Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:42:42.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Labour Organisation: the U.S. decision to cut financial contribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

O.G. de Vries Reilingh
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Section B: Notes and Comments
Information
Netherlands Yearbook of International Law , Volume 2 , December 1971 , pp. 91 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Declaration concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organisation (Annex to the Constitution), Article I d.

2. See for example: UdSSR-Gewerkschaften. Fragen und Antworten (second revised and completed edition), Moscow, 1970, p. 10.Google Scholar

3. International Labour Conference – Record of Proceedings, Forty-first Session, Geneva 1957, pp. 513 and 519. Forty-second Session, Geneva 1958, pp. 508, 519 and 522. Forty-third Session, Geneva 1959, pp. 503, 515 and 530.

4. “Current U.S.-ILO Difficulties” (no publisher, no date). This document was sent, inter alia, to the three Dutch trade union federations by the American Embassy in the Netherlands in October 1970.

5. International Labour Conference – Record of Proceedings, Forty-third Session, Geneva 1959, p. 115.

6. International Labour Conference – Record of Proceedings, Forty-seventh Session, Geneva 1963, pp. 516 and 517.

7. International Labour Conference – Record of Proceedings, Forty-eighth Session, Geneva 1964, pp. 518 and 540.

8. International Labour Office – Minutes of the 161st Session of the Governing Body, Geneva, 1–5 March 1965, p. 29.

9. International Labour Conference –Record of Proceedings, Fiftieth Session, Geneva 1966, pp. 12.

10. Ibid., p. 164.

11. International Labour Conference –Record of Proceedings, Fifty-third Session, Geneva 1969, p. 136.

12. “Current U.S.-ILO Difficulties”, p. 5.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 5.

14. John Herling's Labor Letter, April 24, 1971.

15. Ibid., April 24, 1971.

16. Ibid., June 5, 1971.

17. Ibid., May 15, 1971. For his full statement on the ILO, see ibid., June 26, 1971.

18. International Labour Conference – Provisional Record, Fifty-sixth Session, Geneva 1971, pp. 696, 699 and 702.

19. Ibid., pp. 618–620 and 602.

20. Ibid., pp. 625–628 and 602.

21. Ibid., p. 93.

22. AFL-CIO Free Trade Union News, Vol. 26, No. 7, July 1971, pp. 4 and 5.

23. International Labour Conference – Provisional Record, Fifty-sixth Session, Geneva 1971, pp. 134, 137, 494 and 502.

24. 22 International Labor (U.S. Department of Labor), September-October 1971, No. 4 p. 20.

25. International Labour Conference – Provisional Record, Fifty-sixth Session, Geneva 1971, pp. 303 and 304.