Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:35:53.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To the Editor: The Myth of Gypsy Nationalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Werner Cohn
Werner Cohn*
Affiliation:
Emeritus of Sociology University of British Columbia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 21 , Issue 2: Special Issue - The Ex-Soviet Nationalities Without Gorbachev , Fall 1993 , pp. 281 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Association for the Study of the Nationalities of the USSR and Eastern Europe, Inc. 

References

Notes

1. Hancock, Ian, “The East European Roots of Romani Nationalism” Nationalities Papers, XIX (3), Fall lg91, pp. 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. There are two outstanding books about the Rom: Yoors, Jan, The Gypsies (New York, 1967), a memoir of the author's years with European Rom that constitutes a most satisfactory, brilliant ethnography; and Olof Gjerdman and Erik Ljungberg, The Language of the Swedish Coppersmith Gipsy Johan Dimitri Taikon (Uppsala, 1963), a thorough, scholarly account of Romanes. Any ethnographic work with the Rom would be unthinkable without the aid of these books. While those who cite these works, of course, do not by that act alone become scholarly observers of the Gypsies, those who fail to refer to these books can hardly be taken seriously. My own booklet on the subject is Werner Cohn, The Gypsies (Reading, Mass., 1973). I mention it here only because it documents many of the assertions I make in this communication.Google Scholar

3. Salo, Matt. T., “Gypsy Ethnicity: Implications of Native Categories and Interaction for Ethnic Classification,” Ethnicity, vol. 6 (1979), pp. 73–96.Google Scholar

4. Among the more famous Boasters are the Kwieks of prewar Poland. Hancock takes them at face value (pp. 259-30). Yoors, op. cit., pp. 114-16, tells us what the Rom thought of them.Google Scholar

5. I will mention only one which is among the most notorious and also, unfortunately, among the most influential: Jean-Paul Clébert, The Gypsies (London, 1963), first published in French in 1961.Google Scholar

6. For an insight into the Promoters, I refer the reader to the works by Acton, Kenrick and Puxon, all of which are cited by Hancock.Google Scholar