Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:50:10.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: The Nordic languages and typology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2011

Pål Kristian Eriksen  and
Camilla Wide
Pål Kristian Eriksen
Affiliation:
Agnefestveien Rosfjord, 4580 Lyngdal, Norway. [email protected]
Camilla Wide
Affiliation:
Scandinavian Languages, School of Languages and Translation Studies, 20014 University of Turku, Finland. [email protected]
Get access

Extract

The theme of this special issue is the languages of the Nordic countries and linguistic typology. By ‘the Nordic countries’ we refer to the five countries of Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Iceland. Genetically, the Nordic languages are divided between the Uralic and the Indo-European language families. The Indo-European languages are represented through the North Germanic branch, and conversely the ‘homeland’ of the North Germanic branch is more or less exclusively located within the borders of the Nordic countries. The Uralic languages are represented through most of the languages of the Sami branch (from Southwest to Northeast: South Sami, Ume Sami, Pite Sami, Lule Sami, North Sami, Inari Sami and Skolt Sami; the remaining two Sami languages, Kildin and Ter Sami, are both spoken on the Kola peninsula in Russia), and the Finnic branch, with the four closely related varieties Finnish, Karelian (Eastern Finland), Kven (Northern Norway) and Meänkieli (Northern Sweden).

Type
Introduction
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 34 , Special Issue 2: The Nordic Languages and Typology , October 2011 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Askedal, John Ole. 2005. The typological development of the Nordic Languages II: Morphology and syntax. In Bandle et al. (eds.), 1872–1886.Google Scholar
Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt, Jahr, Ernst Håkon, Karker, Allan, Naumann, Hans-Peter, Teleman, Ulf, Elmevik, Lennart & Widmark, Gun (eds). 2002. The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt, Jahr, Ernst Håkon, Karker, Allan, Naumann, Hans-Peter, Teleman, Ulf, Elmevik, Lennart & Widmark, Gun (eds.). 2005. The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. Circum-Baltic Languages, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Velupillai, Viveka. 2005. Tense and aspect. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 266–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary. 1993. The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd (ed.). 2004. Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 153). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66 (2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar