Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:05:37.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ΛAOΣ 'EΞ 'EΘNΩN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Dom Jacques Dupont
Dom Jacques Dupont
Affiliation:
Bruges
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , November 1956 , pp. 47 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 47 note 1 ‘Peter and Paul in the Acts’, New Testament Studies, II (1955–1956): voir p. 142.

Page 48 note 1 Giet, S. (‘L' Assemblée apostolique et le Décret de Jérusalem. Qui était Siméon?’, Recherches de Science religieuse, XXXIX (1951–1952 = Mélanges j. Lebreton, 1), pp. 203–20) pense que le Syméon dont ilest question dans notre verset n'est pas saint Pierre, mais Syméon Niger (Act. xiii. 1). Pour que cette hypothèse ait quelque vraisemblance, il faudrait qu'il soil possible d'abord que le rédacteur des Actes ait pu confondre les deux personnages.Google Scholar

Page 48 note 2 Mise en valeur de l'initiative prise par Dieu (θɛός); le πρωτον correspond du υ. 7.Google Scholar

Page 48 note 3 ‘The Semitisms of St Luke's Gospel’, journal of Theological Studies, XLIV (1943), PP. 129–38; ‘The Semitisms of the Acts’, ibid. n.s. 1 (1950), pp. 16–28.

Page 48 note 4 Il faudrait éegalement comparer avec Luc i. 17 et 78.

Page 49 note 1 Cf. Bietenhard, H., art. ‘Őνμα’, Theologisches Wörterb. zum N.T., v (voir surtout pp. 255–6).Google Scholar