
Hansell, H. F. (1883–1884), Pediculus pubis in the eyelashes. Polydinic, Philadelphia I. 119. [i.c.] D.Ph.Google Scholar
Hanser, R. (12. 10. 1916), Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1254. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, G. F. (27. 01. 1898), Pediculosis. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., CXXXVIII. 95. D.Google Scholar
Harrison, L. (07. 1916), A preliminary account of the structure of the mouthparts in the body-louse. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., XVIII. 207–226, Pl. VII., 7 Text-figs. A.I.Google Scholar
Hartmann, A. (15. 07. 1915), Zur Behandlung und Ansteckungsverhütung des Flecktyphus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 861. D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hase, A. (1915), Beiträge zu einer Biologie der Kleiderlaus. Zeitschr. f. angewandte Entomol., Berlin II., Heft 2, with 47 Figs. Also issued as No. 1 of Flugschriften d. Deutsch. Gesellsch. f. angew. Entomol., 95 pp., 47 Text-figs. Berlin: P. Parey. [Cited at length by Müller, 1915, p. 66; also by Friedmann, 1916, p. 338; and by Hase himself, 29. 11. 1915; abstract in Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1 Abt., Ref.,LXIV. 528. Inaccessible.] B.K.Google Scholar
Hase, A. (29. 11. 1915), Weitere Beobaohtungen über die Läuseplage. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. u. Infektionskr., 1 Abt., Orig., LXXVII. 153–163. D.B.Google Scholar
Hase, A. (1916), Ueber die Entwickelungsstadien der Eier und über die Larven der Kleiderlaus (Pediculus corporis de Geer = vestimenti Nitzsch). Naturw. Wochenschr., XXXI. pp. 1 et seq. [Abstract in Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1 Abt., Ref., LXIV. 530, reabstr. in Rev. Appl. Entomol., s. B v. 44. Original inaccessible.] B.Google Scholar
Heberden, W. (1831), De morbo pediculari. Opera medica. Leipzig. [M.] D.Google Scholar
Hebra, (1865), Ueber die sogenannte Phthiriasis (Läusesucht). Wien. med. Presse, VI. 745, 777, 801, 849, 876. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Hebra, (1866), Noch ein Wort ueber die sogenannte Läusesucht (Phthiriasis). Wien. med. Wochenschr., XVII. 425, 441. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Hegler, C. and Prowazek, S. V. (3. 11. 1913), Untersuchungen über Fleckfieber. Vorläufiger Bericht. (A) Klinischer Teil von C. Hegler. (B) Aetiologischer Teil von S. von Prowazek. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., L. (No. 44), 2035–2040, 4 Charts. [The full account of these investigations was to have appeared shortly afterwards in Brauer's Beiträge zur Klinik der Infektionskrankheiten. The latter inaccessible.] D.Google Scholar
Heisler, I. (1892), Pediculi pubis [on the scalp]. Orvosi hetil., Budapest, XXXVI. 364. Also (transl.) Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph., Wien, XXIV. 589. Also (transl. abstract) Pest med.-chir. Presse, XXVIII. 978. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Hellwig, J. (1680), Phthiriasis subitanea. In his Obs. phys. med., 4°, Aug. Vindel., 143–147. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Hemmann, A. (1850), Vertilgung von Pediculus capitis. Bern. Gor.-Bl. f. Aerzte u. Apoth., I. 148. [i.c.] K.Google Scholar
Hermann, J. F. (1804), Mémoire aptérologique, An XII. Strasbourg, pp. 114, Pls. I.–IX. [p. 12, Pediculus included under Aptera; brief mention only.] S.Google Scholar
Herxheimer, and Nathan, (1915). [Trikresol powder recommended.] Therap. Monatsh., No. 2, p. 87. [Cited by Bagg, 15. 05. 1915, p. 178, Swoboda, and others.] K.Google Scholar
Herz, L. ( ), Zur Ætiologie des Herpes ciliaris (conjunctivitis lymphatica). Klin. Monatsbl.f. Augenheilk., p. 418. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar
Heusner, H. L. (14. 12. 1915), Bemerkungen zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 1743. (Feldärztl. Beil., No. 50.) K.Google Scholar
Hewetson, J. (1894), Note on the significance of taches bleuâtres. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., V. 19. Ph.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. (4. 04. 1912), Transmission of Typhus fever by Lice. Canadian Entomol., XLIV. 103–104. [A brief summary of recent work on typhus; contains inaccuracies.] O.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. (1916), The suppression of two insects affecting troops. Special circular for Canadian Expeditionary Force. Ottawa: Govt. Printing Bureau, 5 pp. [About flies and lice, popular leaflet, nothing original.] O.Google Scholar
Heymann, B. (8. 08. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 253–4; also Zeitschr. f. ärztl. Fortbildung, No. 10; also [brief notice] Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 325. K.Google Scholar
Heymann, B. (18. 08. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr., LXXX. 299–323, Pl. VI., 3 Text-figs. [Includes all and more than is contained in this author's previous papers.] B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymann, B. (30. 06. 1916), Beiträge zur Frage von der Beteiligung der Kopflaus an der Fleckfieber-Verbreitung. Med. Klinik, XII. 480–8. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entom., V. 32, discusses differences between head and body lice; regards evidence that capitis conveys typhus as inconclusive.] D.Google Scholar
Hilgenberg, C. A. (1854), Augenentzündung durch Pediculus pubis. Org. f. d. ges. Heilk., Aachen, III. 54. [i.c.] D.Ph.Google Scholar
Hindle, E. (26. 02. 1917), Notes on the biology of Pediculus humanus. Parasitology, IX. 259–265 (with a Foreword by G. H. F. Nuttall). B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, A. (1881), Handbuch der historisch-geographischen Pathologie. 3 vols. Stuttgart. [I. p. 405 refers to similarity in epidemiology of typhus and relapsing fever.] D.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A. (1883), Handbook of Geographical and Historical Pathology, transl. by Creighton, C.. London: New Sydenham Society. [Translation of Hirsch, 1881. Vol. I. 545–592, Typhus; Handbook of Geographical and Historical Pathology, 593–616, Relapsing fever.] D.Google Scholar
Holland, W. (1913). [Pediculosis as a cause of anaemia.] Tidsskr.f. d. Norske Laegefo., Kristiania, XXXIII. 829–832. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Holste, A. (12. 07. 1915), Ueber Lausofan. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 738–740. K.Google Scholar
Hönck, (25. 03. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 368, 3 Figs. [Author is ‘Chefarzt im Feldlazarett in W. Flandern.’] K.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. (1665), Micrographia or some physiological description of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses, etc. 246 pp., 38 Pls. Fol. London. [Obs. LIX. of a Louse, pp. 211–213, and Pl 35.] A.B.I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, R. W. (1853), Pediculi from the roots of the eyelashes. American Journ. Med. Sci., Philadelphia n. s., XXV. 374–6. Also Extr. Rec. Boston Soc. Med. Improve., I. 305–7. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Hornstein, F. (1. 06. 1915), Ueber Cinol als Läusebekämpfungsmittel. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 767. (Feldärztl. Beil., No. 22.) K.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. C. (17. 10. 1914), Pediculosis of the scalp and eye disease. Lancet, II. 966. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, C. W. and Clark, P. F. (1912), Experiments on Insect Transmission of the Virus of Poliomyelitis. Journ. Exper. Med., XVI. 850–9. [Experiments with Pediculus capitis and P. vestimenti were negative.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, B. W. (02. 1916), The typhus fever epidemic in Serbia, 1915. St. Bartholomew's Hosp. Journ., London, XXIII. 52–54, 1 Chart. [Casual reference to lice as probable carriers and ‘perhaps fleas and bugs to a slighter degree.’ Wore linen gowns and rubber boots, changed linen frequently, searched for lice, and anointed body with paraffin or vermijelli against lice.] D.K.Google Scholar
Husemann, T. (1856), Ein Beitrag zur Lehre der sogenannten Phthiriasis. Zeitschr. d. K.-K. Gesellsch. d. Aerzte in Wien, XII. 497–533. [s.] Ph.Google Scholar
Husemann, T. (1867), Kaiser Arnulf und König Snyo, zwei Fälle von Phthiriasis aus dem Mittelalter. Deutsche Klinik, Berlin, XIX. 33. [i.c.] H.Google Scholar
Izar, G. (04. 1916), Sulla profilassi del Pediculus hominis. Giorn. di med. milit. [Abstr. in Bull. Inst. Pasteur, XIV. 742.] K.Google Scholar
Jacobsthal, E. (7. 09. 1916), Eine Anregung zur Anstellung von Kutisreaktionen bei Pleckfieber. Deutsche med. Woohenschr., XLII. 1093. [Suggests trial of extract prepared from lice for testing cutaneous reaction in relapsing fever. Cites papers on similar subject by Bocha-Lima (1) ‘Bericht an das Kriegsministerium,’ and (2) Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., 20, 1916, (3) also Nöller, Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., No. 23, 1916.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, L. (1897 ?), Pédiculose des vêtements; mélanodermie parasitaire. Mus. de l'hôp. St. Louis Icon. d. malad. cutan. et syph., Paris, pp. 299–302, 1 Pl. Also (transl.) in Pict. Atlas Skin Dis. and Syph., etc. St. Louis Hosp., London and Philadelphia, 1895–1897, pp. 265–8, 1 Pl [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. A. (1888), On some rarer effects of pediculi. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., London I. 321–7. Ph.D.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. A. (1895), The treatment of pediculosis vestimentorum. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., VII. 248. K.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. A. (1899), The cause of the reappearance of pediculi vestimentorum after apparently thorough treatment. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., XI. 193. K.Google Scholar
Jeanneret-Minkine, M. (1915), Le typhus exanthématique. Cr. 8°, 189 pp., 1 Pl., Paris: Payot et Cie. [A very interesting account of personal experiences of lice and typhus fever in Serbia, etc.] D.Google Scholar
