Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T15:13:22.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scaling Theory for End-Functionalized Polymers Confined Between Two Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Dmitri V. Kuznetsov  and
Anna C. Balazs
Dmitri V. Kuznetsov
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, U.S.A. Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117977, Russia.
Anna C. Balazs
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Using scaling theory, we determine the equilibrium behavior of a melt of functionalized and non-functionalized polymers confined between two infinite, planar surfaces, which model clay sheets. The functionalized chains contain two end-groups (one at each chain-end) that are highly attracted to the surfaces. Through these calculations, we delineate the conditions for the formation of thermodynamically stable polymer/clay mixtures in terms of the end-group adsorption energy, volume fraction of the end-functionalized chains, and polymer chain lengths.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 629: Symposium FF – Interfaces, Adhesion and Processing in Polymer Systems , 2000 , FF2.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Giannelis, E. P., Krishamoorti, R., and Manias, E., Adv. Polym. Sci. 138, 107 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Uzuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Kojima, Y., Okada, A., Kuraichi, T., and Kamigaito, O., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1174 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Lan, T., Kaviratna, P. D., and Pinnavaia, T. J., Chem. Mater. 7, 2144 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Messersmith, P. B. and Stupp, S. I., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2599 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Vaia, R. A. and Giannelis, E. P., Macro-molecules 30, 7990 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Muzny, C. D., Butler, B. D., Hanley, H. J. M., Tsvetkov, F., and Peiffer, D. G., Mater. Lett. 28, 379 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Balazs, A. C., Singh, C., and Zhulina, E., Macromolecules 31, 8370 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Balazs, A. C., Singh, C., Zhulina, E., and Lyatskaya, Yu., Ace. Chem. Res. 32, 651 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Zhulina, E., Singh, C., and Balazs, A. C., Langmuir 15, 3935 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Kuznetsov, D. V. and Balazs, A. C., J. Chem. Phys. 112, 4365 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Kuznetsov, D. V. and Balazs, A. C., J. Chem. Phys., accepted.Google Scholar
12. Ginzburg, V. V. and Balazs, A. C., Macromolecules 32, 5681 (1999); 33, 1089 (2000).Google Scholar