Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:47:35.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnesium homeostasis in cattle: absorption and excretion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2018

Holger Martens*
Affiliation:
Institute for Veterinary Physiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Sabine Leonhard-Marek
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Hannover, Germany
Monika Röntgen
Affiliation:
Institute of Muscle Biology and Growth, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
Friederike Stumpff
Affiliation:
Institute for Veterinary Physiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Holger Martens, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg2+) is an essential mineral without known specific regulatory mechanisms. In ruminants, plasma Mg2+ concentration depends primarily on the balance between Mg2+ absorption and Mg2+ excretion. The primary site of Mg2+ absorption is the rumen, where Mg2+ is apically absorbed by both potential-dependent and potential-independent uptake mechanisms, reflecting involvement of ion channels and electroneutral transporters, respectively. Transport is energised in a secondary active manner by a basolateral Na+/Mg2+ exchanger. Ruminal transport of Mg2+ is significantly influenced by a variety of factors such as high K+ concentration, sudden increases of ammonia, pH, and the concentration of SCFA. Impaired Mg2+ absorption in the rumen is not compensated for by increased transport in the small or large intestine. While renal excretion can be adjusted to compensate precisely for any surplus in Mg2+ uptake, a shortage in dietary Mg2+ cannot be compensated for either via skeletal mobilisation of Mg2+ or via up-regulation of ruminal absorption. In such situations, hypomagnesaemia will lead to decrease of a Mg2+ in the cerebrospinal fluid and clinical manifestations of tetany. Improved knowledge concerning the factors governing Mg2+ homeostasis will allow reliable recommendations for an adequate Mg2+ intake and for the avoidance of possible disturbances. Future research should clarify the molecular identity of the suggested Mg2+ transport proteins and the regulatory mechanisms controlling renal Mg excretion as parameters influencing Mg2+ homeostasis.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Authors 2018 

Introduction

Magnesium (Mg2+) is an essential mineral( Reference Leroy 1 ) and its binding is of central importance for enzymic reactions after combining with the enzyme or substrate. The cytosolic concentration of the free, ionised Mg2+ ion is about 1 mmol/l, but the total intracellular concentration is much higher since numerous anions such as phosphate groups in nucleic acids or ATP4– bind Mg2+ ( Reference McGuigan, Kay and Elder 2 ). Furthermore, Mg2+ acts as a modulator of synaptic transmission in the central nervous system (CNS)( Reference Morris 3 , Reference Möykkynen, Uusi-Oukari and Heikkila 4 ), at the motoric endplate( Reference Lamb and Stephenson 5 ), in immunological pathways( Reference Li, Chaigne-Delalande and Kanellopoulou 6 ) and in timekeeping( Reference Feeney, Hansen and Putker 7 ). Importantly, Mg2+ is involved in the gating of ion channels( Reference Vemana, Pandey and Larsson 8 ). Many transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are regulated by Mg2+ in a voltage-dependent manner( Reference Voets, Janssens and Prenen 9 ) and are involved in the transport of cations across the ruminal epithelium( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 Reference Leonhard-Marek, Stumpff and Brinkmann 12 ).

The modulation of channel function in the CNS by Mg2+ is probably the reason for neurological symptoms such as ataxia, recumbency, convulsions, and finally tetanic muscle spasms in hypomagnesaemia and has been well known in cattle for some 80 years as grass tetany( Reference Sjollema 13 , Reference Sjollema 14 ).

The present review attempts to outline the principles of Mg2+ homeostasis with particular emphasis on the site and mechanism of Mg2+ absorption, renal excretion and possible imbalances such as tetany.

Magnesium homeostasis

Plasma magnesium

Despite the absence of a (known) specific regulatory system, Mg2+ in plasma is kept within the range of 0·9–1·2 mmol/l, provided that influx (via absorption) into the extracellular space (ECS) including plasma is larger than the efflux (requirement and excretion). In humans, six genomic regions have been implicated in the maintenance of plasma Mg2+ concentration( Reference Meyer, Verwoert and Hwang 15 ), and similar gene loci may explain the heritability of plasma Mg2+ concentration in dairy cows (0·20–0·43)( Reference Tsiamadis, Banos and Panousis 16 ).

Plasma Mg2+ is known to be influenced in a non-specific manner by catecholamines( Reference Rayssiguier 17 ), insulin( Reference Persson and Luthman 18 ) and parathyroid hormone (PTH)( Reference Goff, Littledike and Horst 19 ). In addition, epidermal growth factor has recently been shown to have magnesiotropic effects via TRPM6 channels, which regulate renal and intestinal Mg2+ absorption( Reference Groenestege, Thebault and van der Wijst 20 ).

Distribution of magnesium

Some 60–70 % of total body Mg2+ is bound in the skeleton. A further 30 % is found in the intracellular space (ICS) but only 1–5 % of intracellular Mg2+ is in the ionised form( Reference Houillier 21 ). The Mg2+ in the ECS only reflects about 1 % of total body Mg2+. Between 20 and 40 % of plasma Mg2+ is bound to albumin and globulin and some 10 % complexes with small anions such as citrate, phosphate and bicarbonate, so that 50–70 % are ionised.

According to a classical estimate( Reference Blaxter and McGill 22 ), the total content of Mg2+ within the body of calves can be calculated from:

(1) $${\rm Mg}\,\left( {\rm g} \right)\, {\equals}\, \left( {0\!\cdot\!{\rm 655}{\times}{\rm BW\ (kg)}} \right)-{\rm 3}\!\cdot\!{\rm 5},$$

where BW is body weight in kg.

Provided that a similar relationship holds for adult ruminants, the total body Mg2+ of a cow with a BW of 700 kg should be roughly 455 g, of which approximately 320 g would be skeletal, about 130 g intracellular, while only about 4–5 g would be found in the total ECS.

Regulation of magnesium homeostasis

The range of plasma Mg2+ primarily depends on the influx of Mg2+ from the gastrointestinal tract into the ECS (a) and on the efflux from the ECS into milk (b), into the ICS including soft tissue and bones during growth and the fetus during pregnancy (c), and into the intestine as endogenous secretion (d). Mg2+ not required for b–d is excreted into urine (e). Plasma Mg2+ concentration thus depends on the daily Mg2+ balance and is given by:

(2) $${\rm a\, {\equals}\, b{\plus}c{\plus}d{\plus}e,}$$

where a is Mg2+ absorption (g/d) (influx), b is Mg2+ efflux in milk (g/d), c is Mg2+ uptake (efflux) into the ICS (g/d), d is intestinal Mg2+ secretion (efflux) (g/d), and e is renal Mg2+ excretion (efflux) (g/d).

A scheme of Mg2+ metabolism for a cow with a BW of 700 kg and a milk production of 40 kg/d is given in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 Scheme of Mg2+ metabolism in a non-pregnant dairy cow of 700 kg body weight (BW). The daily Mg2+ intake is 50 g, with true Mg2+ absorption being 12·8 g/d (25·6 %). The true absorption is reduced by an endogenous (Endog.) secretion of 2·8 g/d (4 mg/kg), which accounts for an apparent absorption or Mg2+ digestion of 10 g/d (20 %). An amount of 14·8 g Mg2+/d is used for 40 kg milk secretion (120 mg/l) and the surplus (5·2 g/d) is excreted via the kidneys into urine. The pool in the extracellular space has been calculated by assuming that the plasma volume and interstitial space represent 5 and 15 % of BW, respectively, as in sheep( Reference Storry 26 ). The unidirectional flow of Mg2+ into and out of the intracellular space (ICS) and bone is not known and net flux into the ICS or bone is zero at constant BW. In pregnant cows in late gestation a flux of 0·2 g Mg2+/d towards the fetus has to be included( Reference House and Bell 207 ).

In an adult and not growing, non-pregnant cow, net uptake of Mg2+ into the ICS and bone at adequate Mg intake is marginal, so that equation (2) can be simplified to:

(3) $${\rm a}\, {\equals}\, {\rm b}{\plus}{\rm d}{\plus}{\rm e},$$

where a is Mg2+ absorption (g/d) (influx), b is Mg2+ efflux in milk (g/d), d is endogenous Mg2+ secretion (efflux) (g/d), and e is renal Mg2+ excretion (efflux) (g/d).

Because Mg2+ absorption (a) rarely equals Mg2+ efflux, additional mechanisms are necessary for the adjustment, which is very efficiently controlled by the kidneys at Mg2+ surplus. However, mobilisation from the skeleton or the cytosol is very limited( Reference Houillier 21 ). This suggests that Mg2+ influx was very rarely limited during evolution. Obviously, Mg2+ intake and absorption (a) were generally above requirement (b + c + d), so that an efficient renal excretion of the surplus was sufficient for the regulation of Mg2+ homeostasis (e). Moreover, Mg2+ is not very toxic, and hence transient hypermagnesaemia (rapid influx>efflux) is well tolerated( Reference Martens and Stössel 23 ). Therefore, absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is the key factor determining plasma Mg2+ levels, which can only be kept constant when the daily requirement is replaced by an adequate absorption. A better comprehension of the gastrointestinal absorption (influx) and its large variation( Reference Schonewille, Everts and Jittakhot 24 ) appears to be a key factor for understanding Mg2+ homeostasis.

Mg2+ absorption from the ruminant gastrointestinal tract

Site of magnesium absorption

Early studies in vivo suggested the distal part of the small intestine as the site of Mg2+ absorption( Reference Smith 25 ) and Storry( Reference Storry 26 ) stated that ‘there is no evidence to assume that ... a mechanism exists for the transport of calcium and magnesium across the rumen epithelium’. In contrast, Harrison et al. ( Reference Harrison, Hill and Mangan 27 ) observed Mg2+ absorption proximal to the duodenum and Marongiu from the rumen fluid( Reference Marongiu 28 ). In a later study, Rogers & van’t Klooster( Reference Rogers and van’t Klooster 29 ) measured mineral flow rates along the gut and demonstrated absorption before the duodenum. Martens( Reference Martens 30 ) summarised data from sheep and cows. The rate of absorption before the duodenum increased linearly with Mg2+ intake( Reference Martens 31 ). A net secretion was observed into the small intestine; the same amount was absorbed in the large intestine.

Regarding the location of Mg2+ absorption before the duodenum, uptake from the omasum but not from the abomasum was demonstrated( Reference Edrise and Smith 32 , Reference Field and Munro 33 ). However, Martens & Rayssiguier( Reference Martens and Rayssiguier 34 ) showed that, in vitro, the transport capacity of the rumen epithelium was large and predominant.

Physiological significance of the rumen

An important finding was that Mg2+ absorption from the forestomachs was essential for maintaining normal plasma Mg2+ and a precondition for Mg2+ homeostasis( Reference Pfeffer and Rahman 35 ). Reduced Mg2+ absorption from the forestomach was not compensated for by absorption in the intestine( Reference Tomas and Potter 36 ).

Absorption from the large intestine

Mg2+ absorption was shown to switch from the hindgut to the developed rumen after dietary transition from milk to solid feed in calves( Reference Smith 37 ) and lambs( Reference Dillon and Scott 38 ). Mg2+ absorption from the hindgut is maintained in adult animals and can be used for the treatment of acute hypomagnesaemia( Reference Meyer and Busse 39 ).

Mechanism of ruminal Mg2+ transport

Scott( Reference Scott 40 ) analysed the passive driving forces across the rumen epithelium and concluded that the chemical gradient of Mg2+ for passive movement from the rumen to plasma was opposed by the stronger electrical gradient (blood side positive 30–60 mV), which thus prevented passive paracellular uptake of the Mg2+ ion from the rumen to blood. Accordingly, Mg2+ transport across the rumen epithelium has to be energised.

The exclusion of passive paracellular diffusion suggests active, transcellular transport, which was deduced both from in vitro and in vivo experiments( Reference Martens and Harmeyer 41 Reference Martens 43 ) showing: (a) net transport of Mg2+ from the rumen to blood; (b) saturation kinetics; (c) significantly lower transport at lower temperature; and (d) reduced transport by inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase (ouabain or dinitrophenol). Furthermore, it was shown that ‘bulk flow’ could not explain ruminal Mg2+ transport( Reference Martens 44 ), as had been proposed for rats( Reference Behar 45 ).

The movement of Mg2+ across the multilayered epithelium includes: (a) uptake across the apical membrane; (b) the passage of Mg2+ across the various epithelial layers of the multilayered epithelium; and (c) release across the basolateral membrane. In cases where the passive gradients are sufficient, transepithelial transfer may further involve (d) possible paracellular passive movement.

Epithelial mechanisms

For many decades, characterisation of the transcellular transport pathway suffered from a lack of knowledge about Mg2+ transport. The existence of Mg2+ ion channels was still widely considered an unproven hypothesis. However, transport mechanisms for other ions (for example, Na+ or Ca2+) had been clearly established in other epithelia, such as in rabbit ileum( Reference Frizzell and Schultz 46 ). Simply put, transport of ions across epithelia is either influenced by the transepithelial potential difference (PDt) or not. By varying the electrical driving force for a specific ion (ξ)( Reference Frizzell and Schultz 46 ), and plotting the measured flux rate over ξ, it is possible to differentiate between the PD-independent flux (given by the y-intercept in the plot) and the PD-dependent flux (given by the slope of the plotted curve).

Potential-dependent Mg2+ uptake

The suggestion that Mg2+ transport occurred with the passage of a charge was deduced from a reciprocal relationship between an increase in ruminal PDt and a decrease in ruminal Mg2+ transport( Reference Tomas and Potter 36 , Reference Martens, Gäbel and Strozyk 47 ). PDt can be calculated from the apical potential difference (PDa) and the basolateral potential difference (PDb): PDt=PDa – PDb. In this relationship, the sign convention is such that the apical (ruminal) side is set to ground level and an increase in the passage of cations from the apical to the serosal (blood) side will lead to a more positive PDt and a less negative PDa, thus reducing the driving force for apical Mg2+ uptake. Mucosal to serosal Mg2+ transport rates (Jms Mg2+) revealed a linear correlation between ξ (PDt) and Jms Mg2+ within –25 and + 25 mV( Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 48 ). The obtained slope confirmed the suggestion of PD-dependent Jms Mg2+ transport with uptake as an ion (for example, channel-mediated), but also exhibited an intercept of the y-axis, which represents a PD-independent component (for example, via co-transport).

A PD-dependent uptake mechanism for Mg2+ in the apical membrane is supported by data from microelectrode experiments. Leonhard-Marek & Martens( Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 48 ) measured a PDa under open circuit conditions of –67·3 mV (cytosol negative). An increase in the mucosal K+ concentration depolarised PDa and increased PDt. These experiments suggested that the apical membrane is permeable to K+, with non-selective cation channels from the TRP family such as TRPV3 and TRPA1 likely candidates( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 ).

In further flux measurements, Mg2+ transport was reduced not only by elevation of the PDt but also by the apical K+ concentration( Reference Martens, Gäbel and Strozyk 47 , Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 48 ). Depolarisation of PDa by K+ is the most likely explanation for the reduced mucosal to serosal flux of Mg2+ (Jms) at high concentrations of K+ (80 mmol/l) and argues for the uptake of Mg2+ by a PD-dependent mechanism. Since the ionised intracellular Mg2+ concentration (0·54 mmol/l)( Reference Schweigel, Lang and Martens 49 ) is lower than the concentration of Mg2+ in the rumen, the uptake of Mg2+ is driven by the electrochemical gradient across the apical membrane.

The ruminal Mg2+ channel

The significant correlation between changes of PDa and Mg2+ transport led to the suggestion of an apical Mg2+ channel( Reference Martens, Gäbel and Strozyk 47 ), long before such channels were cloned. Channel-mediated transport of Mg2+ is now well established( Reference Hoenderop and Bindels 50 ). Thus, hypomagnesaemia in man is now known to be caused by the mutation of a channel of the TRP gene family, TRPM6( Reference Konrad, Schlingmann and Gudermann 51 ). TRPM6 plays a key role in the intestinal and renal absorption of Mg2+ in mice( Reference Hoenderop and Bindels 50 ). Expression of mRNA encoding for this protein by the rumen epithelium suggests a similar role in the ruminal absorption of Mg2+ ( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 ).

A further member of this channel family, TRPM7, has been demonstrated in ruminal epithelial cells as mRNA( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 , Reference Schweigel, Kolisek and Nikolic 52 ) and protein( Reference Schweigel, Kolisek and Nikolic 52 ) and is thought to play a role in intracellular Mg2+ homeostasis( Reference Demeuse, Penner and Fleig 53 ). Since experiments in TRPM7-deficient mice by Ryazanova et al. ( Reference Ryazanova, Rondon and Zierler 54 ) demonstrate disturbed intestinal Mg2+ absorption, an additional role in epithelial transport has been proposed. It has been suggested that both candidate genes are of functional importance for epithelial transport since both TRPM6 and TRPM7 subunits may be required to form a functional Mg2+ channel( Reference Dimke, Hoenderop and Bindels 55 ). MagT1 is a further candidate gene for the PD-dependent uptake pathway in ruminal epithelial cells( Reference Schweigel, Kolisek and Nikolic 52 , Reference Schweigel, Kuzinski and Deiner 56 ).

Potential difference-independent (electroneutral) Mg2+ uptake

In addition to the channel-mediated pathway, a second, PD-independent Mg2+ uptake pathway mediates Mg2+ transport( Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 48 ). The charge of Mg2+ is compensated by co-transport with anions or counter-transport of cations. Interestingly, the intake of high levels of readily fermentable carbohydrates( Reference Giduck and Fontenot 57 ) increased Mg2+ digestion. Furthermore, SCFA or CO2 enhanced ruminal Mg2+ absorption in vivo ( Reference Martens, Heggemann and Regier 58 ) and stimulated Jms Mg2+ in vitro ( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Gäbel and Martens 59 ). Since both fermentation products acidify the epithelium, Mg2+/2H+ exchange has been proposed to represent this transport mechanism( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Gäbel and Martens 59 , Reference Leonhard-Marek 60 ).

However, Schweigel & Martens( Reference Schweigel and Martens 61 ) found no experimental evidence for directly coupled Mg2+/2H+ exchange in isolated ruminal epithelial cells of sheep and suggested a co-transport of Mg2+ with an anion such as HCO3 or Cl. Furthermore, the conductance of ruminal TRP channels for monovalent cations is activated by exposure to SCFA, possibly related to swelling of the cells( Reference Stumpff, Martens and Bilk 62 , Reference Georgi, Rosendahl and Ernst 63 ). This opens the possibility that the stimulation of Mg2+ by SCFA and CO2 may not exclusively represent PD-independent Mg2+ transport but also involves stimulation of PD-dependent mechanisms. Finally, the activity of the ruminal vacuolar H+-ATPase modulates Mg2+ transport( Reference Schweigel and Martens 61 ), possibly by increasing PDa and thus enhancing the uptake of Mg2+. Such a mechanism would represent functional albeit not fixed Mg2+/H+ exchange. Currently, neither the stoichiometry nor the molecular identity of the PD-independent Mg2+ transporter is known.

Physiological consequences of two uptake mechanisms

Given that the rumen is the essential site of Mg2+ absorption under various feeding conditions, it has been proposed that both mechanisms work in parallel by ‘job sharing’ with an efficient uptake at all Mg2+ concentrations. At low ruminal Mg2+ concentrations, the PD-dependent and K+-sensitive mechanism might mediate Mg2+ transport with high affinity and low capacity. This became apparent in experiments by Ram et al. ( Reference Ram, Schonewille and Martens 64 ) and Care et al. ( Reference Care, Brown and Farrar 42 ). High ruminal K+ intake reduced Mg2+ absorption to a higher extent at low ruminal Mg2+ concentration. Consequently, a possible negative effect of K+ intake will be pronounced at high ruminal K+ (>50 mmol/l) and low ruminal Mg2+ (<2 mmol/l) concentration (see below).

Vice versa, the PD-independent and K+-insensitive mechanism has a high capacity and low affinity and will thus primarily mediate transport at high Mg2+ (>3 mmol/l) concentrations. This uptake mechanism relies exclusively on the chemical gradients of the involved ions and will rise with increasing Mg2+ concentration (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of magnesium transport across the rumen epithelium

PDa, apical potential difference.

Mg2+ transport within the epithelium

The rumen epithelium is a squamous multilayered epithelium forming a functional syncytium comparable with the classical model of frog skin( Reference Ussing and Zerahn 65 ). Connections between cells of the various layers are formed by proteins such as connexin 43( Reference Graham and Simmons 66 ).

Basolateral extrusion

Mg2+ extrusion is related to the uptake of Na+. Reduction of serosal Na+ reduced Jms Mg2+ ( Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 67 ) and in ruminal epithelial cells, the release or uptake of Mg2+ was dependent on the direction of the Na+ gradient( Reference Schweigel, Vormann and Martens 68 ). Furthermore, application of imipramine, an inhibitor of Na+/Mg2+ exchange, reduced Mg2+ transport( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Stumpff and Brinkmann 12 , Reference Schweigel, Vormann and Martens 68 ). The characterisation of Na+/Mg2+ exchange in HEK (human embryonic kidney) cells has revealed that the human gene SLC41A1 (solute carrier family 41 member 1) encodes for this Mg2+-transporting protein( Reference Kolisek, Nestler and Vormann 69 , Reference Schweigel-Röntgen and Kolisek 70 ). The Na+/Mg2+ exchanger is indirectly energised by Na+/K+-ATPase( Reference Martens 43 ). Although evidence for the extrusion of Mg2+ from giant squid axons via Na+/Mg2+ exchange had previously been obtained( Reference Baker and Crawford 71 ), ruminants were arguably the first mammalian species in which evidence for a (secondary) active epithelial Mg2+ transport could be obtained in an essential site of Mg2+ absorption (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Representation of transepithelial ruminal Mg2+ transport. The multi-layered epithelium is simplified to one compartment. Passive Mg2+ uptake is driven (1) mainly by the apical potential difference (PDa) or (2) by the chemical gradient of the involved free ions. The PD-dependent uptake (1) is thought to involve homo- or heteromeric assemblies of the transient receptor potential channel proteins TRPM6 and TRPM7. The molecular identity of PD-independent (2) uptake is unknown. Basolateral extrusion occurs via Na+/Mg2+ exchange via solute carrier family 41 member 1 (SLC41A1). The negative effects of inhibitors (–) on various steps of Mg2+ transport are printed in italics. pJms and Jsm represent the passive flow through the paracellular pathway. The cylindrical scheme represents a channel. PDt, transepithelial potential difference; PDb, basolateral potential difference; Mg2+ i, intracellular ionised (free) Mg2+; DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenol; A, anion; C, carrier; P, pump (Na+/K+-ATPase). Example for PDt (+15 mV)=PDa (–45 mV) – PDb (–60 mV). Depolarisation of PDa by an increase of ruminal K+ increases PDt.

Passive paracellular Mg2+ transport

The flux of Mg2+ from the serosal to the mucosal side (Jsm Mg2+) is entirely passive( Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 48 ) with a permeability in the range of some 1×10–6 cm/s. This low passive flow rate limits passive transport and is unimportant under in vivo conditions.

Saturation of Mg2+ transport

Mg2+ transport saturates in vitro ( Reference Martens and Harmeyer 41 ) and in studies in vivo ( Reference Care, Brown and Farrar 42 , Reference Martens 72 , Reference Martens 73 ) and probably includes the combined transport capacities of both uptake mechanisms. However, this saturation has never been observed in conventional balance studies. Weiss( Reference Weiss 74 ) and Schonewille et al. ( Reference Schonewille, Everts and Jittakhot 24 ) analysed Mg2+ intake and digestion in cows and found a linear correlation between Mg2+ intake and Mg2+ digestion, respectively. The observed saturation under experimental conditions simulated, but very likely did not represent, the real in vivo conditions( Reference Care, Brown and Farrar 42 , Reference Martens 72 , Reference Martens 73 ). Mg2+ was almost certainly ionised in these model studies and available for transport( Reference Care, Brown and Farrar 42 , Reference Martens 72 , Reference Martens 73 ). It is to be assumed that in the normal rumen fluid, Mg2+ is only partially ionised. Indeed, chelating Mg2+ by EDTA severely depresses Mg2+ transport( Reference Leonhard, Smith and Martens 75 ).

Modulation of ruminal Mg2+ transport

In one of his first publications, Sjollema( Reference Sjollema 14 ) reported the composition of tetany-prone grass with high concentrations of K+ and N, low concentrations of Na+, while levels of Mg2+ were moderate but not low. Hence, this disease ‘does not arise by inadequate intake of Mg2+ alone’( Reference Head and Rook 76 ). Hypomagnesaemic tetany also occurred after changing the diet despite equal Mg2+ content( Reference Care, Vowles and Mann 77 ), and a decrease in plasma Mg2+ was observed even with an increase in Mg2+ intake( Reference Johnson, Helliwell and Jones 78 ). Today, there can be no doubt that various dietary factors interfere with Mg2+ transport.

The classical implications of K+

High K+ intake significantly reduced Mg2+ digestion, plasma Mg2+ concentration and, consequently, urinary excretion in sheep( Reference Fontenot, Miller and Whitehair 79 ) and cows( Reference Schonewille, Van’t Klooster and Wouterse 80 ). The reduced Mg2+ digestion was caused by a decrease in Mg2+ absorption and not by an increase in endogenous Mg2+ loss( Reference Newton, Fontenot and Tucker 81 ).

Site of K+ effect

A higher K+ intake reduced Mg2+ absorption from the forestomachs. This reduction was not compensated for in the small or the large intestine( Reference Tomas and Potter 36 ). Furthermore, K+ infusion into the abomasum or ileum did not affect Mg2+ absorption( Reference Wylie, Fontenot and Greene 82 ).

The effect of K+ and Mg2+ concentrations

There is considerable evidence showing that the effect of K+ depends on both ruminal K+ and Mg2+ concentration.

Role of K+ intake

Inhibition of Mg2+ absorption is pronounced between 1 and 3 % K+ in DM and is attenuated at higher K+ concentrations( Reference Rahnema and Fontenot 83 ). In agreement with this conclusion, Schonewille et al. ( Reference Schonewille, Ram and van’t Kloster 84 ) did not find a correlation between Mg2+ digestion and high K+ content of the diet within the range of 2·9 to 4·4 % of DM. Notably, Martens et al. ( Reference Martens, Heggemann and Regier 58 ) observed that the absorption of Mg2+ from the temporarily isolated rumen of heifers dramatically decreased between 25 and 75 mmol K+/l in the artificial rumen fluid, but not between 75 and 100 or 120 mmol K+/l. This agrees with the logarithmic relationship between mucosal K+ concentration and PDa ( Reference Leonhard-Marek and Martens 48 ).

Role of Mg 2+ intake

The proposed model of ‘job sharing’ (Table 1) of the two uptake mechanisms suggests that the effect of K+ also depends on the Mg2+ concentration. The reduction of Mg2+ absorption by K+ must be higher if Mg2+ is mainly transported via the K+-sensitive, PD-dependent mechanism. Ram et al. ( Reference Ram, Schonewille and Martens 64 ) fed sheep increasing amounts Mg2+ at two levels of K+ intake. Mg2+ absorption was reduced by 54 % at low Mg2+ intake and by 27 % at high Mg2+ intake.

The increase in K+ intake elevates ruminal K+ ( Reference Ram, Schonewille and Martens 64 ) and reciprocally decreases Na+ concentration( Reference Lang and Martens 85 ). Neither the rumen volume nor the passage rate was changed by K+ intake, excluding dilution of ruminal Mg2+ concentration or enhanced outflow( Reference Ram, Schonewille and Martens 64 ).

Meta-analysis of Mg2+ digestion: reduction by K+

The quantity of the effect of K+ on Mg2+ was analysed in a meta-analysis by Weiss( Reference Weiss 74 ) in cows, yielding the following relationship:

(4) $$\eqalignno{ {\rm Digestible}\,{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \, {\equals}\, &#x0026; {\rm 4}\!\cdot\!{\rm 5}\ \left( {{\rm {\scale70% S\scale70% E\scale70% M}}\,{\rm 4}\!\cdot\!0} \right){\rm g}/{\rm d}{\plus}0\!\cdot\!{\rm 24}\ \left( {\rm {\scale70% S\scale70% E\scale70% M}\,0\!\cdot\!0{\rm 7}} \right)\cr &#x0026; {\times}{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \,{\rm intake}-{\rm 4}\!\cdot\!{\rm 4}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d}\left\ ( {{\rm {\scale70% S\scale70% E\scale70% M}}\,\,{\rm 2}\!\cdot\!{\rm 2}} \right){\times}{\rm K}^{{\plus}}\! ,$$

where digestible Mg2+ and Mg2+ intake are given in g/d, and K+ is given as % K+ in DM (thirty-nine diets, 162 cows).