Jeanselme, (1905), La phtiriase et son traitement. Journ. de méd. int., Paris, IX. 31–3. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Jeitteles, J. (1841), Phthiriasis. Oesterr. med. Wochenschr., Wien, 632–5. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Joly, P. R. (1898), Importance du rôle des insectes dans la transmission des maladies infectieuses et parasitaires. Du formol comme insecticide. These. Bordeaux: Imprimerie du Midi. 90 pp. [Cit. by Nuttall, 1899, p. 33.] D.K.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, F. (12. 01. 1915), Destruction des poux de corps. Bull. Acad. de Méd.; rev. in Rev. d'hyg., XXXVII. 73. K.Google Scholar
Jürgens, (8. 03. 1915), Ueber Flecktyphus. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 252–3. D.Google Scholar
Karjavine, P. (1789), Description du pou vu au microscope. 1 Pl. 4°, Carouge. [French and Russian text.] [s.] A.Google Scholar
Keferstein, A. (1837), Die den Menschen und den Thieren schädlichen Insekten. 8°, Erfurt, [s.] G.Google Scholar
Kellogg, V. L. (23. 05. 1914), Ectoparasites of Mammals. American Nat., New York, XLVIII. 257–279. [Anoplura of man are Phthirius and 2 spp. of Pediculus occurring throughout the world. Pediculus spp. also occur on chimpanzee and Ateles, but not on other animals, and afford evidence of genetic relationship between apes and man.] Geo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, (20. 01. 1915), Au sujet de la prophylaxie et destruction des parasites de l'homine. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 79–80. [Experiences of general prophylaxis in Morocco. Nothing new.] K.O.Google Scholar
Kinloch, J. P. (19. 06. 1915), An investigation of the best methods of destroying lice and other body vermin. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 1038–1041. Abstract also in U.S. Publ. Health Reports, XXX., issued as Reprint, No. 293. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinloch, J. P. (3. 06. 1916), An investigation of the best methods of destroying lice and other body vermin. II. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 789–793. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, W. and Spence, W. (1826), Introduction to Entomology, vol. IV. London. [p. 393, Anoplura classed under Aptera in the order Hexapoda; brief mention only.] S.Google Scholar
Kirstein, F. (1915), Das Fleckfieber und seine Bekämpfung. Veröffentl. a. d. Gebiete d. Medizinalverwalt., Heft 9. [Cited by Friedmann, 31. 01. 1916, p. 338. Inaccessible.] D.K.Google Scholar
Kisskalt, K. (6. 08. 1914), Das Aussterben der ‘Krankheiten der Unkultur’. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XL. 1606–7. [In a footnote recommends SO2, CS2 or xylol for killing lice.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisskalt, K. (4. 02. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 154. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisskalt, K. (9. 05. 1915), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar
Kisskalt, K. (13. 05. 1915), Das jahreszeitliche Auftreten der Kriegsseuchen. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 579–582. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisskalt, K. (31. 01. 1916), Zur mikroskopischen Anatomie von Ped. vestimentorum. Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitenk., 1 Abt., Orig., LXXII. 338–9, 1 Pl. [Photomicrographs.] A.Google Scholar
Kisskalt, K. and Friedmann, A. (1. 04. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. II. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 397–8. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, G. and Zinn, W. (02. 1915), Zur Diagnose und Prophylaxe des Fleckfiebers. Therap. d. Gegenw., LVI. 41–45. Abstract in Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 324. D.K.Google Scholar
Knaffl-Lenz, E. v. (1. 07. 1915), Beitrag zur Läusefrage. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 26, 708–9. K.Google Scholar
Kniphoff, J. H. (1759), Dissertatio de Pediculus inguinalibus Insectis et Vermibus homini molestis. Erfurt. [M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Knott, J. (1897), Morbus pediculosus. Med. Press and Giro., London, n.s., LXIII. 609–612, 634–7, 658–660; LXIV. 31. G.H.K.Google Scholar
Knott, J. (29. 07. 1905), Phthiriasis. American Med., Philadelphia, X. 188–195. [Reprinted, with no apparent alteration or explanation, from Knott 1897.] G.H.K.Google Scholar
Korbsch, R. (5. 10. 1916), Zur Kenntnis der Febris wolhynica. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1217–1219, 2 Figs, 6 Charts. [Relapsing fever. Reports three negative infection experiments on himself and another physician wherein two lice, fed on typhus patients, bit the doctors afterwards without effect.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, R. (25. 03. 1915), Zur Frage der persönlichen Prophylaxe gegen Typhus exanthematicus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 314–5. K.Google Scholar
Kraus, R. (1915), Nachtrag zu meinem Artikel der persönlichen Prophylaxe gegen Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 442. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Küchenmeister, F. (1855), Die in und an dem Körper des lebenden Menschen vorkommenden Parasiten, 1 Abt., Die thierischen Parasiten. 486 pp., 9 Pl. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. [pp. 439 et seq. lice infesting man.] G.Google Scholar
Küchenmeister, F. (1857), Ueber die angeblichen Fälle von Läusesucht in der Bibel und bei Josephus. Deutsche Klinik, Berlin, IX. 341, 361. [i.c.] H.Google Scholar
Kuhn, E. (18. 04. 1915), Die Entfernung von Kleiderläusen durch Schwefeldämpfe. Med. Klinik, XI. 456–7. K.Google Scholar
Kulka, W. (4. 05. 1915), Ein neues Mittel zur Läusevertilgung. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 630–1. (Feldärztl. Beilage, No. 18.) K.Google Scholar
Kurz, M. D. (1832), Ueber Phthiriasis. Magazin f. d. ges. Heilk., Berlin, XXXVI. 97–110. [Cited by Landois, 1865, p. 501. Title corrected from s.] D.Google Scholar
Labbé, H. and Wahl, M. (09. 1915), Recherches sur l'intoxication des insectes du genre Pediculus par les vapeurs de diftérents corps minéraux ou organiques. Journ. de physiol. et de path, gén., XVI. 872–888. B.Google Scholar
Lagane, L. (14. 09. 1912), Les dangers du pou. Presse méd., Paris, XX., Suppl. 949–951. K.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de (1801), Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres. 452 pp. 8°, Paris [p. 183, Genus Pediculus (included under Arachnides antennistes with Scolopendra, Julus, Podura, etc.). One sp.: P. humanus L. Brief mention only.]Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de (1835–1845), Histoire naturelle des a/nimaux sans vertebres. 11 vols., 8°, 2nd ed. [Vol. V. 50 P. vestimenti. Cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 623.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landesberg, M. (1882), Phthiriasis pubis of the eyebrows. Med. Bull., Philadelphia, IV. 133. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Landois, L. (1864 a), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pediculinen. I. Anatomie des Phthirius inguinalis Leach. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., Leipzig, XIV. 1–26, Pls. I.–V. [Important.] Ph.I.Google Scholar
Landois, L. (1864 b), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pediculinen. II. Historisch-kritische Untersuchung über die Läusesucht. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., Leipzig, XIV. 27–41. [Numerous citations from classical and older authors regarding pediculosis. Interesting.] H.Google Scholar
Landois, L. (1865 a), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pedikuliden. III. Anatomie des Pediculus vestimenti Nitzsch. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., XV. 32–55, Pls. II.–IV. A.I.Google Scholar
Landois, L. (1865 b), Untersuchungen über die auf dem Menschen schmarotzenden Pedikuliden. IV. Abhandlung (Schluss). Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., XV. 494–503, Pl. 38. [Anatomy of P. capitis; Ph. inguinalis, muscular system; pediculosis, historical.] A.H.I.Ph.Google Scholar
Landois, L. (1866 a), Ueber die Existenz der echten Läusesucht. Wien. med. Wochenschr., XVI. 265, 281, 297. D.Google Scholar
Landois, L. (1866 b), Zur Frage ueber die Existenz der echten Läusesucht (Phthiriasis). Wien. med. Wochenschr., 620, 623. D.Google Scholar
Larrieu, J. F. (1915), Notes sur l'étiologie et la prophylaxie du typhus exanthématique. Paris: Vigot frères. 15 pp. 8°. [I.M.] D.K.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. (1796), Précis des caractères génériques des insectes, disposés dans un ordre naturel. An V. 12°, Brive. xii + 201 pp. [Pediculus, p. 175] S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latreille, P. A. (1804), Histoire générate et particulière des Crustacéa et des Insectes. 14 vols. 8°, Paris. [Vol. VIII. 93–6, Pediculus humanus, P. cervicalis Latr., P. pubis, brief description.] S.Google Scholar
Laznia (1915), Die Laus und ihre Bekämpfung. Pharmaceutische Post, 1915, p. 301. [Cited by Müller, 1915, p. 54.] K.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. (1810), Articles ‘Entomology’ and ‘Insecta’ in Edinburgh Encyclopedia. Edinburgh, 4°. [Vol. IX. 77, P. humanus, P. cervicalis, Ph. inguinalis; cited by Stephens, 1829.]Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. (1814–1817), Zoological Miscellany, etc., London, in 3 vols. [III. 66–7, Pediculus.] S.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. (1818), Articles ‘Annulosa’ and ‘Entomology’ in Supplement to Encyclopedia Britannica. Edinburgh. [Cited re Pediculus by Stephens, 1829.]Google Scholar
Lebedeff, V. N. (1915). [Hydrocyanic acid gas used in destruction of insects which transmit disease: lice, fleas, bugs, etc.] MeflimiiHCKOe 0603ptHie [Rev. of Med.], Moscow, LXXXIV. 394–9, 1 Pl. K.Google Scholar
Leboeuf, (1914), La lèpre en Nouvelle Calédonie et Dépendances. Ann. Hyg. Méd. Coloniate, Paris, XVII. 177–197; abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, II. 79. [Negative evidence of lice as carriers.] D.Google Scholar
Leeuwenhoek, A. van, The select works of Antony van Leeuwenhoek, containing microscopic discoveries in many of the works of nature. Transl. from the Dutch and Latin editions published by the author, by Samuel, Hoole. London: Philanthropic Soc. (1807). 28×21 cm. 2 vols. viii + 314 and 344 + viii pp., 20 Plates, [II. pp. 163–169, Pl. XVI., Figs. 1–8, P. vestimenti. The translator appends a note that ‘the author is much more prolix and circumstantial than here set down,’ the translation ‘gives the substance and general result of his observations.’] A.B.I.Google Scholar
