Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:08:27.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Borderline radiocarbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

J. van der Plicht
J. van der Plicht*
Affiliation:
Center for Isotope Research, University of Groningen; also at Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dating of peat has its intrinsic problems. This is often caused by mobile organic fractions. For the Weichselian Pleniglacial, another methodological problem arises: the limit of the 14C dating method. This is discussed in terms of bulk (i.e. non-selected material, generally dated conventionally) vs AMS (i.e. selected botanical remains) dates, contamination, background and calibration, guided by a series of peat samples from the Belgian/Dutch border.

Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 91 , Issue 1-2 , September 2012 , pp. 257 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2012

References

Baiter, M., 2006. Radiocarbon dating's final frontier. Science 313: 1560–1563.Google Scholar
Berger, R., 1983. Willard Frank Libby, 1908-1980. PACT publications 8: 13–16.Google Scholar
Blaauw, M., 2003. An investigation of Holocene sun-climate relationships using numerical 14C wiggle match dating of peat deposits. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T., Bowles, A. & Hedges, R., 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, A.F.M., Mook, W.G., & Becker, B., 1989. Corrected calibration of the Radiocarbon timescale: 390-3203 calBC. Radiocarbon 31: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, H., 1958. Variation in concentration of Radiocarbon with time and location on earth. KNAW Proceedings B61:1–9.Google Scholar
Grootes, P.M., 1977. Thermal diffusion isotopic enrichment and radiocarbon dating beyond 50,000 years BP. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Jelgersma, S., 1961. Holocene Sea Level Changes in the Netherlands. Thesis Leiden University, Mededelingen Geologische Stichting, CVI-7.Google Scholar
Lanting, J.N. & Van der Plicht, J., 1993/1994. 14C-AMS: pros and cons for Archaeology. Palaeohistoria 35/36: 1–12.Google Scholar
Libby, W.F., 1952. Radiocarbon dating. University Press, Chigaco. re-issued 1965.Google Scholar
Mook, W.G., 1984. Archaeological and geological interest in applying 14C AMS to small samples. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B5: 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mook, W.G. & Streurman, H.J., 1983. Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. PACT Publications 8: 31–55.Google Scholar
Mook, W.G., & Van de Plassche, O., 1986. Radiocarbon dating. In: Van de Plassche, O. (ed.): Sea-level research: a manual for the collection and evaluation of data. Geobooks: 525–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mook, W.G. & Van der Plicht, J., 1999. Reporting 14C activities and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41: 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, M.J., Grootes, P.M., Voelker, A., Bruhn, F., Duhr, A. & Oriwall, A., 2001. Carbonate 14C background: does it have multiple personalities? Radiocarbon 43: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, M., Klarqvist, M., Bohlin, E. & Possnert, G., 2001. Variation in 14C age of macrofossils and different fractions of minute peat samples dated by AMS. Holocene 11: 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G.W. & Stuiver, M., 1986. High precision calibration of the Radiocarbon timescale, 500-2500 BC. Radiocarbon 28: 839–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Hughen, K.A., Guilderson, T.P., McCormac, F.G., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Baratt, P., Beck, J.W., Brown, D.M., Buck, C.E., Damon, P.E., Friedrich, M., Kromer, B., Ramsey, C.B., Reimer, R.W., Remmele, S., Southon, J.R., Stuiver, M. & Van der Plicht, J., 2002. Preliminary report of the first workshop of the Intcal04 Radiocarbon Calibration/Comparison Working Group. Radiocarbon 44: 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwel, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C.E., Burr, G.S., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Hajdas, I., Heat, T.J., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., McCormac, F.G., Manning, S.W., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Southon, J.R., Talamo, S., Turney, C.S.M., Van der Plicht, J. & Weyhenmeyer, C.E., 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51: 1111–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1999. Before civilisation: the Radiocarbon revolution and Prehistoric Europe. Pimlico, London.Google Scholar
Shore, J.S., Bartley, D.D. & Harkness, D.D., 1995. Problems encountered with the 14C dating of peat. Quaternary Science Reviews 14: 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Pearson, G.W., 1986. High precision calibration of the Radiocarbon timescale, AD 1950-500 BC. Radiocarbon 28: 805–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuniz, C., Bird, J.R., Fink, D. & Herzog, G.F., 1998. Accelerator Mass Spectrometry: ultrasensitive analysis for global science. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, J., 1985. Paleoenvironment and stratigraphy during the Last Glacial in the Belgian-Dutch border region. Quaternary Research 24: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Plicht, J. & Mook, W.G., 1989. Calibration of Radiocarbon ages by computer. Radiocarbon 31: 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Plicht, J., Wijma, S., Aerts, A.T., Pertuisot, M.H. & Meijer, H.A.J., 2000. The Groningen AMS facility: status report. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B172: 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Plicht, J. & Hogg, A., 2006. A note on reporting Radiocarbon. Quaternary Geochronology 1: 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geel, B., Bos, H.H., Pals, J.P., Van Mourik, J.M., Van Reenen, G.B.A., Wallinga, J. & Van der Plicht, J., 2010. Palaeoecological study of a Weichselian wetland site in the Netherlands suggests a link with Dansgaard-Oeschger climate oscillations. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 89: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Strydonck, M., Nelson, D.E., Crombe, P., Bronk Ramsey, C., Scott, E.M., Van der Plicht, J. & Hedges, R.E.M., 1999. What's in a 14C date. In: Evin, J., Oberlin, C., Daugas, J.P., and Salles, J.F. (eds): Radiocarbon and Archaeology: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (Lyon): 433–440.Google Scholar
Wohlfarth, B., Skog, G., Possnert, G., & Holmquist, B., 1998. Pitfalls in the AMS radiocarbon dating of terrestrial macrofossils. Journal of Quaternary Science 13: 137–145.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar