Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:21:56.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Civil society versus nationalizing state? Advocacy of minority rights in the post-socialist Baltic states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Timofey Agarin*
Affiliation:
European Center for Minority Issues, Flensburg, Germany

Abstract

Strong civil society provides individuals with arenas to bring their interests to the attention of policymakers. In so doing, civil society organizations (CSOs) can support state policies, but can also criticize policies. This paper argues that most minority rights advocacy CSOs in the Baltic states have little say in the crafting of policy and are compartmentalized into the existing agendas, with only a few groups able to evaluate policies independently. It concludes that the Baltic civil society is weak because the CSOs working on minority issues ask policymakers either too much, or too little. The findings suggest that policymakers quell criticism of their work from the side of the CSOs by ignoring their activities. Alternatively, by funding the CSO that shores up the state agenda, policymakers delegate their responsibilities to civic actors, keep critical voices from public debates and claim that their policies have the full support of a vibrant civil society. This paper investigates the options available for civil society actors to relate to policymakers in a nationalizing state by drawing on the data collected in 77 semi-structured interviews with the CSOs working with Russian and Polish minorities in the Baltic states between 2006 and 2009.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarin, Timofey. A Cat's Lick. Democratization and Minority Communities in the Post-Soviet Baltic. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel Abraham, and Verba, Sidney. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1963. Print.Google Scholar
Antane, Aina, and Tsilevich, Boris. “Nation-Building and Ethnic Integration in Latvia.” Nation-building and Ethnic Integration in post-Soviet Societies, Ed. Kolst⊘, Pål. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999: 63152. Print.Google Scholar
Armony, Ariel C. The Dubious Link: Civic Engagement and Democratization. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel H., Kaase, Max, Allerback, Klaus R., Farah, Barbara, Heunks, Felix, Inglehart, Ronald, Kent Jennings, M., Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Marsh, Alan and Rosenmayr, Leopold. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. London: Sage, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Beresneviciute, Vida, and Leoncikas, Tadas. Romu Padeties Tyrimas: Romai Sventimo ir Darbo Rinkos Sankirtoje. Vilnius: Socialiniu tyrimo instituto. Etniniu tyrimu centras, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. “Civil Society and Democratic Transition in East Central Europe.” Political Science Quarterly 108.2 (1993): 307–26. Print.Google Scholar
Booth, John A., and Bayer Richard, Patricia. “Civil Society, Political Capital, and Democratization in Central America.” The Journal of Politics 60.3 (1998): 780800. Print.Google Scholar
Brands Kehris, Ilze. “Citizenship, Participation and Representation.” How Integrated is Latvian Society? An Audit of Achievements, Failures and Challenges, Ed. Muižnieks, N. Riga: U of Latvia P, 2010: 93123. Print.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Borgstrom, Helle, Garrido, Anne-Marie, and Lindsnaes, Birgit. Mid-term Evaluation: The Legal Information Center for Human Rights, Estonia. Copenhagen: The Danish Center for Human Rights, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Budryte, Dovile. Taming Nationalism? Political Community Building in the post-Soviet Baltic States. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Budryte, Dovile, and Pilinkaite-Sotirovic, Vilana. “Lithuania: Progressive Legislation Without Popular Support.” Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe, Ed. Rechel, Berad. London: Routledge, 2009: 151–65. Print.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone, and Kopstein, Jeffrey. “Bad Civil Society.” Political Theory 29.6 (2001): 837–65. Print.Google Scholar
Chandhoke, Neera. “The Civil and the Political in Civil Society.” Democratization 8.2 (2001): 124. Print.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Crotty, Jo. “Reshaping the Hourglass? The Environmental Movement and Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation.” Organization Studies 27.9 (2006): 13191338. Print.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5.3 (1994): 417. Print.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond Michel. “Participation in the New Democracies of Central and Eastern Europe: Cultural Versus Rational Choice Explanations.” The Postcommunist Citizen. Ed. Barnes, Samuel and Simon, Janos. Budapest: Erasmus Foundation, 1998: 197227. Print.Google Scholar
ECRI. Third report on Estonia. European commission against racism and intolerance. Strasbourg, 2005a. Print.Google Scholar
ECRI. Third report on Latvia. European commission against racism and intolerance. Strasbourg, 2005b. Print.Google Scholar
ECRI. Third report on Lithuania. European commission against racism and intolerance. Strasbourg, 2005c. Print.Google Scholar