Lefèbre, C. (1823), Du pou et du meilleur procédé à employer dans son extirpation. 4°, Strasbourg, [i.c.] K.Google Scholar
Lefroy, H. Maxwell- (1916), Measures for avoidance and extermination of flies, mosquitoes, lice and other vermin. 2nd ed.17 pp., 5 Figs. Calcutta and Simla: Thacker, Spink and Co. K.Google Scholar
Lefroy, H. Maxwell-, and Hewlett, F. M. (1909), Indian Insect Life. A Manual of the Insects of the Plains (Tropical India), xii + 786 pp., 84 Pls. 536 Figs. Calcutta and Simla: Thacker, Spink and Co.; London: W. Thacker and Co. [pp. 762–764. Pediculidae. Nothing original.] O.Google Scholar
Legendre, J., (12. 05. 1915), Destruction des poux de corps par le crésyl et le brossage. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exotique, Paris, VIII. 280–3. K.Google Scholar
Legroux, R. (21. 07. 1915), Sur la destruction des poux. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot., VIII. 470–3. K.Google Scholar
Lehmann, (1. 04. 1915), Insektenpulverbestimmung. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 424 [note of 5 lines], abstract from München. med. Wochenschr., No. 10. K.Google Scholar
Lelean, P. S. (1917), Sanitation in War. 2nd ed.336 pp., 54 Figs. 17 × 11 cm. London: J. and A. Churchill. [De-lousing, pp. 141–144, 160–162, 199–208.] K.Google Scholar
Le Play, and Débu, (1906), Un cas de maladie des vagabonds. Bull. Soc. franç. de dermatol. et syph., Paris, XVII. 60–63. Also Ann. de dermatol. et syph., 4 s., VII. 141–4. Ph.Google Scholar
Letulle, M. (20. 01. 1915), Mesures prophylactiques contre le typhus dans le camp retranché de Paris. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 20–25. D.K.Google Scholar
Letulle, M. and Bordas, (20. 03. 1915), La désinfection entomo-parasitaire (Prophylaxie du typhus). Rev. d'hyg. et de police sanit., XXXVII. 245–256, 10 Figs. [Disinfecting apparatus etc., photomicrographs of lice.] K.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1855), Ueber die Mikropyle und den feineren Bau der Schalenhaut bei den Insekteneiern. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Befruchtung. Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol., Berlin, Jahrg. 1855, pp. 90–264, Pls. VII.–XI. [Haematopinus and Pediculus.] A.I.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1855 a), Parasitismus und Parasiten. Arch. f. phys. Heilk., XI. 199–259, 379–437. [Tab. 138, II. f. 1, cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 620, re anatomy of Pediculus.] A.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, D. (1902), Eczema of the scalp due to pediculosis. Med. Standard, Chicago, XXV. 476. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Lindner, E. (25. 03. 1915), Zur Epidemiologie und Klinik des Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 12, 315–6. [Whilst recognizing louse transmission of typhus, he believes that there may be other modes of infection.] D.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758), Systema Naturae, Regnum Animalle, ed. 10, pp. 824, Holmiae. [pp. 610–611, briefest mention of Pediculus humanus L. (Fn. svec. 1153), “Habitat in capite et vestimentis humanis.” P. pubis L. (Fn. svec. 1154).] S.Google Scholar
Lobaczewski, A. R. v. (8. 04. 1915), Zur Frage der “Entlausung.” Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 373–4. K.Google Scholar
Löhe, (24. 05. 1915), Erfahrungen bei der Anwendung von Mitteln zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr., LII. 552. K.Google Scholar
Low, R. B. (1916), The epidemiology of typhus exanthematicus in recent years. XLIVth Ann. Rep. Local Govt. Board, 1914–1915. Supplt. containing Rep. of the Med. Officer. [Cd. 8153.] pp. 28–89. D.Google Scholar
Löwenhardt, (1840), Fall von Phthiriasis durch Tabacksabkochung geheilt. Wochenschr. f. d. ges. Heilk., Berlin, pp. 418–420. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Lorange, O. (1913), Pediculi capitis. Tidsskr.f. d. norske Laegefor., Kristiania, XXXIII. 977–983. [I.M.]Google Scholar
Luton, (1876), Affection pédiculaire. Bull. Soc. méd. de Reims (1875), No. 14, p. 29. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Machold, B. (6. 06. 1915), Lausofan. Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 645. K.Google Scholar
McCoy, G. W. and Clegg, M. T. (6. 09. 1912), A note on acid-fast bacilli in head lice (Pediculus capitis). Publ. Health Rep., Washington, XXVII. 1464–5. [Found bacilli indistinguishable from B. leprae in two lice from case of nodular leprosy. Examinations hitherto made by authors were negative.] D.Google Scholar
McIntyre, G. (1905–1906), Larkspur in the treatment of pediculosis. Illinois Med. Bull., Chicago, VI. 370. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Mackie, F. P. (14. 12. 1907), The part played by Pediculus corporis in the transmission of relapsing fever. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 1706–9. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, F. P. (1913), The body-louse (Pediculus vestimenti) as a disease carrier. The body-louse as a carrier of relapsing fever. Proc. 3rd Meeting Gen. Malaria Committee Madras, Nov. 18–20, 1912, pp. 281–289 (Simla: Govt. Central Branch Press). D.Google Scholar
Mackie, F. P. (04. 1915), Insects and Kala-azar. Ind. Journ. Med. Res., Calcutta, II. 942–9. [Pediculus humanus and P. capitis, captured or fed on persons with Kala-azar, examined with negative result for Leishmania.] D.Google Scholar
Macleay, W. S. (1821), Horae Entomologicae, I. Pt. II. London, [pp. 287, 392, Anoplura placed as an order in the sub-class Ametabola under Annulosa.] S.Google Scholar
Maitland, T. G. (21. 08. 1915), Notes on the typhus epidemic in Serbia, 1915. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 283–5. D.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinin, J. T. (1906), Russian: Anti-mosquito liquid as a remedy against malaria. Tiflis, 118 pp. Cited by Grigorieff, A. X., see abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, s. B, III. 105–7. [Fluid recommended since, as a remedy against lice, by various Russian observers.] K.Google Scholar
Mallet, C. (1882), Études sur les taches bleues. Historique et recherches nouvelles. Thèse: Paris. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar
Manson, Sir P. (1909), see Allbutt and Rolleston.Google Scholar
Marchello, L. (1804), Storia di una rara phthiriasis, o malattia pedicolare. Mem. d. Soc. med. di emulaz. di Genova, III. 65–83. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Marschalko, T. v. (11. 03. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage im Felde. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 316–7. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. J. (4–11. 01. 1913), On Insects as Porters of Bacterial Infection (The Horace Dobell Lectures, Roy. Coll. Phys., London, Nov. 1912). The Lancet, I. 1–10, 81–89. [Lice, pp. 84, 85, 87, Figs. 16, 17.] Also Brit. Med. Journ. I. 1–8, 59–68. [Lice, pp. 64, 65, 66.] A.Google Scholar
Marzinovsky, E. I. (01. 1915), Russian: Insects, as carriers of infective diseases. Proc. Confer. Bacteriologists, etc., Moscow, pp. 56–8. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, III. 123–4.] D.K.Google Scholar
Marzocchi, V. (1908), Di una rara localizzazione dello phtirius inguinalis. Giorn. d. R. Accad. Med. Torino, 4 s., XIV. 150–2. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Marzocchi, V. (1910), Phthirius inguinalis alia pelle del capo. Giorn. d. R. Accad. Med. Torino, LXXI. 150. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Marzocchi, V. (10. 07. 1913), Sur le Phthirius inguinalis. Arch, de Parasitol., Paris, XVI. 314–317. Ph.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. W. P. (1886–1887), Notes on Phthiriasis. Canada Med. and Surg. Journ., Montreal, XV. 45–9. See also remarks by A. L. Smith in Proc. Med.-Chir. Soc. Montreal (1885–7), 1888, pp. 108–112. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Maxwell-Lefroy, H. (05. 1915), see Lefroy.Google Scholar
“Medicus” (1831), Pediculi. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., IV. 371. [I.M.]Google Scholar
Mégnin, P. (1880), Les Parasites et les Maladies Parasitaires chez l'homme, les animaux domestiques et les animaux sauvages avec lesquels ils peuvent être en contact; insectes, arachnides, crustacés. 478 pp., 65 Figs., 26 Pls. 8°, Paris. G.Google Scholar
Mégnin, P. (1906), Les insectes buveurs de sang et colporteurs des virus. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval. 150 pp., 53 Figs. [Human lice, pp. 87–90, Figs. 35, 36. Published posthumously by the author's son, Mégnin, P. Jr.] G.Google Scholar
Meige, H. (1897), Les pouilleux dans l'art. Nouv. Iconogr. de la Salpetrière, Paris, No. 5. [Refers to pictures by Murillo, Gerard Dow, Adrian and Isaac van Ostade, Pieter de Hooch, etc.] H.I.Google Scholar
Meige, H. (1903), Un document pour les pouilleux dans l'art. N. Iconog. de la Salpetrière, Paris, XVI. 271–2, with illustration. [Reproduces an engraving by Joachim Ottens, 16th century, probably after Brower, which suggests that there were professional destroyers of P. capitis at that date.] I.Google Scholar
Meinert, F. (1891), Pediculus humanus L. et trophi ejus. Lusen og dens Munddele. Entom. Meddel, Copenhagen, III. 58–83, Pl I. A.Google Scholar
Melnikow, N. (1869), Beiträge zur Embryonalentwickelung von Insekten. Arch. f. Naturg., Jahrg. XXXV., Bd. I. 136–189, Pls. VIII.-XI. [pp. 153–186, Figs. 22, 23, 30, 31, 37–39. Embryology of P. capitis.] A.I.Google Scholar
Meltzer, O. (29. 04. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage im Felde. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 532–3. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, G. (25. 07. 1915), La profilassi del tifo esantematico al campo. Policlinico, Rome, XXII., sez. prat., 995–7. 1 Fig. K.Google Scholar
Mense, (03. 1915), Zur Frage der Bekämpfung des Fleckfiebers und der Läuse. Arch. f. Schiffs- und Tropen-Hyg., XIX. 172–6. K.Google Scholar
Michie, H. C. (1915), Mexican Typhus Fever. Med. Record, New York, LXXXVII. 214–218. [Summary, with brief consideration of Pediculi and advice on prophylaxis.] D.K.Google Scholar
Mjöberg, E. (1910), Studien ueber Mallophagen und Anopluren. (Ph.D. Dissertation.) Upsala: Almquist and Wiksells. 296 pp., 5 Pls., 157 Text-figs. R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moniez, R. (1889), Les parasites de l'homme (animaux et végétaux). Paris: J. B. Baillière. 307 pp., 72 Figs. [Human lice, pp. 224–229, Figs. 61–62 poor.] G.Google Scholar
Moore, L. (6. 03. 1915), Vermin in the trenches. Lancet, I. 528. K.Google Scholar
Morris, M. (1911), see, Allbutt and Rolleston.Google Scholar
Moursou, J. (1877), Nouvelles recherches sur l'origine des taches ombrées. Ann. de Dermatol. et de Syphil, IX. 198. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar
Moursou, J. (1878), A propos de la coïncidence des taches ombrées et des poux du pubis. Mouvement méd., Paris, XVI. 537. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Mühlens, P. (1914), Ueber Fleckfieber und Rückfallfieber. München. med. Wochenschr., LXI. 2183–5, 2228–2230. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Müller, J. (1915), Zur Naturgeschichte der Kleiderlaus. Das Oesterreichische Sanitätswesen (Wien und Leipzig: Hölder), XXVII., No. 36–38 and No. 47–49 Beilage. Also appeared as a Reprint, 75 pp. (repaged) with 4 coloured Plates and 37 Text-figs., and an Appendix. [Important.] A.B.I.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (1858), Les insectes nuisibles à l'homme, aux animaux et aux plantes. 12°, Paris. [M.] G.Google Scholar
Murchison, C. (1884), A Treatise on the Continued Fevers of Great Britain. 3rd ed.London: Longmans, Green and Co. 731 pp. [Typhus fever, pp. 23–310; Relapsing fever, pp. 311–415. Contains much epidemiological evidence indicating conveyance by lice but the latter not suspected to be vectors. Not surpassed by anything published before or since, except for recent discoveries as to etiology.] Epid.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (1861), On the pediculi infesting the different races of men. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., XXII. 567–578, 2 Pls. Geo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musselius, A. A. (28. 11. 1915), Expériences et observations de la nourriture des poux de corps et de l'effet produit sur eux par des liquides odoriférentes. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Moscou, I. 170–179. K.Google Scholar
Muto, A, (31. 08. 1916), Nuovo metodo di sterilizzazione entomo-parassitario. Ann. d' Igiene, Rome, XXVI. 493–508, 5 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Nettleship, E. (23. 10. 1869), Notes on the presence of the body-louse in prurigo senilis, and on the occurrence of lice on the head in adults. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 435. D.Google Scholar
Neufeld, (1915), Zur Bekämpfung des Fleckfiebers. Med. Klinik, No. 13, p. 365. [Cited by Heymann, 18. VIII. 1915, p. 320.] D.K.Google Scholar
Neukirch, P. and Zlocisti, T. (5. 03. 1916), Epidemiologische und klinische Erfahrungen bei Fleckfieber in Ostanatolien. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XII., No. 9, 256–9. D.Epid.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. (1896), Ueber die Läusesucht in den Volksschulen. Zeitschr. f. Schulgesundheitspl., Hamburg and Leipzig, IX. 185–191. D.Google Scholar
Neumann, L.-G. (1892), Traité des maladies parasitaires non microbiennes des animaux domestiques. 2nd ed.Paris: Asselin et Houzeau. XVI + 767 pp., 364 Figs. [p. 64 brief reference only to human lice.] O.Google Scholar
Neumann, L.-G. (1910), Notes sur les Pédiculidés. II. Arch. de Parasitol., XIV. 401–414, 8 Figs. [pp. 410–413, Pediculus. Throws doubt upon the validity of specific differences between P. capitis and P. vestimenti.] S.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. O. (2. 03. 1909), Ueber das Verhalten der Spirochäten des Rückfallfiebers im Tierkörper und die experimentelle Uebertragung der Parasiten durch Zecken und Läuse. München. med. Wochenschr., p. 477. [Transmission of Russian and African strains of relapsing fever from rat to rat by means of rat-lice, Haematopinus spinulosus, transferred without delay in large numbers from sick to healthy rats which developed relapsing fever after 6–7 days.] R.D.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. O. and Mayer, M. (1914), Atlas und Lehrbuch wichtiger tierischer Parasiten und ihrer Ueberträger mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tropenpathologie. München: J. F. Lehmann. VI + 580 pp., 45 coloured Plates, 237 Text-figs, with descriptive text. [p. 565, briefest treatment; Pl. XLIV., Figs. 20, 21 ♀, excellent.] I.Google Scholar
Neumayer, V. L. (13. 07. 1915), Zur Frage des persönlichen Lausschutzes. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 963–4. K.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (12. 07. 1909), Reproduction expérimentale du typhus exanthématique chez le singe. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CXLIX. 157–160. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (04. 1910), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique entreprises à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1909. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXIV. 243–249. [Other papers follow which were written in collaboration under the covering title above cited. Vide pp. 249–275.] D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (01. 1911), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique entreprises à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1910. (II. Mém.) Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXV. 1–13. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (01. 1911), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique entreprises à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1910. (II. Mém.) Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXV. 1–13. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (14. 04. 1915), Quelques points concernant le typhus exanthématique. Bull. Soc. path, exotique, Paris, VIII. 160–1. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. and Blaizot, L. (1. 04. 1916), Recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique etc. Arch. Inst. Pasteur de Tunis, IX. 127–134. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C., Blaizot, L. and Conseil, E. (10. 06. 1912), Etiologie de la fièvre récurrente. Son mode de transmission par le pou. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLIV. 1636–8. Also Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, Part III. 110–112. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (26. 08. 1912), Conditions de transmission de la fièvre récurrente par le pou. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLV. 481–4. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (1913), Etudes sur la fièvre récurrente. I. L'épidemie tunisienne de 1912 et la démonstration expérimentale de la transmission de la fièvre récurrente par les poux. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, VIII., Part I. 1–30. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (12. 02. 1913), Du rôle négatif des poux dans la transmission expérimentale de la fièvre de tiques. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot., Paris, VI. 106–7. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (03. 1913), Etiologie de la fièvre récurrente; son mode de transmission par le pou. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Paris, XXVII. 204–225. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. and Blanc, G. (15. 06. 1914), Les spirilles de la fièvre récurrente sont-ils virulents aux phases successives de leur évolution chez le pou? Démonstration de leur virulence à un stade invisible. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, pp. 1815–7. Also Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 63–4. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. (1. 12. 1914), Études sur la fièvre récurrente poursuivies à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis. IIme Mém. (1914). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 69–83. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C., Blanc, G. and Conseil, E. (3. 11. 1914), Quelques points de l'étude expérimentale du typhus exanthématique. C.R. Acad. Sci., pp. 661–4. [Preliminary note to paper dated 1. 12. 1914, q.v. infra.] D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C., Blanc, G. and Conseil, E. (1. 12. 1914), Nouvelles recherches expérimentales sur le typhus exanthématique pratiquées à l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis pendant l'année 1914. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 84–121. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C., Comte, C. and Conseil, E. (6. 09. 1909), Transmission expérimentale du typhus exanthématique par le pou du corps. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CXLIX. 486–9. Also (04. 1910) Ann. Instit. Pasteur, XXIV. 261–267. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. and Conseil, E. (01. 1911), Le typhus exanthématique expérimental du singe. Espèces sensibles. Passages. Virulence du sang aux diverses périodes de la maladie. Immunisation. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXV. 13–55. D.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. and Conseil, E. (20. 01. 1915), Nécessité des mesures à prendre pour préserver nos armées en campagne du typhus exanthématique et du typhus récurrent. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 18–20. Also Presse méd., pp. 18–19. D.K.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C. and Conseil, E. (20. 02. 1915), Nos connaissances sur l'étiologie du typhus exanthématique et de la fièvre récurrente. Leur application à la prévention de ces maladies en particulier dans nos armées en campagne. Rev. d'hygiène, XXXVII. 172–205. [History, geographical distribution, etiology, predisposing causes, prophylaxis. A good summary.] D.K.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, C. L. (1818), Die Familien und Gattungen der Thierinsecten (insecta epizoa); als Prodromus einer Naturgeschichte derselben. Magaz. der Entomol. (Germar), Halle, III. pp. 261–316. [Pediculus, pp. 282, 304–5.] S.Google Scholar
Nocht, B. and Halberkann, J. (4. 05. 1915), Beiträge zur Läusefrage. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 626–7 (Feldärztliche Beilage, No. 18). B.K.Google Scholar
Noel, P. (02.–03. 1916), Les mouches, les moustiques, les poux et les rats dans les tranchées. Bull. trim. Lab. Entomol. Agric. Seine infér., Rouen, pp. 9–15. [Abstr. in Rev. Appl. Ent., IV., ser. B, 53.] K.Google Scholar
Noeller, W. (10. 07. 1916), Beitrag zur Flecktyphus Uebertragung durch Läuse. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LIII. 778–780. [Reviewed in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 482. Original inaccessible. See further under Jacobsthal.] B.D.Google Scholar
Nørregaard, K. (1907). [Larvae in wounds; pediculosis.] Ugesk. f. Laeger, Copenhagen, 5 R., XIV. 1059–66. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F.. (10. 1899), On the rôle of insects, Arachnids and Myriapods, as carriers in the spread of bacterial and parasitic diseases of man and animals. A critical and historical study. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Rep., VIII. 154 pp., 3 Pls. Also (transl.) in Hygienische Rundschau, IX. pp. 209 et seq. Also, as a separate publication, translated by Dr Levrier, Bordeaux: Imprimerie du Midi, 161 pp. D.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F.. (01. 1913), The Herter Lectures. I. Spirochaetosis. Parasitology, V. 262–274. Also Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., XXIV. 33–39, 9 Figs. [Summary to date regarding Pediculus, Cimex and relapsing fever.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F.. (26. 02. 1917), Studies on Pediculus. I. The copulatory apparatus and the process of copulation in Pediculus humanus. Parasitology; IX. 293–324, 2 Pls., 12 Text-figs. A.B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F.. (3. 03. 1917), The Louse problem Brit. Med. Journ., I. 297. [Abstract of discussion of paper by Bacot, q.v.]Google Scholar
Nysten, P. H. (1858), Dictionnaire de Méd., de, Chir., de Pharm., etc. 11ème ed. par E. Littré and Ch. Robin, 1671 pp., 500 Figs. [Phthiriase, p. 1080; Pou, p. 1140.]Google Scholar
Official Instructions (18. 10. 1915). [Instructions for the destruction of clotheslice.] HaBiciia BcepocciftcKaro Coroaa ropojoBi. [Bulletins of All-Russian Union of Towns, Moscow, No. 18, pp. 58–60; abstract in Rev. Applied Entomol., London, ser. B, IV. 13.] K.Google Scholar
Official Instructions (18. 11. 1915), Bekämpfung der Läuse in Pferdebeständen: Merkblatt für die preussische Armee. Berlin, tierärztl. Wochenschr., XXXI. 547; abstract Rev. Applied EntomoL, ser. B, Med. and Vet., IV. 10. [Remedies: 1. Mercurial ointment, with or without oil or soft soap, brushed on. 2. Tobacco infusion 1: 25 or 30 (poisonous). 3. Petroleum and methylated spirit (1: 10) or petroleum and rapeseed oil (1: 1). 4. 3 % cresolsoap solution. 5. Sabadilla vinegar (1: 20, poisonous; apply only on infested spots). 6. Fish-oil, apply as under 5. 7. Wash with soapy water and while damp dust on and brush in fine ashes of beech or peat. 8. Arsenic in obstinate cases. Repeat treatment at 5-day intervals.] R.K.Google Scholar
Olitsky, P. K., Denzer, B. S. and Husk, C. S. (27. 05. 1916), The etiology of typhus fever in Mexico (tabardillo). Prel. communication. Journ. American Med. Assoc., LXVI. 1692–3. [Cultures from patients and lice taken from them yielded Bacillus typhi-exanthematici.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, H. (20. 02. 1908), Zur Therapie der Phthiriasis. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XXXIV. 332–3. Ph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, M. (1901), Ueber einen von Pediculus pubis gebildeten Farbstoff. Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph., Wien u. Leipzig, LVII. 235–244, 1 Pl. [i.c.] Ph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, M. (1901 a), Ueber einen von Pediculus pubis gebildeten Farbstoff. Author's abstract in Verhandl. d. Gesellsch. deutscher Naturf. u. Aerzte, LXXIII., Part II., Med. Abt., p. 451. Ph.Google Scholar
Orticoni, (17. 04. 1915), Prophylaxie du typhus exanthématique, precédé de destruction rapide des poux de corps. Paris Med., XV., Nos. 49–50, pp. 480–1. K.Google Scholar
Ory, E. (1879), Phthiriase. N. Dict. de Méd. et Chir. prat., Paris, XXVII. 212–215. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. (1891), The Pediculi and Mallophaga affecting man and the lower animals. U.S. Dept. Agric., Div. of EntomoL, Bull., No. 7, 56 pp., 42 Figs. [pp. 7–10, Figs. 1–4, lice infesting man.] O.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. (12. 1891), Origin and development of the parasitic habit in Mallophaga and Pediculidae. Insect Life, Washington, IV. 187–191. [Merely speculative.] B.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. (1896), Insects affecting domestic animals etc. U.S. Dept. Agric., Div. of Entomol., n.s., Bull. 5, 302 pp., 170 Figs. [pp. 165–168, Figs. 94–97. Same as Osborn, 1891, q.v.] O.Google Scholar
Osler, W. (1892), The Principles and Practice of Medicine. New York: D. Appleton and Co. [Lice, pp. 15, 1048, brief mention of effects they produce.] D.Google Scholar
Paneth, L. (11. 06. 1916), Züchtung des Bacterium typhi-exanthematici nach Plotz, Olitzky and Baehr. Med. Klinik, No. 24, pp. 647–8. [Rev. in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 486. Contents indicated in the title.] D.Google Scholar
Panzer, G. W. F.. (1795), Faunae insectorum Germanicae initia, oder Deutschlands Inseclen. Nürnberg. [Pediculus includes Mallophaga; cited by Denny, 1842.] S.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. and Cragg, F. W. (1913), A Text-book of Medical Entomology. London, Madras and Calcutta: Christian Lit. Soo. for India, xxxiv + 764 pp., 89 Pls. [pp. 527–564, Pls. 66–71, Anoplura; pp. 531–541, P. vestimenti, structure of mouthparts; pp. 545–6, Pediculus and Phthirus; pp. 551–563, anatomy and biology of P. vestimenti.] A.B.I.Google Scholar
Paul, M. E. (27. 11. 1897), A caution against the use of kerosene in the treatment of pediculosis capitis. Lancet, II. 1385. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paullini, C. F. (1706), Sudor pedicularis, post mortem. In his Obs. med. -phys., 12°, Lips., 398–402. [i.c.] D.Google Scholar
Pawlowsky, E. (1906), Ueber den Stech- und Saugapparat der Pediculiden. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Insektenbiol., II. 156–162, 198–204, Figs. 1–13. A.Google Scholar
Pawlowsky, E. N. (1907). [Anatomy of sexual organs of P. capitis and P. vestimenti.] Horae Soc. Entomol. Rossicae, St. Petersburg, XXXVIII. 82–108, Pls. II.–VI. A.I.Google Scholar
Payne, J. F. (1890), Maculae caeruleae and other symptoms produced by Pediculi pubis. Brit. Journ. Dermatol., London, II. 209–212. Also, transl., in Monatschr. f. prakt. Dermatol., Hamburg, XI. 388–392. Ph.Google Scholar
Peacock, A. D. (07. 1916), The Louse problem at the Western Front. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, London, XXVII. 31–60, 10 Figs. A.B.E.Google Scholar
Penfold, W. J. (02. 1916), Etiology of Typhus. Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg., IX. 105–115, 18 Charts. [Critical summary of publications of Plotz, Wilson, Hort and Ingram (1914). Author isolated a Micrococcus in pure culture from blood and urine of three cases. Cultures inoculated into monkeys produced fever. He regards the coccus as the probable cause of typhus as it has been found repeatedly by other observers.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perroncito, E. (1901), I Parassiti dell' Uomo e degli Animali utili e le piu' comuni Malattie da essi prodotte. 2d ed.632 pp., 25 Pls, 276 Text-figs. Milan: Vallardi. [Human lice, pp. 595–599; Pl. XIV. Figs, of capitis, corporis and pubis, from Dubini; poor.] G.Google Scholar
Perry, J. E. (1876), Pediculophobia. Med. and Surg. Reporter, Philadelphia, XXXIV. 267. [i.c.]Google Scholar
Piaget, E. (1880), Les Pédiculines. Essai monographique. Leyden, 4°. xxxix + 714 pp., 52 Pls. [pp. 619–630, lice infesting man. Systematic description mainly. In a footnote, p. 620, gives references to numerous papers, etc. of slight importance: P. capitis is figured by. Schäffer, Barbut, Baker, Ledermüller, Watkins, etc.; the references might be multiplied indefinitely; he cites many which merely mention P. capitis.] S.Google Scholar
Pick, A. (1915), Ueber eine einfache Methode der Anwendung der Heissluft zur Entlausung von Kleidungsstüeken. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XVIII., No. 22, Militärsanitätswesen. [Cited by Müller, 1915, p. 53.] K.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. C. (1916), Typhus fever: prevention and control. Texas State Journ. Med., XII. 182–188. [Rev. in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 487. ‘To prevent typhus from spreading only one thing is necessary—eliminate lice.’ The author lays down some good simple rules to avoid typhus.] D.Google Scholar
Pignot, A. (1887), Phthiriase. Dict, encycl. d. sci. méd., Paris, 2 s., XXIV. 448–460. [i.c.]Google Scholar
Pinkos, F. (28. 02. 1915), Die Läusefrage. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI., No. 9, 239–241. D.K.Google Scholar
Pjatnitski, I. (1886), Sluch. neobich. pediculosis. Med. Obozr., Moscow, XXVI. 288–290. [i.c.]Google Scholar
Plique, A. F. (10. 01. 1915). [Typhus Fever in war time.] Journ. de méd. et de chir., rev. in Brit. Med. Journ., I., Epitome, p. 41. D.K.Google Scholar
Plotz, H. (1914), The etiology of typhus fever (and of Brill's Disease). Prel. communication. Journ. American Med. Assoc., LXII. 1556; also Presse Méd., No. 43, p. 411. [Rev. in Trop. Dis. Bull., IV. 488. Describes a bacillus which is regarded as the cause.] D.Google Scholar
Plotz, H. and Olitsky, P. K. (1915), The etiology of typhus exanthematicus. Journ. Infect. Dis., Chicago, XVII. 1–68, 1 Pl [No observations on lice, but louse-transmission is discussed on pp. 61–64.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, V. A. (01. 1915), Russian: Skin parasites of soldiers of the active armies, importance, remedies. Proc. Confer. Bacteriologists, etc., Moscow, pp. 68–70. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, III. 123.] A.K.Google Scholar
Portalier, (1882), Mélanodermie phthiriasique chez une femme cachectique. Ann. de Dermatol. et Syphil., p. 484. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.D.Google Scholar
Postnikov, A. I. (01. 1915), Russian: Control of Lice in the active army. Proc. Confer. Bacteriologists, etc., Moscow, pp. 70–1. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, ser. B, III. 122–3.] K.Google Scholar
Potel, R. (09. 1916), Observations cliniques et étiologiques sur les cas de typhus soignés à l'hôpital permanent de la marine de Sidi-Abdallah. V. Remarques sur les mesures de prophylaxie et le rôle des ectoparasites. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, IX. 282–5. [Observations proving the effectiveness of anti-louse measures in checking typhus incidence.] D.K.Google Scholar
Pouchet, F. A. (1841) Traité élémentaire de zoologie. Paris, [II. p. 205, cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 439, as regarding capitis from negroes and whites as different species.] O.Google Scholar
Pouillaude, J. (1915), Centre les poux des soldats. Insecta, p. 56. K.Google Scholar
Pouillaude, J. (1915 a), Animaux nuisibles aux soldats en campagne. Bull. Soc. sc. méd. Ouest, 8 pp. Repr. G.Google Scholar
Pregl, (19. 03. 1915). [Entlausungsverfahren durch Ammoniak.] K.K. Gesellsch. f. Aerzte in Wien. Abstract in Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI. 465. K.Google Scholar
Priess, (24. 05. 1915), Ueber die Zusammensetzung des Ung ziefermittels ‘Plagin’. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 552. K.Google Scholar
Prieto, (1916), Un dato para la etiologia de tifus exantematico. Siglo Med., Madrid, LXIII. 19–20. [Rev. in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 67. Author cites Cortezo, 1903, as having stated that typhus is transmitted by lice and fleas; but the latter scarcely deserves much credit for a mere supposition!] D.Google Scholar
Proescher, F. (2. 08. 1915), Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 805–7. D.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. v. (8. 11. 1913), see Hegler, C.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. v. (12. 01. 1915), Bemerkungen ueber die Biologie und Bekämpfung der Kleiderlaus. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 67–8. [What this author writes of lice is mostly cited from other authors.] B.K.Google Scholar
Raadt, O. L. E. de (1916), Kunnen hoofdluizen pest overbrengen? Meded, Burg. Geneesk. Dienst. Ned.-Indic¨, Batavia, 1915, Pt. 4, 39–40. D.Google Scholar
Rabe, F. (18. 03. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochensfhr., XLI. 347. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitsch, M. (1915) [Experimental typhus in the guinea-pig and vaccination against it.] 47 pp. [Rev. by Keilin and Porter in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 63–4.] D.Google Scholar
Rabinowitsch, M. (1916) [Biological Reactions—Agglutination and Complement fixation—in typhus exanthematicus.] 17 pp. Cracow. [Rev. by Keilin and Porter in Trop. Dis. Bull., VIII. 484–5. Diplobacillus exanthematicus regarded as the cause.] D.Google Scholar
Ragg, M. (15. 05. 1915), Ueber die Vernichtung der Kleiderlaus. Der Militärarzt, Wien, XLIX. 172–179. K.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1889), Article ‘Phtiriase, Poux’ in Nouv. Dict. prat. de méd. et chir., et d'hyg. vétér., XVII. [Cited by L.-G. Neumann, 1892, p. 62.] G.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1895), Traité de Zoologie médicale et agricole. Paris: Asselin et Houzeau. XV + 1301 pp., 892 Figs. [pp. 825–830, Figs. 566–8. Interesting account of human lice.] G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramdohr, (1811), Abhandlung. über die Verdauungswerkzeuge der Insekten. Halle, [pp. 185–7, P. humanus, Pl. XXV., Fig. 4, intestinal tract, quite a good figure showing all the parts.] A.Google Scholar
Raven, H. M. (6. 07. 1907), Treatment of pediculosis capitis. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 64. K.Google Scholar
Redi, F. (1668), Esperienze intorno alla generazione degl' insetti. 228 pp., 28 Pls. Firenze, 23 × 17 cm. [Pl. 18 Pidocchio ordinario (P. h. corporis ♀), Pl. 19 II piattone (Ph. pubis) only casual mention in the text, pp. 195, 204.] I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redi, F. (1671), Experiments circa generationem Insectorum. Amsterdam: A. Frisius. [Pls. XVIII.–XIX. Pediculus ordinarius and P. inguinalis; interesting early figs.] I.Google Scholar
Renault, J. (24. 07. 1915), Mesures prophylactiques centre le typhus exanthématique et le typhus récurrent. Paris Méd., V. 206–212. [Abstract in Rev. of Appl. Entomol., London, III. 232.] K.Google Scholar
[Report (10. 1915) of a Commission of Surgeons of the Old Municipal Hospital of Odessa on the question of the control of Lice.] HsBliCTifl BcepocciftcKaro Coioaa ropcxnoBt [Bulletins of the All-Russian Union of Towns], Moscow, No. 18, pp. 53–58. [Review in Rev. of Appl. Entomol., ser. B, IV. 24–25.] K.Google Scholar
Retzius, A. J. (1783), Caroli de Geer, Genera et Species Insectorum. Lipsiae. S.Google Scholar
Reydelet, A. A. F.. (1802), Sur la maladie pédiculaire ou phthiriase. Thesis, 19 pp. 8°, Paris, [s.] Ph.Google Scholar
Ricketts, H. T. and Wilder, R. M. (5. 02. 1910), The typhus fever of Mexico (Tabardillo), Journ. Am. Med. Assoc., LIV. 463–467. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricketts, H. T. and Wilder, R. M. (04. 1910), The relation of typhus fever (tabardillo) to Rocky Mountain Fever. Arch. of Internal Med., V. 361–370. [Conclude the two fevers are distinct.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricketts, H. T. and Wilder, R. M. (16. 04. 1910), The transmission of the typhus fever of Mexico (tabardillo) by means of the louse (Pediculus vestimenti). Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., LIV. 1304–7. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieck, (8. 08. 1916), Ein transportabler Entlausungskasten. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII., No. 32, Feldärztliche Beilage, p. 1177, 2 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Riley, W. A. and Johannsen, O. A. (1915), Handbook of Medical Entomology. Ithaca, N.Y.: Comstock Publ. Co. ix + 348 pp., 174 Figs. [pp. 80–86, Figs. 64–69 (from other authors) three of which illustrate effects on skin of man.] G.Google Scholar
Ring, F. W. (1885), A case of phthiriasis palpebrorum. New York Med. Record, XXVIII. 647. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.Google Scholar
Rischbieter, (22. 02. 1916), Einfacher und billiger Entlausungsapparat mit überhitztem Dampf zur Verwendung an der Front. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII. 302, Fig. 1. K.Google Scholar
Rizzuti, G. (1913), Osservazioni sul tifo ricorrente a Tripoli. Malaria, e Malat. d. Paesi Caldi, IV. 153–172. D.Google Scholar
Rocha-Lima, H. da (01. 1916), Beobachtungen bei Flecktyphusläusen. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., Leipzig, XX. 17–31, 1 Pl D.Google Scholar
Rocha-Lima, H. da (26. 09. 1916), Untersuchungen ueber Fleckfieber. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII. 1381–1383, 1 Fig. [See further under Jacobsthal.] D.Google Scholar
Rocha-Lima, H. da (2. 11. 1916), Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1353–1354. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, L. (1886), Ueber Pediculosis palpebrarum. München. med. Wochenschr., XXXIII. 145. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, (1841), Phthiriasis. Wochenschr. f. d. ges. Heilk., Berlin, 81–87. [i.c.] Ph.Google Scholar
Rossberger, S. (24. 06. 1915), Zur Aetiologie des Flecktyphus. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 679. [A few lines, mostly nonsense.] D.Google Scholar
Rubio, F. (1879), Modo de tratar el pediculo. Siglo méd., Madrid, XXVI. 338–344. [i.c.] K.Google Scholar
Rudolph, (15. 07. 1915), Zur Beseitigung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 863. K.Google Scholar
Sabouraud, R. (1906), Traitement des phtiriases par le xylol. Clinique, Paris I. 201. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Sabouraud, R. (1907), Traitement de la pédiculose compliquée d'impétigo pédiculaire. Clinique, Paris, p. 710. [I.M.] K.Google Scholar
Salazar, M. M. (1916), Profilaxis del tifus exantematico. Siglo Med., Madrid, LXIII. 161, 177, 194, 209, 225. [Rev. in Trop. Dis. Bulletin, VIII. 59. A general account.] D.Google Scholar
Salomon, O. (28. 01. 1913), Ueber eine für Pediculosis capitis charakteristische Hauterkrankung. München. med. Wochenschr., LIX. 201. D.Google Scholar
Samouelle, G. (1819), The Entomologist's Useful Compendium, or an Introduction to the Knowledge of British Insects, etc. London, 8°. [pp. 142–143, P. humanus, P. cervicalis; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar
Scelsi, S. (11. 04. 1913), Pidocchi nei bovini. Rivista di Agricolt., Parma, XIX. 232; abstr. in Rev. Appl. Entomol, London, ser. B, I. 98. [Lice on cattle. Recommends (1) washing well with potash soap and whilst damp to sprinkle with wood ashes which are then brushed in, (2) Stavesacre decoction, (3) creosote and olive oil, 1: 20, brushed in, (4) tobacco decoction made by boiling tobacco 50 g. in 1·5 L. water until reduced to 1 L. In any case must repeat treatment for 3–4 days to destroy all lice. ] R.Google Scholar
Schaefer, (17. 10. 1916), Zur Biologie der Kleiderlaus. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII. 1507. B.Google Scholar
Schilling, V. (8. 08. 1916), Zur Biologie der Kleiderlaus. Uebertragung auf dem Luftwege. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII., No. 32, Feldärztliche Beilage, p. 1176. B.Google Scholar
Schjödte, J. C. (1864), On phthiriasis and the structure of the mouth in Pediculus. [Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, Copenhagen, 1864, ser. 3, III., pp. 48 et seq. Translated from Danish and republished, 1866, in] Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., London, XVII. 213–230, 2 Figs.] A.S.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, (1915). [Destruction of Pediculi by SO2.] München. med. Wochenschr., No. 16. [Rev. in Med. Klinik, 1915, p. 523.] K.Google Scholar
Scholz, W. (1915), Zur Frage der Fleckfieberverbreitung durch Läuse. Mitt. d. Ver. d. Aerzte in Steiermark, Graz, LII. 57–9. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Schønfelder, P. (1915). [Transmission of typhus fever and measures against lice.] Norsk. Mag. f. Laegevidensk., Kristiania, 5 R., XIII. 1124–1130. [I.M.] D.K.Google Scholar
Schöppler, H. (17. 08. 1915), Der Kresolpuder, ein Schutz- und Vertilgungs-puder des Ungeziefers im Felde. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 1137–8. [3 % trikresol powder dusted on skin and rubbed in, also put on clothes. Found excellent from practical experience in keeping fleas off soldiers in Eastern theatre of the war. Effect immediate in badly infested places. Men have remained louse-free, possibly owing to trikresol.] K.Google Scholar
Schrank, Fr. a Paula (1781), Enumeratio Insectorum Austriae indigenorum. 8°, Augustae Vindel. [n. 1021, cited by Piaget, 1880, p. 628 re Ph.pubis.] Ph.Google Scholar
Schrauth, C. (1878), Ueber Vernichtung der Kleiderläuse (Pediculi vestimentorum) in Gefängnissen. Aerztl. Int.-Bl, München, XXV. 292–4. [I.C.] K.Google Scholar
Schweinitz, G. E. de (1888–1889), Phthiriasis palpebrarum. Univ. Med. Mag., Philadelphia, I. 353. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Schweinitz, G. F. de and Randall, B. A. (1891–1892), Phthiriasis palpebrarum. Univ. Med. Mag., IV. 137. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Schwenk, P. N. K. (1891), Phthiriasis, with report of cases of phthiriasis pubis in eyelashes, eyebrows, and head. Times and Reg.,. New York and Phila., XXII. 381–3. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Seitz, (24. 10. 1916), Zur Läusevertilgungsfrage. München. med. Wochenschr., XLIII. 1538, 1 Fig. K.Google Scholar
Seligmann, E. and Sokolowsky, R. (13. 07. 1915), Untersuchungen an einem Entlausungsofen. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 962–963, 5 Figs. Feldärztl. Beil. K.Google Scholar
Semmedo, J. C. (1718), Quidam, ut se liberaret a maxima pediculorum copia, qui ei turn caput, tum obscoenas partes efferate infestabant, medicastri consilio hydrargyri unguento ipsa illivit, etc. In his obs. aegritudinum, fol., Ulyssipone Occid., p. 183. [I.C.] K.Google Scholar
Sergent, E. and Foley, H. (03. 1908), Fièvre récurrente du Sud-Oranais et Pediculus vestimenti. Note préliminaire. Bull. Soc. path, exot., I. 174–6. D.Google Scholar
Sergent, E. and Foley, H. (05. 1910), Recherches sur la fièvre récurrente et son mode de transmission, dans une épidémie algérienne. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXIV. 337–373. D.Google Scholar
Sergent, E. and Foley, H. (21. 03. 1914), Transmission de la fièvre récurrente par dépôt sur les muqueuses intactes du produit de broyage de poux rélevés sur un spirillaire. C.R. Soc. Biol., LXXVI. 471–472. D.Google Scholar
Sergent, E. and Foley, H. (I.–02. 1916), Epidémiologie de la fièvre récurrente. Malaria e Malattie dei Paesi caldi, Rome, VII. 1–7. [No new matter; see earlier papers.] D.Google Scholar
Sergent, Edm. and Foley, H. (6. 07. 1914), De la période de latence du spirille chez le pou infecté de fièvre récurrente. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLIX. 119–122. D.Google Scholar
Sergent, Edm. and Foley, H. (9. 06. 1915), Destruction par l'essence d'Eucalyptus des poux du corps, agents transmetteurs de la fièvre récurrente et du typhus exanthématique. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot., VIII. 378–381. K.Google Scholar
Sergent, E., Foley, H. and Vialatte, C. (30. 03. 1914), Transmission à l'homme et au singe du typhus exanthématique par les poux d'un malade atteint de la fièvre récurrente et par des lentes et poux issus des précédents. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CLVIII. 964–5. D.Google Scholar
Sergent, E., Foley, H. and Vialatte, C. (19. 06. 1914), Sur des formes microbiennes abondantes dans le corps de poux infectés par le typhus exanthématique, et toujours absentes dans les poux témoins, non typhiques. C.R. Soc. Biol., LXXVII. 101–3, [Cocco-bacilli in lice as already observed by Ricketts and Wilder, absent in thousands of control lice examined.] D.Google Scholar
Sergent, E., Gillot, V. and Foley, H. (12. 07. 1911), La spirillose nord-africaine et sa transmission par les poux. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot., Paris, IV, 438–440. D.Google Scholar
Serrurier, (1820), Phthiriase, ou maladie pédiculaire. Dict. d. sci. méd., Paris, XIII. 1–14. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. (1806), General Zoology, vol. VI. (Insecta). 8°. [p. 450, P. humanus; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar
Shevirev, Iv. (21. 12. 1914), Russian: Destruction of external parasites in the army, Hoboe Bpemr (Novoe Vremya), Petrograd, p. 5. [Abstract in Rev. Appl. Entomol., London, s. B, III. 105.] K.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (19. 09. 1914), Insects and war: lice. Brit. Med. Journ., London, II. 497–9, 1 Fig. [P. vestimenti; also short note, Brit. Med. Journ., London, II. p. 597 with photograph of German soldiers with hair clipped short.] K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (27. 02. 1915), Flowers of sulphur and Lice. Brit. Med. Journ., I. 395. K.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1916), The Minor Horrors of War. 3rd ed.186 pp., 63 Figs. London: Smith, Elder and Co. [pp. 1–35 “The Louse,” Figs. 1, 2 sketchy. Popular and humorous account of lice.] P.Google Scholar
Sichel, J. (1825), Historiae phthiriasis internae verae fragmentum. 31 pp. 8°, Berolini, formis Brüschckianis. [I.C. Inaccessible.]Google Scholar
Sikora, H. (25. 08. 1915), Beiträge zur Biologie von Pediculus vestimenti. Centralbl. f. Bakt., LXXVI. 523–537. [Appendix pp. 535–7 deals with Haematopinus suis, the hog-louse.] B.Google Scholar
Sikora, H. (29. 11. 1915), Bemerkungen zu der Arbeit: “Zur Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse” von Dr A. Zucker in Heft 4, Bd. 76 dieser Zeitschrift. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1 Abt., Orig., LXXVII. 163–164. K.B.Google Scholar
Sikora, H. (04. 1916), Beiträge zur Anatomie, Physiologie und Biologie der Kleiderlaus (Pediculus vestimenti Nitzsch). Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., Beihefte. XX. 5–76, 3 Pls. [Important. Unfortunately inaccessible.] A.B.I.Google Scholar
Simon, O. (1881), Ueber maculae cœruleae mit Krankenvorstellung. Breslauer ärztl. Zeitschr., No. 14. [Cited by Blanchard, 1890, p. 446.] Ph.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. A. (1823–1825), On a pedicular eruptive disease. Trans. Med. and Phys. Soc. Calcutta, I. 149. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Smith, G. U. (1909), On some cases of relapsing fever in Egypt and the question of carriage by domestic vermin. (M.D. Thesis.) London: John Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd. 60 pp. [A useful summary up to end of 1908.] D.Google Scholar
Smith, G. U. (05. 1910), Recherches expérimentales sur la spirillose humaine. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXIV. 374–5. D.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. (4. 10. 1913), Pediculosis capitis among school children. New York Med. Journ., XCVIII. 656–664. Also separately printed: N.Y. City Dep. Health, Repr. s., No. 12. Also School Hyg., London, V. 167–9. D.K.Google Scholar
Soulima, A. and Ebert, B. (14. 04. 1915), Nouveaux remèdes contre les ectoparasites. Compt. rend. Soc. de biol., Paris, LXXVIII. 340. K.Google Scholar
Southworth, J. W. (1873), The Pediculodermata. Detroit Rev. Med. and Pharm., VIII. 55–65. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Squire, B. (13. 11. 1869), Pediculi and skin-eruptions. Brit. Med. Journ., II. 549. D.Google Scholar
Stefanski, V. K. (1915), [Is relapsing fever transmitted by lice?] Russk. Vrach, Petrograd, XIV. 246. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Stegmann, (1829), Läusesucht. Arch. f. med. Erfahr., Berlin, II. 1104. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Stelwagon, H. W. (1881), A case of phthiriasis palpebrarum. Arch. Dermatol., New York, VII. 301. Ph.Google Scholar
Stelwagon, H. W. (1892), Pediculosis corporis. Internal. Med. Mag., Philadelphia, I. 725. D.Google Scholar
Stempell, W. (13. 04. 1916), Ueber einen als Erreger des Flecktyphus verdächtigen Parasiten der Kleiderlaus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., LXIII. 439–442. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, J. F. (1829), Systematic Catalogue of British Insects, pp. 338. London. [Lice constitute the Order Aptera; gives synonymy and earlier literature.] S.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. (1829 a), The Nomenclature of British Insects, etc. 68 pp. 12°, London. [p. 63, Aptera. Lists under Pediculidae Leach: (1) Pediculus Auct. incl. humanus Lin. and cervicalis Latr. (2) Phthirus Leach incl. inguinalis Redi. (3) Haematopinus spp.] S.Google Scholar
Stevenson, E. C. (1905), The external parasites of hogs, being articles on the hog louse (Haematopinus suis) and mange, or scabies, of hogs. U.S. Dept. Agricult., Bur. Animal Industry, Bull., No. 69, 44 pp., 29 Figs. R.Google Scholar
Strong, R. P. (1915), Delivering a people from pestilence. Am. Red Cross Mag., Washington, X. 339–347. [Typhus fever.] [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Strong, R. P. (1915 a), Typhus fever. Med. Record, New York, LXXXVIII. 892. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Swammerdam, J. (1682), Histoire generale des insectes. Utrecht: G. de Walcheren. A.B.Google Scholar
Swammerdam, J. (1758), The Book of Nature; or, the History of Insects: etc. transl. into English by Thos., Flloyd, revised by John Hill. London: C. G. Seyffert. 41 × 27 cm., 53 Plates, [pp. 30–8, Pls. I. and II., Pediculus.] A.B.I.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. (1915), Eenige opmerkingen over de bestrijding der Kleederlinzen. Nederl. Tijdschr. v. Geneesk., XII. 1734–1759, 28 Figs. [Superseded by papers of later date; translated into French and same figures reproduced in Author's paper of 1916, q.v.] K.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. (1916), Quelques remarques sur la façon de combattre le pou des vêtements. Arch. Néerland. d. Sci. Exact, et Nat., ser. 3 B, III. 1–31, Pl. I. 23 Text-figs. [Photomicrographs of P. vestimenti in different stages, of its mouthparts, of Amsterdam disinfector-waggon, of developing nit, of lice feeding on arm.] A.B.K.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. (1916 a), La lutte contre les poux. Bull. Assoc. Internat. de Bains Populaires et de Propreté, La Haye, IV. 3–9, 6 Figs. [Photomicrographs of body lice and photo of lice feeding on arm.] A.B.K.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. and Otten, L. (25. 07. 1914), Experimentelle Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Uebertragung der Pest durch Flöhe und Läuse. Centralbl. f. Bakt., etc., 1 Abt., Orig., LXXIV. 592–603. D.Google Scholar
Swoboda, N. (5. 08. and 26. 08. 1915), Zur Frage der Läusebekämpfung (1. Lausfreie Gipsverbände. II. Einführung officineller Läuseschutzmittel). Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII., No. 31, 836–8; No. 34, 920–2. K.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, C.L. (1900), [Pediculi in] Brehm's Thierleben, Insekten. XXXII + 764 pp., Figs, and Pls. Leipzig and Wien. [pp. 616–8 relate to lice, nothing original, 3 poor Figs.] O.Google Scholar
Teske, H. (18. 03. 1915), Die Bekämpfung der Läuseplage, insbesondere mit Behelfsdampfsdesinfektionsapparaten. Deutsche, med. Wochenschr., XLI. 346. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoinot, L. (17. 04. 1915), Le Typhus exanthématique. Paris Méd., Nos. 49–50, pp. 473–480. [An excellent condensed account of typhus: symptoms, pathology, treatment and prophylaxis.] D.K.Google Scholar
Tièche, (1908), Zur Kenntnis der Maculae coeruleae. Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph., Wien u. Leipzig, XCI. 327–336. Ph.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (23. 05. 1916) [Rickettsia prowazeki in typhus-lice.] Report on Deutsch. Kongr. f. inn. Med., Warsaw, May, 1916. Abstract in München. med. Wochenschr.,.No. 21, p. 779. D.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (12. 10. 1916), Der Fleckfieber in der Laus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1251–1254. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Töpfer, H. (17. 10. 1916), Zur Ursache und Uebertragung des Wolhynischen Fiebers. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII. 1495–1496, 1 Fig. D.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (31. 10. 1916), Die Uebertragung der Recurrens durch Läuse. München. med. Wochenschr., LXIII. 1571–1572, 1 Fig. D.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (9. 11. 1916), Zur Aetiologie und Behandlung des Fleckfiebers. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. p. 1383. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Töpfer, H. and Schüssler, H. (21. 09. 1916), Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLII. 1157–1158, 3 Figs. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournadour, P. (1816), Essai sur la Phthiriase et sur l'oedème, considérés comme maladies qu'il est quelquefois dangereux de guérir. 4°, Paris, [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Toyoda, H. (1914), Ueber die Entwicklung von Rekurrensspirochäten in der Kleiderlaus. Zeitschr.f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr.,LXXVI. 313–320, Pl VIII. D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trappe, (14. 09. 1915), Ein sehr altes und einfaches, aber sehr wirksames Verfahren zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage im Felde. München. med: Wochenschr., LXII. 1266–7 (Feldarztl. Beil., No. 37). K.Google Scholar
Trouessart, E. L. (28. 12. 1891), Sur une phthiriase de cuir chevelu causée chez un enfant de cinq mois par le Phthirius inguinalis. C.R. Acad. Sc., CXIII., No. 25. [Cit. by Waldeyer, 1900, p. 295.] Ph.Google Scholar
Tullidge, E. K. (17. 06. 1916), Fleck Typhus. The scourge of the Eastern War theatre. New York Med. Journ., CIII. 1167–9, 2 Figs. [Unimportant in respect to lice, judging from abstract in Rev. Appl. Entom., v. 31.] D.Google Scholar
Turton, W. (1806), A General System of Nature through the three grand kingdoms of Animals, Vegetables, and Minerals, etc. Translated from Gmelin's last edition of Systema Naturae. London, 8°. Vols. II., III. [III. 695, P. humanus. Ph. pubis; cited by Stephens, 1829.] G.Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, (9. 05. 1916), see Editorial (same date).Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, and Olbrich, (18. 04. 1915), Improvisation von Dampfdesinfektions-apparaten und “Entlausungsanstalten” im Felde. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XI. (16), 447–452, 9 Figs. D.Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, and Olbrich, (11. 07. 1915), Anleitung zur Improvisation und Betrieb von kleinen und mittleren Entlausungsanstalten. Med. Klin., Berlin, XI. 776–8, 2 Figs. D.K.Google Scholar
U. S. Public Health Service (2. 02. 1917), Typhus fever. Measures for the prevention of its introduction at El Paso, Tex. Public Health Reports, Washington, XXXII. 197–198. [An account of widespread prevalence of typhus throughout Mexico; to prevent its introduction into the U. S. all incoming passengers at El Paso, Texas, if found lousy are to be disinfected. Clothing and effects are steamed. Persons treated with gasoline or a mixture of vinegar and kerosene.] K.Google Scholar
Ussher, C. D. (19. 09. 1914), An epidemic of typhus fever in Van, Turkey. Med. Record, LXXXVI. 509–510. D.Google Scholar
Vágó, H. A. (27. 02. 1916), Eine leicht herstellbare Entlausungsanlage zur Abtötung der Kleiderläuse durch ueberhitzten Dampf. Med. Klinik, Berlin, XII. 240–1, 2 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Valentini, M. B. (1730), De phthiriasi insolita. Acta Acad. nat. curios., Norimb., II. 396. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Vallisneri, A. (1724), Giunta di alcune lettere fisico-mediche intorno all' origine del morbo detto pedicolare, e suoi rimedi. 12°, Padova. [I.C] D.Google Scholar
Vallot, (1822), Note sur le phthyriasis, ou maladie pédiculaire. Rev. méd. franç, et étrang., Paris, IX. 389–391. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Van Ooteghem, J. (1836), Guérison d'une maladie pédiculaire par le sublimé corrosif. Ann. soc. de méd. de Gand, II. 75. Also Bull. soc. méd. de Gand, II. 17. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Vaughan, V. C. (29. 05. 1915), History and epidemiology of typhus fever. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., LXIV. 1805–1810. [A short summary.] D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versluys, J. (1914), Die Verbreitung von Seuchen durch Insekten und andere Gliederfüssier im Kriege. Ber. d. Oberhessischen Gesellsch. f. Nat.- u. Heilk. zu Giessen, n.s., Naturwiss. Abt., VI. [Cited by Hase, 29. 11. 1915; cited by Friedmann, 31. 01. 1916, p. 321, as a separate publication printed in Leipzig, 1915; inaccessible.] D.Google Scholar
Vignolo-Lutati, C. (1908), Sulla cosi detta melanodermia ptirisica; contributo critico di osservazioni cliniche ed istologiche. Gazz. med. ital., Torino, LIX. 451, 461. Also [in German] Arch. f. Dermatol. u. Syph., Wien u. Leipzig (1909), XCIV. 365–378. Ph.Google Scholar
Vishnjakov, Th. A. (28. 11. 1915), Observation de l'influence sur la vitalité des poux adultes de différents matériaux employés pendant la lessive du linge. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Moscou, I. 179. K.Google Scholar
Waldeyer, L. (1900), Ein Fall von Phthirius pubis im Bereiche des behaarten Kopfes. Charité-Annalen, Berlin, XXV. 494–9. Ph.Google Scholar
Warburton, C. (1910), Report on a preliminary investigation of Flock as a possible distributor of vermin, and on the life history of the body-louse. Reports Local Govt. Board on Public Health and Med. Subjects, London, n.s., No. 27, pp. 23–7. B.Google Scholar
Wark, D. (1883), A rare and curious case (Phthiriasis from the use of ergot?). Med. Tribune, New York, V. 189–193. [I.C.] Ph.?Google Scholar
Wasielewski, V. (4. 05. 1915), Ueber die Vorbeugung von Fleckneberübertragung auf Aerzte und Pfleger. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 627–8, 1 Fig. [Photo of ♂.] (Feldärztliche Beilage, No. 18.) K.Google Scholar
Weidenfeld, S. and Pulay, E. (11. 02. 1915), Einige Bemerkungen zur Prophylaxe der Pedikulosis (auch einiges über Lebensweise der Pediculiden). Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 153–4. K.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, G. (15. 07. 1915), Zur Bekämpfung der Läuseplage. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XLI. 861–863. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, (1872), Ueber die sichere Vertilgung der Kleiderläuse die Plage der Armeen im Felde und im Bivouak. Militärarzt, Wien, VI. 84. [I.C.] K.Google Scholar
Whitfield, A. (14. 12. 1912), A method of rapidly exterminating Pediculi capitis. Lancet, II. 1648–9. K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmann, E. (18. 08. 1915), Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Biologie der Kleiderlaus und deren Bekämpfen. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr., LXXX. 289–298. B.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmann, E. (28. 09. 1915), Zur Frage der Uebertragung von Bakterien durch Läuse. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 1336–1338. 4 Figs. A.B.D.Google Scholar
Wilder, R. M. (19. 07. 1911), The problem of transmission in typhus fever. Journ. Infect. Dis., Chicago, IX. 9–101. [pp. 39–46, 74–98 deal specially with lice and typhus.] D.B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfart, (1811), Etwas über die Erzeugung der Läuse in den Haaren überhaupt, und über die Läusesucht insbesondere. 'AσκληπLεLον, Berlin, I. 705–715. [I.C.] D.Google Scholar
Wolter, F. (2. 08. 1915), Ueber den Flecktyphus als Kriegsseuche. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr., LII. (No. 31), 807–809 et seq. [Discusses epidemiology of typhus and throws doubt on the “theory of louse-transmission,” with the literature of which he is obviously unfamiliar. He cites von Hecker (München. med. Wochenschr., 1915, No. 7), and Hueppe (Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., 1915, Nos. 7–8) in support of his antiquated views.] D.Google Scholar
Wolter, F. (09. 1915), Ueber das Auftreten von Flecktyphusepidemien in Truppen-und Gefangenenlagern. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr., LII. 1045–8. [I.M.] D.Google Scholar
Worth, M. J. (1907), De la pigmentation des muqueuses dans la mélanodermie phtiriasique et du diagnostique différentiel de cette affection avec la maladie d'Addison. Paris, 8°, 89 pp. [I.M.] Ph.Google Scholar
Walker, G. (4. 05. 1915), Zur Frage der Läusebekämpfung. München. med. Wochenschr., LXII. 628–630, 1 Fig. [Ova.] (Feldärztl. Beilage, No. 18.) A.K.I.Google Scholar
Zabel, (1915), Entlausungsversuche und ihre Ergebnisse. Zeitschr. f. Medizinalbeamte, p. 478. [Cited by Friedmann, 31. 01. 1916, pp. 336–8.] K.Google Scholar
Ziamal, W. (1856), Tödtung der Plattläuse durch Chloroform. Zeitschr. f. Nat. u. Heilk. in Ungarn, Oedenburg, VII. 251. [I.C.] Ph.Google Scholar
Zucker, A. (28. 06. 1915), Zur Bekämpfung der Kleiderläuse. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., LXXVI. 294–303, 18 Figs. K.Google Scholar
Zupnik, L. (8. 04. 1915), Zur Frage der Läusevertilgung. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 371–3. K.Google Scholar
Zupnik, L. (27. 05. 1915), Ueber Züchtungsversuche von Läusen und Nissen. Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XXVIII. 564–565, 2 Figs. B.K.Google Scholar