Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:36:02.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The problem of Mehlis's gland in helminths with special reference to Penetrocephalus ganapatii (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. Hanumantha-Rao
K. Hanumantha-Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Leeds, and The Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Mehlis's gland secretion in trematodes and pseudophyllidean cestodes may be a lecithin-like phospholipid.

2. After enzymic degradation of the lecithin into lysolecithin the release of egg-shell precursors from the vitelline cells is effected.

3. Soon after the completion of the egg-shell the lysolecithin may be reconverted into lecithin in vitelline cells of Penetrocephalus ganapatii, thus accounting for the periodic acid-Schiff positive reaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 50 , Issue 3-4 , November 1960 , pp. 349 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Casselman, W. G. B. (1959). Histochemical technique, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hanumantha-Rao, K. (1959). Histochemistry of Mehlis' gland and egg-shell formation in the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica L. Experientia, 15, 464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanumantha-Rao, K. (1960). Studies on Penetrocephalus ganapatii. a new genus (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from the marine teleost Saurida tumbil (Bloch). Parasitology. 50, 155–162.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1953). Histochemistry, J. & A. Churchill Ltd.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolman, M. (1950). Staining of lipids by periodic acid-Schiff reaction. Proc. soc. Exp. Biol. 75, 583–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed