Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:16:58.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restatement of the Law Second, Conflict of Laws, As Adopted and Promulgated by the American Law Institute at Washington, D.C. May, 23, 1969. Trois volumes. St. Paul, Minn. American Law Institute Publishers1971, Prix $ 85.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

H. U. Jessurun d'Oliveira
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Boekbesprekingen—Aankondigingen Book Reviews—Notes
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , May 1972 , pp. 70 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 En outre on élabora un certain nombre de codes-modè

les qui pouvaient ětre adoptés par les Etats avec d'éventuelles modifications, tel le Uniform Commercial Code.

2 Private International Law (General Part) 1967, p. 56.Google Scholar

3 Voyez Reese, Unification of common law rules: The role of the American Law Institute, in: Legal Thought in the United States of America under Contemporary Pressures (1970, p. 171–182)Google Scholar, auquel cette partie de notre exposé emprunte quelques éléments.

4 Voyez le compte-rendu dans les actes (“Mededelingen”) no. 64, p. 8, 23, 28, 35 et 43. Antérieurement, de Winter s'était déjà prononcé dans le meme esprit: WPNR 4990. Dans Hoofdlijnen (1968) p. 50Google Scholar, Lemaire considérait le projet de Loi Uniforme lui-měme comme un “Restatement”, “susceptible de critique, d'élucidation et de dérogation”, tant qu'il ne serait pas entré en vigueur.