Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:39:22.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Man and Three Women– Hans, Adrienne, Mary and Luce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This is probably best described as a marginal paper, given in one of the short slots at the conference of the Catholic Theological Association of Great Britain on the subject of Hans Urs von Balthasar. It is deliberately provocative, intended to raise questions about the relationship between von Balthasar and Adrienne von Speyr in the presence of experts who are in a position to defend him against my charges.

Von Balthasar made extravagant claims about von Speyr’s influence on his work, and they understood their relationship as the lived expression of their theological insights about the significance of sexual difference. John Roten writes that “The very concrete symbolism of man and woman was retranslated into theological categories” to such an extent that von Speyr sometimes depicted herself as the Church to von Balthasar’s Christ. Given that von Balthasar has become what somebody referred to as the “court theologian” of the Vatican, is there an implicit suggestion in neoorthodox Catholic theology that the relationship between von Speyr and von Balthasar embodies some kind of symbolic ideal, and what are the implications of this for the theological understanding of sexual difference? In asking these questions I draw on the insights of psychoanalysis, and in particular on the work of Luce Irigaray, but I am not suggesting that theology should be answerable to psychoanalysis nor indeed to any other non-theological discipline. I do however believe that Irigaray’s philosophy of sexual difference, informed by her experience as a practising psychoanalyst, offers a rich resource for those seeking to identify both the promises and pitfalls of Catholic sexual symbolism, especially in von Balthasar’s theology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Roten, John S.M., “The Two Halves of the Moon” in Schindler, David L. (ed.), Hans Urs von Balthazar–His Life and Work (Ignatius Press 1991), p 73Google Scholar.

2 Irigaray, Luce, This Sex Which Is Not One (Cornell University Press 1985), p 132Google Scholar.

3 Irigaray, This Sex Which Is Not One, p 76.

4 Roten, “The Two Halves of the Moon,” p 86.

5 Balthasar, Hans Urs von, Theo‐drama Volume III (Ignatius Press 1992), p 287Google Scholar.

6 Theo‐drama III, p 284.

7 Theo‐drama III, p 284.

8 Theo‐drama HI, p 283.

9 Theo‐drama HI, p 284.

10 Theo‐drama III, p 285.

11 Theo‐drama III, p 285.

12 See Irigaray, , An Ethics of Sexual Difference (The Athlone Press 1993), pp 3455Google Scholar.

13 Balthasar, von, The Christian State of Life (Ignatius Press 1983), p 202Google Scholar. 14. Balthasar, von, Elucidations (SPCK 1975), p 71Google Scholar.

15 von Speyr, Adrienne, The Handmaid of the Lord (The Harvill Press 1956), p 84Google Scholar.

16 Schindler, David L., “Catholic theology, gender, and the future of Western civilization” in Communio 20 (Summer, 1993), pp 200‐39Google Scholar.

17 von Balthasar, , “Women priests? A Marian Church in a fatherless and motherless culture” in Communio 22 (Spring, 1995), p 169Google Scholar.

18 McPartlan, Paul, “The Marian church and women's ordination” in McLoughlin, William and Pinnock, Jill (eds.), Mary is for EveryoneEssays on Mary and Ecumenism (Gracewing 1997), p 45Google Scholar.

19 Roten, “The Two Halves of the Moon,” p 66.

20 “The Two Halves of the Moon,” p 75.

21 “The Two Halves of the Moon,” p 66.

22 “The Two Halves of the Moon,” p 73.

23 “The Two Halves of the Moon,” p 74.

24 von Speyr, quoted in von Balthasar, Theo‐drama 111, p 241, fn 43.

25 Irigaray, An Ethics of Sexual Difference, p 5.