Schonewille et al. ( Reference Schonewille, Everts and Jittakhot 24 ) performed a second meta-analysis with a different set of experiments and with a larger number of diets and cows, yielding:

(5) $$\eqalignno{ {\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \left( {{\rm true}\,{\rm absorption}} \right)&#x0026;\, {\equals}\, {\rm 3}\!\cdot\!{\rm 6}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d}\ \left( {{\rm {\scale70% S\scale70% E\scale70% M}}\,0\!\cdot\!{\rm 67}} \right){\plus}0\!\cdot\!{\rm 2}\ \left( {{\rm {\scale70% S\scale70% E\scale70% M}}\,0\!\cdot\!0{\rm 1}} \right) \cr &#x0026; \quad {\times}{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}}\,{\rm intake}-0\!\cdot\!0{\rm 8}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d }\left\ ( {{\rm {\scale70% S\scale70% E\scale70% M}}\,0\!\cdot\!0{\rm 14}} \right){\times}{\rm K}^{{\plus}}\! ,$$

where Mg2+ true absorption and intake are given in g/d, and K+ is given as g/kg in DM (sixty-eight diets, 323 cows).

True absorption can be transferred to apparent absorption (=digestible Mg2+) by correction for endogenous Mg2+ secretion (700 kg BW×4 mg/kg/d=2·8 g/d)( 86 , Reference Schonewille and Beynen 87 ):

(6) $$\eqalignno {{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \left( {{\rm apparent}\,{\rm absorption}} \right)\, {\equals}&#x0026;\, {\rm 3}\!\cdot\!{\rm 6}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d}-{\rm 2}\!\cdot\!{\rm 8}{\plus}0\!\cdot\!{\rm 2} \cr &#x0026;{\times}{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \,{\rm intake}-0\!\cdot\!0{\rm 8}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d}{\times}{\rm K}^{{\plus}}\!;$$
(7) $$\eqalignno{{\rm Digestible}\,{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \, {\equals}\, &#x0026;0\!\cdot\!{\rm 8}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d}{\plus}0\!\cdot\!{\rm 2}{\times}{\rm Mg}^{{{\rm 2}{\plus}}} \,{\rm intake} \cr &#x0026; -0\!\cdot\!0{\rm 8}\,{\rm g}/{\rm d}{\times}{\rm K}^{{\plus}}\!,$$

Where Mg2+ (apparent absorption), digestible Mg2+ and intake are given in g/d, and K+ is given in g/kg in DM.

At a K+ concentration of 1 % in the DM, the apparent Mg2+ digestion is slightly lower (20 %) than in the calculation of Weiss( Reference Weiss 74 ) (24 %). However, Mg2+ digestion is more depressed at low Mg2+ intake.

The linear decrease in digestible Mg2+ with rising ruminal K+ (equations 4 and 7) is in contradiction to the discussed reduction of an effect of K+ at a higher Mg2+ intake. The major reason is probably the experimental design. The experiments of Ram et al. ( Reference Ram, Schonewille and Martens 64 ) and Martens et al. ( Reference Martens, Heggemann and Regier 58 ) were performed under identical conditions. Equations 4 and 5 are the result of meta-analyses of many balance studies.

The role of Na+

Insufficient Na+ intake releases aldosterone and decreases Na+ in both saliva and rumen fluid, while K+ is increased( Reference Bailey 88 Reference Martens, Kubel and Gäbel 90 ). Accordingly, Na+ deficiency in sheep caused a decrease of Na+ in saliva and rumen fluid, an increase of K+ in both liquids, and an enhanced PDt, while Mg2+ absorption from the rumen decreased (see Table 2)( Reference Martens, Kubel and Gäbel 90 ). All of these changes were abolished by repletion of Na+. Furthermore, intravenous infusion of aldosterone in sheep caused an increase in K+ and a decrease in the Na+ concentration in the rumen. Concomitantly, ruminal Mg2+ concentration rose, while plasma Mg2+ declined( Reference Charlton and Armstrong 91 ). Since aldosterone alone does not change Mg2+ absorption( Reference Martens and Hammer 92 ), these effects are best explained by the aldosterone-induced elevation of the ruminal K+ concentration.

Table 2 Na+ deficiency and high K+ intake change the same rumen parameters and have identical effects on Mg2+ absorption

PDt, transepithelial potential difference; ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.

Notably, K+ concentration in saliva can reach some 100 mmol/l in Na+-deficient animals. Assuming a salivary flow rate of 200 litres/d, this leads to a total influx of some 780 g K+/d and presents a significant risk for reduced Mg2+ absorption. The condition is easily overlooked, because overt clinical signs of Na+ deficiency are usually missing and because the large Na+ pool in the rumen can be mobilised to cover deficiency for a long time( Reference Kemp and Geurink 93 ). Furthermore, as the K+ concentration in the rumen fluid increases, the absorption of Na+ is enhanced( Reference Lang and Martens 85 ), which may help to compensate for Na+ deficiency.

Young spring grass frequently contains extremely low concentrations of Na+ ( Reference Morris and Gartner 94 ) and was suggested as a risk factor as early as 1966 by Metson et al. ( Reference Metson, Saunders and Collie 95 ): ‘If low sodium is confirmed as yet another stress factor in the development of hypomagnesaemia, most of the present analyses [of grass] would undoubtedly qualify as tetany prone’. This suggestion is in agreement with the observation of Butler( Reference Butler 96 ) about a negative relationship between the low Na+ content of grass and the incidence of tetany. Vice versa, grass tetany caused by Na+ deficiency can be prevented by supplementation with NaCl( Reference Paterson and Crichton 97 ).

Protein and ammonia

Tetany-prone young grass in spring exhibits a high concentration of crude protein( Reference Sjollema 14 ), that causes an increase of up to 70 mmol/l ruminal ammonia( Reference Annison, Lewis and Lindsay 98 ) and is associated with grass tetany( Reference Kemp 99 ). (The term ammonia is used without discrimination between NH3 and NH4 +. Chemical symbols are used when a specification is required.) Relationships between ammonia and Mg2+ absorption have been tested with contradictory results: both inhibition of Mg2+ absorption and no effect on Mg2+ digestion at high ruminal ammonia, depending on the experimental conditions. A decrease in Mg2+ absorption was observed at a sudden increase in ruminal NH4 + concentration. Intraruminal application of large amounts of ammonium acetate in cows caused a decrease both in plasma Mg2+ concentration and urinary Mg2+ excretion( Reference Head and Rook 76 ). When working with sheep( Reference Martens and Rayssiguier 34 ) or young heifers( Reference Martens, Heggemann and Regier 58 ), respectively, Mg2+ absorption from the temporarily isolated rumen was severely reduced by increasing NH4 + concentrations which agrees with studies of the rumen pouch( Reference Care, Brown and Farrar 42 ).

However, alterations in Mg2+ metabolism were not observed in chronic experiments with a delay in sampling after raising ruminal NH4 + concentrations( Reference Moore, Fontenot and Webb 100 , Reference Gäbel and Martens 101 ). These observations led to the hypothesis that an acute increase in ruminal NH4 + reduces Mg2+ absorption, but that when ruminal NH4 + remains elevated for a period of days, an adaptational response normalises Mg2+ absorption. Gäbel & Martens( Reference Gäbel and Martens 101 ) tested this hypothesis in vivo. Acute addition of artificial rumen fluid with 40 mmol NH4 +/l into the isolated sheep rumen significantly reduced Mg2+ absorption. In balance experiments, ruminal NH4 + was rapidly increased from 4·81 (sd 0·18) to 47·9 (sd 3·1) mmol/l within 1 d. Mg2+ excretion in urine transiently decreased from 385 to 255 mg/d over 2 d, but on the 3rd day, urinary Mg2+ increased and returned to control values, despite high ruminal NH4 + (36·1 (sd 4·8) mmol/l). Obviously, a sudden change in N intake and NH4 + concentration impairs Mg2+ absorption, but adaptation occurred within 3 d.

The reason(s) for the temporary reduction of Mg2+ absorption by NH4 + have not been studied. Ammonia is transported across the rumen epithelium both as NH3 and NH4 +, depending on the pH( Reference Abdoun, Stumpff and Wolf 102 ). At a (physiological) pH of<7·0, NH4 + is predominantly transported across cation channels in the apical membrane( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 , Reference Abdoun, Stumpff and Wolf 102 ), decreasing PDa ( Reference Lu, Stumpff and Deiner 103 ) and increasing PDt ( Reference Gäbel and Martens 101 ). Since a variable fraction of the NH4 + that is taken up is extruded in the form of NH3, protons are released and decrease the cytosolic pH( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 , Reference Lu, Stumpff and Deiner 103 ), which stimulates apical Na+/H+ exchange and Na+ transport( Reference Abdoun, Stumpff and Wolf 102 ). These intraepithelial alterations of PDa and intracellular pH (pHi) offer some suggestions. Firstly, PDa changes by some 10 mV when NH4 + is elevated to 40 mmol/l( Reference Lu, Stumpff and Deiner 103 ) which may inhibit channel-mediated uptake in analogy to what has been discussed for K+. However, interactions between pHi and Mg2+ transport are a further possibility. Thus, the enhanced uptake of Na+ due to stimulation of Na+/H+ exchange( Reference Abdoun, Stumpff and Wolf 102 ) should elevate cytosolic Na+ (Na+ i), which can be expected to interfere with basolateral extrusion of Mg2+ via Na+/Mg2+ exchange. The possible mechanisms of adaptation are still unclear.

Ruminal pH

Only unbound Mg2+ in solution is available for transport across the ruminal epithelium and, accordingly, chelating Mg2+ by EDTA strongly reduces Mg2+ transport( Reference Leonhard, Smith and Martens 75 ). The range of free Mg2+ in the ruminal fluid varies from 34 to 77 % of the total amount( Reference Grace, Caple and Care 104 , Reference Dalley, Isherwood and Sykes 105 ) and depends on various factors( Reference Johnson, Helliwell and Jones 78 , Reference Dalley, Isherwood and Sykes 105 , Reference Xin, Tucker and Hemken 106 ). One major factor determining the digestion of Mg2+ is the particle size of MgO( Reference Xin, Tucker and Hemken 106 ). Furthermore, free Mg2+ concentration in the rumen depends on pH( Reference Dalley, Isherwood and Sykes 105 ). The curvilinear relationship between rumen pH and Mg2+ solubility exhibits a steep slope between pH 5 and 7, which varies with diet( Reference Dalley, Isherwood and Sykes 105 , Reference Horn and Smith 107 , Reference Johnson and Aubrey Jones 108 ) (Fig. 3). Most likely, increasing pH leads to the deprotonation of anionic binding sites in the ingested matter which are then available for binding of Mg2+. An enhancing effect of low ruminal pH on Mg2+ digestion was suggested early on by Wilcox & Hoff( Reference Wilcox and Hoff 109 ), and is probably related to an increase in unbound Mg2+. Horn & Smith( Reference Horn and Smith 107 ) found a close and negative relationship between rumen pH and Mg2+ absorption before the duodenum. The obvious effect of pH on ionised Mg2+ is very likely the major reason for the influence of the diet on Mg2+ absorption, particularly with regard to carbohydrates. A causal relationship cannot be deduced from these studies, but the pH determines Mg2+ solubility with consequences for transport.

Fig. 3 Scheme of Mg2+ solubility in rumen fluid (redrawn from Dalley et al. ( Reference Dalley, Isherwood and Sykes 105 )). The slope of Mg2+ solubility between pH 5 and 7 is influenced by the diet (←, →).

There is also reason to believe that Mg2+-transporting proteins may be affected directly by changes in pH. Thus, patch clamp studies demonstrate that the conductance of monovalent cations is enhanced by a low pH in cells overexpressing TRPM6 and TRPM7( Reference Li, Jiang and Yue 110 ). At present it is unclear if Mg2+ conductance is similarly affected. Conversely, an acidic pH has been shown to decrease the expression of TRPM6 and other Mg2+-transporting proteins( Reference Nijenhuis, Renkema and Hoenderop 111 ), which probably contributes to the renal Mg2+ wasting that is observed in metabolic acidosis in man( Reference Houillier 21 , Reference Dai, Friedman and Quamme 112 ). Interestingly, chronic usage of proton pump inhibitors impairs gastrointestinal Mg2+ absorption( Reference Atkinson, Reynolds and Travis 113 ). The possible role of ruminal pH in the aetiology of grass tetany is not clear, because both higher( Reference Horn and Smith 107 ) or lower pH has been reported( Reference Balch and Rowland 114 ). However, the close inverse correlation between ruminal pH and Mg2+ absorption before the duodenum( Reference Horn and Smith 107 ) suggests that a high ruminal pH interferes with Mg2+ digestion, particularly at low DM intake in cold weather (H Meyer, personal communication) or as a consequence of pre-existing subclinical hypomagnesaemia with plasma Mg2+ concentration ≤0·8 mmol/l and no visible clinical signs such as ataxia or muscle spasms.

Mg2+ absorption and readily fermentable carbohydrates

A low level of fermentable carbohydrates in tetany-prone grass has been suggested to decrease Mg2+ availability( Reference Metson, Saunders and Collie 95 ). Vice versa, drenching of grazing dairy cattle with a starch solution increased plasma Mg2+ concentration( Reference Wilson, Reid and Molloy 115 ) and digestion of Mg2+ ( Reference Giduck and Fontenot 57 ) although Mg2+ absorption was not consistently improved( Reference House and Mayland 116 ). In ruminal fluid, the addition of fermentable carbohydrates causes: (a) an increase in the concentration of SCFA( Reference Giduck, Fontenot and Rahnema 117 ), (b) a decrease in pH( Reference Giduck, Fontenot and Rahnema 117 ), which (c) enhances Mg2+ solubility( Reference Dalley, Isherwood and Sykes 105 ), (d) a decrease in NH4 + concentration, and (e) an increase of the number and size of rumen papilla( Reference Martens, Rabbani and Shen 118 ), with the latter increasing the area for Mg2+ absorption( Reference Gäbel, Martens and Suendermann 119 ). Hence, Mg2+ digestion was enhanced in sheep by lactose( Reference Rayssiguier and Poncet 120 ).

The exact mechanism of the stimulation of Mg2+ transport by SCFA or HCO3 /CO2 is not clear( Reference Leonhard-Marek 60 ). Notably, addition of fermentable carbohydrates to the diet with production of SCFA enhanced Mg2+ absorption from the caecum of rats( Reference Demigné, Rémésy and Rayssiguier 121 ) and, in mice, inulin increased Mg2+ absorption and expression of TRPM6 and TRPM7 in the hindgut( Reference Rondon, Rayssiguier and Mazur 122 ). In studies with goats, Schonewille et al. ( Reference Schonewille, Ram and Van’t Klooster 123 ) have demonstrated that the depressive effect of K+ can be compensated for by the addition of fermentable carbohydrates. Various reasons for this are conceivable. Influx of protonated SCFA with subsequent dissociation can be expected to lead to cell swelling, which, in turn, enhances monovalent currents both in cells hyperexpressing TRPM7 channels( Reference Bessac and Fleig 124 ) and in native ruminal epithelial cells( Reference Stumpff, Martens and Bilk 62 , Reference Georgi, Rosendahl and Ernst 63 ). However, the most likely hypothesis is that the PD-independent pathway is stimulated by SCFA. Replacement of SCFA by gluconate significantly reduced the Jms flux of Mg2+ and reduced uptake into cells( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Gäbel and Martens 59 , Reference Schweigel and Martens 61 ). This reduction in Mg2+ transport does not reflect binding by gluconate, because gluconate only weakly binds Mg2+ ( Reference Stumpff and McGuigan 125 ), and does not affect the epithelial transport of Mg2+ ( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Marek and Martens 126 ).

Mg2+ intake and digestion

The meta-analyses of Weiss( Reference Weiss 74 ) and Schonewille et al. ( Reference Schonewille, Everts and Jittakhot 24 ) demonstrated a linear correlation between Mg2+ intake and digestible Mg2+, suggesting a constant rate of Mg2+ absorption with no adaptation. However, McAleese et al. ( Reference McAleese, Bell and Forbes 127 ) orally dosed 28Mg2+ in sheep and observed a higher 28Mg2+ absorption at deficient Mg2+ intake. In line with these findings are the results of Schweigel et al. ( Reference Schweigel, Kolisek and Nikolic 52 , Reference Schweigel, Kuzinski and Deiner 56 ): incubation of isolated rumen epithelial cells in a low- or high-Mg2+ medium caused a corresponding increase or decrease of in- and efflux mechanisms of Mg2+. Although the expression of TRPM7 was only slightly altered, both the expression of the Na+/Mg2+ exchanger( Reference Schweigel, Kolisek and Nikolic 52 , Reference Schweigel, Kuzinski and Deiner 56 , Reference Schweigel, Park and Etschmann 128 ), corresponding to SLC41( Reference Schweigel-Röntgen and Kolisek 70 ), and the Mg2+ channel MagT1 increased significantly at low Mg2+ incubation and vice versa( Reference Schweigel, Kolisek and Nikolic 52 ), supporting the assumption of the adaptation of Mg2+ transport at low Mg2+.

Allsop & Rook( Reference Allsop and Rook 129 ) suggested that Mg2+ absorption is suppressed after increasing plasma Mg2+ concentration by intravenous infusion and concluded that ‘the most probable major site of action is therefore on the uptake of Mg from the reticulorumen’. Martens & Stössel( Reference Martens and Stössel 23 ) tested this hypothesis and measured Mg2+ absorption from the isolated rumen in sheep. Mg2+ (net) transport was not influenced by increased plasma Mg2+ concentration or after 5 weeks of hypomagnesaemia, which is in contrast to the suggestion of McAleese et al. ( Reference McAleese, Bell and Forbes 127 ) and can probably be explained by the method used: sheep were orally dosed with equal amounts of 28Mg2+, and the appearance of the isotope in blood was taken as Mg2+ absorption. However, it is highly likely that the ratio between the radioactive isotope (28Mg2+) and the total concentration of Mg2+ was much higher in Mg2+-deficient sheep than in controls. Accordingly, a higher absorption of 28Mg2+ into blood could be expected even without a change of the total rate of Mg2+ – a possibility that was not considered by the authors since absorption from the rumen was not known at that time.

Endogenous Mg2+ secretion

Storry( Reference Storry 26 ) made an estimation of Mg2+ secretion in various secretions of sheep (saliva, gastric juice, bile, etc.) and estimated a daily secretion of 192 mg/d in a 40 kg sheep or 4·8 mg/kg (live weight),with similar secretion rates of 3·4 and 5·04 mg/kg found by Care( Reference Care 130 ). A significant part of the endogenous Mg2+ loss is related to high flow rates of saliva. In sheep, Dua & Care( Reference Dua and Care 131 ) estimated a secretion of about 40 % of the Mg2+ amount in the ECS or 2–3 mg/kg (live weight). This involuntary endogenous loss of Mg2+ is not constant. In sheep on an artificial, low-Mg2+ diet, secretion dropped to 0·4–1·4 mg/kg( Reference Allsop and Rook 129 ), which is probably related to the linear correlation between plasma Mg2+concentration and endogenous secretion of Mg2+ into the gut in general( Reference Allsop and Rook 132 ), and into the small intestine( Reference Martens 31 ) or the bile in particular( Reference Care 130 ).

Schonewille & Beynen( Reference Schonewille and Beynen 87 ) summarised data for the endogenous Mg2+ secretion by dairy cows (within a range from 1·5 to 6·0 mg/kg) and proposed 4 mg/kg, a value that is also used by the Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (German Society for Nutritional Physiology)( 86 ).

Animal breeds and Mg2+ absorption

The digestion of Mg2+ in cows( Reference Greene, Baker and Hardt 133 ) and ruminal Mg2+ transport are influenced by animal breed( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Marek and Martens 126 ). Greene et al. ( Reference Greene, Baker and Hardt 133 ) have shown that Mg2+ absorption is greater in Brahman than in Jersey, Holstein or Hereford cows. Leonhard-Marek et al. ( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Marek and Martens 126 ) measured the net Mg2+ transport in vitro across isolated rumen epithelium of four breeds of sheep (Merino, Schwarzkopf, Skudde and Heidschnucke). Skudde transported significantly less Mg2+ under short-circuit conditions. The wide variation of Mg2+ digestion seen in different studies might have a genetic background and may contribute to heritability of Mg2+ in plasma( Reference Tsiamadis, Banos and Panousis 16 ). The significance of a genetic variation of Mg2+ transport proteins has been shown in man, where mutation of TRPM6 channels reduced transcellular Mg2+ transport in the intestine and kidney( Reference Hoenderop and Bindels 50 ).

Vitamin D and Mg2+ homeostasis

PTH and vitamin D3 are the principal regulators of Ca2+ metabolism. Interactions between PTH, calcitriol and Mg2+ in cows are well established( Reference Goff, Littledike and Horst 19 , Reference Schneider, Parkinson and Houston 134 , Reference Moate, Schneider and Leaver 135 ), but the results are, in some cases, contradictory( Reference Littledike and Goff 136 , Reference Hardwick, Jones and Brautbar 137 ). Calcitriol increased plasma Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations in hypomagnesaemic sheep( Reference Schneider, Parkinson and Houston 134 ) and Ca2+ concentration in cows, but decreased Mg2+ concentration( Reference Moate, Schneider and Leaver 135 , Reference Sansom, Allen and Davies 138 ). A calcitriol-dependent uptake of Mg2+ into soft tissue has been suggested( Reference Moate, Schneider and Leaver 135 , Reference Yano, Horiuchi and Matsui 139 ). Calcitriol did not change faecal excretion in cattle( Reference Moate, Schneider and Leaver 135 ), although calcitriol increased Mg2+ absorption from the rumen in sheep( Reference Beardsworth 140 ).

The infusion of bovine PTH in cows caused an increase in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), Ca2+ and Mg2+ in plasma and a decrease in Mg2+ in urine( Reference Goff, Littledike and Horst 19 ), indicating enhanced Mg2+ resorption in the kidney. Dua et al. ( Reference Dua, Leonhard and Martens 141 ) observed a trend for increased Mg2+ absorption from the reticulo-rumen of sheep after the onset of PTH or PTH-related protein infusions.

While interactions between the PTH and 1,25(OH)2D3 axis and Mg2+ metabolism can thus be observed, the physiological significance of this interaction is not clear. The effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 on epithelial Ca2+ transport is classical and related to increased expression and activity of TRPV5 and TRPV6 channels( Reference Hoenderop and Bindels 50 ). These channels are non-selective cation channels with a high selectivity for Ca2+ over monovalent cations. However, a certain, albeit low, permeability to Mg2+ is to be expected. In summary, the possible stimulation of Mg2+ transport by 1,25(OH)2D3 or effects of PTH should be considered as a side-effect of Ca2+ homeostasis.

Ionophores and Mg2+ digestion

Ionophores like monensin and lasalocid significantly increase Mg2+ digestion( Reference Greene, Schelling and Byers 142 ). Both ionophores lowered ruminal K+ concentrations in steers, suggesting a diminution of the reduction of K+ on Mg2+ transport.

Sequestration of magnesium

A new environment, temperature changes or prolonged transport of animals may lead to a shift in the distribution of Mg2+ from the ECS into the ICS( Reference Larvor 143 ). The stress hormone adrenaline has well-documented effects. Rayssiguier( Reference Rayssiguier 17 ) intravenously infused adrenaline in sheep and observed a rapid decline in plasma Mg2+ concentration. This decrease was blocked by the β-receptor inhibitor propranolol. Adrenaline or theophylline stimulates lipolysis and increases NEFA, as a possible cause of sequestration( Reference Elliott and Rizack 144 ). Prevention of both lipolysis and increase in NEFA by application of sodium nicotinate abolished changes in plasma Mg2+ concentration in theophylline-treated sheep( Reference Larvor and Rayssiguier 145 ). Furthermore, β-agonists such as adrenaline activate the Mg2+ channel TRPM7, stimulating uptake of Mg2+ into the cytosol( Reference Takezawa, Schmitz and Demeuse 146 ). Since TRPM7 is expressed throughout the body, a sequestration of Mg2+ into the cytosolic compartment is to be expected. The pathogenesis of transport tetany probably involves this adrenaline-dependent type of hypomagnesaemia( Reference Ali, Al-Qarawi and Mousa 147 ). It may also play a role as a secondary factor in classical grass tetany, in particular after the onset of the first clinical signs and may function as a trigger for tetanic muscle spasms.

Urinary Mg2+ excretion

Adjusted renal handling (influx ≠ efflux) is a precondition for the regulation Mg2+ homeostasis (Fig. 1) and includes two steps: filtration and re-absorption( Reference Houillier 21 ).

Mg2+ filtration

Plasma Mg2+ varies from 0·9 to 1·2 mmol/l. Some 60–80 % or 0·48–0·96 mmol/l of plasma Mg2+ is ultrafiltrable so that, on a daily basis, roughly 29–59 g Mg2+/d will appear in the glomerular filtrate of a cow of 650 kg BW (calculated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) data of Murayama et al. ( Reference Murayama, Miyano and Sasaki 148 )). Possible effects of GFR on Mg2+ filtration are not known.

Re-absorption proximal tubule

In the proximal tubule 20–30 % of the filtered Mg2+ is reabsorbed( Reference Houillier 21 ). The fractional reabsorption rate in this part of the nephron is remarkably constant and probably occurs passively in an unregulated manner.

Re-absorption ascending limb of Henle

Most Mg2+ (60–70 %) is reclaimed in the thick ascending limb of Henle (TAL)( Reference Houillier 21 ). The paracellular and passive transport in the TAL is mainly driven by PDt (lumen positive). Energised by the basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase, this potential is generated by the apical uptake of Na+, K+ and Cl via NKCC2 with subsequent recycling of K+ via renal outer medullary K (ROMK) channels and basolateral extrusion via ClC-Kb. Mg2+ absorption is mediated by the tight junctional channel protein, claudin-16 (paracellin-1), which interacts with claudin-19 to form a cation-selective channel( Reference Günzel and Yu 149 , Reference Konrad, Schaller and Seelow 150 ). Reduction of the passive driving force by blocking NKCC2 with furosemide( Reference Quamme 151 ) increases magnesuria in sheep( Reference Larvor and Rayssiguier 145 ). Mg2+ transport in the TAL is stimulated by PTH( Reference Shareghi and Agus 152 ) in rabbits and, accordingly, a reduced urinary excretion of Mg2+ has been found after PTH infusion in vivo in cows( Reference Goff, Littledike and Horst 19 ).

The passive transport across this pathway is regulated by Mg2+ availability. Hypomagnesaemia in mice increases both claudin-16 protein and mRNA abundance, while Mg2+-loaded animals down-regulated claudin-16( Reference Efrati, Hirsch and Kladnitsky 153 ). The expression of claudin-16 is inhibited by calcitriol( Reference Kladnitsky, Rozenfeld and Azulay-Debby 154 ) and further influenced by a variety of hormones such as glucagon, insulin, calcitonin, vasopressin or isoproterenol( Reference Quamme 155 ), which makes it difficult to evaluate these effects in vivo. Furthermore, Ca2+ transport via claudin-16 is reduced by Mg2+ ( Reference Ikari, Hirai and Shiroma 156 ): ‘A competitive transport of Mg2+ and Ca2+ via the common paracellular route in TAL could explain the coupling between Mg2+ and Ca2+ excretion’( Reference Ferrè, Hoenderop and Bindels 157 ) (see below).

The remarkable roles of NKCC2, ROMK, CIC-Kb, and claudins 16 and 19 in Mg2+ homeostasis clearly emerge from genetic studies in human subjects( Reference Houillier 21 ). Thus, Mg2+ homeostasis is severely impaired by a mutation of the claudin-16 gene( Reference Kausalya, Amasheh and Günzel 158 ). Patients with this autosomal recessive disorder suffer from hypomagnesaemia, hypermagnesuria and hypercalciuria. In Japanese black cattle homozygous deletion (not mutation) of the claudin-16 gene has been reported( Reference Ohba, Kitagawa and Kitoh 159 , Reference Hirano, Kobayashi and Itoh 160 ), with reduced renal Mg2+ clearance and reabsorption( Reference Ohba, Kitoh and Nakamura 161 ).

Re-absorption distal tubule

Approximately 5–10 % of the filtered Mg is reabsorbed in the distal convoluted tubule (DCT) via active transport. Luminal Mg2+ uptake is mediated by TRPM6, driven by PDa ( Reference Houillier 21 ). Renal TRPM6 is regulated by epidermal growth factor, which has been considered to be the first autocrine/paracrine magnesiotropic hormone( Reference Groenestege, Thebault and van der Wijst 20 ). Mg2+ deficit increases TRPM6 mRNA and protein expression in mice( Reference Groenestege, Hoenderop and van den Heuvel 162 , Reference Rondon, Groenestege and Rayssiguier 163 ). Neither PTH nor 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulated TRPM6 expression in the kidney( Reference Groenestege, Hoenderop and van den Heuvel 162 ). Interestingly, TRPM6 expression is influenced by the acid–base status of the animal. Metabolic acidosis decreases renal TRPM6 expression and thus increases Mg2+ excretion, whereas metabolic alkalosis led to the opposite effects( Reference Nijenhuis, Renkema and Hoenderop 111 ). The tight control of Mg2+ transport by TRPM6 has led to the conclusion that TRPM6 functions as a gatekeeper of Mg2+. The efflux mechanism across the basolateral membrane is still uncertain, but may involve Na+/Mg2+ exchange as in the rumen( Reference Leonhard-Marek, Stumpff and Brinkmann 12 , Reference Schweigel, Park and Etschmann 128 ) or the intestine (cyclin and CBS domain divalent metal cation transport mediator 4; CNNM4)( Reference Yamazaki, Funato and Miura 164 ).

The adaptation of Mg2+ transport in the TAL and DCT has raised questions regarding the signalling cascade. Particularly intriguing is the rapid adaptation of Mg2+ excretion by the re-absorption of almost all filtered Mg2+ under low dietary Mg2+ intake, so that plasma Mg2+ concentration is almost perfectly maintained. Because mutation of the Ca-sensing receptor (CaSR) causes disturbances of Mg2+ homeostasis in man( Reference Cole and Quamme 165 ), the CaSR is emerging as an important player in the regulation of reabsorption of both Ca2+ and Mg2+ via luminal and basolateral sensing mechanisms( Reference Houillier 21 , Reference Ferrè, Hoenderop and Bindels 157 ). More recently, Stuiver et al. ( Reference Stuiver, Lainez and Will 166 ) identified a protein (CNNM2), the mutation of which causes a disturbance in Mg2+ homeostasis. CNNM2 is located in the basolateral membrane of the TAL and DCT, and is up-regulated under Mg2+ deficiency. CNNM2 ‘might contribute to a Mg2+ sensing mechanism rather than transporting Mg2+ itself’ and should thus considered to be a Mg2+ homeostatic factor( Reference Sponder, Mastrototaro and Kurth 167 ).

Urinary Mg2+ excretion

The adaptation of renal Mg2+ transport activity in cows to various levels of intake has been illustrated by Schonewille( Reference Schonewille, van‘t Klooster and Wouterse 168 ) and Holtenius et al. ( Reference Holtenius, Kronqvist and Briland 169 ). Urinary excretion of Mg2+ rises in a quasi-exponential manner with plasma Mg2+ concentration. However, urinary Mg2+ drops rapidly with falling plasma Mg2+, but levels off at 0·61–0·73 mmol/l, after which Mg2+ almost ceases to be excreted in urine( Reference Storry and Rook 170 ). Accordingly, a dairy cow with a plasma Mg2+ concentration<0·8 mmol/l has to be considered at risk of hypomagnesaemia. This range of Mg2+ concentration appears to be a threshold. In a recent meta-analysis of Mg2+ metabolism in man, a concentration of ≥0·87 mmol/l leads to substantial urinary Mg2+ excretion( Reference Zhang, Del Gobbo and Hruby 171 ).

Urinary Mg2+ excretion is a more sensitive indicator of Mg2+ availability than the plasma concentration. Rook & Balch( Reference Rook and Balch 172 ) observed a much more pronounced decline of Mg2+ in urine than in plasma following a change in diet. The tight control of Mg2+ transport activity, particularly in the DCT( Reference Houillier 21 ) but also in the TAL( Reference Efrati, Hirsch and Kladnitsky 153 ), explains these classical observations.

The adjustment of renal Mg2+ excretion to changes in dietary intake with altered Mg2+ absorption (influx) not only ensures the maintenance of Mg2+ homeostasis in most feeding situations (Fig. 1), but also provides the practitioner with a diagnostic tool. According to the data of Kemp( Reference Kemp 173 ), Mg2+ influx can be considered to be sufficient at urinary Mg2+>4·4 mmol/l, while a range of 0·87–4·4 mmol/l might indicate a risk of Mg2+ shortage. Urinary Mg2+<1 mmol/l is probably a reliable indicator of insufficient intake/absorption.

Interaction of magnesium and calcium

Mutual interactions of transport between Ca2+ and Mg2+ have been observed( Reference Quamme 174 ). Hypercalcaemia caused a large increase in urinary Mg2+ excretion. Vice versa and again in rats, infusion of Mg2+ caused an increase of urinary Ca2+ associated with a reduction in Ca2+ uptake via TRPV5( Reference Bonny, Rubin and Huang 175 ). A mutual interaction of Ca2+ and Mg2+ has also been found in cows, with negative interactions observed both on the level of the kidney( Reference Roche, Morton and Kolver 176 ) and the rumen( Reference Care, Brown and Farrar 42 , Reference Oehlschlaeger, Wilkens and Schroeder 177 ).

Magnesium in milk

The Mg2+ concentration in milk is much higher than in plasma and exhibits a high heritability (0·60) in cows( Reference van Hulzen, Sprong and van der Meer 178 ). The higher Mg2+ concentration in milk requires active transport from plasma to milk. Nothing is known about this mechanism, which is most probably genetically determined and subject to modulation or regulation, leading to the wide variation in milk Mg2+ concentration. Cerbulis & Farrell( Reference Cerbulis and Farrell 179 ) analysed Mg2+ in the milk of different breeds with a range of 99–120 mg/l, with one cow at 268 mg/l. The average concentration of Mg2+ in the milk of all animals was 112 mg/l, close to the recommendation of Schonewille & Beynen( Reference Schonewille and Beynen 87 ) of 120 mg/l. Assuming a milk yield of 30–40 litres/d, a cow will lose some 3–5 g Mg2+/d, which approaches the total amount of Mg2+ in the ECF (see Fig. 1). It is important to realise that Mg2+ efflux via milk is continued probably with some (genetic) variation even in hypomagnesaemic cows( Reference Rook and Storry 180 ) so that excretion of Mg2+ in milk exacerbates Mg2+ deficiency.

Goff & Horst( Reference Goff and Horst 181 ) suggest that the concentration of Mg2+ in colostrum is 100 mg/l, although higher values of 238–322 mg/l were found by Shappel et al. ( Reference Shappell, Herbein and Deftos 182 ) on the day of parturition in heifers and cows, with a rapid and exponential decline postpartum within 2 to 3 d to the normal level of 120 mg/l. The total amount in colostrum on the day of parturition amounted to 1·57–4·97 g/d. The rapid change of Mg2+ in milk after parturition probably explains the much higher concentration of Mg2+ in early colostrum( Reference Kehoe, Jayarao and Heinrichs 183 ). Kehoe et al. ( Reference Kehoe, Jayarao and Heinrichs 183 ) reported 733 mg/kg (range 230–1399 mg/kg) in the colostrum of fifty-five fully milked out cows from different herds within 4 h of calving. Assuming a volume of 5 litres yields a rough estimate of 3·6 g Mg2+ excretion in colostrum results, which underlines the significant Mg2+ demand at parturition.

Magnesium and tetany

Plasma Mg2+ and tetany

Sjollema( Reference Sjollema 13 , Reference Sjollema 14 ) first demonstrated the relationship between the clinical symptoms of grass tetany and hypomagnesaemia. However, the Mg2+ concentration in the plasma of afflicted animals exhibits some variation (Table 3), and the severity of the nervous disturbances is not closely related to the plasma Mg2+ concentration( Reference Halse 184 ). Possibly, the speed of plasma Mg2+ decline promotes the onset of clinical manifestations( Reference Allcroft and Burns 185 ).

Table 3 Status of Mg2+ metabolism and plasma Mg2+ concentration

At values below 0·9 mmol/l, both an adequate supply of Mg2+ or impending clinical hypomagnesaemia are possibilities, so that a safe assessment of Mg2+ status should involve a determination of urinary Mg2+ excretion. Even then, difficulties in judging Mg2+ status can be clearly seen in a study involving non-pregnant lactating cows with normal Mg2+ intake (29–32·5 g/d) and plasma Mg2+ concentration of 0·75–1·1 mmol/l( Reference Schweigel, Voigt and Mohr 186 ). After intravenous infusion of Mg2+ and despite a slight increase in plasma Mg2+ in four of the nine animals, the fractional renal Mg2+ excretion decreased, indicating Mg2+ retention after the Mg2+ load and pointing towards a possible Mg2+ deficit. Despite these uncertainties, low plasma Mg2+ concentrations almost invariably precede the onset of neurological symptoms with impaired function of the CNS.

Clinical hypomagnesaemia

Classical hypomagnesaemic tetany was originally observed a few days after cows had been let out to graze in spring( Reference Blaxter and McGill 22 ). At first sight, it appears surprising that the relatively large Mg2+ pools in the ICS (130 g) or bones (about 320 g) of cattle cannot acutely be mobilised to maintain physiological plasma Mg2+ ( Reference Blaxter and McGill 22 ), although a small mobilisation of 0·5 g/d has been reported in cows( Reference Storry and Rook 170 ), comparable with observations in human subjects( Reference Houillier 21 ). Mobilisation of Mg2+ from bone is unlikely, because the ratio between Ca2+ and Mg2+ in bone is 42 to 1, and substantial withdrawal from bone would disrupt Ca2+ homeostasis( Reference Fontenot, Allen and Bunce 187 ). Furthermore, both PTH secretion and sensitivity of bone to PTH are decreased under conditions of hypomagnesaemia or alkalosis( Reference Kopic and Geibel 188 ). Cytosolic Mg2+ is only partly available for redistribution too; only 1–5 % is available in the ionised form with the rest bound primarily to ATP or sequestered in microsomes and mitochondria( Reference Houillier 21 ). Accordingly, a massive efflux of Mg2+ from the cytosol into the ECS might interfere with cellular energy metabolism and cellular enzyme function.

Impaired function of the central nervous system

Hypomagnesaemic tetany is observed frequently as plasma Mg2+ drops below 0·7 mmol/l( Reference Meyer 189 ) and was originally suggested to be caused by impaired synaptic transmission at the motoric endplate( Reference Hemingway and Ritchie 190 ). This hypothesis was not confirmed by Todd & Horvath( Reference Todd and Horvath 191 ). The possible involvement of the CNS was first discussed by Chutkow & Meyers( Reference Chutkow and Meyers 192 ) at low Mg2+ concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Mg2+-deficient rats. The hypothesis of a decreased Mg2+ concentration in the CSF as a reason for clinical signs was tested by Meyer & Scholz( Reference Meyer and Scholz 193 ) in Mg2+-deficient sheep by measuring the Mg2+ concentration in plasma and CSF. They found that while the Mg2+ concentration in the CSF is kept constant over a wide range of plasma Mg2+ concentrations, it begins to decrease at plasma levels<0·5 mmol/l so that at<0·25 mmol/l, Mg2+ in CSF decreases almost linearly with the concentration in plasma. Allsop & Pauli( Reference Allsop and Pauli 194 ) further tested the discussed causal correlation between Mg2+ in CSF and clinical signs. Mg2+ concentrations of<0·25 mmol/l in the solution of CSF perfusion produced episodes of tetany that were abolished by higher Mg2+ concentrations. Because these effects were not accompanied by changes in blood parameters, the clinical symptoms were considered to be caused by the non-controlled activation of muscles by processes within the CNS. However, little is known about the regulation of Mg2+ in the CSF. After rectal infusion of MgCl2, Reynolds et al. ( Reference Reynolds, Bell and Sims 195 ) observed that the Mg2+ concentration in the CSF remained constant in calves with normal plasma Mg2+, while in calves with subnormal plasma Mg2+ (<0·75 mmol/l), an increase in Mg2+ was observed in the CSF with a delay up to 120 min. These results suggest carrier-mediated transport into the CSF and might explain why a rapid decline of plasma Mg2+ causes a fall of Mg2+ in the CSF, whereas a slow decrease allows for sufficient Mg2+ transport into the CSF. This conclusion agrees with the observation of Allcroft & Burns( Reference Allcroft and Burns 185 ) who suggested that the speed at which plasma Mg2+ level decreases is critical for triggering clinical symptoms.

There are a number of reasons why a drop of Mg2+ in the CSF might trigger hyperexcitability. Mg2+ is a physiological antagonist of Ca2+-induced transmitter release at synapses( Reference Thomson 196 ), and low Mg2+ in the CSF might facilitate Ca2+-dependent transmitter release and the excitation of CNS neurons that, amongst others, activate muscles. The activity of the glutamatergic NMDA receptor (N-methyl-d-aspartate) in the CNS is inhibited by external Mg2+ in a PD-dependent manner and at low Mg2+ in the CSF, more receptors are activated, which should result in hyperexcitability( Reference Morris 3 , Reference Mayer, Westbrook and Guthrie 197 ). Furthermore, the activity of the inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor is enhanced by Mg2+. Conversely, the inhibitory effects of GABA are reduced when Mg2+ falls, facilitating neuronal activation( Reference Möykkynen, Uusi-Oukari and Heikkila 4 ). Hence, a decrease of Mg2+ in the CSF induces hyperexcitability of excitatory neurons (NMDA) while reducing activity of inhibitory neurons (GABA).

The effect of Ca2+ concentration in the CSF on the onset of clinical symptoms is still controversial. Reynolds et al. ( Reference Reynolds, Bell and Sims 195 ) and Allsop & Pauli( Reference Allsop and Pauli 194 ) observed diminished Mg2+ and Ca2+ concentrations in the CSF. However, plasma Ca2+ concentration did not correlate with clinical symptoms in sheep( Reference Meyer 189 ).

Subclinical hypomagnesaemia

It is important to note that the appearance of clinically relevant neurological symptoms is not obligatory, even when plasma levels of Mg2+ are low. Hypomagnesaemia of about 0·5 mmol/l was induced in sheep by feeding a low-Mg2+ diet for 5 weeks without appearance of any neurological symptoms( Reference Martens and Stössel 23 ). It is very likely that Mg2+ concentration in the CSF is maintained when the induction of hypomagnesaemia with a low-Mg2+ diet is gradual (see above). It should be noted that even in the absence of clear neurological symptoms, animals may suffer from various non-neurological manifestations of hypomagnesaemia.

Interactions between hypomagnesaemia and the regulation of Ca2+ metabolism were observed early on. Thus, Allen et al. ( Reference Allen, Sansom and Davies 198 ) showed a correlation between subclinical hypomagnesaemia and the occurrence of milk fever with plasma Mg concentrations of<0·8 mmol/l. Subclinical hypomagnesaemia has a negative effect on the release of PTH( Reference Littledike and Goff 136 , Reference Anast, Mohs and Kaplan 199 , Reference Rayssiguier, Garel and Davicco 200 ), the functioning of PTH on the target organ( Reference MacManus, Heaton and Lucas 201 , Reference Goff 202 ) and the conversion of 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol)( Reference Horsting and DeLuca 203 ). Moreover, in organ cultures of fetal rat bone, the release of Ca by supplementing 1,25(OH)2D3 or PTH was reduced at low (<0·8 mmol/l) Mg concentration( Reference Johannesson and Raisz 204 ). Furthermore, regulation of Ca homeostasis was found to deteriorate with induction of secondary hypocalcaemia in calves with hypomagnesaemia( Reference Rayssiguier, Garel and Davicco 200 ). These results correspond very well with in vivo observations of Sansom et al. ( Reference Sansom, Manston and Vagg 205 ), who found that the mobilisation of Ca from bone was lowered significantly in cows with hypomagnesaemia. A subsequent study by van de Braak et al. ( Reference van de Braak, van’t Klooster and Malestein 206 ) confirmed these findings.

Conclusions and perspectives

A correlation between the clinical symptoms of ‘grass staggers’ or ‘grass tetany’ and hypomagnesaemia more than 80 years ago initiated myriads of studies about Mg2+ metabolism in ruminants. These studies led to a stepwise improvement in understanding the pathogenesis: (a) hypomagnesaemia was not caused by a Mg2+-deficient diet, but by reduced availability from the diet; (b) the site and mechanisms of Mg2+ absorption were described; and (c) the factors that influence Mg2+ transport and digestion were characterised. Despite a considerable increase in knowledge about the pathogenesis and prevention of hypomagnesaemic tetany, many open questions remain. Further work is necessary to identify if channels other than TRPM6, TRPM7 or MagT1 contribute to PD-dependent uptake of Mg2+ in the rumen. In particular, the role of various other TRP channels expressed by the rumen has to be clarified( Reference Rosendahl, Braun and Schrapers 10 ). The PD-independent uptake mechanism is still not well characterised and its molecular identity is unknown( Reference Leonhard-Marek 60 , Reference Schweigel and Martens 61 ). Furthermore, the antagonism between Mg2+ and Ca2+ in the gut and the kidney deserves attention. In particular, renal excretion in vivo is of major interest, because renal Mg2+ transport is regulated according to the Mg2+ requirement. A better understanding of this mechanism could lead to improved diagnosis of the Mg2+ status of cattle.

Acknowledgements

The studies of the authors were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). The manuscript was written by H. M., and was improved and optimised by F. S., S. L.-M. and M. R.

There is no conflict of interest.

References

1. Leroy, J (1926) Nécessite du magnesium pour la croissance de la souris (Requirement of magnesium for the growth of the mouse). C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 94, 432433.Google Scholar
2. McGuigan, JA, Kay, JW, Elder, HY, et al. (2007) Comparison between measured and calculated ionised concentrations in Mg2+/ATP, Mg2+/EDTA and Ca2+/EGTA buffers; influence of changes in temperature, pH and pipetting errors on the ionised concentrations. Magnes Res 20, 7281.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Morris, ME (1992) Brain and CSF magnesium concentrations during magnesium deficit in animals and humans: neurological symptoms. Magnes Res 5, 303313.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Möykkynen, T, Uusi-Oukari, M, Heikkila, J, et al. (2001) Magnesium potentiation of the function of native and recombinant GABA(A) receptors. Neuroreport 12, 21752179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Lamb, GD & Stephenson, DG (1994) Effects of intracellular pH and [Mg2+] on excitation–contraction coupling in skeletal muscle fibres of the rat. J Physiol 478, 331339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Li, FY, Chaigne-Delalande, B, Kanellopoulou, C, et al. (2011) Second messenger role for Mg2+ revealed by human T-cell immunodeficiency. Nature 475, 471476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Feeney, KA, Hansen, LL, Putker, M, et al. (2016) Daily magnesium fluxes regulate cellular timekeeping and energy balance. Nature 532, 375379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Vemana, S, Pandey, S & Larsson, HP (2008) Intracellular Mg2+ is a voltage-dependent pore blocker of HCN channels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295, C557C565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Voets, T, Janssens, A, Prenen, J, et al. (2003) Mg2+-dependent gating and strong inward rectification of the cation channel TRPV6. J Gen Physiol 121, 245260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Rosendahl, J, Braun, HS, Schrapers, KT, et al. (2016) Evidence for the functional involvement of members of the TRP channel family in the uptake of Na+ and NH4 + by the ruminal epithelium. Pflugers Arch 468, 13331352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Stumpff, F & Martens, H (2007) The rumen and potassium homeostasis: a model. J Anim Feed Sci 16, Suppl. 2, 436441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Leonhard-Marek, S, Stumpff, F, Brinkmann, I, et al. (2005) Basolateral Mg2+/Na+ exchange regulates apical nonselective cation channel in sheep rumen epithelium via cytosolic Mg2 +. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288, G630G645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Sjollema, B (1930) On the nature and therapy of grass staggers. Vet Rec 10, 425430.Google Scholar
14. Sjollema, B (1932) Untersuchungen über die Ursache der Grastetanie und der großen Frequenzzunahme dieser Krankheit (Studies on the cause of grass tetany and the large increase in the frequency of this disease). Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 40, 225250.Google Scholar
15. Meyer, TE, Verwoert, GC, Hwang, SJ, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association studies of serum magnesium, potassium, and sodium concentrations identify six loci influencing serum magnesium levels. PLoS Genet 6, e1001045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Tsiamadis, V, Banos, G, Panousis, N, et al. (2016) Genetic parameters of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and potassium serum concentrations during the first 8 days after calving in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 99, 55355544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Rayssiguier, Y (1977) Hypomagnesemia resulting from adrenaline infusion in ewes: its relation to lipolysis. Horm Metab Res 9, 309314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Persson, J & Luthman, J (1974) The effects of insulin, glucose and catecholamines on some blood minerals in sheep. Acta Vet Scand 15, 519532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Goff, JP, Littledike, ET & Horst, RL (1986) Effect of synthetic bovine parathyroid hormone in dairy cows: prevention of hypocalcemic parturient paresis. J Dairy Sci 69, 22782289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Groenestege, WM, Thebault, S, van der Wijst, J, et al. (2007) Impaired basolateral sorting of pro-EGF causes isolated recessive renal hypomagnesemia. J Clin Invest 117, 22602267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Houillier, P (2014) Mechanisms and regulation of renal magnesium transport. Annu Rev Physiol 76, 411430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Blaxter, KL & McGill, RF (1956) Magnesium metabolism in cattle. Vet Rev Annot 2, 3555.Google Scholar
23. Martens, H & Stössel, EM (1988) Magnesium absorption from the temporarily isolated rumen of sheep: no effect of hyper- or hypomagnesaemia. Q J Exp Physiol 73, 217223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Schonewille, JT, Everts, H, Jittakhot, S, et al. (2008) Quantitative prediction of magnesium absorption in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 91, 271278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Smith, RH (1962) Net exchange of certain inorganic ions and water in the alimentary tract of the milk-fed calf. Biochem J 83, 151163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Storry, JE (1961) Studies on calcium and magnesium in the alimentary tract of sheep. I. The distribution of calcium and magnesium in the contents taken from various parts of the alimentary tract. J Agric Sci 57, 97102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Harrison, FA, Hill, KJ & Mangan, JL (1963) Absorption and excretion of lithium and magnesium in the sheep. Biochem J 89, 99100.Google Scholar
28. Marongiu, A (1971) Assorbimento del magnesio nei diversi segmenti del tubo digerente nell’ovino (Magnesium absorption in different segments of the digestive tract in sheep). Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 47, 768770.Google Scholar
29. Rogers, PAM & van’t Klooster, A (1969) The fate of Na, K, Ca, Mg and P in the digesta. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool 69, 2639.Google Scholar
30. Martens, H (1978) Lokalisation und Mechanismen der Magnesiumresorption bei Wiederkäuern (Localization and mechanisms of magnesium absorption in ruminants). Übers Tierernähr 6, 7590.Google Scholar
31. Martens, H (1981) Neue Erkenntnisse über den Magnesiumstoffwechsel bei Wiederkäuern (New insights into magnesium metabolism in ruminants). Übers Tierernähr 9, 233258.Google Scholar
32. Edrise, BM & Smith, RH (1979) Absorption and secretion in the omasum of the young steer. Ann Rech Vet 10, 354355.Google ScholarPubMed
33. Field, AC & Munro, CS (1977) The effect of site and quantity on the extent of absorption of Mg infused into the gastro-intestinal tract of sheep. J Agric Sci 89, 365371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Martens, H & Rayssiguier, Y (1980) Magnesium metabolism and hypomagnesemia, In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 447466 [Y Ruckebusch and P Thivend, editors]. Lancaster: MTP Press.Google Scholar
35. Pfeffer, E & Rahman, KA (1974) Untersuchungen zur Lokalisierung der Magnesium Absorption beim Wiederkäuer (Studies on the localisation of magnesium absorption in ruminants). Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd 33, 209213.Google Scholar
36. Tomas, FM & Potter, BJ (1976) The effect and site of action of potassium upon magnesium absorption in sheep. Aust J Agric Res 27, 873880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Smith, RH (1959) The development and function of the rumen in milk-fed calves. J Agric Sci 52, 7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Dillon, J & Scott, D (1979) Digesta flow and mineral absorption in lambs before and after weaning. J Agric Sci 92, 289297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Meyer, H & Busse, FW (1975) Rectal absorption of magnesium in ruminants. Brief report. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 82, 140141.Google Scholar
40. Scott, D (1965) Factors influencing the secretion and absorption of calcium and magnesium in the small intestine of the sheep. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 50, 312329.Google ScholarPubMed
41. Martens, H & Harmeyer, J (1978) Magnesium transport by isolated rumen epithelium of sheep. Res Vet Sci 24, 161168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Care, AD, Brown, RC, Farrar, AR, et al. (1984) Magnesium absorption from the digestive tract of sheep. Q J Exp Physiol 69, 577587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Martens, H (1985) The effect of dinitrophenol on magnesium transport across an isolated preparation of sheep rumen epithelium. Q J Exp Physiol 70, 567573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Martens, H (1985) Magnesium absorption from the temporarily isolated rumen of sheep. The effect of water absorption and osmotic pressure. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 32, 631635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Behar, J (1974) Magnesium absorption by the rat ileum and colon. Am J Physiol 227, 334340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Frizzell, RA & Schultz, SG (1972) Ionic conductances of extracellular shunt pathway in rabbit ileum. Influence of shunt on transmural sodium transport and electrical potential differences. J Gen Physiol 59, 318346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Martens, H, Gäbel, G & Strozyk, H (1987) The effect of potassium and the transmural potential difference on magnesium transport across an isolated preparation of sheep rumen epithelium. Q J Exp Physiol 72, 181188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Leonhard-Marek, S & Martens, H (1996) Effects of potassium on magnesium transport across rumen epithelium. Am J Physiol 271, G1034G1038.Google ScholarPubMed
49. Schweigel, M, Lang, I & Martens, H (1999) Mg2+ transport in sheep rumen epithelium: evidence for an electrodiffusive uptake mechanism. Am J Physiol 277, G976G982.Google ScholarPubMed
50. Hoenderop, JG & Bindels, RJ (2008) Calciotropic and magnesiotropic TRP channels. Physiology (Bethesda) 23, 3240.Google ScholarPubMed
51. Konrad, M, Schlingmann, KP & Gudermann, T (2004) Insights into the molecular nature of magnesium homeostasis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286, F599F605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Schweigel, M, Kolisek, M, Nikolic, Z, et al. (2008) Expression and functional activity of the Na/Mg exchanger, TRPM7 and MagT1 are changed to regulate Mg homeostasis and transport in rumen epithelial cells. Magnes Res 21, 118123.Google ScholarPubMed
53. Demeuse, P, Penner, R & Fleig, A (2006) TRPM7 channel is regulated by magnesium nucleotides via its kinase domain. J Gen Physiol 127, 421434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Ryazanova, LV, Rondon, LJ, Zierler, S, et al. (2010) TRPM7 is essential for Mg2+ homeostasis in mammals. Nat Commun 1, 109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Dimke, H, Hoenderop, JG & Bindels, RJ (2011) Molecular basis of epithelial Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport: insights from the TRP channel family. J Physiol 589, 15351542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Schweigel, M, Kuzinski, J, Deiner, C, et al. (2009) Rumen epithelial cells adapt magnesium transport to high and low extracellular magnesium conditions. Magnes Res 22, 133150.Google ScholarPubMed
57. Giduck, SA & Fontenot, JP (1987) Utilization of magnesium and other macrominerals in sheep supplemented with different readily-fermentable carbohydrates. J Anim Sci 65, 16671673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Martens, H, Heggemann, G & Regier, K (1988) Studies on the effect of K, Na, NH4 +, VFA and CO2 on the net absorption of magnesium from the temporarily isolated rumen of heifers. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 35, 7380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Leonhard-Marek, S, Gäbel, G & Martens, H (1998) Effects of short chain fatty acids and carbon dioxide on magnesium transport across sheep rumen epithelium. Exp Physiol 83, 155164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Leonhard-Marek, S (1999) Do forestomach epithelia exhibit a Mg2+/2H+-exchanger? Magnes Res 12, 99108.Google Scholar
61. Schweigel, M & Martens, H (2003) Anion-dependent Mg2+ influx and a role for a vacuolar H+-ATPase in sheep ruminal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 285, G45G53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Stumpff, F, Martens, H, Bilk, S, et al. (2009) Cultured ruminal epithelial cells express a large-conductance channel permeable to chloride, bicarbonate, and acetate. Pflugers Arch 457, 10031022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. Georgi, MI, Rosendahl, J, Ernst, F, et al. (2014) Epithelia of the ovine and bovine forestomach express basolateral maxi-anion channels permeable to the anions of short-chain fatty acids. Pflugers Arch 466, 16891712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64. Ram, L, Schonewille, JT, Martens, H, et al. (1998) Magnesium absorption by wethers fed potassium bicarbonate in combination with different dietary magnesium concentrations. J Dairy Sci 81, 24852492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65. Ussing, HH & Zerahn, K (1951) Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand 23, 110127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Graham, C & Simmons, NL (2005) Functional organization of the bovine rumen epithelium. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288, R173R181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67. Leonhard-Marek, S & Martens, H (1994) Influences of Na on Mg transport across sheep rumen epithelium. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol 3, 88.Google Scholar
68. Schweigel, M, Vormann, J & Martens, H (2000) Mechanisms of Mg2+ transport in cultured ruminal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 278, G400G408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69. Kolisek, M, Nestler, A, Vormann, J, et al. (2012) Human gene SLC41A1 encodes for the Na+/Mg2+ exchanger. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302, C318C326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. Schweigel-Röntgen, M & Kolisek, M (2014) SLC41 transporters – molecular identification and functional role. Curr Top Membr 73, 383410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71. Baker, PF & Crawford, AC (1972) Mobility and transport of magnesium in squid giant axons. J Physiol 227, 855874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Martens, H (1979) In-vivo studies on the absorption of magnesium from the ovine rumen. Estimation of the maximum absorption capacity of the rumen. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 92, 152155.Google ScholarPubMed
73. Martens, H (1983) Saturation kinetics of magnesium efflux across the rumen wall in heifers. Br J Nutr 49, 153158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74. Weiss, WP (2004) Macromineral digestion by lactating dairy cows: factors affecting digestibility of magnesium. J Dairy Sci 87, 21672171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Leonhard, S, Smith, E, Martens, H, et al. (1990) Transport of magnesium across an isolated preparation of sheep rumen: a comparison of MgCl2, Mg aspartate, Mg pidolate, and Mg-EDTA. Magnes Trace Elem 9, 265271.Google ScholarPubMed
76. Head, MJ & Rook, JAF (1955) Hypomagnesæmia in dairy cattle and its possible relationship to ruminal ammonia production. Nature 176, 262263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77. Care, A, Vowles, L, Mann, S, et al. (1967) Factors affecting magnesium absorption in relation to the aetiology of acute hypomagnesemia. J Agric Sci 68, 195204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Johnson, CL, Helliwell, SH & Jones, DA (1988) Magnesium metabolism in the rumens of lactating dairy cows fed on spring grass. Q J Exp Physiol 73, 2331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79. Fontenot, JP, Miller, RW, Whitehair, CK, et al. (1960) Effect of a high-protein high-potassium ration on the mineral metabolism of lambs. J Anim Sci 19, 127133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80. Schonewille, JT, Van’t Klooster, AT, Wouterse, H, et al. (1999) Effects of intrinsic potassium in artificially dried grass and supplemental potassium bicarbonate on apparent magnesium absorption in dry cows. J Dairy Sci 82, 18241830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81. Newton, GL, Fontenot, JP, Tucker, RE, et al. (1972) Effects of high dietary potassium intake on the metabolism of magnesium by sheep. J Anim Sci 35, 440445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82. Wylie, MJ, Fontenot, JP & Greene, LW (1985) Absorption of magnesium and other macrominerals in sheep infused with potassium in different parts of the digestive tract. J Anim Sci 61, 12191229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83. Rahnema, SH & Fontenot, JP (1986) Effect of potassium on association of minerals with various fractions of digesta and feces of sheep fed hay. J Anim Sci 63, 14911501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84. Schonewille, JT, Ram, L, van’t Kloster, AT, et al. (1997) Intrinsic potassium in grass silage and magnesium absorption in dry cows. Livest Prod Sci 48, 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85. Lang, I & Martens, H (1999) Na transport in sheep rumen is modulated by voltage-dependent cation conductance in apical membrane. Am J Physiol 277, G609G618.Google ScholarPubMed
86. Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (GfE) (1978) Empfehlungen zur Mineralstoffversorgung (Recommendations for Mineral Intake). Energie- und Nährstoffbedarf landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere 1 (Energy and Nutrient Requirements of Farm Animals 1) . Frankfurt am Main: Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie.Google Scholar
87. Schonewille, JT & Beynen, AC (2005) Reviews on the mineral provision in ruminants (III): Magnesium metabolism and requirement in ruminants. In CVB Documention Report, no. 35, pp. 13–26. Lelystad: Central Veevoederbureau Lelystad.Google Scholar
88. Bailey, CB (1961) Saliva secretion and its relation to feeding in cattle. 4. The relationship between the concentrations of sodium, potassium, chloride and inorganic phosphate in mixed saliva and rumen fluid. Br J Nutr 15, 489498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
89. Denton, DA (1956) The effect of Na+ depletion on the Na+:K+ ratio of the parotid saliva of the sheep. J Physiol 131, 516525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90. Martens, H, Kubel, OW, Gäbel, G, et al. (1987) Effects of low sodium intake on magnesium metabolism in sheep. J Agric Sci 108, 237243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91. Charlton, JA & Armstrong, DG (1989) The effect of an intravenous infusion of aldosterone upon magnesium metabolism in the sheep. Q J Exp Physiol 74, 329337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. Martens, H & Hammer, U (1981) Magnesium and sodium absorption from the isolated sheep rumen during intravenous aldosterone infusion (author’s transl). Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 88, 404407.Google ScholarPubMed
93. Kemp, A & Geurink, JH (1966) Further information on the sodium requirement and sodium supply of lactating cows. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 91, 580613.Google Scholar
94. Morris, JG & Gartner, RW (1975) The effect of potassium on the sodium requirements of growing steers with and without α-tocopherol supplementation. Br J Nutr 34, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
95. Metson, AJ, Saunders, WMA, Collie, TW, et al. (1966) Chemical composition of pastures in relation to grass tetany in beef breeding cows. NZ J Agric Res 9, 410436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96. Butler, EJ (1963) The mineral element content of spring pasture in relation to the occurrence of grass tetany and hypomagnesemia in dairy cows. J Agric Sci 60, 329340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
97. Paterson, R & Crichton, C (1960) Grass staggers in large scale dairying on grass. J Br Grassl Soc 15, 100105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98. Annison, EF, Lewis, D & Lindsay, DB (1959) The metabolic changes which occur in sheep transferred to lush spring grass. I. Changes in blood and rumen constituents. J Agric Sci 53, 3441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99. Kemp, A (1960) Influence of fertiliser treatment of grassland on the incidence of hypomagnesaemic tetany (grass tetany in milking cows). Neth J Agric Sci 8, 281304.Google Scholar
100. Moore, WF, Fontenot, JP & Webb, KE Jr (1972) Effect of form and level of nitrogen on magnesium utilization. J Anim Sci 35, 10461053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
101. Gäbel, G & Martens, H (1986) The effect of ammonia on magnesium metabolism in sheep. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 55, 278287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
102. Abdoun, K, Stumpff, F, Wolf, K, et al. (2005) Modulation of electroneutral Na transport in sheep rumen epithelium by luminal ammonia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 289, G508G520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
103. Lu, Z, Stumpff, F, Deiner, C, et al. (2014) Modulation of sheep ruminal urea transport by ammonia and pH. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 307, R558R570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
104. Grace, ND, Caple, IW & Care, AD (1988) Studies in sheep on the absorption of magnesium from a low molecular weight fraction of the reticulo-rumen contents. Br J Nutr 59, 93108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105. Dalley, DE, Isherwood, P, Sykes, AR, et al. (1997) Effect of in vitro manipulation of pH on magnesium solubility in ruminal and caecal digesta in sheep. J Agric Sci 129, 107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
106. Xin, Z, Tucker, WB & Hemken, RW (1989) Effect of reactivity rate and particle size of magnesium oxide on magnesium availability, acid–base balance, mineral metabolism, and milking performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 72, 462470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107. Horn, JP & Smith, RH (1978) Absorption of magnesium by the young steer. Br J Nutr 40, 473484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108. Johnson, CL & Aubrey Jones, DA (1989) Effect of change of diet on the mineral composition of rumen fluid, on magnesium metabolism and on water balance in sheep. Br J Nutr 61, 583594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109. Wilcox, GE & Hoff, JE (1974) Grass tetany: an hypothesis concerning its relationship with ammonium nutrition of spring grasses. J Dairy Sci 57, 10851089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
110. Li, M, Jiang, J & Yue, L (2006) Functional characterization of homo- and heteromeric channel kinases TRPM6 and TRPM7. J Gen Physiol 127, 525537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
111. Nijenhuis, T, Renkema, KY, Hoenderop, JG, et al. (2006) Acid–base status determines the renal expression of Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport proteins. J Am Soc Nephrol 17, 617626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
112. Dai, LJ, Friedman, PA & Quamme, GA (1997) Acid–base changes alter Mg2+ uptake in mouse distal convoluted tubule cells. Am J Physiol 272, F759F766.Google ScholarPubMed
113. Atkinson, NS, Reynolds, DJ & Travis, SP (2015) ‘Lemonade legs’: why do some patients get profound hypomagnesaemia on proton-pump inhibitors? Intest Res 13, 227232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114. Balch, DA & Rowland, SJ (1957) Volatile fatty acids and lactic acid in the rumen of dairy cows receiving a variety of diets. Br J Nutr 11, 288298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
115. Wilson, GF, Reid, CSW, Molloy, C, et al. (1969) Influence of starch and peanut oil on plasma magnesium in grazing dairy cows. NZ J Agric Res 12, 467488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
116. House, WA & Mayland, HF (1976) Magnesium utilization in wethers fed diets with varying ratios of nitrogen to readily fermentable carbohydrate. J Anim Sci 43, 842849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
117. Giduck, SA, Fontenot, JP & Rahnema, S (1988) Effect of ruminal infusion of glucose, volatile fatty acids and hydrochloric acid on mineral metabolism in sheep. J Anim Sci 66, 532542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
118. Martens, H, Rabbani, I, Shen, Z, et al. (2012) Changes in rumen absorption processes during transition. Anim Feed Sci Technol 172, 95102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
119. Gäbel, G, Martens, H, Suendermann, M, et al. (1987) The effect of diet, intraruminal pH and osmolarity on sodium, chloride and magnesium absorption from the temporarily isolated and washed reticulo-rumen of sheep. Q J Exp Physiol 72, 501511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
120. Rayssiguier, Y & Poncet, C (1980) Effect of lactose supplement on digestion of lucerne hay by sheep. II. Absorption of magnesium and calcium in the stomach. J Anim Sci 51, 186192.Google ScholarPubMed
121. Demigné, C, Rémésy, C & Rayssiguier, Y (1980) Effect of fermentable carbohydrates on volatile fatty acids, ammonia and mineral absorption in the rat caecum. Reprod Nutr Dev 20, 13511359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
122. Rondon, LJ, Rayssiguier, Y & Mazur, A (2008) Dietary inulin in mice stimulates Mg2+ absorption and modulates TRPM6 and TRPM7 expression in large intestine and kidney. Magnes Res 21, 224231.Google ScholarPubMed
123. Schonewille, JT, Ram, L, Van’t Klooster, AT, et al. (1997) Native corn starch versus either cellulose or glucose in the diet and the effects on apparent magnesium absorption in goats. J Dairy Sci 80, 17381743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
124. Bessac, BF & Fleig, A (2007) TRPM7 channel is sensitive to osmotic gradients in human kidney cells. J Physiol 582, 10731086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
125. Stumpff, F & McGuigan, JA (2014) Measuring Ca2+ binding to short chain fatty acids and gluconate with a Ca2+ electrode: role of the reference electrode. Anal Biochem 459, 4652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
126. Leonhard-Marek, S, Marek, M & Martens, H (1998) Effect of transmural potential difference on Mg transport across rumen epithelium from four different breeds of sheep. J Agric Sci 130, 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
127. McAleese, DM, Bell, MC & Forbes, RM (1961) Magnesium-28 studies in lambs. J Nutr 74, 505514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
128. Schweigel, M, Park, HS, Etschmann, B, et al. (2006) Characterization of the Na+-dependent Mg2+ transport in sheep ruminal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290, G56G65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
129. Allsop, TF & Rook, JA (1979) The effect of diet and blood-plasma concentration on the endogenous faecal loss of magnesium and plasma magnesium concentration in sheep. J Agric Sci 92, 403408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
130. Care, A (1960) The kinetic of magnesium distribution within sheep. Res Vet Sci 1, 338349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
131. Dua, K & Care, AD (1998) Secretion of magnesium and calcium in the total saliva of sheep and its relevance to hypomagnesaemia. Vet J 156, 217221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
132. Allsop, TF & Rook, JA (1970) Influence of the diet on the relationship between endogenous faecal loss of magnesium in sheep. J Agric Sci 92, 403408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
133. Greene, LW, Baker, JF & Hardt, PF (1989) Use of animal breeds and breeding to overcome the incidence of grass tetany: a review. J Anim Sci 67, 34633469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
134. Schneider, KM, Parkinson, GB, Houston, JC, et al. (1985) 1,25 Dihydroxyvitamin D3 increases plasma magnesium and calcium in sheep fed liquid diets low in calcium and magnesium. Aust Vet J 62, 8285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
135. Moate, PJ, Schneider, KM, Leaver, DD, et al. (1987) Effect of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the calcium and magnesium metabolism of lactating cows. Aust Vet J 64, 7375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
136. Littledike, ET & Goff, J (1987) Interactions of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and vitamin D that influence their status in domestic meat animals. J Anim Sci 65, 17271743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
137. Hardwick, LL, Jones, MR, Brautbar, N, et al. (1991) Magnesium absorption: mechanisms and the influence of vitamin D, calcium and phosphate. J Nutr 121, 1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
138. Sansom, BF, Allen, WM, Davies, DC, et al. (1976) Use of 1α-OH cholecalciferol in preventing post parturient hypocalcaemia and its potential value for the prevention of milk fever in dairy cows. Vet Rec 99, 310312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
139. Yano, F, Horiuchi, K, Matsui, T, et al. (1984) Effect of 1α(OH)D3 injection on Ca and Mg absorption in thyroparathyroidectomized sheep. Canad J Anim Sci 64, 223224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
140. Beardsworth, P (1987) Physiological factors involved in the aetiology of hypomagesaemia in sheep. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
141. Dua, K, Leonhard, S, Martens, H, et al. (1994) Effects of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein on the rates of absorption of magnesium, calcium, sodium, potassium and phosphate ions from the reticulo-rumen of sheep. Exp Physiol 79, 401408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
142. Greene, LW, Schelling, GT & Byers, FM (1986) Effects of dietary monensin and potassium on apparent absorption of magnesium and other macroelements in sheep. J Anim Sci 63, 19601967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
143. Larvor, P (1976) 28Mg kinetics in ewes fed normal or tetany prone grass. Cornell Vet 66, 413429.Google ScholarPubMed
144. Elliott, DA & Rizack, MA (1974) Epinephrine and adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated magnesium accumulation in adipocytes and their plasma membranes. J Biol Chem 249, 39853990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
145. Larvor, P & Rayssiguier, Y (1972) Hypomagnesaemia following theophylline or furosemide injection in ewes: renal versus extrarenal effect. J Physiol 227, 365375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
146. Takezawa, R, Schmitz, C, Demeuse, P, et al. (2004) Receptor-mediated regulation of the TRPM7 channel through its endogenous protein kinase domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 60096014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
147. Ali, BH, Al-Qarawi, AA & Mousa, HM (2006) Stress associated with road transportation in desert sheep and goats, and the effect of pretreatment with xylazine or sodium betaine. Res Vet Sci 80, 343348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
148. Murayama, I, Miyano, A, Sasaki, Y, et al. (2013) Glomerular filtration rate in Holstein dairy cows estimated from a single blood sample using iodixanol. J Dairy Sci 96, 51205128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
149. Günzel, D & Yu, AS (2013) Claudins and the modulation of tight junction permeability. Physiol Rev 93, 525569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
150. Konrad, M, Schaller, A, Seelow, D, et al. (2006) Mutations in the tight-junction gene claudin 19 (CLDN19) are associated with renal magnesium wasting, renal failure, and severe ocular involvement. Am J Hum Genet 79, 949957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
151. Quamme, GA (1981) Effect of furosemide on calcium and magnesium transport in the rat nephron. Am J Physiol 241, F340F347.Google ScholarPubMed
152. Shareghi, GR & Agus, ZS (1982) Magnesium transport in the cortical thick ascending limb of Henle’s loop of the rabbit. J Clin Invest 69, 759769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
153. Efrati, E, Hirsch, A, Kladnitsky, O, et al. (2010) Transcriptional regulation of the claudin-16 gene by Mg2+ availability. Cell Physiol Biochem 25, 705714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
154. Kladnitsky, O, Rozenfeld, J, Azulay-Debby, H, et al. (2015) The claudin-16 channel gene is transcriptionally inhibited by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Exp Physiol 100, 7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
155. Quamme, GA (1997) Renal magnesium handling: new insights in understanding old problems. Kidney Int 52, 11801195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
156. Ikari, A, Hirai, N, Shiroma, M, et al. (2004) Association of paracellin-1 with ZO-1 augments the reabsorption of divalent cations in renal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 279, 5482654832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
157. Ferrè, S, Hoenderop, JG & Bindels, RJ (2012) Sensing mechanisms involved in Ca2+ and Mg2+ homeostasis. Kidney Int 82, 11571166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
158. Kausalya, PJ, Amasheh, S, Günzel, D, et al. (2006) Disease-associated mutations affect intracellular traffic and paracellular Mg2+ transport function of claudin-16. J Clin Invest 116, 878891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
159. Ohba, Y, Kitagawa, H, Kitoh, K, et al. (2000) A deletion of the paracellin-1 gene is responsible for renal tubular dysplasia in cattle. Genomics 68, 229236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
160. Hirano, T, Kobayashi, N, Itoh, T, et al. (2000) Null mutation of PCLN-1/claudin-16 results in bovine chronic interstitial nephritis. Genome Res 10, 659663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
161. Ohba, Y, Kitoh, K, Nakamura, H, et al. (2002) Renal reabsorption of magnesium and calcium by cattle with renal tubular dysplasia. Vet Rec 151, 384387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
162. Groenestege, WM, Hoenderop, JG, van den Heuvel, L, et al. (2006) The epithelial Mg2+ channel transient receptor potential melastatin 6 is regulated by dietary Mg2+ content and estrogens. J Am Soc Nephrol 17, 10351043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
163. Rondon, LJ, Groenestege, WM, Rayssiguier, Y, et al. (2008) Relationship between low magnesium status and TRPM6 expression in the kidney and large intestine. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294, R2001R2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
164. Yamazaki, D, Funato, Y, Miura, J, et al. (2013) Basolateral Mg2+ extrusion via CNNM4 mediates transcellular Mg2+ transport across epithelia: a mouse model. PLoS Genet 9, e1003983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
165. Cole, DE & Quamme, GA (2000) Inherited disorders of renal magnesium handling. J Am Soc Nephrol 11, 19371947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
166. Stuiver, M, Lainez, S, Will, C, et al. (2011) CNNM2, encoding a basolateral protein required for renal Mg2+ handling, is mutated in dominant hypomagnesemia. Am J Hum Genet 88, 333343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
167. Sponder, G, Mastrototaro, L, Kurth, K, et al. (2016) Human CNNM2 is not a Mg2+ transporter per se . Pflugers Arch 468, 12231240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
168. Schonewille, JT, van‘t Klooster, AT, Wouterse, H, et al. (2000) Time courses of plasma magnesium concentrations and urinary magnesium excretion in cows subjected to acute changes in potassium intake. Vet Q 22, 136140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
169. Holtenius, K, Kronqvist, C, Briland, E, et al. (2008) Magnesium absorption by lactating dairy cows on a grass silage-based diet supplied with different potassium and magnesium levels. J Dairy Sci 91, 743748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
170. Storry, JE & Rook, JAF (1963) Magnesium metabolism in the dairy cow. V. Experimental observations with a purified diet low in magnesium. J Agric Sci 61, 167171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
171. Zhang, X, Del Gobbo, LC, Hruby, A, et al. (2016) The circulating concentration and 24-h urine excretion of magnesium dose- and time-dependently respond to oral magnesium supplementation in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Nutr 146, 595602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
172. Rook, JAF & Balch, CC (1958) Magnesium metabolism in the dairy cow. II. Metabolism during the spring grazing season. J Agric Sci 51, 199207.Google Scholar
173. Kemp, A (1983) The effect of fertilizer treatment of grassland on the biological availability of magnesium to ruminants. In Proceedings of John Lee Pratt International Symposium on the Role of Magnesium in Animal Nutrition, pp. 143157 [JP Fontenot, GE Bunce, KE Webb Jr and VG Allen, editors]. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
174. Quamme, GA (1982) Effect of hypercalcemia on renal tubular handling of calcium and magnesium. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 60, 12751280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
175. Bonny, O, Rubin, A, Huang, CL, et al. (2008) Mechanism of urinary calcium regulation by urinary magnesium and pH. J Am Soc Nephrol 19, 15301537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
176. Roche, JR, Morton, J & Kolver, ES (2002) Sulfur and chlorine play a non-acid base role in periparturient calcium homeostasis. J Dairy Sci 85, 34443453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
177. Oehlschlaeger, V, Wilkens, M, Schroeder, B, et al. (2014) Effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on localisation and extent of gastrointestinal calcium absorption in dairy cattle. Anim Prod Sci 54, 13941398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
178. van Hulzen, KJ, Sprong, RC, van der Meer, R, et al. (2009) Genetic and nongenetic variation in concentration of selenium, calcium, potassium, zinc, magnesium, and phosphorus in milk of Dutch Holstein–Friesian cows. J Dairy Sci 92, 57545759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
179. Cerbulis, J & Farrell, J (1976) Composition of the milk of dairy cows. II. Ash, calcium, magnesium, and phosphorous. J Dairy Sci 59, 589593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
180. Rook, JAF & Storry, JE (1962) Magnesium in nutrition of ruminants. Nutr Abstr Rev 32, 10551076.Google Scholar
181. Goff, JP & Horst, RL (1997) Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. J Dairy Sci 80, 12601268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
182. Shappell, NW, Herbein, JH, Deftos, LJ, et al. (1987) Effects of dietary calcium and age on parathyroid hormone, calcitonin and serum and milk minerals in the periparturient dairy cow. J Nutr 117, 201207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
183. Kehoe, SI, Jayarao, BM & Heinrichs, AJ (2007) A survey of bovine colostrum composition and colostrum management practices on Pennsylvania dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 90, 41084116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
184. Halse, K (1970) Individual variation in blood magnesium and susceptibility to hypomagnesaemia in cows. Acta Vet Scand 11, 394414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
185. Allcroft, R & Burns, KN (1968) Hypomagnesaemia in cattle. NZ Vet J 16, 109128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
186. Schweigel, M, Voigt, J & Mohr, E (2009) Indication of intracellular magnesium deficiency in lactating dairy cows revealed by magnesium loading and renal fractional excretion. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 93, 105112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
187. Fontenot, JP, Allen, VG, Bunce, GE, et al. (1989) Factors influencing magnesium absorption and metabolism in ruminants. J Anim Sci 67, 34453455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
188. Kopic, S & Geibel, JP (2013) Gastric acid, calcium absorption, and their impact on bone health. Physiol Rev 93, 189268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
189. Meyer, H (1977) Pathogenesis of the clinical symptoms of hypomagneaemia in ruminants. Vet Sci Commun 1, 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
190. Hemingway, RG & Ritchie, NS (1965) The importance of hypocalcaemia in the development of hypomagnesaemic tetany. Proc Nutr Soc 24, 5463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
191. Todd, JR & Horvath, DJ (1970) Magnesium and neuromuscular irritability in calves, with particular reference to hypomagnesaemic tetany. Br Vet J 126, 333346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
192. Chutkow, JG & Meyers, S (1968) Chemical changes in the cerebrospinal fluid and brain in magnesium deficiency. Neurology 18, 963974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
193. Meyer, H & Scholz, H (1972) Research into the pathogenesis of hypomagnesaemic tetany. I. Relationships between the magnesium content of blood and cerebrospinal fluid in sheep. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 79, 5561.Google Scholar
194. Allsop, TF & Pauli, JV (1975) Responses to the lowering of magnesium and calcium concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of unanesthetized sheep. Aust J Biol Sci 28, 475481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
195. Reynolds, CK, Bell, MC & Sims, MH (1984) Changes in plasma, red blood cell and cerebrospinal fluid mineral concentrations in calves during magnesium depletion followed by repletion with rectally infused magnesium chloride. J Nutr 114, 13341341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
196. Thomson, AM (1986) A magnesium-sensitive post-synaptic potential in rat cerebral cortex resembles neuronal responses to N-methylaspartate. J Physiol 370, 531549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
197. Mayer, ML, Westbrook, GL & Guthrie, PB (1984) Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones. Nature 309, 261263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
198. Allen, WM, Sansom, BF & Davies, DC (1981) Hypomagnesaemia in cows. Vet Rec 109, 342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
199. Anast, CS, Mohs, JM, Kaplan, SL, et al. (1972) Evidence for parathyroid failure in magnesium deficiency. Science 177, 606608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
200. Rayssiguier, Y, Garel, JM, Davicco, MJ, et al. (1977) Parathyroid hormone and calcitonin in magnesium-deficient calves. Horm Metab Res 9, 438439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
201. MacManus, J, Heaton, FW & Lucas, PW (1971) A decreased response to parathyroid hormone in magnesium deficiency. J Endocrinol 49, 253258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
202. Goff, JP (2008) The monitoring, prevention, and treatment of milk fever and subclinical hypocalcemia in dairy cows. Vet J 176, 5057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
203. Horsting, M & DeLuca, HF (1969) In vitro production of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 36, 251256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
204. Johannesson, AJ & Raisz, LG (1983) Effects of low medium magnesium concentration on bone resorption in response to parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in organ culture. Endocrinology 113, 22942298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
205. Sansom, BF, Manston, R & Vagg, MJ (1983) Magnesium and milk fever. Vet Rec 112, 447449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
206. van de Braak, AE, van’t Klooster, AT & Malestein, A (1987) Influence of a deficient supply of magnesium during the dry period on the rate of calcium mobilisation by dairy cows at parturition. Res Vet Sci 42, 101108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
207. House, WA & Bell, AW (1993) Mineral accretion in the fetus and adnexa during late gestation in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 76, 29993010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Scheme of Mg2+ metabolism in a non-pregnant dairy cow of 700 kg body weight (BW). The daily Mg2+ intake is 50 g, with true Mg2+ absorption being 12·8 g/d (25·6 %). The true absorption is reduced by an endogenous (Endog.) secretion of 2·8 g/d (4 mg/kg), which accounts for an apparent absorption or Mg2+ digestion of 10 g/d (20 %). An amount of 14·8 g Mg2+/d is used for 40 kg milk secretion (120 mg/l) and the surplus (5·2 g/d) is excreted via the kidneys into urine. The pool in the extracellular space has been calculated by assuming that the plasma volume and interstitial space represent 5 and 15 % of BW, respectively, as in sheep(26). The unidirectional flow of Mg2+ into and out of the intracellular space (ICS) and bone is not known and net flux into the ICS or bone is zero at constant BW. In pregnant cows in late gestation a flux of 0·2 g Mg2+/d towards the fetus has to be included(207).