Estonian Government. Estonian Civil Society Development Concept. Tallinn, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Estonian Government. State Programme Integration in Estonian society 2000–2007. Tallinn, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Evans, Alfred B.Civil Society in the Soviet Union?Russian Civil Society. A Critical Assessment, Eds. Evans, Alfred B., Henry, Laura and Mcintosh, Lisa. Sundstrom. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 2006: 2854. Print.Google Scholar
Fagan, Adam. “Taking Stock of Civil-Society Development in post-Communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic.” Democratization 12.4 (2005): 528–47. Print.Google Scholar
Fennema, Meindert, and Tillie, Jean. “Political Participation and Political Trust in Amsterdam: Civic Communities and Ethnic Networks.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 25.4 (1999): 703–26. Print.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael W., and Edwards, Bob. “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7.3 (1996): 3852. Print.Google Scholar
Galbreath, David J., and Muiznieks, Nils. “Latvia: Managing post-Imperial Minorities.” Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe, Ed. Rechel, Bernd, London: Routledge, 2009: 135–50. Print.Google Scholar
Green, Andrew T.Comparative Development of post-Communist Civil Societies.” Europe-Asia Studies 54.3 (2002): 455–71. Print.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. The Weakness of Civil Society in post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Kasatkina, Natalija, and Leončikas, Tadas. Lietuvos Etniniu Grupiu Adaptacija: Kontekstas ir Eiga. Vilnius: Eugrimas, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Kasatkina, Natalija, and Beresneviciute, Vida. “Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector in Lithuania.” Case-study for UNRISD Project “Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector”. Geneva: UNRISD, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Killingsworth, Matt. “Opposition and Dissent in Soviet Type Regimes: Civil Society and its Limitations.” Journal of Civil Society 3.1 (2007): 5979. Print.Google Scholar
Kopecky, Petr, and Mudde, Cas. “Rethinking Civil Society.” Democratization 10.3 (2003): 114. Print.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, Mikko. “From NGOs to Civil Society: A Learning Process.” Non-profit Sector and the Consolidation of Democracy: Studies on the Development of Civil Society in Estonia, Eds. Lagerspetz, Mikko, Trummal, Aire, Ruutsoo, Rein and Rikmann, Erle. Tallinn: Kunst, 2004: 86103. Print.Google Scholar
Latvian Government. Cooperation Memorandum between Non-Governmental Organizations and the Cabinet of Ministers. Riga, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Latvian Government. The Integration of Society in Latvia. National Programme. Riga, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Latvian Government. The National Programme ‘Roma in Latvia’ 2007–2009. Riga, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Latvian Government. Valsts programma “Sabiedrības integrācija Latvijā.” Riga Secretariat of the Special Assignments Minister for Social Integration, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
LICHR. Bronze Soldier: April Crisis. Tallinn: Legal Information Center for Human Rights, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
LICHR. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: Bor'ba s neterpimost'yu i diskriminatsiei. Tallinn: Legal Information Center for Human Rights, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan José, and Stepan, Alfred. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Lithuanian Government. Lietuvos Respublikos Etnines Politikos Koncepcija. Vilnius, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Lithuanian Government. Lenkai lietuvoje—lietuviai Lenkijoje. Vilnius: Statistikos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybes, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Lithuanian Government. The Programme ‘Integration of Roma in Lithuanian Society 2000–2004'. Vilnius, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Lithuanian Government. Romu Integracijos i Lietuvos Visuomene 2008–2010 Metu Programa. Vilnius: Tautinių mažumų ir išeivijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Lovell, David W.Promoting Democracy: The Challenge of Creating a Civil Society.” Comparative Sociology 6.3 (2007): 324–43. Print.Google Scholar
LŽTC. Human rights. Minority rights. Vilnius: Lietuvos žmogaus teisių centras, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
LŽTC. Tautiniu Mazumu Teises. Vilnius: Lietuvos žmogaus teisių centras, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Muiznieks, Nils. How Integrated is Latvian Society? An Audit of Achievements, Failures and Challenges. Riga: U of Latvia P, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Muiznieks, Nils. “A Political Scientists Experience in the Real World of Politics.” European Political Science 8.1 (2009): 6878. Print.Google Scholar
Muižnieks, Nils, and Brands-Kehris, Ilze. “The European Union, Democratization, and Minorities in Latvia.” The European Union and Democratization, Ed. Kubicek, Paul. London: Routledge, 2003: 3055. Print.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Seligson, Mitchell A.Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships.” American Political Science Review 88.3 (1994): 635–52. Print.Google Scholar
Nikolić, Sara. “Empowerment as a Two-Way Process: The Role of Romani NGOs in Integration of Macedonian Xociety.” Minority Integration in Central Eastern Europe. Between Ethnic Diversity and Equality. Ed. Agarin, Timofey and Brosig, Malte. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2009: 279304. Print.Google Scholar
Odmalm, Pontus. “Civil Society, Migrant Organizations and Political Parties: Theoretical Linkages and Applications to the Swedish Context.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30.3 (2004): 471–89. Print.Google Scholar
Orr, Scott David. “Identity and Civil Society in Latvia, Poland, and Ukraine: Women's NGOs.” East European Politics and Societies 22.4 (2008): 856–78.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.” American Sociological Review 67.2 (2002): 254–77. Print.Google Scholar
Pettai, Velio, and Kallas, Kristina. “Estonia: Conditionality Amidst a Legal Straightjacket.” Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe. Ed. Rechel, Bernd. London: Routledge, 2009: 104–18. Print.Google Scholar
Poleshchuk, Vadim. Advice Not Welcomed: Recommendations of the OSCE High Commissioner to Estonia and Latvia and the Response. Hamburg: Lit, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Poleshchuk, Vadim. ed. Chance to Survive: Minority Rights in Estonia and Latvia. Tallinn: Legal Information Center for Human Rights and Latvian Human Rights Committee, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Poleshchuk, Vadim. “The War of the Monuments in Estonia: The Challenges of History and the Minority Population.” Report from the Aland Islands Peace Institute. Alands: Aland Islands Peace Institute, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Poleshchuk, Vadim, and Helemäe., JelenaEstonia-in Question of Minority Protection.” International Obligations and National Debates: Minorities Around the Baltic sea, Ed. Akermark, Athanasia S. Marienham: The Aland Islands Peace Institute, 2006: 109–70. Print.Google Scholar
Popovski, Vesna. National Minorities and Citizenship Rights in Lithuania. 1988–1993. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. London: Simon & Schuster, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. Making Democracy Work: Civil Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Racko, Girts. “The Goals of the Foundation of Ethnic Minority non-Governmental Organizations in Latvia.” Critical Sociology 34.1 (2008): 139–55. Print.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian. Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Schofer, Evan, and Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion. “The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review 66.6 (2001): 806–28. Print.Google Scholar
Simmons, Cynthia. “Women's Work and the Growth of Civil Society in Post-War Bosnia.” Nationalities Papers 35.1 (2007): 171–86. Print.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. “The Ethnic Democracy Thesis and the Citizenship Question in Estonia and Latvia.” Nationalities Papers 24.2 (1996): 199216. Print.Google Scholar
Smooha, Sammy, and Järve, Priit. The Fate of Ethnic Democracy in Post-Communist Europe: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Budapest: Open Society Institute, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald. “States, Civil Society, and Ethnic Cultural Consolidation in the USSR–Roots of the National Question.” From Union to Commonwealth: Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Ed. Lapidus, Gail. New York: Cambridge UP, 1992: 2244. Print.Google Scholar
Taylor, Brian D.Law Enforcement and Civil Society in Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 58.2 (2006): 193213. Print.Google Scholar
Trummal, Aire, and Lagerspetz, Mikko. “The Profile of Estonian Civil Society.” CIVICUS Index on Civil Society Occasional Paper Series 1.6 (2001). Print.Google Scholar
Uhlin, Anders. “The Structure and Culture of Post-Communist Civil Society in Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies 62.5 (2010): 829–52. Print.Google Scholar
Uhlin, Anders. “Which Characteristics of Civil Society Organizations Support What Aspects of Democracy? Evidence from post-Communist Latvia.” International Political Science Review 30.3 (2009): 271–95. Print.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, Peter, and Ram, Melanie H.The Roma.” Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe. Ed. Rechel, Bernd. London: Routledge, 2009: 6173. Print.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. Democracy and Association. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Deutsch, Franziska. “Social Capital, Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest ‘Civic’ Payoff?Journal of Civil Society 1.2 (2005): 121–46. Print.Google Scholar
Zepa, B. 2006. Integration Practice and Perspectives. Riga: Baltic Institute of Social Sciences. Print.Google Scholar
Žiliukaitė, Rῡta, Ramonaitė, Ainė, Nevinskaitė, Laima, Beresnevičiῡtė, Vida, and Vinogradnaitė, Inga. Neatrasta Galia: Lietuvos Pilitinės Visuomenės Žemėlapis. Vilnius: Versus Aureus, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Žukauskiene, Rita. Active Civic Participation of Immigrants in Lithuania. Oldenburg: POLITIS-a European research project, 2005. Print.Google Scholar