Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
In 1920 the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic emerged upon the ruins of German and Polish occupation. It replaced the short-lived Belarusian Democratic Republic as the embodiment of national statehood. The ensuing decade came to be an important but ambiguous period in Belarusian history. New state institutions such as the Commissariat of Public Enlightenment, the Institute of Belarusian Culture, and the Belarusian State University carried out unprecedented “nation-building” policies designed to reverse the effects of tsarist Russification and foster the development of Belarusian national culture. Parodoxically, many of the same institutions also implemented various aspects of “Sovietization.” A myriad of measures under the label “socialist construction” served to integrate ever more closely Belarus into the Soviet Union.
1. The BSSR, proclaimed for the first time in January 1918, assumed a longer-term existence on 1 August 1920 following the Red Army's taking of Minsk. The Belarusian Democratic Republic, or BNR, created in March 1918 by representatives of the Vilna and Minsk Belarusian Councils (Rada), operated on Belarusian territory under both German and Polish occupations. In October 1925 most members of the BNR government in exile opted to disband and recognize the BSSR as the sole legal Belarusian government, and returned to Belarus to occupy high educational and cultural administrative posts. A minority remained abroad to carry on the cause of the BNR. For an account of the political history of Belarusian statehood see Nicholas P. Vakar, Belorussia: The Making of a Nation (Cambridge, 1956), pp. 93–119; and Vitaut and Zora Kipel, eds, Byelorussian Statehood (New York, 1988), pp. 1–205.Google Scholar
2. Most historians have viewed the early to mid-1920s as a period of cultural blossoming, during which Belarusian administrators were able to promote national culture. See Lubachko, Ivan, Belorussia Under Soviet Rule 1917–1957 (Kentucky, 1972), pp. 80–93; Hlybinny, Uladzimir, Dolia belaruskae kul'tury pad savetami (Munich, 1958), pp. 11–54; Vakar, pp. 139–145.Google Scholar
3. Historians have usually located an intensification of Soviet influence at the decade's close, viewing it as a political and cultural shift from the mid-1920s. See Vakar, pp. 147–154; Kosman, Marceli, on the other hand, while neglecting national development, depicted a more continuous history of the building of socialism throughout the inter-war period. See Kosman, Marceli, Historia Bialorusi (Warsaw, 1979), pp. 315–325.Google Scholar
4. An alternative perspective is that of the producers and products of culture. The two major books addressing cultural activity in the areas of literature and theater, respectively, are: Adamovich, Anthony, Opposition to Sovietization in Belorussian Literature (Munich, 1958), pp. 15–173; and Seduro, Vladimir, The Byelorussian Theater and Drama (New York, 1955), pp. 52–115.Google Scholar
5. See note 2.Google Scholar
6. Balitskii, A., “Blizhaishie zadachi Narkomprosa v sviazi s ukrepleniem Savetsaki Belarusi,” As'veta, No. 1, 1924, p. 2.Google Scholar
7. Balitskii, A., “Kul'turnae budaunitstva da dzesiatai hadaviny Kastrychnikavai revaliutsyi,” As'veta, No. 7, 1927, p. 16.Google Scholar
8. Knoryn, V., “Prablemy kul'turnai revaliutsyi,” As'veta, No. 2, 1928, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
9. Nekrashevich, Al., “Belaruski Nats-Fashyzm i Nats-Demakratyzm,” As'veta, Nos. 11–12, 1929, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
