Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:10:39.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John's Citation of Psalm lxxxii Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Anthony Hanson
Anthony Hanson
Affiliation:
Hull, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , July 1967 , pp. 363 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 363 note 1 See an art. ‘II QMelchizedek and the New Testament’ by de Jonge, M. and van der, A. S. Woude in N.T.S. XII, no. 4 (07 1966), 301–26.Google Scholar

page 363 note 2 De Jonge and van der Woude, art. cit. p. 303; I have not thought it necessary to indicate where the text is restored.

page 363 note 3 Emerton, J. A., art. ‘The Interpretation of Psalm 82 in John 10’, in J.T.S. XI (N.S.) (04 1960), 329–32.Google Scholar

page 364 note 1 Emerton, J. A., art. ‘Melchizedek and the Gods. Fresh Evidence for the Jewish Background of John x. 34–36’, in J.T.S. XVII (N.S.) (10 1966), 399–401.Google Scholar

page 364 note 2 Dr Emerton admits the force of this verse; see his first article, p. 332.Google Scholar

page 364 note 3 Hanson, A. T., art. ‘John's Citation of Psalm 82’, in N.T.S. XI (1965), 158–62.Google Scholar

page 365 note 1 The Babylonian Talmud, ed. Epstein, I., Tractate Berakoth, ed. Simon, Maurice (London, 1948), p. 24.Google Scholar

page 365 note 2 Wm. Braude, G., ed. and tr., The Midrash on the Psalms (New Haven, U.S., 1959), II, 59–60.Google Scholar

page 366 note 1 ‘Tractate ‘Abodah Zarah’, ed. Mishcon, A. and Cohen, A. in The Babylonian Talmud (London, 1955), PP. 19–21.Google Scholar

page 366 note 2 ‘Tractate Rosh Hashanah’ in The Babylonian Talmud, ed. Simon, Maurice (London, 1938), p. 146.Google Scholar

page 367 note 1 Except that it substitutes for .

page 367 note 2 Midrash on the Psalms, vol. 1, p. 107.

page 367 note 3 Dodd, C. H., Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge, 1963), p. 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 367 note 4 Thus H. J. Holtzmann's explanation of this phrase is hardly adequate; he agrees that ή γραφή in verse 35 must refer to the Psalm quoted, but he thinks it indicates the phrase ‘You are gods’ and suggests that it underlines the permanence (Verbleiben) of this utterance. But in fact the Psalm quoted does not bear this out; far from continuing as gods, they are to the like men. We need a scripture that points towards the eschatological future. (See Holtzmann, H. J., Evangelium, Briefe, and Offenbarung des Johannes, Tubingen, 1918.)Google Scholar