Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:29:22.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetic Model for Layer-By-Layer Homoepitaxial Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

V. I. Trofimov
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Engineering & Electronics of RAS Mokhovaya str., 11, Moscow 103907, Russia, 7(095) 203 8414
V. G. Mokerov
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Engineering & Electronics of RAS Mokhovaya str., 11, Moscow 103907, Russia, 7(095) 203 8414
A. G. Shumyankov
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Engineering & Electronics of RAS Mokhovaya str., 11, Moscow 103907, Russia, 7(095) 203 8414
Get access

Abstract

The new kinetic model for homoepitaxial growth on a singular surface is presented. The model combines a familiar rate equations approach and a concept of a feeding zone that allows to connect the growth processes in neighbouring monolayers. The model involves the irreversible 2D nucleation, growth and coalescence of the islands in each growing monolayer and consists of an infinite set of coupled rate equations for the adatom and island densities and coverage in successive monolayers. With using this model the temporal evolution of the surface morphology (rms roughness and RHEED intensity) is studied. It is shown that the growth mode is fully determined by a single dimensionless parameter μ = D/J where D and J are the normalized surface diffusion coefficient and deposition flux, respectively. There exist five regions of m corresponding different growth regimes varying from smooth 2D layer-by-layer growth at sufficiently high values of μ (>108) to very rough Poisson-like random deposition growth at μ<10−4. The extension of the model to the case of heteroepitaxy is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Myers-Beaghton, A.K. and Vvedensky, D.D., Phys. Rev. B42, 5544 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Tersoff, J.,Gon, A.W. Denier van der and Tromp, R.M., Phys.Rev. 72, 266 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Ratsch, C., Nelson, M.D. and Zangwill., A. Phys.Rev. B50 14489 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Johnson, M.D., Orme, C.,Hunt, A.W. et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 72, 116 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Ishizaka, A. and Murata, Y., J.Phys.:Condens.Matter 6, L693 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Trofimov, V.I., Medvedev, B.K.,Mokerov, V.G. and Shumyankov, A.G., Physics- Doklady. 40, 445 (1995); V.I. Trofimov, B.K. Medvedev, V.G. Mokerov and A.G. Shumyankov, Physics- Doklady., 41, 142 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Evolution of Epitaxial Structure and Morphology, edited by Zangwill, A., Jesson, D., Chambliss, D., and Clarke, R. (MRS Proc. 399, Pittsburgh, PA,1996)Google Scholar
8. Venables, J.A., Spiller, G.D.T. and Hanbuken, M., Rept.Progr.Phys. 47, 399 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Trofimov, V.I. and Osadchenko, V.A., Growth and Morphology of Thin Films, in Russian ( Energoatomizdat Moscow, 1993), 272pp.Google Scholar
10. Schwoebel, R.L. and Shipsey, E.J., J.Appl.Phys. 37, 3682 (1966).Google Scholar
11. Kersulis, S. and Mitin, V., Semicond. Sci.Technol. 10, 653 (1995).Google Scholar