Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:35:33.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cameral liquid in Nautilus and ammonites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Peter D. Ward
Peter D. Ward*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent Nautilus pompilius from the Fiji Islands and N. macromaphalus from New Caledonia show decreasing cameral liquid volumes relative to total phragmocone volume during ontogeny. A maximal value of 32% of the phragmocone filled with cameral liquid was measured from a 190 g N. pompilius. No specimens of over 500 g total weight of either species exceeded 12%. These figures are in contrast to values derived for seven ammonoid species by Heptonstall (1970), who found values ranging between 19 and 52%.

The relationship between cameral liquid volume and salinity within single chambers engaged in the emptying process are examined in N. pompilius and N. macromphalus. Both species start with newly formed chambers filled with cameral liquid isotonic to seawater. Ionic removal by the siphuncular epithelium rapidly reduces the cameral liquid osmolarity, producing osmotic movement of the cameral liquid into the blood spaces of the siphuncle. In both species the lowest cameral liquid salinities occur when the chamber is slightly over half emptied. After this point, which coincides with decoupling of the cameral liquid from the siphuncle, cameral liquid volume continues to decrease, but cameral liquid salinity increases, indicating that the rate of ionic removal slows relative to liquid removal. In N. macromphalus decoupled cameral liquid salinity rises until it is nearly isotonic to seawater when the chamber is nearly emptied. In N. pompilius, however, the rate of ion removal in decoupled cameral liquid is not slowed as much as in N. macromphalus, since it rarely exceeds 40% seawater osmolarity even when the chamber is nearly emptied. The differences in emptying methods demonstrated in these two species are probably related to their different habitat depths: N. pompilius from Fiji is found in much deeper water and must employ more physiologic work to empty chambers at greater depth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Winter 1979 , pp. 40 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bayer, U. 1977. Cephalopoden-Septen Teil 2: Regelmechanismen in Gehäuse-und Septembau der Ammoniten. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont Abh. 155(2):162–215.Google Scholar
Collins, D., Westermann, G., and Ward, P. 1978. The mature Nautilus: its shell and buoyancy. Geol. Soc. Am. Ann. Mtg., Abs. with Programs 10(7):382.Google Scholar
Davis, R. A. and Mohorter, W. 1973. Juvenile Nautilus from the Fiji Islands. J. Paleontol. 47:925–928.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1961a. The buoyancy of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (L.). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 41:219–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1961b. The effect of light on the buoyancy of the cuttlefish. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 41:343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1961c. The distribution of gas and liquid within the cuttlebone. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 41:365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1966. On the buoyancy of the pearly Nautilus. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 46:723–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1971. Further observations on the buoyancy of Spirula. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 51:363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1973. Flotation mechanisms in modern and fossil cephalopods. Adv. Mar. Biol. 11:197–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnish, W. M. and Glenister, B. F. 1964a. Paleoecology. Pp. 114–124. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part K, Mollusca. Univ. Kans. Press and Geol. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
Heptonstall, W. B. 1970. Buoyancy control in ammonoids. Lethaia. 3:317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutvei, H. and Reyment, R. A. 1973. Buoyancy control and siphuncle function in ammonoids. Palaeontology. 16:623–636.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1973. Factors in the distribution of fossil cephalopods. Part 3: Experiments with exact models of certain shell types. Bull. Geol. Inst. Univ. Uppsala, N.S. 4(2):7–41.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E. 1941. The ammonite body chamber, with special reference to the buoyancy and mode of life of the living ammonite. Q. J. Geol. Soc. London. 96:339–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P., Stone, R., Westermann, G., and Martin, A. 1977. Notes on animal weight, cameral fluids, swimming speed, and color polymorphism of the cephalopod Nautilus pompilius in the Fiji Islands. Paleobiology. 3:377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. and Martin, A. 1978. On the buoyancy of the Pearly Nautilus. J. Exp. Zool. 205:5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, A. 1902. “Contributions to the natural history of the pearly Nautilus: A”. Willey's zoological results. 6:691–830. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar