Article contents
Schleswig and Non-Territorial Autonomy – The Territorial Trap?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2022
Abstract
Non-territorial autonomy (NTA) is a concept to ensure political and cultural participation of national minorities in society and thus a tool to manage diversity without challenging territorial integrity. This article relates to the experience of Schleswig, which is widely perceived as a model of successful border-delineation based on national self-determination and subsequent reconciliation and accommodation of national, linguistic, and cultural binarity in a majority-minority framework. Minority membership is based on subjective self-identification and not registered.
The principle of subjective self-identification and its fluidity challenge attempts to implement a legitimate, democratic structure of minority self-government. The non-definition of “minority” based on objective, measurable criteria is due to the apparent social integration of the Schleswig society: today, it is socially more divided by the national border drawn 100 years ago than by respective majority-minority divisions. It has become apparent that the territorial restriction to the boundaries of the former Duchy of Schleswig does not cohere with social practices and mobility frameworks and thus questions the present NTA infrastructure, which is restricted to a historic territory no longer relevant in contemporary administrative frameworks or in patterns of social practices.
- Type
- Special Issue Article
- Information
- Nationalities Papers , Volume 50 , Issue 5: Special Issue on Accommodating National Diversity Within States , September 2022 , pp. 906 - 922
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
References
- 2
- Cited by