Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:25:35.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hebräerbrief 4. 14-16. Textlinguistik als Kommentierungsprinzip1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Wolfgang Schenk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , January 1980 , pp. 242 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Überarbeiteter Entwurf zu dem Diskussionstext der Seminargruppe ‘Linguistik und Exegese’ beim 33. General Meeting des SNTS in Paris vom 26 Juli 1978. Angegebene Literatur: P. Andriessen-A. Lenglet, ‘Quelques passages difficiles de l'Epître aux Hébreux’, Bibl. LI (1970), 207–20. O. Hofius, Katapausis (Tübingen, 1970). K. Koch, Amos (Neukirchen, 1976). O. Michel, Der Brief an die Hebräer (Göttingen, 196019). E. Riggenbach, Der Brief an die Hebräer (Leipzig, 19222). H.M. Schenke, ‘Erwägungen zum Rätsel des Hebr.’, FS H. Braun (Tübingen, 1973), 421–37. H. Strathmann, Der Brief an die Hebräer (Göttingen, 1962). J. Swetnam, ‘Form and Content in Hebr. I-VI’, Bibl. LII (1972), 368–85. Ders., ‘Form and Content in Hebr. VII–XIII, ebd. LV (1974), 333–48. A. Vanhoye, ‘Discussion sur la structure de l'Epître aux Hébreux’, ebd., 349–80. H. Windisch, Der Hebräerbrief (Tübingen, 1931).