Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:10:12.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tropical forest management: can rates of natural treefalls help guide us?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Joseph P. Skorupa  and
John M. Kasenene
Joseph P. Skorupa
Affiliation:
Graduate Group in Ecology, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
John M. Kasenene
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Only a small percentage of tropical forests are legally protected and so, if we are to conserve tropical forest species we must encourage sustainable exploitation of unprotected forest areas. Selective timber harvesting is frequently cited as a sustainable use of tropical forests and the authors studied the effects of this kind of exploitation on natural treefall rates, an important regulative process, in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Their results indicate that levels of destruction typical of capital intensive mechanised timber harvesting seriously disrupt the dynamic balance of the forest. They discuss alternative methods for selective timber harvesting that would be less disruptive and present an objective method which may help rain forest managers determine which multiple-use options are compatible with rain forest conservation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 96 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1984

References

Bazzaz, F.A. and Pickett, S.T.A. 1980. Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Ann. Rev. Ecology Systematics, 11, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, C.B. and Wadsworth, F.H. 1970. Stand structure and yield in the Tabonuco Forest of Puerto Rico. In A Tropical Rain Forest (Eds Odum, H.T. and Pigeon, R.F.). US Atomic Energy Commission, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Dawkins, H.C. 1958. The management of natural tropical high forest with special reference to Uganda. Commonw. Forestry Inst. Pap. No. 34.Google Scholar
Ewel, J. and Conde, L. 1976. Potential ecological impact of increased intensity of tropical forest utilization. Final Report to U.S.D.A.-Forest Service, Forests Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, on Research Agreement 12–28.Google Scholar
Fons, W.L. 1940. Influence of forest cover on wind velocity. J. For. 38, 481–486.Google Scholar
Gartlan, J.S. 1982. The forests and primates of Ghana: prospects for protection and proposals for assistance. Lab. Primate News 21, 1–14.Google Scholar
Gomez-Pompa, A., Vazquez-Yanes, C. and Guevara, S. 1972. The tropical rain forest: a non-renewable resource. Science, 177, 762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorn, G.S. 1978. Tree falls and tropical forest dynamics. In Tropical Trees as Living Systems (Eds Tomlinson, P.B. and Zimmerman, M.H.). Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kingston, B. 1967. Working plan for Kibale and Itwara Central Forest Reserves. Uganda Forests Department, Entebbe.Google Scholar
Langdale-Brown, I., Osmaston, H.A. and Wilson, J.G. 1964. The Vegetation of Uganda. Government Printing Office, Entebbe.Google Scholar
Leigh, G.H. (Jr) 1975. Structure and climate in tropical rain forest. Ann. Rev. Ecology Systematics, 6, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinlin, H.J. 1982. Monitoring the world's tropical forests. Unasylva, 34(137), 2–8.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T.T. 1975. The Red Colobus Monkey. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO 1978. Tropical Forest Ecosystems: a State of the Knowledge Report. Natural Resources Research No. XIV. United Nations, Paris.Google Scholar
Wing, L.D. and Buss, I.O. 1970. Elephants and forests. Wildl. Monogr. No. 19.Google Scholar