Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:56:57.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of floodplain morphology and river works on spatial patterns of overbank deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

I. Thonon ,
H. Middelkoop  and
M. van der Perk
I. Thonon
Affiliation:
Centre for Geo-ecological Research (ICG) & Netherlands Centre for River Studies (NCR), Departement Fysische Geografie, Faculteit Geowetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, Postbus 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
H. Middelkoop*
Affiliation:
Centre for Geo-ecological Research (ICG) & Netherlands Centre for River Studies (NCR), Departement Fysische Geografie, Faculteit Geowetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, Postbus 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
M. van der Perk
Affiliation:
Centre for Geo-ecological Research (ICG) & Netherlands Centre for River Studies (NCR), Departement Fysische Geografie, Faculteit Geowetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, Postbus 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Floodplain topography and related hydraulic patterns of overbank flow constitute a major control on the amounts and patterns of sediment deposition on floodplains. We studied the differences in sediment deposition at two scales along two river branches of the lower River Rhine in the Netherlands: the Waal and IJssel River. Human alterations like levelling and embankment construction have severely impacted the floodplains along the Waal River branch (average discharge: 1500 m3·s‒1), whereas the relatively wide floodplains along the IJssel River (average discharge: 250 m3·s‒1) still exhibit their characteristic ridge-and-swale topography and natural levees. We found that, in general, the amounts of sediment deposited sediment decreases with increasing distance to the sediment source. Clay and organic matter content generally increase with decreasing floodplain elevation. These trends are, however, far less pronounced in the Waal River floodplains than in the IJssel River floodplains. Sediment deposited on the IJssel River floodplains also contains significantly more sand than the sediment deposited on the Waal River floodplains, probably because of the absence of minor embankments along the IJssel River and its higher sinuosity. Furthermore, during inundation the individual Waal River floodplains receive more sediment per unit area than the IJssel River floodplains. At the scale of the river branch, however, the conveyance losses in the Waal River are less than in the IJssel River, because of the larger surface area of the floodplains along the IJssel River relative to its water and sediment discharge during flood events. This discrepancy stresses that both the individual floodplain sections and the total river branch should be taken into account when studying the role of overbank deposition as part of a river’s sediment budget.

Keywords

human impactfloodplain topographyRiver Rhinesedimentationspatial variabilitythe Netherlands
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 63 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2007

References

Asselman, N.E.M. & Middelkoop, H., 1995. Floodplain sedimentation: quantities, patterns and processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 20: 481–499.Google Scholar
Asselman, N.E.M. & Middelkoop, H., 1998. Temporal variability of contemporary floodplain sedimentation in the Rhine-Meuse delta, the Netherlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23: 595–609.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselman, N.E.M., Middelkoop, H. & Van Dijk, P.M., 2003. The impact of changes in climate and land use on soil erosion, transport and deposition of suspended sediment in the River Rhine. Hydrological Processes 17: 3225–3244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselman, N.E.M. & Van Wijngaarden, M., 2002. Development and application of a ID floodplain sedimentation model for the River Rhine in the Netherlands. Journal of Hydrology 268: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bathurst, J.C., Benson, I.A., Valentine, E.M. & Nalluri, C. 2002. Overbank sediment deposition patterns for straight and meandering flume channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.G., 1985. Traditional and multivariate techniques in the interpretation of floodplain sediment grain size variations. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 10: 281–291.Google Scholar
Droppo, I.G., 2003. A new definition of suspended sediment: implications for the measurement and prediction of sediment transport. IAHS Publication 283: 3–12.Google Scholar
Droppo, L.G., Leppard, G.G., Flannigan, D.T. & Liss, S.N., 1997. The freshwater floe: a functional relationship of water and organic and inorganic floe constituents affecting suspended sediment properties. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99: 43–54.Google Scholar
Droppo, L.G., Walling, D.E. & Ongley, E.D., 2000. The influence of floe size, density and porosity on sediment and contaminant transport. IAHS Publication 263: 141–147.Google Scholar
Foster, J.M., Thoms, M.C. & Parsons, M., 2002. Using multivariate statistical techniques to interpret patterns of flood plain sedimentation. IAHS Publication 276: 451–461.Google Scholar
Gomez, B., Phillips, D., Magilligan, F.J. & James, L.A., 1997. Floodplain sedimentation and sensitivity: summer 1993 flood, Upper Mississippi Valley. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22: 923–936.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guccione, M.J., 1993. Grain-size distribution of overbank sediment and its use to locate channel positions. Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists 17: 185–194.Google Scholar
He, Q. & Walling, D.E., 1997. Spatial variability of the particle size composition of overbank floodplain deposits. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, O. & Walling, D.E., 1998: An investigation of the spatial variability of the grain size composition of floodplain sediments. Hydrological Processes 12: 1079–1084.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hren, M.T, Chamberlain, C.P. & Magilligan, F.J., 2001. A combined flood surface and geochemical analysis of metal fluxes in a historically mined region: a case study from the New World Mining District, Montana. Environmental Geology 40: 1334–1346.Google Scholar
Hudson-Edwards, K.A., Macklin, M.G. & Taylor, M.P., 1999. 2000 years of sediment-borne heavy metal storage in the Yorkshire Ouse basin, NE England,U.K. Hydrological Processes 13: 1087–1102.Google Scholar
Hudson, P.E. & Heitmuller, F.T., 2003. Local- and watershed-scale controls on the spatial variability of natural levee deposits in a large fine-grained floodplain: Lower Panuco Basin, Mexico. Geomorphology 56: 255–269.Google Scholar
Keesstra, S.D., 2006. The effects of natural reforestation on the hydrology, river morphology and sediment budget of the Dragonja River, SW Slovenia. PhDthesis, Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands): 187 pp.Google Scholar
Kesel, R.H. Dunne, K.C., McDonald, R.C., Allison, K.R.. & Spicer, B.E., 1974. Lateral erosion of overbank deposition on the Mississippi River in Louisiana, caused by 1973 flooding. Geology 2: 461–464.Google Scholar
Lambert, C.P. & Walling, D.E., 1987. Floodplain sedimentation: a preliminary investigation of contemporary deposition within the lower reaches of the River Culm, Devon, U.K. Geografiska Annaler 69A: 393–404.Google Scholar
Lecce, S.A., 1997. Spatial patterns of historical overbank sedimentation and floodplain evolution, Blue River, Wisconsin. Geomorphology 18: 265–277.Google Scholar
Lecce, S.A. & Pavlowsky, R.T., 1997. Storage of mining-related zinc in floodplain sediments, Blue River, Wisconsin. Physical Geography 18: 424–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecce, S.A. & Pavlowsky, R.T., 2001. Use of mining-contaminated sediment tracers to investigate the timing and rates of historical floodplain sedimentation. Geomorphology 38: 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecce, S.A. & Pavlowsky, R.T., 2004. Spatial and temporal variations in the grain-size characteristics of historical flood plain deposits, Blue River, Wisconsin, USA. Geomorphology 61: 361–371.Google Scholar
Leenaers, H. & Rang, M.C., 1989. Metal dispersal in the fluvial system of the River Geul: The role of discharge, distance to the source, and floodplain geometry. IAHS Publication 184: 47–55.Google Scholar
Maas, G.J., Makaske, B., Hommel, P.W.F.M., Nijhof, B.S.J. & Wolfert, H.P., 2003. Verstoring en successie: Rivierdynamiek en stroomdalvegetaties in de uiterwaarden van de Rijntakken. Alterra-rapport 759, Wageningen University & Research Centre (Wageningen, the Netherlands): 100 pp.Google Scholar
Marriott, S., 1992. Textural analysis and modelling of a flood deposit: River Severn, U.K.. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17: 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertes, L.A., 1994. Rates of flood-plain sedimentation on the central Amazon River: Geology 22: 171–174.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middelkoop, H., 2000. Heavy-metal pollution of the river Rhine and Meuse floodplains in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 79: 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middelkoop, H., 2002. Reconstructing floodplain sedimentation rates from heavy metal profiles by inverse modelling. Hydrological Processes 16: 47–64.Google Scholar
Nanson, G.C. & Croke, J.C., 2002. Emerging issues in flood plain research. IAHS Publication 276: 271–278.Google Scholar
Nicholas, A.P. & Walling, D.E., 1997. Modelling flood hydraulics and overbank deposition on river floodplains. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22: 59–77.Google Scholar
Simm, D.J. & Walling, D.E., 1998. Lateral variability of overbank sedimentation on a Devon flood plain. Hydrological Sciences Journal 43: 715–732.Google Scholar
Sweet, R.J., Nicholas, A.P., Walling, D.E. & Fang, X., 2003. Morphological controls on medium-term sedimentation rates on British lowland river floodplains. Hydrobiologia 494: 177–183.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.P., 1996. The variability of heavy metals in floodplain sediments: a case study from mid Wales. Catena 28: 71–87.Google Scholar
Ten Blinke, W., 2004. De beteugelde rivier: Bovenrijn, Waal, Pannerdensch Kanaal, Nederrijn-Lek en IJssel in vorm. Veen Magazines (Diemen, the Netherlands): 228 pp.Google Scholar
Ten Brinke, W.B.M., Schoor, M.M., Sorber, A.M. & Berendsen, H.J.A., 1998. Overbank sand deposition in relation to transport volumes during large-magnitude floods in the Dutch sand-bed River Rhine system. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23: 809–824.Google Scholar
Thoms, M.C., Foster, J.M. & Gawne, B., 2000. Flood-plain sedimentation in a dryland river: the River Murray, Australia. IAHS Publication 263: 227–236.Google Scholar
Thonon, I., 2006. Deposition of sediment and associated heavy metals on floodplains. Netherlands Geographical Studies 337, Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap / Faculteit Geowetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht (Utrecht, the Netherlands): 174 pp.Google Scholar
Thonon, I., Roberti, J.R., Middelkoop, H., Van der Perk, M. & Burrough, P.A., 2005. In situ measurements of sediment settling characteristics in floodplains using a LISST-ST. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30: 1327–1343.Google Scholar
Van der Lee, G.E.M., Olde Venterink, H. & Asselman, N.E.M., 2004. Nutrient retention in floodplains of the Rhine distributaries in the Netherlands. River Research and Applications 20: 315–325.Google Scholar
V&W, , 2005. Waterbase; www.waterbase.nl. Ministerie van Verkeer & Waterstaat (The Hague, the Netherlands).Google Scholar
Walling, D.E., 1999. Invited lecture: river floodplains as sediment sinks. In: Jayawardena, A.W., Lee, J.H.W. & Wang, Z.Y. (eds): River sedimentation Theory and applications. Balkema (Rotterdam, the Netherlands).Google Scholar
Walling, D.E., Pang, D., Nicholas, A.P. & Sweet, R.J., 2004. The grain size characteristics of overbank deposits on the flood plains of British lowland rivers. IAHS Publication 288: 226–234.Google Scholar
Walling, D.E. & He, Q., 1998. The spatial variability of overbank sedimentation on river floodplains. Geomorphology 24: 209–223.Google Scholar
Walling, D.E. & Owens, P.N., 2003. The role of overbank floodplain sedimentation in catchment contaminant budgets. Hydrobiologia 494: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walling, D.E., Owens, P.N. & Leeks, G.J.I., 1998. Erratum to ‘The characteristics of overbank deposits associated with a major flood event in the catchment of the River Ouse, Yorkshire, UK’. Catena 32: 309–331.Google Scholar
Wijnhoven, S., Thonon, I., Van der Velde, G., Leuven, R.S.E.W., Zorn, M.I., Eijsackers, H.J.P. & Smits, A.J.M., 2006. The impact of bioturbation by small mammals on heavy metal redistribution in an embanked floodplain of the river Rhine. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 177: 183–210.Google Scholar
Wyiga, B., 1999. Estimating mean flow velocity in channel and floodplain areas and its use for explaining the pattern of overbank deposition and floodplain retention. Geomorphology 28: 218–297.Google Scholar