Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:19:19.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dialect development in a melting pot: The formation of a new culture and a new dialect in the industrial town of Høyanger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Randi Solheim
Randi Solheim*
Affiliation:
Sør-Trøndelag, University College, Faculty of Teacher and Interpreter Education, Rotvoll allé, NO-7004 Trondheim, Norway. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The article describes new dialect formation in Høyanger, a small industrial town located in the county of Sogn og Fjordane on the west coast of Norway, where an aluminium industry was established in 1916. Four generations of dialect development are studied from a synchronic and a diachronic point of view, based on older real-time data as well as new fieldwork. Qualitative interviews with informants at different ages shed light on linguistic choices made in complex dialect contact situations, particularly at the decisive second stage of koineization. Local and social embeddings are essential for the interpretations of the results because the linguistic changes seem to be dependent on dynamic relations between language and society. The results are interesting as a contribution to recent debate on the role of identity and social factors in new dialect formation. Related to more general processes of linguistic change, the article also discusses further development of the focused dialect.

Keywords

dialect contactdialect levellingHøyangerkoineizationlinguistic compromises
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 32 , Special Issue 2: Sociolinguistics , December 2009 , pp. 191 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Britain, David & Trudgill, Peter. 2005. New dialect formation and contact-induced reallocation: Three case studies from the English Fens. International Journal of English Studies 5 (1), 183–209.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 1994. Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 2001. Social Construction in Context. London, Thousand Oaks & New Dehli: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2002. Koineization and accomodation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 669–702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2007. Review of Peter Trudgill, Dialect Contact and New-dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes (Edinburgh University Press, 2004). Language 83 657–661.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. Forthcoming. Contact and new varieties. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a New Town koine: Children and language in Milton Keynes. Language and Society 29 (1), 65–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Language in Society 37(2). 2008. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Amund B. 1926. Sognemålene. Oslo: Det norske videnskaps-akademi/Jacob Dybvad.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1976. Strategies of neutrality: Language choice in uncertain situations. Language 52 (4), 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mæhlum, Brit. 2000. Strategies of neutrality in the Artic. In Mattheier, Klaus (ed.), Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, 99–108. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Omdal, Helge. 1977. Høyangermålet – en ny dialekt. Språklig Samling 1 7–9.Google Scholar
Sandve, Bjørn Helge. 1976. Om talemålet i Odda og Tyssedal. Generasjonsskilnad og tilnærming mellom dei to målføra. Masters thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Røyneland, Unn. 2005. Dialektnivellering, ungdom og identitet. Ein komparativ studie av språkleg variasjon og endring i to tilgrensande dialektområde, Røros og Tynset. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Røyneland, Unn. 2009. Dialects in Norway – catching up with the rest of Europe? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 196/197 7–30.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 1985. Koines and koineization. Language in Society 14 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Smith, Norval (ed.), Creolization and Contact, 176–197. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Solheim, Randi. 2006. Språket i smeltegryta. Sosiolingvistiske utviklingsliner i industrisamfunnet Høyanger. Ph.D. thesis, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new dialect formation. Language in Society 37 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassenden, Lars. 1956. Målet i Høyanger I–III. Etter Storms “Kortere Ordliste”. Ms., University of Bergen (archive).Google Scholar