Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:44:57.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba ranarum the same Species? An Experimental Inquiry1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Clifford Dobell
Clifford Dobell
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nobody who studies the parasitic amoeba of the frog (Entamoeba ranarum) and the dysentery amoeba of man (E. histolytica) can fail to be struck by the remarkable resemblance between these organisms. The development of the former I described for the first time in 1908 and 1909, since when I have had exceptional opportunities of studying the latter; and I can state, with some confidence, that there is no constant structural character which will permit of a distinction being drawn between these two species. The active amoebae can usually be readily distinguished from one another by the inclusions (food bodies) in their protoplasm, but not by their own nuclear and cytoplasmic structure; but the precystic amoebae, devoid of all food bodies, and the cysts, at every stage in their development, are so closely alike that preparations of the one could be used as demonstration specimens of the other.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , January 1918 , pp. 294 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexeieff, A. (1912). Sur quelques noms de genres des Flagellés qui doivent disparaître de la nomenclature, etc. Zool. Anz. XXXIX. 674.Google Scholar
Alexeieff, A. (1914). Notes protistologiques. Zool. Anz. XLIV. 193.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E. (1913). Précis de parasitologie. Paris.Google Scholar
Casagrandi, O. and Barbagallo, P. (1895). Sull' Amoeba coli (Lösch). Ricerche biologiche e cliniche. Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat., Catania, fasc. XLI.Google Scholar
Collin, B. (1913). Sur un ensemble de Protistes parasites des Batraciens. Arch. Zool. exp. LI. (Notes et Revue), 59.Google Scholar
Councilman, W. T. and Lafleur, H. A. (1891). Amoebic Dysentery. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Rep. II. 393.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1908). On the intestinal protozoan parasites of frogs and toads. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. XIV. 428.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1909). Researches on the intestinal Protozoa of frogs and toads. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., LIII, 201.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1914). Cytological studies on three species of Amoeba, etc. Arch. Protistenk. XXXIV. 139.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. and Jepps, M. W. (12. 05. 1917). On the three common intestinal entamoebae of man, and their differential diagnosis. British Med. Journ. I. 607.Google Scholar
Elmassian, M. (1909). Sur une nouvelle espèce amibienne chez l'homme, Entamoeba minula n. sp. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1 Abt. (Orig.), LII. 335.Google Scholar
Kuenen, W. A. and Swellengrebel, N. H. (1913). Die Entamoeben des Menschen und ihre praktische Bedeutung. Centralbl. f. Bakt. LXXI. 378.Google Scholar
Lösch, F. (1875). Massenhafte Entwickelung von Amöben im Dickdarm. Virchow's Archiv, LXV. 196.Google Scholar
Mathis, C. and Mercier, L. (1916). L'amibe de la dysenterie. Bull. Inst. Pasteur, XIV. 641.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F. (1903). Untersuchungen über die Fortpflanzung einiger Rhizopoden. Arb. kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, XIX. 547.Google Scholar
Viereck, H. (1907). Studien über die in den Tropen erworbene Dysenterie. Arch. Schiffs- u. Tropenhyg. XI Beih. 1.Google Scholar
Walker, E. L. (1911). A comparative Study of the Amoebae in the Manila water supply, in the intestinal tract of healthy persons, and in amoebic Dysentery. Philippine Journ. Sci. VI. Sec. B, 259.Google Scholar
Walker, E. L. and Sellards, A. W. (1913). Experimental entamoebic Dysentery. Philippine Journ. Sci. VIII. Sec. B (Trop. Med.), 253.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (27. 11. 1915). Observations on the common intestinal Protozoa of Man, etc. Lancet, II. 1173.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. and O'Connor, F. W. (1916). Memorandum on the carriage of cysts of E. histolytica by house-flies, etc. Alexandria. (See also (1917) Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, XXVIII. 522.)Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. and O'Connor, F. W. (1917). An inquiry into some problems affecting the spread and incidence of intestinal protozoal infections, etc. Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, XXVIII. 151.Google Scholar