10. Baikou, M., “Pos'pekhi belaruskae shkoly za chas revaliutsyi,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 43.Google Scholar
11. Nodel', V., “Blizhaishie zadachi Soiuza Rabotnikov Prosveshcheniia Belorussii,” As'veta, No. 1, 1924, p. 10.Google Scholar
12. Knoryn, V., “Ab rashaiuchykh ‘drobiaziakh’ u vialikim pytan'ni (Da pytan'nia ab palitytsy belarusizatsyi),” As'veta, No. 3, 1928, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
13. Knoryn, V., “Ab rashaiuchykh ‘drobiaziakh’ u vialikim pytan'ni (Da pytan'nia ab palitytsy belarusizatsyi),” As'veta, No. 4, 1928, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
14. Akhramovich, T., “Asnaunyia momanty plianu pratsy saiuzu na kastrychniks'nezhan'1924 g.,” As'veta, No. 3, 1924, p. 13.Google Scholar
15. , Balitskii “Kul'turnae budaunitstva Savetskai Belarusi da X gadaviny agalashen'nia BSSR,” As'veta, No. 8, 1928, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
16. , Baikou “Pos'pekhi belaruskai shkoly za chas revaliutsyi,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 43.Google Scholar
17. Serbov, I., “Vvedenie vseobshchevo obrazovaniia v BSSR,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
18. , Baikou “Pos'pekhi belaruskai shkoly …,” p. 47.Google Scholar
19. Ibid., p. 43.Google Scholar
20. “Na frontse belarusizatsyi (Gomelshchina, s. Iaromina.),” As'veta, No. 7, 1925, pp. 104–105.Google Scholar
21. , Baikou “Pos'pekhi belaruskai shkoly …,” p. 45.Google Scholar
22. Ibid., p. 47.Google Scholar
23. “Da nastaunitstva Savetskae Belarusi,” As'veta, No. 4, 1926, p. 3.Google Scholar
24. Aisov, S., “Ocherednye voprosy politiko-prosvetitel'noi raboty v derevne,” As'veta, No. 1, 1924, pp. 17, 19.Google Scholar
25. Lisouski, V., “Spravachnaia pratsa u khatse-chytal'ni,” As'veta, No. 1, 1926, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
26. , Balitskii “Kul'turnae budaunitstva …,” pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
27. Nodel', V., “Blizhaishie zadachi Saiuza Rabotnikov Prosveshcheniia Belorussii. Posle belorusskogo s'ezda,” As'veta, No. 1, 1924, p. 8.Google Scholar
28. Ibid., pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
29. Matsiukevich, Iaz., “Vyniki II-ga Usebelaruskaga Nastaunitskaga Z'ezdu,” As'veta, No. 4, 1926, p. 8. The success of these ideological prescriptions was not complete, since both congresses noted the continued presence of anti-Soviet attitudes among teachers. See Nodel', “Bilzhaishie zadachi …,” pp. 8–9; and Matsiukevich, p. 8.Google Scholar
30. “Partyia-nastaunitstvu,” As'veta, No. 1, 1925, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
31. Nodel', V., “Pas'lia Usebelaruskaga nastaunitskaga z'ezdy,” As'veta, No. 1, 1925, p. 12; Shabashova, M., “Pytan'ni kul'tpratsy (Da Usebelaruskae narady),” As'veta, No. 1, 1925, p. 25.Google Scholar
32. “Partyia-nastaunitstvu,” As 'veta, No. 1, 1925, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
33. Lysou, S., “Formy polityka-as'vetnai pratsy y vestsy,” As'veta, No. 1, 1925, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
34. V-ko, I., “Samoperedpodgotovka uchitel'stva Kraiskoi volosti Borisovskogo uezda,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 144.Google Scholar
35. Vasileuski, D., “Ab metodakh perapadrykhtouki nastaunitstva veski,” As'veta, No. 3, 1924, p. 86.Google Scholar
36. Ibid., p. 87.Google Scholar
37. , Hlybinny pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
38. , Baikou “Pos'pekhi belaruskae shkoly …,” p. 45.Google Scholar
39. Niakhai, G., “Pratsa na Bysheishykh Kursakh Belarusaznaustva,” As'veta, No. 1, 1925, p. 179.Google Scholar
40. M-ki, A., “Bysheishyia kursy belarusaznaustva u 1925–26 vuch. godze,” As'veta, No. 7, 1925, p. 135.Google Scholar
41. Mazurkevich, Iazep, “Belarusaznaustva u Belaruskai Savetska-Partyinai shkole II-i stupeni u Vitsebsku,” As'veta, No. 6, 1925, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
42. “Na frontse belarusizatsyi (Gomelshchina, s. Iaromina),” As'veta, No. 7, 1925, p. 105.Google Scholar
43. V. S'migel'ski and Ia. Tros'ka, “Belaruskaia kul'turna-as'vetnaia sprava na Gomel'shchyne,” As'veta, No. 5, 1926, p. 147.Google Scholar
44. , Mazurkevich “Belarusaznaustva …,” p. 46.Google Scholar
45. Tros'ka, s'migel'ski and, “Belaruskaia kul'turna-as'vetnaia sprava …,” p. 144.Google Scholar
46. Ibid.Google Scholar
47. Vasileuski, D., “Kraiaznaustva u shkolakh, iak srodak kamunistychnaga vykhavan'nia maladzi na veskakh,” As'veta, No. 3, 1924, pp. 90–93.Google Scholar
48. I. S., “Usebelaruskaia kraiaznauchaia konferentsyia,” As'veta, No. 3, 1924, pp. 168–169.Google Scholar
49. Karshuk, Mikhaila, “Mestsa shkoly u kraiaznauchai pratsy,” As'veta, No. 2, 1925, pp. 117–119.Google Scholar
50. “Opravazdacha Mazyrskaga Akrugovaga Addzelu Narodnae As'vety a praroblenai pratsy za 1923–24 vuchebny god i a stanovishchy sprau narodnai as'vety na I studzenia 1925 g., pa Mazyrskai akruze,” As'veta, No. 3, 1925, p. 141.Google Scholar
51. “Praekt pragram gramadaznaustva dlia pedagagichnykh tekhnikumau BSSR,” As'veta, No. 3, 1927, p. 100.Google Scholar
52. Ibid., pp. 102–106.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., p. 102.Google Scholar
54. Baikou, M., “Shkola i natsyianal'nae pytanie u Belarusi,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 28.Google Scholar
55. Balitskii, A., “Institut Belaruskai Kul'tury,” As'veta, No. 3, 1924, p. 9.Google Scholar
56. “Eureiski Addzel Instytutu Belaruskai Kul'tury,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 131.Google Scholar
57. Dambrouski, Ch., “Pol'skaia shkola i pol'ski nastaunik u Savetsakai Belarusi,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, pp. 37–39.Google Scholar
58. , Balitskii “Blizhaishie zadachi Narkomprosa …,” p. 4.Google Scholar
59. Ihnatouski, U., “Saiuzu Pratsaunikou As'vety Belarusi y dzen' iago iubileiu,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 4.Google Scholar
60. Myshkouski, L., “Zhydouskaia as'vetnaia sprava u Belarusi,” As'veta, No. 2, 1924, p. 33.Google Scholar
61. , Baikou p. 24.Google Scholar
62. , Myshkouski p. 34.Google Scholar
63. , Dambrouski p. 39.Google Scholar
64. “Informatsyia ab pratsy Tsentral'naga Praulen'nia saiuzu pratsaunikou as'vety Belarusi (ab pershai Usebelaruskai kul'tnaradze),” As'veta, No. 3, 1925, p. 133.Google Scholar
65. , Balitskii “Kul'turnae budaunitstva da dzesiatai hadaviny Kastrychnikavai revaliutsyi,” pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
66. , Baikou pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
67. , Balitskii, “Blizhaishie zadachi Narkomprosa …,” p. 5.Google Scholar
68. , Baikou pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
69. “Pratakol tretsiaga Usebelaruskaga z'ezdu inspektarou i instruktarou pa sotsyial'namu bykhavan'niu, adbyushagasia 2–7 liutaga 1925 godu. Rezoliutstyia No. 4. Pa dakladu zagadchyka zhydouskaga biuro: Zadan'ni u galine raz'vits'tsia natsyianal'nykh kul'tur,” No. 2, 1925, p. 168.Google Scholar
70. , Baikou pp. 29–31.Google Scholar