Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:26:16.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advance care planning in advanced cancer: Can it be achieved? An exploratory randomized patient preference trial of a care planning discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Louise Jones ,
Jane Harrington ,
Cate A Barlow ,
Adrian Tookman ,
Robyn Drake ,
Kelly Barnes  and
Michael King
Louise Jones*
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
Jane Harrington
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
Cate A Barlow
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
Adrian Tookman
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
Robyn Drake
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
Kelly Barnes
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
Michael King
Affiliation:
Research Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Louise Jones, Department of Mental Health Sciences, 2nd Floor, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Little is known about the effectiveness of advance care planning in the United Kingdom, although policy documents recommend that it should be available to all those with life-limiting illness.

Method:

An exploratory patient preference randomized controlled trial of advance care planning discussions with an independent mediator (maximum three sessions) was conducted in London outpatient oncology clinics and a nearby hospice. Seventy-seven patients (mean age 62 years, 39 male) with various forms of recurrent progressive cancer participated, and 68 (88%) completed follow-up at 8 weeks. Patients completed visual analogue scales assessing perceived ability to discuss end-of-life planning with healthcare professionals or family and friends (primary outcome), happiness with the level of communication, and satisfaction with care, as well as a standardized measure of anxiety and depression.

Results:

Thirty-eight patients (51%) showed preference for the intervention. Discussions with professionals or family and friends about the future increased in the intervention arms, whether randomized or preference, but happiness with communication was unchanged or worse, and satisfaction with services decreased. Trial participation did not cause significant anxiety or depression and attrition was low.

Significance of results:

A randomized trial of advance care planning is possible. This study provides new evidence on its acceptability and effectiveness for patients with advanced cancer.

Keywords

Advance care planningEnd of lifeAdvance directivesFuture care
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 3 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, K., Jones, L., Tookman, A., et al. (2007). Acceptability of an advance care planning interview schedule: A focus group study. Palliative Medicine, 21, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, K.A., Barlow, C.A., Harrington, J., et al. (2011). Advance care planning discussions in advanced cancer: Analysis of dialogues between patients and care planning mediators. Palliative & Supportive Care, 9, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bravo, G., Dubois, M.-F. & Wagneur, B. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: A systematic review and multi-level analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1122–1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M., Grbich, C., Maddocks, I., et al. (2005). Documenting end of life decisions in residential aged care facilities in South Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 29, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, J.M., Butow, P.N. & Tattersall, M.H. (2005). When and how to initiate discussion about prognosis and end-of-life issues with terminally ill patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connors, A.F., Dawson, N.V., Desbiens, N.A., et al. (1995). A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalised patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 1591–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. (2007). Cancer reform strategy. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_081006.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2008). End of life care strategy - Promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_086277.Google Scholar
Dow, L.A., Matsuyama, R.K., Ramakrishnan, V.L., et al. (2010). Paradoxes in advance care planning: The complex relationship of oncology patients, their physicians, and advance medical directives. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold Standards Framework. (2010). Enabling a gold standard of care for all people nearing the end of life. http://www.goldstandardsframework.nhs.uk.Google Scholar
Heyland, D.K., Allan, D.E., Rocker, G., et al. , and Canadian researchers at the end-of-life network. (2009). Discussing prognosis with their patients and their families: Impact on satisfaction with end-of-life care. Open Medicine, 3, 101–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Horne, G., Seymour, J. & Shepherd, K. (2006). Advance care planning for patients with inoperable lung cancer. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 12, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jezewski, M.A., Meeker, M.A., Sessanna, L., et al. (2007). The effectiveness of interventions to increase advance directive completion rates. Journal of Ageing and Health, 19, 519–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karnofsky, D.A. & Burchenal, J.H. (1949). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. Macleod, C.M. (ed). pp. 191–205. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
King, M., Nazareth, I., Lampe, F., et al. (2005). Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment, 9, 1–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, M., Sibbald, B., Ward, E., et al. (2000). Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy and usual general practitioner care in the management of depression as well as mixed anxiety and depression in primary care. Health Technology Assessment, 4, 1–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, J.W., Block, S.D., Nilsson, M., et al. (2009). Measuring the therapeutic alliance between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer. The human connection scale. Cancer, 115, 3302–3311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical Research Council. (2000). A Framework for the Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London: MRC.Google Scholar
Melbourne, E., Sinclair, K., Durand, M.A., et al. (2010). Developing a dyadic OPTION scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 78, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MRC Complex Intervention Guidance. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC004871.Google Scholar
NHS End of Life Care Programme. (2008). Advance Care Planning: A Guide for Health and Social Care Staff. http://www.endoflifecareforadults.nhs.uk/eolc/eolcpub.htm.Google Scholar
Royal College of Physicians. (2009). Advance care planning – National guidelines. concise guidance to good practice. A series of evidence-based guidelines for good clinical management. http://mailsystem.palliatief.be/accounts/15/attachments/Research/2009_royal_college_acp.pdf.Google Scholar
Schag, C.C., Heinrich, R.L. & Ganz, P.A. (1984). Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiff, R., Shaw, R., Raja, N., et al. (2009). Advance end-of-life healthcare planning in an acute NHS hospital setting; development and evaluation of the Expressions of Healthcare Preferences (EHP) document. Age and Ageing, 38, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, S., Blanchard, M., Tookman, A., et al. (2006). Estimating needs in life threatening illness: A feasibility study to assess the views of patients and doctors. Palliative Medicine, 20, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terrence Higgins Trust & King's College London. (2000). Living Will, 4th ed. www.tht.org.uk.Google Scholar
Zigmond, A.S. & Snaith, R.P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed