Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-8cnds Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:53:26.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic factors in susceptibility of Biomphalaria glabrata for different strains of Schistosoma mansoni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Charles S. Richards
Charles S. Richards
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20014
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Biomphalaria glabrata selected for genetic differences in susceptibility to infection with a Puerto Rican strain of Schistosoma mansoni were exposed to miracidia of a strain of S. mansoni from St Lucia. The St Lucian strain was less infective than the Puerto Rican. Results suggested that in snails susceptible to the Puerto Rican S. mansoni, differences in susceptibility to the St Lucian strain were determined by a single gene, with insusceptibility dominant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 231 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barbosa, F. S., & Barreto, A. C., (1960). Differences in susceptibility of Brazilian strains of Australorbis glabratus to Schistosoma mansoni. Experimental Parasitology 9, 137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Files, V. S., & Cram, E. B., (1949). A Study on the comparative susceptibility of snail vectors to strains of Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 35, 555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuntz, R. E., (1952). Exposure of planorbid snails from the Western Hemisphere to miracidia of the Egyptian strain of Schistosoma mansoni. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, D.C. 19, 9–15.Google Scholar
Newton, W. L., (1953). The inheritance of susceptibility to infection with Schistosoma mansoni in Australorbis glabratus. Experimental Parasitology 2, 242–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paraense, W. L., & Correa, L. R., (1963). Variation in susceptibility of populations of Australorbis glabratus to a strain of Schistosoma mansoni. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 5, 15–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. S., (1969). Genetic studies on Biomphalaria glabrata: Mantle pigmentation. Malacologia 9, 339–48.Google Scholar
Richards, C. S., (1970). Genetics of a molluscan vector of schistosomiasis. Nature, London 227, 806–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. S., (1972). Biomphalaria glabrata genetics: Pearl formation. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 20, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. S., (1973 a). Susceptibility of adult Biomphalaria glabrata to Schistosoma mansoni infection. American Journal Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 22, 748–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. S., (1973 b). Genetics of Biomphalaria glabrata (Gastropoda: Planorbidae). Malacological Review 6, 199–202.Google Scholar
Richards, C. S., (1973 c). Inherited variability in the course of the intestine in Biomphalaria glabrata. Malacological Review 6, 133–8.Google Scholar
Richards, C. S., (1974). Antler tentacles of Biomphalaria glabrata: Genetic studies. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 24, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. S., & Merritt, J. W. Jr, (1972). Genetic factors in the susceptibility of juvenile Biomphalaria glabrata to Schistosoma mansoni infection. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 21, 425–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. S., & Merritt, J. W. Jr., (1975). Variation in size of Biomphalaria glabrata at maturity. Veliger (In the Press.)Google Scholar