Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:25:55.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lachmann's Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

N. H. Palmer
N. H. Palmer
Affiliation:
Cardiff, Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , July 1967 , pp. 368 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 368 note 1 The Originality of S. Matthew (1951), ch. v, ‘The Lachmann Fallacy’.Google Scholar

page 369 note 1 Moule, C. F. D., The Birth of the New Testament (1962), pp. 223–32.Google Scholar

page 369 note 2 The Synoptic Problem (1964).Google Scholar

page 370 note 1 I am grateful to the librarians of the University Colleges at Bangor and Cardiff for providing a photocopy.

page 372 note 1 Ut adpareat ibid utrumque secutum esse.

page 373 note 1 Passages in quotes are given by Lachmann in the Greek.

page 375 note 1 vel traiecta vel recisa.

page 377 note 1 Abbott, E. A. and Rushbrooke, W. G., The Common Tradition of the Synoptic Gospels (1884), p. viiGoogle Scholar; Farmer, , op. cit. p. 77.Google Scholar

page 377 note 2 Quentin, H., Essais de critique textuelle (1926), ch. III.Google Scholar