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics of magnesium transport across the rumen epithelium

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Representation of transepithelial ruminal Mg2+ transport. The multi-layered epithelium is simplified to one compartment. Passive Mg2+ uptake is driven (1) mainly by the apical potential difference (PDa) or (2) by the chemical gradient of the involved free ions. The PD-dependent uptake (1) is thought to involve homo- or heteromeric assemblies of the transient receptor potential channel proteins TRPM6 and TRPM7. The molecular identity of PD-independent (2) uptake is unknown. Basolateral extrusion occurs via Na+/Mg2+ exchange via solute carrier family 41 member 1 (SLC41A1). The negative effects of inhibitors (–) on various steps of Mg2+ transport are printed in italics. pJms and Jsm represent the passive flow through the paracellular pathway. The cylindrical scheme represents a channel. PDt, transepithelial potential difference; PDb, basolateral potential difference; Mg2+i, intracellular ionised (free) Mg2+; DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenol; A, anion; C, carrier; P, pump (Na+/K+-ATPase). Example for PDt (+15 mV)=PDa (–45 mV) – PDb (–60 mV). Depolarisation of PDa by an increase of ruminal K+ increases PDt.

Figure 3

Table 2 Na+ deficiency and high K+ intake change the same rumen parameters and have identical effects on Mg2+ absorption

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Scheme of Mg2+ solubility in rumen fluid (redrawn from Dalley et al.(105)). The slope of Mg2+ solubility between pH 5 and 7 is influenced by the diet (←, →).

Figure 5

Table 3 Status of Mg2+ metabolism and plasma Mg2+ concentration